United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FSIS Notice Measures to Address E. coli O157:H7 at Establishments that Receive, Grind, or Otherwise Process Raw Beef Products FSIS Notice Measures.
Advertisements

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program : Timeline and Verification Patrick R. Burke Senior.
PROCESS FOR EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS Sally White, JD Director International Equivalence Staff Office.
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
January 24, 2008 Policy Development Division 1 FSIS Notice Verification of the Annual Reassessment and Establishment Training Requirements Under.
Todd “Jeremy” Reed Team Lead, Analytical Design Group Office of Data Integration and Food Protection January 7-8, 2013 Food Safety and Inspection Service.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 General HACCP Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008 Washington,
Printed by DEVELOPING A NON-PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM FOR THE STATE OF GEORGIA Scott A. Uhlich, MCP Georgia Department of Human.
(H.L.) HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Domestic Inspection Function Public Health Information System (PHIS) Charles.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service August 27, 2008 Carol Maczka, PhD Assistant Administrator Office of Food Defense.
Listeria Summit - Washington, DC November RISK MANAGEMENT Current FSIS Activities Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service SALMONELLA SUBTYPING RESULTS IN RAW PRODUCTS FSIS Notice /3/2010 Policy Development.
Public Health Information System: Headquarters Session HACCP Verification.
NACMPI November 15-16, 2005 Risk-Based Inspection Dr. Barbara Masters Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 E. Coli Checklist for Beef Operations E. coli O157:H7 - Addressing the Challenges,
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
Public Health Information System: Industry Session Inspection Verification Features  Inspection Results  Noncompliance  Inspector Notes/Agendas/MOIs/NR.
Review of the Compliance Guide HACCP Systems Validation Public Meeting June 25, 2013 Washington, DC Dr. William Shaw Risk, Innovations & Management Staff.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service February William C. Smith Assistant Administrator Office of Program.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Salmonella Initiative Program Isabel Arrington, PhD, DVM Sci. Advisor, RIMD.
E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Actions Directive 10,010.1 Rev. 1 In-Plant Control Transit.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service NACMPI February 5-6, 2008 Attribution February 5, 2008 Curtis Travis, PhD Science.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Strengthening Verification Activities at and Guidance for Veal Slaughter Establishments.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 FSA Work Flow and Next Steps EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE FSIS Directive PRIOR LABELING APPROVAL 1 District Correlation Meeting.
Regulatory Update National Turkey Federation 2012 Annual Convention February 15 – 18, 2012 Brett T. Schwemer.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 New FSA Tools EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December 18, 2008 Washington,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Public Health Risk-Based Inspection System for Processing and Slaughter Overview.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Treatment of Primal Cuts STEC - Addressing the Challenges, Moving Forward.
FSIS Policy Update: Turkey Product Presented by DANIEL ENGELJOHN, PhD Assistant Administrator Office of Policy and Program Development Food Safety and.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 HACCP Systems Validation NACMPI September 22-23, 2011 Washington, DC William.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Using Risk to Direct In-Plant Processing and Off-line Slaughter Inspection Activities.
Proposed Rule: Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection
Data Acquisition to Anticipate Foodborne Hazards National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection Sean Altekruse DVM, PhD November 16, 2004.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Public Health Based Slaughter Inspection: Rationale and Process August 7,
Public Health Lessons from HACCP-Based Inspection Models Project Presentation by Loren D. Lange August 7, 2007 United States Department of Agriculture.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03J Slaughter Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
1 Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001 Processed Meat and Poultry Proposed Rule _________________ Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp.
Risk Assessment Technical Meeting Washington, DC -- February Current Listeria Policy And Risk Management Questions Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service UPDATE : Improvements for Processing and Slaughter Inspection August 27, 2008.
1 Introduction to the Control of Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Ready-to-Eat Products; Interim Final Rule Small and Very Small Establishment Implementation.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Industry Briefing December 18, 2008 Advanced EIAO Methodology.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Validation – In Plant Findings Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Across Establishment Ranking Concept For Processing and Slaughter February.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
NACMPI May 23-24, Measuring Establishment Risk Control for Risk-Based Inspection Philip Derfler Assistant Administrator, Office of Policy, Program.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Background and Overview of the FSIS Plan to Address Today’s Issues Daniel Engeljohn,
Christopher Alvares Director, Data Analysis and Integration Staff Office of Data Integration and Food Inspection January 7, 2014 Food Safety and Inspection.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Within Establishment Public Health Risk-Based Inspection for Poultry Slaughter.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Within Establishment Public Health Risk-Based Inspection for Processing and.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03B Raw Ground Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting.
Targeted Food Safety Assessments Barb Masters OFW Law September 2015.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1.
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS. Prerequisite Programs Support the HACCP Plan.
Food Safety Challenges and Benefits of New Technology Randall Huffman, Ph.D. Vice President, Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation USDA-
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
PROCESS FOR EVALUATING THE EQUIVALENCE OF FOREIGN MEAT AND POULTRY FOOD REGULATORY SYSTEMS International Policy Division Food Safety and Inspection.
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Presentation transcript:

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection (NACMPI) Public Meeting January16 th and 17 th, 2013 USDA Headquarters Washington, DC 1

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Selection of Public Health Related Regulations Christopher Alvares Director, Data Analysis and Integration Group Office of Data Integration and Food Protection Food Safety and Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 2

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview Background –Public Health Decision Criteria and the W3NR criterion Approach to updating the public health regulations (PHRs) Plan for implementing PHRs 3

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Questions to the Committee 1.What comments does the Committee have regarding the approach used to select the PHR list? 2.Does the Committee have any comments on the four criteria used to select the candidate PHR list? 1.Establish and maintain HACCP plan and Critical Control Points (CCPs) 2.Establish and Maintain Sanitary Conditions 3.Prevent Adulteration 4.Implement Effective Corrective Actions 3.Does the Committee have any comments on the public health outcomes (pathogen test results) analyzed to select the final list of PHRs? 1.Salmonella 2.E. coli O157:H7 3.Listeria monocytogenes 4

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Public Health Decision Criteria Report* In 2008, FSIS developed a data-driven approach for scheduling FSAs –Reviewed by NACMPI in 2008 –Reviewed and endorsed by National Academy of Sciences in 2009 –Published FSIS website 2010 Approach uses seven decision criteria *http// th_Decision_Criteria_Report.pdf 5

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Public Health Decision Criteria Approach FSIS Data on Establishment Performance Seven Decision Criteria 1. E. coli O157:H7 or LM positive 2. Salmonella Category 3 3. High rate of W3NR NCs 4. Enforcement actions 5. Food safety Recalls 6. Sole supplier to E coli positive 7. Linked to human illness Any one of these criteria would trigger an FSA Evaluation for FSA scheduling 6

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service One Decision Criterion Was High Rate of W3NRs W3NR regulations are also called public health related regulations 62 W3NR regulations were selected by a group of FSIS staff Selection was based on the potential for non-compliances to have public health consequences 7

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Examples of W3NR Regulations Bears or contains poisonous or deleterious substance Failure to maintain adequate HACCP Plan Failure of keep CCPs under control Failure to take appropriate corrective action Failure to prevent adulterated product from entering commerce 8

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Need for Updating W3NR Regulations With the implementation of PHIS, the W3NR criterion needs to be reevaluated –The nature of the data collected has changed The set of regulations to verify is different in PHIS The W3NR rate is computed differently in PHIS –The W3NR list needs to be reevaluated Therefore the W3NR decision criterion was suspended until the data could be analyzed and an updated list developed 9

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Updating the Public Health Reg List Purpose: Make selection of W3NRs more transparent and data-driven –The new list will be called PHRs to distinguish it from the W3NR list Approach : –Define a set of evaluation criteria –Develop a list of candidate regulations related to verifying food safety process control –Select the subset of regulations whose non- compliance rate is higher in establishments with Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, or Lm positives 10

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service PHR Development Process Select candidate list of 9 CFR regulations related to HACCP food safety process control Narrow down list to those with higher NC rates before Salmonella, E coli O157:H7, Lm positives Develop non-compliance rate Cut Points for use in scheduling FSAs and HAVs Define criteria for Selecting candidate list 11

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Step 1: Define Selection Criteria Four criteria have been identified for selection of public health regs Regulations concerning: –Establish and maintain HACCP plan and Critical Control Points (CCPs) –Establish and Maintain Sanitary Conditions –Prevent Adulteration –Implement Effective Corrective Actions 12

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Step 2: Select Candidate PHR Regulations Assess the set of 9 CFR regulations and select those regulations whose non-compliance provides evidence that establishments are NOT satisfying one of the following four key criteria –Could non-compliance be associated with a potential failure to meet the four criteria in step 1 13

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Step 2: Select Candidate PHR Regulations A set of CFR regulations were selected as being indicators of a potential loss of process control The 143 regulations map to 118 regulations in PHIS. –Some of the 143 map directly to regulations in PHIS –Others are verified under higher order regulations in PHIS. For example, 381.1(i)-381.1(iv) are verified under

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Step 3: Select the Public Health Regulations From the list of 118 candidate PHR regulations, select the subset whose non-compliance rate in establishments 3 months before a Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, or Lm positive is higher than in establishments without any positives A two-sided Fisher Exact p value was used to show a statistically higher non-compliance rate 15

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Step 3: Select the Public Health Regulations Of the 118 potential PHR Regulations –28 PHR regulations were higher 3 months before a Salmonella positive – 6 PHR regulations were higher 3 months before a E. coli O157:H7 positive –4 PHR regulations were higher 3 months before a Lm positive The final PHR list has 33 regulations, 21 (64%) of which are on the earlier W3NR list 16

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Examples of PHRs in Common with Earlier W3NR List Bears or contains poisonous or deleterious substance Failure to maintain adequate HACCP Plan Failure of keep CCPs under control Failure to take appropriate corrective action Failure to prevent adulterated product from entering commerce Prevent the use of Specified Risk Materials as human food 17

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Examples of PHRs not in the Earlier W3NR List Operate in manner to prevent insanitary conditions Evaluate effectiveness of SSOP‘s Product must be protected from adulteration at all times 18

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Where we’re at today FSIS has –Developed a set of candidate regs –Analyzed PHIS inspection data to select PHRs –Plans to start using the PHR decision criterion in PHIS in 2013 –Plans to reevaluate the PHR analysis after each year of new PHIS data 19

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Use of the Public Health Regulations The PHR regulations are used as one criteria in prioritizing scheduling of FSAs and, when implemented, HAVs Noncompliance with a single PHR regulation does not indicate loss of process control The aggregate set of PHR regulations is used to identify establishments that significantly deviate from the 3-month rolling average noncompliance rate for all similar establishments (slaughter only, processing only, and slaughter plus processing) 20

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Use of Public Health Regulations Compute establishment PHR NC rate Compare to cut point for similar establishments District Office selects FSAs to perform If selected, include in proposed FSA schedule 21

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Related Topics What about candidate PHRs not selected? –FSIS plans to reanalyze data periodically This may result in updates to the PHR list –FSIS plans to explore any training or instructions to the field that may drive more informative data What about the potential impact of the Poultry Slaughter Rule? –Updates will be made as required 22

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Future PHR Updates FSIS plans to analyze candidate regs annually and if needed update the set of PHRs –Updates would coincide with fiscal years –A 90-day period between announcing updates and implementation Update cycle: –April-May: Reanalyze candidate regulations –June: Finalize materials and clear internally –July: Announce any PHR updates –October: Implement PHR updates 23

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Information For Stakeholders FSIS intends to –post the list of PHRs –post PHR cut points –post updated Decision Criteria Document 24

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Conclusion A more transparent and data-driven methodology was developed to select public health regulations (PHRs) The PHRs have significantly higher noncompliance rates 3 months before a Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, or Lm positive The final PHR list is composed of 33 regulations, 21 (64%) of which are on the earlier W3NR list 25

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Questions to the Committee 1.What comments does the Committee have regarding the approach used to select the PHR list? 2.Does the Committee have any comments on the four criteria used to select the candidate PHR list? 1.Establish and maintain HACCP plan and Critical Control Points (CCPs) 2.Establish and Maintain Sanitary Conditions 3.Prevent Adulteration 4.Implement Effective Corrective Actions 3.Does the Committee have any comments on the public health outcomes (pathogen test results) analyzed to select the final list of PHRs? 1.Salmonella 2.E. coli O157:H7 3.Listeria monocytogenes 26

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Questions ? 27