Aircraft Overrun and Undershoot Analysis for Runway Safety Areas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Runway Safety Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing Sector By Fabrice.
Advertisements

International Coordinating Council of Aerospace Industries Associations Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions From the Design and Manufacturing.
1 Los Angeles World Airports | LAX Interim Runway Safety Improvement Project Update of Interim Safety Improvement Planning Presentation to Board of Airport.
Runway Incursions Presentation to the NZ Airport Association Conference 15 October 2009.
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
How We Stopped Airplanes Falling From The Sky Solving the Windshear Problem NCAR 50 th Anniversary Presentation Rita Roberts, Jim Wilson, Robert Marfuta.
Office of Aviation Safety Runway Overrun Learjet 60, N999LJ Global Exec Aviation Columbia, South Carolina September 19, 2008.
Downloaded from Approach and Landing Accidents Reducing the Risk Presented by Bryan W. Neville Aviation Safety Inspector.
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Presented by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Warning Decision Training Branch Aviation Weather Training for FAA.
Weather related Aviation Crashes & Deaths in 2004 by Type of Operation Crashes Deaths Crashes Deaths Scheduled Airlines 1 13Scheduled Airlines 1 13 Air.
Boeing Field 1.
Advancing Transportation Safety One Investigation at a Time
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 39 – Software Quality Assurance.
Boeing Field. Downbursts can be Divided into Two Main Types MACROBURST: A large downburst with its outburst winds extending greater than 2.5 miles horizontal.
ICAO/ASPA Safety Management System Seminar Air Traffic Management Occurrence Reporting Mexico City, Mexico, 14 – 16 March 2006 Jeremy Jackson – Civil Aviation.
Presented to: MPAR Working Group By: William Benner, Weather Processors Team Manager (AJP-1820), FAA Technical Center Date: 19 March 2007 Federal Aviation.
Runway Excursions. Runway Excursion 2000 Worldwide, runway excursions are the highest single occurrence category of all accidents for commercial & general.
NAV CANADA AT A GLANCE NAV CANADA is the non-share capital, private corporation which owns and operates Canada’s civil air navigation service (ANS). It.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Orlando – Tampa Flight Standards District Office Flight Training Special Emphasis CFI Special Emphasis.
Data Driven Safety. X-15 Simulator X-15 Simulator Use Time honored criteria to predict aircraft behavior failed to uncover serious threats Pilot.
Aviation Meteorology FAA estimates than 50% of aircraft accident are weather related Substantial implications of weather –Cancellations –Delays –Extra.
Gerard van Es 58th annual Business Aviation Safety Seminar
Writing Better Aviation AFDs (or) Do you know who your customer really is ? National Weather Service, Jackson, KY Dustin Harbage And Brian Schoettmer.
Period: Jun 2009 to Feb 2011 Developed by:
Offices of Research and Engineering and Aviation Safety Overview of HEMS Safety Issues Dr. Joseph Kolly Acting Director, Office of Research and Engineering.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD ACRP Improved Models for Risk Assessment of Runway Safety Areas (RSA) Objective: develop and validate a user-friendly.
Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada Alyre Boudreau Aerodrome Safety (613)
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Minimum Safe Altitude Warning November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael Air Traffic Manager, Boston ARTCC.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Randy Stevens Office of Aviation Research 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999 Enhancing Aviation.
Office of Aviation Safety Platinum Jet Bombardier CL-600 Teterboro, New Jersey February 2, 2005 Teterboro, New Jersey February 2, 2005.
Presented to: Accident Investigation LAL By: Ben Coleman (CTR), ASO Runway Safety Team Date: May 11, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Runway.
Office of Aviation Safety Delta Connection Flight 6448 Operated by Shuttle America Cleveland, Ohio February 18, 2007 Investigator-in-Charge Presentation.
By: FAASTeam Federal Aviation Administration Land and Hold Short Operations (LAHSO)
A Piloted Simulator Evaluation of Transport Aircraft Rudder Pedal Force/Feel Systems Eric C. Stewart NASA Langley Research Center 98 th Aerospace Control.
SUPERAWOS AWOS AUTOMATED UNICOM. YOUR PILOTS NEED AWOS For flight requirements UNICOM For flight safety & service.
Federal Aviation Administration TAIWIN By: Jim Riley, ANG-E282 To: Icing Wx Tools Meeting Date: 11/19/13 – 11/21/13.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance Software Quality Assurance 1.
Lecture 8: Approach & Landing Performance
1 Safety - definitions Accident - an unanticipated loss of life, injury, or other cost beyond a pre-determined threshhold.  If you expect it, it’s not.
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS GAP ANALYSIS SURVEY FOR U.S. AIRPORTS
Hazard Identification
Presented to: By: Dennis H. Whitley Date: March 1, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration SOUTHERN REGION FAASTeam/Area 1 Approach and Landing Accidents.
Flight Safety Foundation Runway Safety Initiative Update October 25, 2007 Thomas Romig Manager, Safety ACI World Headquarters.
Southwest Airlines Flight 1248
Wes Timmons, Director of Runway Safety, FAA April 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety: Sun ‘N Fun Update.
Human Factors & Safety Management Systems Mike O’Leary Eddie Rogan.
New Approach  Aircraft specific tables and charts See:
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
2010 FAA Worldwide Airport Technology Transfer Conference Risk Assessment of RSA Alternatives at San Francisco International Airport Manuel Ayres Regis.
Office of Aviation Safety Operations Bombardier CRJ-200 Pinnacle Airlines Traverse City, Michigan April 12, 2007.
Stord Airport, Norway Runway Safety Initiative (RSI) ARAST, Bangkok, Thailand Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) November 19, 2008 Glenn W. Michael.
Presented to: International Civil Aviation Organization By: LaGretta Bowser Date: September 2005 Federal Aviation Administration Runway Incursion Severity.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety Airport Operations & Collision Avoidance Pacific Aviation Directors Work Shop Chris.
FATIGUEFATIGUE. What is Fatigue Fatigue can be defines as extreme tiredness resulting from mental or physical illness. Fatigue also is the bodies reaction.
Federal Aviation Administration Runway Safety For Corporate Pilot’s Corporate Seminar August 8, 2009 Back to Basics For Runway Safety.
TALPA Takeoff & Landing Performance Assessment
Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment
FAA Flight Standards AFS-220/430 FPAW 2017 Summer
KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH: A CASE STUDY
FAA and EASA Sport Aviation Accident Data Richard T Garrison FAI CIMP USA Paris France 2013.
Preventing Runway Excursions Technical solutions
UNIT -4 AERODROME DATA.
New Approach Aircraft specific tables and charts
Safety Analysis of General Aviation Runway Operations
Runway Excursions.
Runway Incursion Severity Categorization (RISC) Model
Presentation transcript:

Aircraft Overrun and Undershoot Analysis for Runway Safety Areas ACRP 4-01 Aircraft Overrun and Undershoot Analysis for Runway Safety Areas Manuel Ayres, Ph.D.

Summary Objective Approach Functional Hazard Analysis Accident/Incident Database Normal Operations Data Normalization Risk Models Analysis Software

ACRP 4-01 Project Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Objective: develop near-term practical solutions to problems faced by airports Industry-driven program focused on applied research to airport operators Authorized in December 2003 as part of the Vision 100-Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act Oct 2005, FAA executed a contract with the National Academies (through TRB) to serve as manager of the ACRP Program oversight and governance are provided by representatives of airport operating agencies http://www.trb.org/crp/acrp/acrp.asp

Project Team ARA Team ARA Loughborough University ESR-Technology Jim Hall – PI Manuel Ayres – PM Rich Speir Hamid Shirazi Tara Puzin Other Loughborough University David Pitfield Robert Caves Andrew Appleyard Derek Wong ESR-Technology Mark Eddowes ACRP Staff Responsible Michael R. Salamone, CM

Background 71% of Accidents occur during landing and take-off 41% of onboard and 3rd party fatalities Landing overruns, landing undershoots, take-off overruns, and crashes after take-off Runway safety areas (RSA) are prescriptive resulting in ‘averaged’ degrees of protection Current RSA dimensions based on studies by FAA in the 80s

Reason’s Swiss Cheese The cheese is moving! Holes are active failures & latent conditions Accidents/ Incidents The cheese is moving! Successive layers of defenses, barriers and Safeguards Hazards

Objective of ACRP 4-01 Collect historical information related to overrun and undershoot accidents and incidents Develop risk models for overrun and undershoot events Evaluate risks associated with standard and non-standard RSA dimensions Develop prototype software for overrun and undershoot risk analysis

Functional Hazard Analysis Formal and systematic process for the identification of hazards (similar to hazard and operability (“HAZOP”) studies) Gathering together a multi-disciplinary team Determine relevant causal factors of overrun and undershoot accidents and hazards to aircraft associated with airport operations Support the data collection and development of risk models

Functional Hazard Analysis Categories Aircraft characteristics and system faults Airport characteristics and system faults Weather characteristics Pilot related issues

Landing Overruns – Major Factors Weather Tailwind Cross wind Visibility Ceiling Airport Surface contaminants and friction (water, snow, ice, rubber deposits) Pilot Landing long Landing high Landing fast Aircraft System faults

Takeoff Overruns – Major Factors Weather Tailwind Airport Surface contaminants and friction (water, snow, ice, rubber deposits) Pilot Delay to abort Aircraft System or component malfunction require to abort takeoff

Landing Undershoots – Major Factors Weather Visibility Ceiling Wind variations (gusts, shear) Airport Surface contaminants and friction (water, snow, ice, rubber deposits) Pilot Visual illusion

Visual Illusion A B Runway dimensions Runway and terrain slope Intensity of runway lighting Visibility Wet runway Crosswind Source: David Newman and Flight Safety Foundation

Other Factors Wind variations (gusts, shear) Temperature, Altitude Landing/Takeoff Distance (LDA vs. LDR; ASDA vs. ASDR) Slopes (longitudinal and transverse) Runway profile System faults Unstabilized approach “Press-on-itis” Incorrect (delay) application of thrust reverse, spoilers and brakes ‘Over-consideration’ for comfort Incorrect interpretation of reported operation conditions Selecting wrong runway Weight Availability of navigational aids Approach too low Attempt to land too close to arrival end of the runway

Database Sources NTSB Accident Database & Synopses (Accidents and Incidents) FAA Aviation Safety Reporting System - ASRS (Incidents) Accident/Incident Data System - AIDS (Incidents) Transportation Safety Board of Canada (Accidents & Incidents) UK CAA-Safety Regulation Group (SRG) Mandatory Occurrence Reporting Scheme (MORS) Database (Accidents & Incidents) Australian Transport Safety Bureau (Accidents & Incidents)

DATA Collection Accidents Incidents Consequences Cost of Investigation & Availability of Information # Reported Events Probability and # of Events

Database Filters Both accidents and incidents North American, Western European, Australia, New Zealand Fixed-wing Part 121, 125, 129, 135 and Part 91F Operations Aircraft with MTOW > 12500 lb Excluded single engine and piston engine aircraft

Access Database ~ 300 fields/record Basic Data Aircraft Data Airport Data Consequences Details Flight Data Obstacles Terrain Injuries Weather Wreckage

Accident Location y x Wreckage Location

Summary Table

Normal Operations Data Approach Evaluate number of operations that experience certain factors benignly, singly and in combination. Generate risk ratios and quantify the importance of risk factors Source: FAA's Enhanced Traffic Management System Counts (ETMSC) & a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) weather database

Normal Operations Data NOD was sampled from a total of 78 selected airports Sampled airports account for 48,924,040 operations from 2000 to 2005 inclusive (25.5% of all relevant traffic in the period) Flights on the first day of February, May, August and November of 2002, 2003 and 2004 were sampled to constitute the NOD sample After eliminating incompatible traffic, the final NOD sample consists of 24,240 flights

Normalization Small pool of relevant data available Data from different airports, operation conditions, aircraft performance Comparing apples and apples Only raw distances between the final wreckage location and the runway end have been used to develop current RSA recommendations Assume an infinitely long hard surface runway

Normalization Procedures Correcting (overrun and undershoot) distances for Temperature Altitude Slope (when available) Aircraft performance Landing/Takeoff distance available Terrain (type, slope)

Risk Models Frequency Location Severity (Injuries, Cost) Landing overrun Takeoff overrun Landing undershoot

Risk Models

Frequency Models Probability = Ni/a / Nn (under certain operation conditions) P{Accident_Occurrence} is the probability (0-100%) of an accident type occur given certain operational conditions. Xi = f(runway friction, ceiling, visibility, crosswind, tailwind, etc.)

Location Model - Overruns Stop Location Probability Distribution RSA x y

Location Model - Overruns Decreasing Probability RSA Frequency Contours

Location Model - Undershoots Touchdown Location Probability Distribution RSA x y

Consequences Model

Prototype Analysis Software User-friendly application in Visual Basic for MS Excel Input operation conditions Normalize the data Estimate risks Denormalize data

Contact Info ARA Jim Hall, 601-629-6165 jhall@ara.com Manuel Ayres 410-540-9949 mayres@ara.com ACRP Staff Michael R. Salamone (202) 334-1268 msalamone@nas.edu

Questions?