OPTIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF A NEW PICK-UP AND SCHEDULE G. Kotzian, LIU-SPS High Bandwidth Damper Review, July 30, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M.Gasior, CERN-AB-BIBase-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System 1 Base-Band Tune (BBQ) Measurement System Marek Gasior Beam Instrumentation Group, CERN.
Advertisements

IU e-Cloud Feedback Workshop March 13, 2007 LA-UR Review of the e-p feedback experiments Rod McCrady Los Alamos National Lab.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
Introduction to the High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback W. Hofle on behalf of HBTFB Team Proposed New System vs. Existing Feedback System Brief History.
“What you get” Transverse damper system (ADT) F. Dubouchet W. Höfle G. Kotzian D. Valuch Special thanks to: A. Boucherie, A. Butterworth, S. Calvo, G.
Microwave diagnostics for electron cloud detection on the SPS F. Caspers, E. Mahner, T. Kroyer B. Henrist, J.M. Jimenez Thanks to the SPSU study team members.
Front-end amplifiers for the beam phase loops in the CERN PS Alessandro Meoli (CERN BE/RF/FB) Supervised by Heiko Damerau 21 April CERN.
POTENTIAL OF THE WIDEBAND TRANSVERSE DAMPER G. Kotzian on behalf of HBTFB team G. Kotzian, LIU-2013, April 12, 2013.
CLIC DR EXTRACTION KICKER DESIGN, MANUFACTURING AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM C. Belver-Aguilar (IFIC) On behalf of: A. Faus-Golfe (IFIC), F. Toral (CIEMAT),
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
The 2008 SPS electron cloud transmission experiment: first results F. Caspers, E. Mahner, T. Kroyer B. Henrist, J.M. Jimenez Thanks to the SPSU study team.
Summary of visit to BNL and LARP workshop High Bandwidth Feedback perspective Preliminary Report by W. Hofle
March 2, 2007ELC Experience with clearing voltages and solenoids at SPS damper pick-ups W. Hofle Acknowledgements PS-OP, SL-OP, SL-BI LHC-VAC, SL-HRF.
Few slides from J. Fox’ talk in last November’s LARP meeting LARP CM
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui IHEP , Beijing Sep 17 th, 08IMAC.
M.Gasior, CERN-BE-BIBE-KT Innovation Day, 3 June Base Band Tune (BBQ) measurement systems - observing beam oscillations with sub-micrometre amplitudes.
Digital Signal Processing and Generation for a DC Current Transformer for Particle Accelerators Silvia Zorzetti.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
BI day 2011 T Bogey CERN BE/BI. Overview to the TTpos system Proposed technical solution Performance of the system Lab test Beam test Planning for 2012.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
BBQ system Tatiana and Benoit, thanks to a lot of help from Christian Boccard, Marek Gasior and Ralph Steinhagen (BE/BI-QP)
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Summary of Booster Dampers Systems Dave McGinnis December 7, 2010.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
Wolfgang Hofle BE/RFSPS Studies WG - November 17, 20091/23 reported by Wolfgang Hofle CERN BE/RF/FB Transverse feedback to cure electron-cloud induced.
W. Hofle LIU-SPS Meeting SPS BA2 Damper LS1 Progress and plans reported by W. Hofle LIU-SPS Meeting G. Kotzian T. Levens D. Valuch.
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
Renovation of the 200 MHz RF system LLRF issues. Cavities redistribution 26 October th LIU-SPS Coordination Meeting 2  2011 : 4 cavities 2 x 4.
High Bandwidth damper Input from W.Hölfe Acknowledgement to all collaborators at SLAC, INFN, LBNL and CERNL Presentation of recent MD results (J.Cesaratto):
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
A.Blas APC meeting 12/5/ Status of the PS TFB Project triggered by: K. Schindl and R. Cappi Hardware: J. Belleman (PU amplifiers) T. Bohl, W. Hofle,
L. Ventura, H. Damerau, G. Sterbini MSWG MEETING, June 19 th 2015 Acknowledgements: S. Gilardoni, M. Haase, M. Migliorati, M. Paoluzzi, D. Perrelet. 1.
Some ideas for/from the SPS LIU-SPS team. Scrubbing (only) for ecloud in SPS? aC coating remains baseline..... –but scrubbing has many potential advantages.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Andreas Jansson, "Quadrupole Pick-ups", LHC BI-Review, November 19-20, Quadrupole Pick-ups  What is a quadrupole pick-up?  PS pick-ups and experimental.
An Inductive Pick-Up (IPU) for Beam Position and Current Measurement
Outcome of HBW damper Review of W. Hofle LIU-SPS HBW damper review LIU SPS Coordination,
CLIC workshop 2015 EXTRACTION KICKER STRIPLINE MEASUREMENTS C. Belver-Aguilar (IFIC) On behalf of: A. Faus-Golfe (IFIC), F. Toral (CIEMAT), M.J. Barnes.
SPS Transverse Damper with Crab Cavities G. Kotzian, W. Hofle BE-RF-FB, 11. January 2016 Crab Cavity SPS Tests Day I
Coupled-bunch oscillation feedback studies 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 20 February 2013 Many thanks to R. Garoby, S. Gilardoni, S. Hancock,
Experience and Perspectives of Transverse Feedback Systems for Scrubbing Thanks to: SPS OP crew and colleagues from BE-ABP and BE-RF, for their support.
F f Quadrupole Pick-Ups at CERN & Fermilab A.Jansson FNAL.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
CLIC Beam instrumentation work shop, CERN, 2 nd & 3 rd of June 2009, Lars Søby BPM overview CLIC instrumentation work shop 2-3 June BPM overview.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
Beam Instrumentation of CEPC Yue Junhui (岳军会) for the BI Group Accelerator Center, IHEP HF2014.
Status of the single-bunch feedback system for the SPS/LHC M. Pivi C. Rivetta, J. Cesaratto, J. Fox, O. Turgut, S. Uemuda, W. Hofle, U. Wehrle, K. Li,
Progress with High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback CERN - May 2015 Reported by W. Hofle.
Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: Front-End RF Design
EUROTeV Diagnostics WP5
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Jorge Sánchez-Quesada BE-RF-FB
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Digitizers in CCR for transverse wide-band pick-ups
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
STUDIES OF THE STRIPLINE KICKER FOR BEAM EXTRACTION FROM THE CLIC DRs
Transverse Feedback System (LHC Damper)
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
ERL BPM System Mike Billing, Mark Palmer
CLIC DR EXTRACTION KICKER DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
Limits on damping times
I Alexander Nass for the JEDI collaboration
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

OPTIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF A NEW PICK-UP AND SCHEDULE G. Kotzian, LIU-SPS High Bandwidth Damper Review, July 30, 2013

HBTFB - High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback Wideband feedback system (GHz bandwidth) Intra-bunch GHz transverse feedback system Help stabilize beam against Ecloud and TMCI effects Under development with LARP supported by: US-LARP CERN SPS LIU Project Analog Front End Analog Back End Signal Processing BPM Kicker Power Amp ADC DAC Beam transverse position pre-processed sampled position “slices” calculated correction data correction signal pre-distortiondrive signal

OVERVIEW A.Design Considerations B.Strip-line Pick-up Options Coupler type pick-ups Current PU: Exponential coupler BPW(A) Strip-line BPCL Long Strip-line Option Variation of strip-line for scrubbing beam optimization B.Alternative PUs Electromagnetic PU: Position Sensitive Wall Current Monitor Exotic (i.e. electro-optic) PUs Faltin-type (not treated today) C.Schedule On-going activities Possible Roadmap

Design considerations Option to split system into several bands to cover entire frequency range  Centre frequencies of instabilities moving during acceleration  Adequate adjustment of loop delay and for all bands (5 deg approx. ~14 ps)  Overlap of bands becomes delicate Option for direct digitization with high bandwidth ADCs (GSPS)  Direct representation of beam transverse motion  Gain and phase equalization realizable using digitally implemented filters  Loop delay adjustment follows acceleration Analog BW: 10 MHz – 2 GHz Lower end covered by classical damper (dipole mode, large injection oscillations require strong damping) Upper limit defined by Nyquist frequency for subsequent sampling (fs > 4 GSPS) SPS 200 MHz RF System: 5ns bucket length With 4 GSPS  20 slices/bucket NB: observed signal is always position x intensity  holds information on longitudinal and transverse motion

Design considerations SCOPE: PU design; requires taking into account properties of pre-processing chain (cables, filters, attenuators/amplifiers, orbit suppression signal processing) GOAL: provide analog representation of beam transverse position for direct digitization with high bandwidth ADC (few GSPS) Equalizer BPM ADC Passive Closed Orbit Suppression 7/8’’ transmission line Equalizer 7/8’’ transmission line Delay adjustment

Coupler type pick-ups ^ |Z T (  )|  … ZTZT Frequency Domain Z T (  ) = Z T j sin(  ) e -j  /2 ^ f=1/(2  ) L Beam  = 2 L/c  load or short notches in freq. response PU output voltage, matched in 50 Ω direct representation of the bunch profile logarithmic scale: dBMax(1V/m), 70 dB range

Current PU: Exponential Stripline (BPWA) (Courtesy W. Höfle, SPS Studies WG - August 5, 2008) Four such couplers installed in SPS (four electrodes at 45 degrees) … but: phase response not linear with frequency ! Developed for SPS by T. Linnecar, Reference: CERN-SPS-ARF-SPS/78/17 Special case: no notches in frequency response due to tapering of electrodes

Exponential PU – Beam response w/o coaxial transmission linewith coaxial transmission line Gaussian bunch Ideal PU response Reversed PU PU response with dispersive and corrugated cable  shows ringing in time domain Ringing due to cable TF

Bunchlet in BPWA 2 short bunches, 5ns spaced PU response w/o cables Reversed PU PU response with dispersive and corrugated cable Observation: BWPA length of 375 mm was chosen to just separate two successive bunches no mixing when bunches are split; however not so evident when closer May need another iteration taking into account the implemented or an improved phase compensation K. Pollock, Signal Equalizer for SPS ECloud/TMCI Instability Feedback Control System (Courtesy W. Höfle)

Exponential strip-line BPW (A/B) Advantages mechanically short L = 375 mm no notches in frequency response due to tapering of electrodes 4 electrodes, can be wired horizontally or vertically Limitations Vacuum chamber cut-off frequency for TE11 mode at 1.64 GHz (D=107mm, BPWA/BPWB) resp GHz (D=155mm, BPW) phase response not linear, thus group delay frequency dependent; need to compensate for PU response and cable dispersion impedance variation & matching was difficult to control in the design (T. Linnecar)  production of matching not perfect 1 of the 4 existing devices may be damaged, will be inspected during LS1  For MDs and demonstrator system OK; fully functional system: what are better options? NamePositionDescriptionDiameter/TE11 cut-off BPW317.98horizontal PU, 3x H-183; for beam observation in CCR155 mm / GHz BPWA319.01vertical PU (reversed), used as vertical kicker (RF injected in downstream end)107 mm / 1.64 GHz BPWA319.31vertical PU, 3x H-183, 2x 6dB attn. at each coupling port; for beam observation in CCR, may be damaged  inspection during LS1 107 mm / 1.64 GHz BPWB321.01vertical PU, 6 dB/12W attn. at each coupling port; H-183 hybrids replaced by two resistive combiners ( ) 107 mm / 1.64 GHz

Strip-line BPCL Courtesy: R. Steinhagen

Long strip-line Option calculations based on: J-P. Papis, L. Vos, CERN SL/91-g (BI) BPWA BPCL stay-clear aperture limit

Long strip-line – Option II

Variation of strip-line for scrubbing beam optimization Challenge in direct representation of bunch profiles using coupler-type PUs: the residual reflection spoils the response.  exponential coupler uses tapered electrodes  long strip-line with delayed reflection Quest: Absorb the residual reflection in bulk material Studies on-going … localized load material with adjusted bulk conductivity

Position Sensitive Wall-Current Monitor Option BPM based on M. Gasior design AB-Note BDI: A proposal for an Inductive Pick-Up for Measuring the Position and Current of Proton Beams in the Transfer Lines between the Linac 2 and the PSB adapted from and based on an inductive pick-up (IPU), developed for position and current measurement in CTF3 Bandwidth starting from 100 kHz up >1 GHz should be feasible 1-10 Ohm loading, differential L~70 nH taken from: M. Gasior, AB-Note BDI Provided by R. Steinhagen 100 kHz1 GHz  Scale this version to fit to the SPS vacuum chamber

EO-PBM – Electro-Optical Pick-Up Working principle similar to LCD/TFT screen: particle beam modulates crystal birefringence (double refracting) → intensity of two laser beams A & B, position ~ (A-B)/(A+B) Pro: very wide-band signal, no beam power issues, true DC response (alt. AGM?) Only lab tests for the full assembly until now Hope to have a in-vacuum prototype ready for post-LS1 → to be published SPS-LSS4.421SPS-ECA4 P A P A p-beam 532/1550 nm Laser MM or SM (not matched) OM4 (matched) DAQ: Scope & Multiband-Inst._Mon. Σ & Δ tunnel EO-Hybrid Analog FE x2 locally stabilised ΔT< 0.1-1°C (Courtesy R. Steinhagen)

On-going activities Pick-up design 3D-EM simulations and documentation of long strip-line design Verification using HFSS and CST Microwave/Particle Studio Evaluation of “terminated” strip-line performance (also thermal simulation including losses) Optimization for length reduction/tapering of electrodes Closed Orbit Suppression  suppression of common mode signal  to avoid amplifier saturation and good usage of dynamic range (digitization) Fact-finding: programmable step attenuators with required resolution 0.1 dB/step Preparation of hardware & firmware development (for use with VME form factor) Coaxial transmission lines New smooth-wall coaxial transmission lines installed during LS1(lower dispersion than corrugated cables) Characterisation measurement method utilizes “synthetic TDR” via commercial VNAs (high sensitivity) Equalize cable length (equal pairs of same length for pick-up A and B outputs)

Possible Roadmap New Pick-up design Finalize EM-design until end down selection which PU to be realized Produce design drawings in Prototyping and lab testing , to be ready for installation at the latest in LS2 Closed orbit suppression Start HW development after fall 2013 Possible synergies with other active projects, e.g. damper HW upgrade project Finalize HW and firmware in 2014 Ready for tests with beam in the SPS after LS1 Coaxial transmission lines May require new analog compensation filters Adapt analog front-end for optimum signal levels to fast ADCs

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Button electrodes - Variant of electrostatic electrodes signal current flowing onto (behind) the electrode beam velocity current of a centred pencil beam voltage onto termination R termination resistance