STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08): Arm J overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katie Ward STAMPEDE Data Manager
Advertisements

Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Charlene Green STAMPEDE Clinical Trial Manager
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Natural History of Prostate Cancer Local therapy Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) Therapies after ADT Death ADT mCRPC post- docetaxel mCRPC symptomatic.
STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08): Arm J Pharmacy Training
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
1 Baz R et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract Lacy MQ et al.
Advances in the Management of Skeletal Related Events/Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Robert Dreicer, M.D., M.S., FACP, FASCO Chair Dept of Solid Tumor.
Controversies in the management of PSA-only recurrent disease Stephen J. Freedland, MD Associate Professor of Urology and Pathology Durham VA Medical Center.
Sponsor number:. MRC PR08 ISRCTN number:
Drug Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
BAD Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR ) An update November 2010.
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
Tom Fairfield STAMPEDE Trial Manager
Howard M. Sandler, MD University of Michigan Medical School
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
ODAC SCHERING-PLOUGH RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 Temozolomide Oncology Drug Advisory Committee March 13, 2003 Craig L. Tendler, M.D. Vice President, Oncology.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
The Carry-Over Effect of Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid: Comparison of 48- and 62-Month Analyses of ABCSG-12 Suggests the Benefits of Combining Zoledronic Acid.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
A Phase 2 Study of Elotuzumab in Combination with Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit STAMPEDE Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy Sponsor number:MRC PR08 ISRCTN.
Phase II in Second Line NSCLC DefinitionPhase II: BI 6727 vs. BI 6727+pemetrexed vs. pemetrexed in second line advanced NSCLC Early stopping.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 175.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
Start or Switch?: Latest data from ABCSG/ARNO
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Two Year Estimate of Overall Survival in COMBI-v, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study Comparing the Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib With Vemurafenib.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
A prospective randomized trial
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in metastatic castration- resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results from a phase II randomized discontinuation.
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone alone inpatients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma regardless of prior.
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
Abiraterone Changes in Landscape of Advanced Prostate Cancer
SABR Update Breast SSG June 2017.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
STAMPEDE: Docetaxel Significantly Improves Survival in Men With Hormone-Naive Prostate Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Finding the Right Fit: Personalizing Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Alena Kreychman Xofigo.
Updates and Insights on the Medical Science of Prostate Cancer
SYSTEMIC THERAPY OF PROSTATE CANCER
Role of Chemotherapy in the Current Treatment Paradigm for Men With CRPC.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
FDA Approvals for Systemic Treatment of Prostate Cancer in 2018
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Targeting the Androgen Pathway: Current Best Practice and Future Directions.
Evaluating the Totality of Evidence
Uncovering the Right Sequence
Presentation transcript:

STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08): Arm J overview “Enzalutamide and abiraterone comparison” and trial update

Hypotheses and rationale Arm J Hypotheses and rationale

STAMPEDE: Hypothesis Will addition of enzalutamide and abiraterone to standard-of-care improve survival in hormone-naïve Pca?

Hypotheses: LHRHa + Enzalutamide + Abiraterone + Prednisolone Combination of abiraterone (+ prednisolone 5mg od) with enzalutamide is safe and well tolerated Translational data suggest that: Resistance to enzalutamide is associated with increased androgen synthesis Resistance to abiraterone is associated with activation of “promiscuous” or over-expressed AR by residual ligands Administration of both agents in combination but not in sequence will improve efficacy of inhibition of AR signalling

T Change in Bone Marrow Aspirate(%) AR inhibition by enzalutamide associated with increased androgen biosynthesis T Change in Bone Marrow Aspirate(%) -100 -90 -75 -50 -30 25 50 75 100 Bone Marrow T Change in Blood (%) -100 -90 -75 -50 -30 25 50 75 100 Blood Androgen increase following MDV3100 supportive of ‘on-target’ effect 33 patients 37 patients Efstathiou et al. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(Suppl)

Sustained depletion of testosterone by abiraterone Blood Testosterone 0.25 0.20 0.15 Concentration (ng/mL) 0.10 0.05 0.00 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 16 24 31 40 54 67 71 76 80 88 95 EOS EOS EOS EOS EOS Pretreatment Week 8 End of Study Seen on your left are the pretreatment testosterone concentration in blood above and marrow plasma below as measure by mass spec As you can see abiraterone acetate effectively depletes testosterone and maintains depletion until cessation of treatment. The same findings apply for dht The findings presented here which determine blood and marrow t concentration within the paracrine range by mass spec demonstrate that abi T and dht independent pathways of progression account for the observed progression on abiraterone acetate Bone Marrow Testosterone 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.30 0.25 0.20 Concentration (ng/mL) 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 End of Study Pretreatment Week 8 Efstathiou et al. J Clin Oncol 2012

Phase Ib experience with Abiraterone + Enzalutamide 60 patients with metastatic CRPC treated at MDACC 57 patients evaluable No severe adverse effects Well tolerated Efstathiou et al ESMO 2013

Maximum PSA change with combination >30% Reduction: 84% (41/49) >50% Reduction: 76% (37/49) >90% Reduction: 45% (22/49) 49 evaluable patients 12%

Conclusion from Efstathiou et al Confirms tolerability of combination in metastatic CRPC Limitations: Incomplete follow-up Not yet published in a peer reviewed journal Single-arm study of 2 highly active drugs Does not allow any conclusions on increased activity of combination

Abiraterone + Enzalutamide Enthusiasm from both manufacturers, physicians and patients Indirect comparisons with abi + pred in STAMPEDE Arm G Comparisons using network meta-analysis with enza alone Other trials: Combination assessed vs enzalutamide alone in NCT01949337 US Co-operative group trial Metastatic CRPC N=1400 Primary end-point - survival PLATO study (Medivation sponsored) Abi + enza vs abi alone after progression on enza alone

Abiraterone + Enzalutamide: possible concerns Long-term toxicities associated with more profound androgen suppression Priming of CRPC to earlier development of resistance Cost

STAMPEDE: Eligibility and trial design NEWLY DIAGNOSED M1 PATIENTS1 A ADT (+RT if N0 M0) J Arm A + abiraterone + enzalutamide ALL OTHER PATIENTS2 RANDOMISATION ADT H Arm A + RT to prostate 1 except pts with a contra-indication to RT 2 all suitable pts with newly diagnosed locally advanced disease should also have RT1 Patients eligible for STAMPEDE

Main Inclusion Criteria Broad disease categories: Newly diagnosed high risk patients T3/4 N0 M0 Newly diagnosed metastatic or nodal disease Previously treated relapsing patients

Updated exclusion criteria Patients with contra-indications to prednisolone Prior exposure to enzalutamide or abiraterone History of seizure Unexplained history of loss of consciousness Operation of heavy machinery during treatment Prior therapy with zoledronic acid or other bisphosphonates Active inflammatory bowel disease

Arm J: Treatment administrations 4 x 250mg abiraterone (empty stomach) + 5 mg od prednisolone 4 x 40mg enzalutamide (with or without food) Trial treatment to start within 4 weeks of randomisation Standard-of-care RT (to be stratified at randomisation) Mandatory for N0M0 patients Optional for N+M0

Arm J: Assessment of Treatment Duration M+ patients, treatment should continue until all progressions occur: PSA progression Radiological progression Clinical progression It is accepted that these flexible criteria for stopping trial treatments are open to the investigator’s interpretation and discretion. All progressions must be reported as per the other arms

Arm J: Assessment of Treatment Duration N0M0 patients or N+M0 patients planned for RT treatment should continue until: 2 years or Disease progression as defined for M+ patients, whichever is sooner N+M0 patients not planned for radical radiotherapy should continue until: Disease progression as defined for M+ patients

Arm J: Treatment duration Treatment should be stopped if new systemic therapy is introduced (eg anti-androgens) Post progression dexamethasone 0.5mg can be given instead of prednisolone Selective discontinuation of either IMP depending on toxicity Toxicity data to be collected on FU forms until all progressions occur and patient stops treatment

Arm J: Safety analysis First safety review – first 50 patients allocated to Arm J on trial for ~6wks Second safety review – first 50 patients allocated to Arm J on trial for ~6mths Additional safety reviews at the request of the IDMC

Arm J Activation Timelines

Activation timelines Activation plan as per “abiraterone comparison” and “M1/RT comparison” Activation date to be communicated in due course REC approval received in February 2014 MHRA approval received in April 2014 IMP distributor in set-up

Activation timelines “Switch on” date to be communicated in the future Approximately 4 weeks to gain local R&D approval Activation in late June 2014 Additional support available: Teleconferences Trial website www.stampedetrial.org CRF training Pharmacy training

“abiraterone comparison” local approvals New arm “switched on” for whole trial on set date Sites given ~4wks notice to gain local approvals 80 sites ready to recruit on activation day! Accrual nearly seamless

“M1/RT comparison” local approvals

CRF changes CRFs updated but overall structure unchanged CRFs guidelines training: Q2 2014 (14th, 16th ,19th May) CRFs guidelines being updated

Key CRFs changes

STAMPEDE: general update How to report FFS events

STAMPEDE Follow-up schedule Follow-up dates will be sent to you on a treatment and follow-up schedule each time you randomise a patient Please complete a follow-up form for each visit 6 weekly Randomisation to 24 weeks 12 weekly 24 weeks to 2 years 6 monthly 2 years to 5 years Annually thereafter

Assessment of Treatment Failure Types of progression: Biochemical Objective Local Lymph node Distant metastatic Skeletal related event Symptomatic Progression of each type need only be reported once Complete an ‘additional treatment update form’ if a patient receives additional treatment for a progression that you have already reported

Defining PSA Nadir & PSA Failure Categories Lowest reported PSA level Between randomisation and 24 weeks PSA Failure: Depends on baseline PSA measurement and PSA nadir 3 possible PSA failure categories, A, B and C

Defining PSA Relapse PSA nadir is lowest value in first 24 weeks on trial 3 PSA failure categories: PSA Failure Category A – Nadir >50% baseline  Relapse = failed at time zero PSA Failure Category B – Nadir >4ng/ml but <50% baseline  Relapse = PSA increases by 50% above nadir PSA Failure Category C – Nadir <4ng/ml and <50% baseline  Relapse = PSA increases by 50% above nadir and >4ng/ml

Defining PSA Relapse

Reporting PSA Relapse Confirmatory PSA test between 1 week and 3 months later: If value is ≥PSA progression value then report biochemical progression If clinician adds anti-androgens therapy before trial progression: Report progression PSA progression emails are sent to sites approx. 3-monthly Baseline and FU forms up to week 24 needed Alternatively contact the trial team for help

Reporting progressions on CRFs In case of progression: Follow up form for the relevant visit (i.e. week 36) Progression and Additional Treatment form End of treatment form (if applicable) Death form (if applicable)

Reporting progressions on CRFs For patients on Arms A, B, C, E and H: Continue to follow-up as normal and report data on Follow-up (post-progression) form Ensure all second-line treatments are reported on CRFs

Reporting progressions on CRFs For patients on Arm G: Continue to follow-up as normal but report data on Follow-up form until all types of progression are reported or treatment changes Ensure no further second-line treatment is given until: all types of progressions are reported trial abiraterone treatment is stopped

What to do post-progression Continue to follow up patients as normal until death Complete Follow up (Post-progression) form at each follow up visit Ensure additional treatment post progression are reported using the Additional Treatments form

STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08): Arm J overview “Enzalutamide and abiraterone comparison” and trial update