What Have We Learned? Spillover Benefits for Society Urban and metro areas have high potential for innovation and social benefits across policy areas Inequality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connect Nevada Residential Technology Assessment Results.
Advertisements

A Brief History Outcomes of the March 2010 summit, “Social Media and Social Change,” related to access and digital literacy Course-based student studies.
Office of Rural Affairs High Speed Communications Cris Fulford Office of Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Skillman One North Capitol, Suite 600 Indianapolis,
Community Benefits & Digital inclusion Efforts. What Is Digital Inclusion? Every Minneapolis resident deserves access to the social, civic, educational.
+ James Carras. + Carras Community Investment, Inc. Prepared Fair Housing and Equity Assessment for regional vision and plan – Seven/50 Prepared Regional.
Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
Rural Broadband Availability and Adoption: Evidence, Policy Challenges, and Options Brian Whitacre, Oklahoma State University Roberto Gallardo, Mississippi.
Made Possible by the Broadband Technology Opportunities Program Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Local Governments and Digital.
Sharon Strover, University of Texas What do we know about rural users? People in rural areas want the same things people in urban areas want with respect.
A SHARED FUTURE “In search of jobs and economic opportunity, migrants are fueling economic growth, revitalizing neighborhoods, enhancing global connections,
1 115 million people 14 countries EU STRATEGY FOR THE DANUBE REGION.
16 October 2003 Romania, ICT and FP5,6 1 Romanian Experiences Related to ICT and the Fifth Framework Program of the EU and Expectations From the Sixth.
Chicago’s Broadband Strategy TOWARDS AFFORDABLE, UNIVERSAL TECHNOLOGY ACCESS City of Chicago Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Innovation and Technology.
Health Insurance Coverage of California’s Working Latinos Howard Greenwald Suzanne O'Keefe Mark DiCamillo University of Southern California California.
How to Reveal the Digital Divide via the Internet Survey in China.
Neighborhood-Level Change in Internet Use: Chicago’s Smart Communities BTOP Program Karen Mossberger, Ph.D Arizona State University Caroline Tolbert, Ph.D.
Shape the future George Randelov, Country Manager Microsoft Bulgaria.
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program Draft: January 26, 2007, Milwaukee Department of Administration.
Advancing equity through Thrive MSP 2040 Equity: The Superior Growth Model.
Karen Mossberger, University of Illinois at Chicago Caroline J. Tolbert, University of Iowa William Franko, University of Iowa Allison Hamilton, University.
A New Vision for Summer School Jeff Smink Bridge Conference Seattle, WA October, 2011.
A Unique Bi-State Partnership to Improve Jobs, Housing and Transportation NEW YORK & CONNECTICUT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES Mt Vernon City Hall February 15,
Digital Literacy Workgroup of the Minnesota Learning Commons Mary Ann Van Cura, Workgroup Chair State Library Services, Minnesota Department of Education.
1. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and Broadband FCC Diversity Council Laura Efurd, ZeroDivide June 15,2010.
From Digital Divide to Digital Opportunity – Policy Issues Kelly Levy, Associate Administrator National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
Education and Culture Main initiatives and events 2013 Multilingualism.
2010 © Connect Ohio ®. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Copy Without Written Permission. Connect Ohio Technology Assessment Executive Summary
Ensuring No One Is Left Behind: Community Digital Inclusion John Carlo Bertot, iPAC Larra Clark, ALA.
Ghetto’s In Canada?. Research Methods All of their statistical information comes from the 1991 and 2001 census They took the information from the census.
Oregon Broadband Outreach and Strategic Planning Project Chris Tamarin Oregon Business Development Department SHLB Coalition Annual Conference – May 8,
Building social capacity for older people through ICTs Jeni Warburton John Richards Research Initiative La Trobe University Australia.
The Digital Divide.
ONE ECONOMY/BROADBAND OPPORTUNITY COALITION EVALUATION PLAN JUNE 27, 2011 Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.
Weaving a story of poverty in Multnomah County. Per capita income, Portland MSA, US Metro, Multnomah County, Source: Regional Economic Information.
TOPIC Explain what the digital divide is and how it impacts the impoverished? Presentation by Zama and Nosipho – Online Journalism 2015.
Digital Divides. Summary of claims for online community Utopian views of community: –Create opportunities for education and learning –Creat new opportunities.
How Community Transport tackles Social Exclusion – UK experience Jeff Turner, Independent Consultant, UK Toolkit available at:
How well-connected are we as a nation? James McConnaughey, Chief Economist Office of Policy Analysis and DevelopmentSHLB Conference Arlington, VA Karen.
Brian E. Kiser Executive Director Steve Landers, Program Manager Dana Case, Program Administrator.
1 Purpose: The purpose of this Appendix to the State of the Community Report is to present county residents’ and community leaders’ perceptions about:
Karen Mossberger, Ph.D Univ. of IL at Chicago EVALUATING BROADBAND USE FOR BUILDING SMART COMMUNITIES Funded by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,
Y490 Politics of the Internet February 1, Digital Divide   Gap in computer and Internet use across various social groups   Who is included and.
Community Benefits & Digital inclusion Efforts. What Is Digital Inclusion? Every Minneapolis resident deserves access to the social, civic, educational.
518LE Community Informatics Class 1 / August 29 1 What is community informatics and why does it matter? 2 Introductions 3 Discussion 4 Cyberorganizing/
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Creating Library Advocacy Messages.
Regional & Urban Policy Investments for growth & jobs Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities 6 th Report on economic, social.
Are We Really A Nation Online? Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Access to Technology and Their Consequences Robert W. Fairlie University of California,
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Democracy, the role of government and the development of the digital citizen Sue McKerracher, CEO, ALIA 12 November 2015.
BTOP Funding: The Freedom Rings Partnership American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding: Broadband Technology Opportunities Program $18 million to.
Why e‐skills matter for employability Ian Clifford Telecentre Europe.
BRIDGING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE IN KANSAS CITY. Internet Benefits Low Income Families  Increased educational success at all levels  Online jobs search and.
Digital Inclusion & Readiness: Role of Libraries John B. Horrigan, PhD Pew Research Center June 2015.
Public Access: Supporting digital inclusion for all Addis Ababa, September 2015 Emilar Vushe Gandhi.
By: Joy DuPont and Group. I. What is the digital divide? II. Who is affected by the digital divide? III. How are they affected by the digital divide?
Edge: Where People Connect, Communities Achieve Craig Gerhart, Facilitator International City County Management Association / Edge Initiative Joyce Wilson,
Seattle City Council February 11, 2010 Potluck Consulting Eva Wingren, Lan Bai, Gary Pollack Poverty Dispersal Policies.
Presentation to OECD Policy Forum on the reassessment of the OECD Jobs Strategy 7-8 July 2005, Tokyo, Japan Better Jobs, Working Smarter.
THE ROLE OF TOWNSHIPS AND MUNICIPALITIES Rebecca Hendrick, Ph.D. Karen Mossberger, Ph.D. Department of Public Administration UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT.
Welcome to November’s Inquiry Group, Bridging the Digital Divide.
Digital Inclusion in San Francisco Tom Berman Matthew Case Joshua Daniels Mara Larsen-Fleming Sun Ha Lee May 17, 2007 San Francisco City Hall.
Working Group 4 report to the General Assembly Stephen McNair and Tine Fristrup.
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program
Council Working Group on International Internet-Related Policy Issues Geneva, 3 February 2017 Measuring the Information Society Report 2016 Esperanza.
What is it? The Digital Divide 3 Stages Dimensions
Smart Communities: Chicago
Creating and Enabling Environment to Connect the Unconnected
Regional and Global Comparative Analysis of Information Society in the Arab region Dr. Nibal Idlebi Chief, ICT Applications Section UN-ESCWA September.
Changing Demographics, Changing Times
Presentation transcript:

What Have We Learned? Spillover Benefits for Society Urban and metro areas have high potential for innovation and social benefits across policy areas Inequality in adoption  Across cities and metros  Across neighborhoods within Digital Citizenship for Individuals Ability to participate in society online  Increase in Internet use (but not home broadband) in Chicago’s Smart Communities SBA,  Urban and metro programs were training, outreach, public access  Affordability not sufficiently addressed by policy Mossberger, Q.1.1

Cities and Broadband Adoption, 2009 Mossberger, Tolbert and Franko 2012, Digital Cities: The Internet and the Geography of Opportunity, Oxford University Press Q1.2 Q. 1.2

Place Matters for Broadband Opportunity  Cities (and their suburbs) vary widely –  from 39% with broadband at home in Buffalo  to 83% in Seattle in 2009  Minorities do better where high % of population is online  Cities and regions with low technology use have fewer resources for education, health, e-government, economic development, and more  Cuyahoga County 2012 –  only 50% of social service recipients have broadband at home  72% of parents in county core have broadband vs. 80% county-wide  88% of parents with broadband have used the school website vs. 56% with smartphones only  Mossberger, Q.1.3

Mapping Broadband Use Across Neighborhoods in Chicago, 2011 Mossberger, Tolbert & Hamilton 2012 Partnership for a Connected Illinois Home Adoption Smartphone-only Users Mossberger, Q.1.4

Community-Level Change: Smart Communities in Chicago  Smart Communities (BTOP SBA) neighborhoods have 15 percentage point higher increase in Internet use, – compared to other Chicago community areas, controlling for demographic change  No significant increase in broadband adoption, activities online  Regression models based on change in estimates in multilevel models, 2008, 2011  Early 2013 citywide survey will offer additional measure of change later this year  Program goal is to create a culture of digital excellence in community  Resource sharing, networks, as well as outreach?  Substantively large effect for Internet use in targeted communities  Report available at broadbandillinois.org. Mossberger, Q.2

What Accounts for Inequalities/Barriers to Adoption? Socio-economic factors and age - not availability - account for most digital inequality, whether urban or rural Multivariate analysis, 2009 CPS, Mossberger, Tolbert and Franko 2012 Cost is most important barrier nationally (computer + broadband) Multivariate analysis, 2009 CPS, Mossberger, Tolbert and Franko 2012 Neighborhood context (concentrated poverty/segregation) magnifies barriers and disparities in cities; These in turn reinforce poverty and limit access to health, education, employment, government services. Multilevel analysis, 2008 & 2011 Chicago surveys, Mossberger, Tolbert and Franko 2012 Mossberger, Q.3

Figure 8.6: Probability of Citing a Lack of Interest, Cost or Skill as a Reason for No Home Internet, Latinos and the Percent Latino in their Neighborhood, and for Blacks and the Percent Black in their Neighborhood Segregated neighborhoods magnify disparities, but barriers differ for Latinos in immigrant gateway communities Mossberger, Q.3

Why Mobile Phones Won’t Close Gaps Chicago 2011 survey, Mossberger, Tolbert and Hamilton 2012 Home Broadband AdoptersSmartphone-only Users Are statistically more likely to:  get community news,  get political info,  do work for job,  get health info  get transit info  score higher on measures of Internet skill Do less online than home broadband adopters, except for:  entertainment  job search  national news Have some advantages over those with no personal access Have lower levels of skill than home adopters Multivariate Models Mossberger, Q.4

What Next? Digital Citizenship requires skills and regular, full access Cost & Home Broadband Competition Universal Service Fund Reforms Municipal Broadband Evaluation Needed What works and why? Correcting problems in implementation early Identifying best practices Finding cost-effective options Research Roundtable on Broadband Evaluation Policy Brief Available at Mossberger, Q.5