1 GUIDELINES as a way of harmonisation in Europe: Pro’s and Con’s Prof. Dr. Jan. A. Swinkels Psychiatrist Professor in clinical guideline development in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the Stroke Palliative Approach Pathway
Advertisements

Integrating the gender aspects in research and promoting the participation of women in Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health.
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Improving Quality of Care How do we address the implementation challenge? Iain Wallace Interim Medical Director NHS Quality Improvement Scotland.
Danish Nursing Society Improving Nursing by Clinical Guidelines and Documentation. How to organize the work?
Patient Safety Conference National Clinical Effectiveness Committee
Using research findings in clinical practice – demystifying the process of appraisal of literature for clinicians Rosalyn Stanton Physiotherapy Clinical.
EU Cross-Border Care Directive from the Primary Care perspective Results of a simulation Rita Baeten Gothenburg, 3 September 2012.
What should researchers do about knowledge transfer? By Réjean Landry Faculty of Business Laval University Notes prepared for presentation and discussion.
Standards and Guidelines in EU countries EQUS Conference, Brussels, 2011 Roland Simon, Marica Ferri, EMCDDA.
The Legal Implications of Practice Guidelines Cal Chaney, JD April 12, 2002.
EVIDENCE BASED HEALTH CARE and BEST PRACTICES at Northwestern Health Sciences University Gert Bronfort DC, PhD; Michele Maiers, DC, MPH; Roni Evans DC,
Shared decision making and Australian general practitioner training Dr Ronald McCoy, Education Strategy Senior Advisor, Royal Australian College of General.
The process of formulating responses remains
Critical Appraisal Dr Samira Alsenany Dr SA 2012 Dr Samira alsenany.
INTRODUCTION HINF 371 Medical Methodologies Session 1.
1. 2 Implementing and Evaluating of an Evidence Based Nursing into Practice Prepared By Dr. Nahed Said El nagger Assistant Professor of Nursing H.
Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Clinical Practice October 2014 Dawn Stacey RN, PhD Research Chair in Knowledge Translation to Patients Full Professor,
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
Towards an Integrity Standard in the Pharmaceutical Industry IACC Conference, May 27, 2003 Seoul, Korea Dr. Jillian Clare Cohen Assistant Professor, Leslie.
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine Enabling Patients to Access Electronic Health Records Guidance for Health Professionals.
1 Drug and Therapeutics Committee Session 10. Standard Treatment Guidelines.
Clinical Practice Guidelines
Quality Improvement Prepeared By Dr: Manal Moussa.
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Shakila Thangaratinam Professor of Maternal and Perinatal Health Women’s Health Research Unit R & D Director of Women’s.
Medico-legal aspects of “off-licence” prescribing in Obstetrics ENTER 2006 CONFERENCE Saj Shah Solicitor/Pharmacist 3 May 2006.
Time Tested Guideline Development and Implementation : The Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) Collaborative Process © 2007 Institute for.
Evidence based implementation for quality and health promotion in hospitals Professor Jos Kleijnen Director Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University.
Oviedo Convention and Its Protocols – Impact on Polish Law International Bioethics Conference Oviedo Convention in Central and Eastern European Countries.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Perioperative fasting guideline Getting it into practice Getting started.
Future research directions for patient safety in primary care Michel Wensing Wim Verstappen Sander Gaal.
Medical Audit.
The New ACGME Competencies for Internal Medicine.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
1 Crossing the Quality Chasm Second Report Committee on Quality of Health Care in America To order:
University – University Hospital Interactions: the AMSE Lisbon Declaration David Gordon President, AMSE.
Skills Building Workshop: PUBLISH OR PERISH. Journal of the International AIDS Society Workshop Outline Journal of the International.
Does Evidence Make a Difference?. Elements of Evidence Based Practice EBP Needs and preferences of patients/clients Professional expertise, skills & judgment.
Research Utilization in Nursing Chapter 21
My role Being part of the core MAGIC team for primary care Imbedding shared decision making into the culture of the surgery Writing patient decision aids(PDAs)
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Delmar Learning Copyright © 2003 Delmar Learning, a Thomson Learning company Nursing Leadership & Management Patricia Kelly-Heidenthal
Overview of Chapter The issues of evidence-based medicine reflect the question of how to apply clinical research literature: Why do disease and injury.
Changing Practitioner Behavior Gail D’Onofrio MD, MS Professor and Chief Section of Emergency Medicine Yale University School of Medicine.
Information, choices & professional judgement: what’s right, wrong and can be done with decision making in the health professions. Dr Carl Thompson, Department.
CHAPTER 28 Translation of Evidence into Nursing Practice: Evidence, Clinical practice guidelines and Automated Implementation Tools.
META-ANALYSIS, RESEARCH SYNTHESES AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION & KEITH MORRISON.
Clinical Practice Guidelines By Dr. Hanan Said Ali.
(MEDICAL) CLINICAL AUDIT
Adapting Guidelines for Local Implementation: Fusion Cuisine or Fast Food Leftovers Eddy Lang MDCM CCFP(EM) Head Department of Emergency Medicine Senior.
SINGING FROM THE SAME HYMN SHEET Address to SATS Study Day 29 June 2013 Dr Sue Armstrong.
Implementing a new drug or technique (APA Cambridge 21. June 2013) Tom G. Hansen, MD, PhD, Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Odense University.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Medicines adherence Implementing NICE guidance 2009 NICE clinical guideline 76.
Ghada Aboheimed, Msc. Review the principles of an evidence based approach to clinical practice. Appreciate the value of EBM Describe the 5 steps of evidence.
Nurse Led Discharge Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Hilda Dowler, ADON Nursing Quality.
NHS Education for Scotland
Accountability and Delegation Medicines Management
Evidence-based Medicine
Risk Communication in Medicines
Prescribing.
Musculoskeletal Health in Europe
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Quality Health Care Nursing 870
Effective evidence-based occupational therapy
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Continuing Professional Development Knowledge Market
CLINICAL RESEARCH: An Introduction
Evidence-Based Public Health
Presentation transcript:

1 GUIDELINES as a way of harmonisation in Europe: Pro’s and Con’s Prof. Dr. Jan. A. Swinkels Psychiatrist Professor in clinical guideline development in health care

Harmonisation Europe and health care Driven by ideals: – It is our moral duty to realise the 'idea of Europe' - Europe founded on the values of democracy, rule of law, respect for human rights, prosperity and stability" concluded Mr. Cox, chairman of the European parliament Drive ideological: –Where is the power? Driven by facts and an ideal: – there are great inequalities in the health care it’s our moral duty to diminish them, can guidelines helps?

3 Good healthcare Good standard (EB guidelines) Effective (the size of the effect) Safe (side effects, troublesome or dangerous) Accepted (effect= quality x acceptation Applicable (in and exclusion criteria) Feasible (available, in time) Patient directed (patient involvement) Meets the real objective needs of the patients Efficiency (value for money) effectiveness

Introduction 4

5 CLINICAL GUIDELINES Definition: Systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. Institute of Medicine, Field and Lohr (1992)

Evidence based? Evidence ≠ proof A guideline is called evidence based after a search for the evidence even when there is not enough evidence Why? –No evidence is not the same for doing nothing Mono of multidisciplinary

7 WHY EB GUIDELINES? It’s difficult (impossible?) to keep up with the literature and judge the validity and implications of the research findings for there use in clinical practice – problems with information management There is considerable evidence of a gap between evidence and practice

8

9 BARRIERS RELATING TO INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Identifying effective health care interventions. Health care professionals have difficulty in identifying and comprehending literature due to: –It’s to much –Poor presentation of research findings –No ‘just in time information’ and a lack of time to search for information –Dispersion or scatter of relevant literature across a large number of journals (ICT and search engines) –Difficulties in interpreting published evidence (new knowledge is necessary)

10

Are EB guidelines needed? From research it’s clear that a considerable part of our patients didn’t get evidence based treatment (Wang e.a.2005, Young e.a.2001, Fernandez e.a. 2007, Lehman e.a. 2004, Leslie e.a. 2004, Weinmann e.a. 2005) So what, are EB treatments better than care as usual? EB treatments diminishes the burden of diseases. It’s possible to get an average profit of 25 % (Andrews e.a. 2004, Issakides 2004 e.a.)

Are EB guidelines needed? The last conclusion is on statistical epidemiological research, but is it confirmed by clinical studies? Yes: (Bauer e.a.2002, Adli e.a.2006, Supes e.a. 2004, Dennehy e.a. 2005), by the treatments themselves and by ‘measurement based care’ Is this confirmed by implementation research of an EB guideline?

On a national level

14 IMPLEMENTING GUIDELINES Largely ineffective strategies - dissemination of written educational materials, didactic educational sessions Variable effectiveness - audit and feedback, local consensus conferences, opinion leaders consensus conferences Largely effective - reminders, educational outreach (for prescribing), patient mediated interventions, interactive educational workshops, multi-faceted interactive interventions (Grol e.a. 2001, 2003)

Disappointing results? We need more research findings to improve the implement ability of the guidelines –There is a high generalisation level, we need information on subgroups We need more research with effect modificators (age ethnicity, co morbidity etc.) So more research in needed despite the circumstantial evidence

On an international level

Can we adopt a guideline developed elsewhere? Yes –But try to reduce ideological thinking –Use scientific evidence in the guideline –Adopt a coherent frame work for action

Con’s and pro’s Not simple select the best clinic or provider Private provision of care is not inherently better Not exclude the professionals Not exclude costs Impossibilities Try to develop data and make them public Optimize the use of available evidence about what works and doesn’t works (use the Dutch guideline!) Use ADAPTE to make your own guideline Use effective implementation strategies

20

21 MEDICO-LEGAL ISSUES Do not in principle represent a barrier to implementation Use of guidelines protect against liability Compliance with clinical guidelines is unlikely to prove decisive in a medical negligence action, unless the intervention concerned is so well established that no responsible doctor acting with reasonable skill would fail to comply with it Non compliance is possible or sometimes necessary but needs to be documented

Take home messages EB Guidelines can help to improve the quality and safety of care in Europe Transparency is needed For the public to make choices Professionals are stimulated to work better Economic reasons: value for money Make a plan to make use of the Dutch guideline by using ADAPTE and effective implementation methods 23

Literature