Third International Workshop 12-15 November San José, Costa Rica Producer Responsibility for WEEE in the European Union An overview of legislation and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Workshop on Inventories and Projections of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste under WG 1 and 2 of the Climate Change Committee Summary of reporting on.
Advertisements

Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Experiences from Sweden and Europe Thomas Lindhqvist IIIEE – Lund University JORNADA INTERNACIONAL.
WEEE Directive 2002/96/EC and Estonian legislation Malle Piirsoo Estonian Ministry of the Environment
Environmental law is what we do. TM 1191 Second Avenue Suite 2200 Seattle, WA ELECTRONIC WASTE RECYCLING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.
The recycling and recovery of Polyolefins waste in Europe Identiplast, Madrid, 03 October 2011 Sylvain Lhôte, Borealis Group.
Biodegradable Municipal Waste Management in Europe Gerry Carty The Parliamentary Sustainable Waste Group and Environmental Services Association 28th January.
WEEE compliance schemeWEEE compliance scheme Michal Mazal, International TradeMichal Mazal, International Trade.
Dmitrij Zarinovs Article that I looked at was from European Union Official Journal. WEEE Directive.
WEEE Directive Waste from electrical and electronic equipment Workshop EU legislation Sofia, 20 April 2006 Willem Canneman.
21-22 July 2009 INFRA Workshop in Sofia Overview of the Hungarian implementation and practical experiences related to WEEE INFRA workshop in Sofia
1 How can we reach the new WEEE collection targets? Wednesday, 27 February 2013 Brussels Filippo Bernocchi Delegate to Energy and Waste ANCI - National.
The Electronics Lifecycle Resource TM John Dickenson -- REWAS 2008.
WEEE Producer Responsibility Compliance in Sweden El-Kretsen AB Peter Mellgren Head of market and information.
EReg Association of European Vehicle and Driver Registration Authorities Fleur Pullen – EReg Secretariat.
Europe: A mid term PSI review Chris Corbin ePSIplus Analyst Den Haag, The Netherlands, funded by eContentPlus.
Development of Censuses in Europe and Development for EC Statistical Co-operation European Commission (Eurostat) Jurgen Heimann UNFPA/PARIS 21 International.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Johannes ENZMANN European Commission DG Energy and Transport Unit Electricity and Gas GIE Annual Conference.
Reuse and Recycling Social Enterprises in the European Union (RREUSE) 2nd Annual Community Reuse Network Ireland Conference 10/11/2011 Michal Len RREUSE.
“Management of Packaging Waste in Europe – Learnings and best practices” by Joachim Quoden Managing Director PRO EUROPE Packaging and Packaging Waste Management.
7 November 2006VI Eurosai Training Event - Prague1 Auditing EU funds – National SAI experiences Jan van den Bos – Netherlands Court of Audit.
Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive Work started in the year 1994 To device a strategy.
EUROPEAN UNION. WHAT Coalition of 30 countries united in ECONOMY World’s largest trading bloc. World’s largest exporter to the world 16 TRILLION *Biggest.
CEPI comments on Current Developments in EU Waste Policy Massimo Medugno Deputy Director, Assocarta European Paper Week Brussels, 30 November 2005.
Linking trading schemes – considerations and lessons learned from EU ETS Jill Duggan IISD/WRI - Chicago November 2007.
The UK WEEE Regulations What do I need to do? The WEEE Regulations What do I need to do? Outline Objectives of the WEEE Regulations What is WEEE An overview.
Directive 2000/53/EC on End-of-Life Vehicles
ÖKOTECH 2007 BUDAPEST European Commission DG Environment Sustainable Production and Consumption Directive 2000/53/EC on End-of-Life Vehicles and its implementation.
Estonia and the European Union NGO Eurohouse Europe Direct Kuressaare inforelay 10A Tallinna str., Kuressaare Phone and fax:
The European Union “United in Diversity”
THE EUROPEAN UNION. HISTORY 28 European states after the second world war in 1951 head office: Brussels 24 different languages Austria joined 1995.
THE EUROPEAN UNION. EU  1993 European Union  Main Aims  All states in the EU = a single market  One currency throughout the EU = the Euro  To have.
Norwegian experiences - Hans Løken Director of Elretur AS.
Workshop on Recycling of Waste Tirana, Albania September 20 – 21, 2011 Tsvetelina Borissova Filipova Senior Project Manager/Lawyer Environmental.
STATE OF PLAY : ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION. 2 Overall 2012 ESF Budget Execution on 20/11/2012 Programmin g period 2012 Payment appropriation s mil.€ 2012.
European Union – Location 3.1 Miss Richmond Standard Grade Business Management.
Accession to the European Union Criteria acquis rationale.
EPR webconference Tues 15 Feb 2011 Jane Bickerstaffe Director INCPEN.
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
I will: Know how and why the EU was created. Understand the benefits of being part of the EU.
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -
Three key players The European Parliament - voice of the people Jerzy Buzek, President of of the European Parliament The council of Ministers - voice of.
Your first EURES job Making it easier to move and work to recruit young people in Europe.
WEEE Producer Responsibility in the UK – Best Practice.
The European WEEE Directive International Seminar on Electronic Waste World Bank – infoDev Eric MUGNIER, Executive director ERNST & YOUNG.
Maps of Topic 2B Multilingualism in Europe Europe A Story of Empire (a united Europe) & Language.
The European Union Objectives Identify countries within the EU Explain the political and economic structure of the EU What is the importance of.
Syria & Modern Banking in Light of Arab & International Practices Role of the Banking Sector in Developing Private Businesses Poul Gadegaard 2 nd - 3 rd.
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS Unit 2 Business Development GCSE Business Studies.
ASEKOL Partner for Your Business in Czech Republic and Slovakia Ronald Blaho, Director ASEKOL SKRonald Blaho, Director ASEKOL SK.
Ministry of Strategy and Finance of Korea Korea Development Institute (KDI) Ministry of Environment and Water of Bulgaria 2015/16 Korea-Bulgaria Knowledge.

EUROPEAN UNION – MAKING OFF European Economic Community
15 March 2016, Kiev, Ukraine TWINNING PROJECT
EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY HOW IT WORKS?
System for waste management and Extended Producer’s Responsibility
This project is funded by the European Union
PRAG PRACTICAL GUIDE TO CONTRACT PROCEDURES FOR EXTERNAL ACTIONS
DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATIC - GENERATION
Lifelong Learning Programme 2007 – 2013
Economic aspects of environmentally sound management of used batteries
ELENA BODÍKOVÁ Slovak Environmental Agency
The 1680 Family’s Reach.
The organisation of WEEE collection in Catalonia
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The Electronics Lifecycle ResourceTM
Producer Responsibility Organisations – Experience from Switzerland
"Financing Natura 2000 Guidance and Workshops”
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Producer Responsibility for WEEE in the European Union An overview of legislation and implementation Ivo Haenen, WASTE, Advisers on Urban Environment and Development, Gouda, The Netherlands

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Overview of the presentation  Introduction  The WEEE Directive  EPR at Member States level  EPR systems options for countries  Country overview with 2 examples  Some concerns  Final remarks  Questions?

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Introduction  Introduction to WASTE  Introduction to the bilateral project: “Implementation and strengthening of systems that guarantee a responsible management of WEEE, in Costa Rica and The Netherlands”  Introduction to this presentation

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica The WEEE Directive (1)  Objectives:  Prevention of WEEE  Increase reuse, recovery, and recycling as to minimise disposal of WEEE  Improve environmental performance of life cycle of WEEE of all operators involved: producers, distributors, consumers, treatment facilitators

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica The WEEE Directive (2) Key aims are:  Reduction of WEEE to landfill  Set targets for recovery, reuse and recycling  Provide for better product design for improved recoverability, reusability and recyclability  Provide for the establishment of take-back scheme and set up collection facilities, free to use for consumers  Provide a framework for financing structures Source: IPTS, 2006

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica EPR at level of EU Member States Member States must:  make their own choices about how to transpose the WEEE Directive into national legislation and where to assign national responsibility  ensure that systems for separate collection are in place and financed by producers  inform HH, register producers, monitor performance, collect annual sales and recovery information, and report to EU Commission every three years

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica EPR system options for countries (1)  Collective vs. Individual responsibility:  National collective (monopoly) vs. competitive clearing house system  Collection / Recovery Channels:  Retail, municipal, producer  Organisation, Logistics & Treatment  Single Producer Responsibility Organisation (PRO) vs. multiple service providers  In-house vs. outsource  How many categories of WEEE?  Exceed collection rates or not?

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica EPR system options for countries (2)  Informative instruments  Use a disposal fee? Visible or not?  Campaigns or other PR approaches?  Financing structures:  Do fees accrue in a fund, or invoice payment (no fee)?  Cost-sharing for historical / orphan products?  Real costs of treatment or flat fee per type?  Guarantees: financial guarantees, insurance, participation in scheme?

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica EPR system options for countries (3) Recovery Channels (One or more):  Municipal collection: At depots, with bulky waste or by other arrangements  Retail take back on 1:1 basis, free for consumers: all countries except Germany which has no take back  Producer take back: generally only for large commercial appliances, and on 1:1 basis

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Country overview (1) Collective vs. Individual Resp

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Country overview (2)  Collective Responsibility  Belgium, The Netherlands, Sweden (operational)  Portugal, Ireland, Hungary Luxemburg, Cyprus (partially operational)  Individual Responsibility  Germany (partial); France, UK, Spain, Italy + 15 others (systems designed but not yet fully operational)  Many delays, with issues still to be resolved

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Country overview (3) Financing: Fees  No fee for Cyprus, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania and Malta  Visible fee mandatory for Luxemburg, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden  Visible fee allowed in other EU Countries (15)

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Example: The Dutch system (1) Collective responsibility, two major systems: 1. NVMP:  Ensures collection, transport and recycling of White & Brown Goods  Maintains fund, accrued by Advanced Disposal Fees  Monitors and reports to VROM  Informs the public and producers  Uses both in-house services (transport & segregation) as outsourced services (recycling)

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Example: The Dutch system (2) 2. ICT Milieu:  Ensures transport of ICT WEEE, from regional depots to treatment facility and outsources recycling  Invoices producers of ICT equipment for collection, transport and treatment costs, based on market share (no consumer fees)  Monitors and reports to VROM

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Example Spain  Individual responsibility model  Producers must cover all costs for collection, treatment and final disposal, also for historic waste, based on market share  Registration of producers done by National Register of Industrial Establishments (government)  Take-back through 1:1 at retailer or authorized drop-off points  Municipality responsible for primary collection WEEE from HH  Trade associations are set up

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Some concerns:  “WEEE Directive only transposed”  Collective systems are the only ones operating, while individual systems are delayed and untested  Diversity of country models / interpreta- tions of WEEE directive level increases costs and creates avoidance behaviour  Recovery targets not consistent with sales  Little attention to prevention, reuse and re-design in practice

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Final remarks  Effectiveness of systems VERY country specific  One EU? Not in implementation WEEE management  One LAC? One Central America? One Caribbean?

Third International Workshop November San José, Costa Rica Thank you for your attention! Questions are welcome