Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Advertisements

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Volume Group 5 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Southwind High School August 5, 2015.
Clear Purpose: Assessment for and of Learning: A Balanced Assessment System “If we can do something with assessment information beyond using it to figure.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
Coaching Case 3 Group 4 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership of self linked with a system of formative assessment Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckmann Connie Laughlin.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Assessments Matching Assessments to Standards. Agenda ● Welcome ● What do you think of assessment? ● Overview of all types of evidence ● Performance Tasks.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Classroom Assessment Literacy and What you need to know to do it well!
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
EXAMINING THE MODULES: ASSESSMENT PRACTICES LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Word problems…. No problem! Class 5 November 13, 2012 This.
Understanding Angle Group 3 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Reviewing Using the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool: Mathematics Module 103: Standards for Mathematical Practice and Access for All Students (AC.
Examining the Modules: Assessment Practices LT 2c. I can analyze the role of student-friendly learning targets, aligned assessment, and effective curriculum-
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014 This material was developed for.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Components of Quality Classroom Assessments Mitch Fowler School Data Consultant, Calhoun ISD
Summer Assessment Institute: Linking Data Teams & Quality Assessment August 2015.
Additive Comparison Situations
APA Format Tuesday July 8, 2014.
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Project & Syllabus.
Standards for Mathematical Practice
Equality Project Part A Observations
Smarter Balanced Assessment Items
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
The Power of A Number String Purposeful Number Talks (part 2)
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Common Core Standards Building Curriculum Units
A Language-Rich Math Class
Access & Equity Core Mathematics Partnership
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Student Work Presentation and Reflection Project Due: July 31
Our Leadership Journey
CCSS Training 9/24/14.
Student Work Analysis: Looking for Growth in Thinking
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013–2014   This material was developed for the Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics project through the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Center for Mathematics and Science Education Research (CMSER). This material may be used by schools to support learning of teachers and staff provided appropriate attribution and acknowledgement of its source. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. This project was supported through a grant from the Wisconsin ESEA Title II Improving Teacher Quality Program.

Keys to Quality Classroom Assessment: Sound Design Part II Common Core Leadership in Mathematics (CCLM)

Homework from Last Week First: Read Chapter 9 pages 297 - 307. Second: Looking ahead …… Choose the unit you will be teaching in November. Read three lessons and write learning targets for these lessons. Targets will be discussed in small groups. Consider: Type of target, student friendly language, embedded math idea not a math activity When we left off last week, we asked you to work on writing learning targets (in draft form) for three lessons you will teach in November.

Target Discussion In Triads, examine and offer feedback to your partners on their learning targets. Spend some time in your discussion on: the classification of the learning target the student-friendly language the target as an activity or a learning

Writing a Learning Target Grade Level groups (Triads) Read the designated lesson. Individually: choose the standard that aligns best to the lesson. List the activities students will do. From the activities write a learning target. Classify your target. 3. Share and discuss your target with your triad. 4. If time, share you target with another grade level group.

Teacher’s Role in Assessment FOR Learning Identify the standard. Deconstruct it to enabling targets. Transform to student friendly version. Create accurate classroom assessments. Use with students to track growth. These are the 5 points that Stiggins makes for our roles in assessment FOR learning. The point is, we have a serious role of what we need to do for students. This is where the hard work of formative assessment is. No discussion.

Learning Targets Learning Target: Explain how your planning process includes formative assessment practices.

Building on Big Ideas Reread the our Graffiti Chart from last week. Questions: What ideas do you want to build into your own classroom assessment system? How will you enrich your own assessment system? Have 3 different colored markers and chart paper. Vignette, content chp 4, tchart

Sound Design: Big Ideas

Keys to Quality Assessment: Sound Design Key 1: Clear Purpose Key 2: Clear Targets Key 3: Sound Design Key 4: Effective Communication Key 5: Student Involvement Sound Design: How to design assessments that align with our targets and serve our purposes. Refer to chart on page 88 in book. This chart is at the beginning of each chapter. Highlight where we have been and where we are going.

Four Assessment Methods Selected Response Written Response Performance Assessment Personal Communication All four methods are legitimate options, but only when their use is closely matched with the kind of learning target to be assessed and the intended use of the information. (p. 89) Participants go back to notes – 8 min We are describing the four assessment methods. Turn to your partner what do you know about the 4 assessment methods – 2 mins to discuss with partner before start conversation whole group conversation – how should be matched to learning target – what do you know how might they be connected to learning targets? Clarify what they heard when would we use each one? Intended use – clarify this Share out whole group

Learning Target – Assessment Method Match Selected Response Written Response Performance Assessment Personal Communication Knowledge Good Strong Partial Reasoning Skill Poor Product What is the importance of the assessment method? We are explaining how to choose which method to use for any given learning target. What connections are you making between the learning targets and assessment methods that you might not have had when making previous assessments? Explain to your partner – then answer question

Learning Target - Assessment Method Match “Varying assessment methods to give students practice or to accommodate learning styles is a thoughtful consideration. However, assessment methods are not interchangeable. To ensure accurate assessment results, the overriding criterion for selection of method is consideration of the type of learning targets to be assessed.” (p. 87)

Assessment Development Cycle Planning Stage Determine who will use the assessment results and how they will use them. Identify the learning targets to be assessed. Select appropriate assessment method or methods. Determine sample size. Development Stage 5. Develop or select items, exercises, tasks, and scoring procedures. 6. Review and critique the overall assessment for quality before use. Use Stage 7. Conduct and score assessment. 8. Revise as needed for future use. We are outlining the steps in assessment planning and development. We have focused on #1 and 2 in previous classes. Tonight we are talking about #3. Give some examples of what is meant by #4.

Sound Design: Assessment “Even if you are using an already-developed test, we recommend that you review it with each of the first six steps in mind. When we rely on textbook test writers to do the planning and development, we may have high-quality items, but we may have a partial or poor match to what we taught or to the relative balance of importance of each learning target in our curriculum.” (p. 113)

Reflecting Back

Learning Targets Learning Target: Explain how your planning process includes formative assessment practices.

Homework Assessing the Learning Target: Working with your November learning targets, either write your own assessment item or find an assessment item from the suggested resources that will reveal evidence of student learning. At least one of your targets should be a reasoning target. Consider the learning from Chapter 4 as you put together your assessment item(s).   Online Resources: http://www.illustrativemathematics.org/ http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/standards/common-core-tools/ Point to poster on wall and Seven Strategies of Assessment for Learning on the back of the binders.