Over-the-Air (OTA) Bit Management David Felland Milwaukee Public Television.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Maximizing Satellite Transmission Efficiency With DVB-S2
Advertisements

New ADSL2 Standards Which delivers improved rate and reach performance, advanced diagnostics capabilities, standby modes, and more to broadband designers.
Archiving Legacy Composite Recordings Made On Component VTRs Terry Harvey Southern Illinois University WSIU-TV (PBS)
Chapter 6 Review.
Digital Media Dr. Jim Rowan ITEC 2110 Video. Works because of persistence of vision Fusion frequency –~ 40 frames.
Q G Bit Management John Watkinson David Felland Jim Kutzner.
CPSC Characteristics of Streaming Media Stored on the Web M. Li, M. Claypool, R. Kinicki, and J. Nichols To appear in ACM Transactions on Internet.
Serge Rutman Director Display & DTV R&D Home Products Group, Intel.
T.Sharon-A.Frank 1 Multimedia Size of Data Frame.
ATSC Digital Television
COE 341: Data & Computer Communications (T061) Dr. Marwan Abu-Amara Chapter 8: Multiplexing.
Statistical Multiplexer of VBR video streams By Ofer Hadar Statistical Multiplexer of VBR video streams By Ofer Hadar.
Regulating Broadcasting Overview of the technical specifications that make up the U. S. broadcast spectrum.
HDTV (High Definition Television). HDTV History Early 1980’s: –Japan created analog HDTV Mid-1980s: –US, trying to stay competitive, decided to go digital.
Broadcast Television Archiving Rod Hewitt
January 26, Nick Feamster Development of a Transcoding Algorithm from MPEG to H.263.
1 CCTV SYSTEMS RESOLUTIONS USED IN CCTV. 2 CCTV SYSTEMS CCTV resolution is measured in vertical and horizontal pixel dimensions and typically limited.
Doc.: IEEE /0717r0 Submission June 2008 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide Packets and MPEG Frames Background to Graceful degradation of audio.
Digital TV Transition Nate Gallert CBE 555 February 23, 2009.
Media Streaming By Derek Aten – Digital T.V. and HDTV Maria Preciado – Audio Streaming Genevieve Taduran – Data Streaming.
Sony Pictures1 Preparing your customers and your facilities for Blu-ray A powerful format that leads to new challenges in authoring and creative design.
MPEG-2 Standard By Rigoberto Fernandez. MPEG Standards MPEG (Moving Pictures Experts Group) is a group of people that meet under ISO (International Standards.
What is broadband Multiple broadband technologies Advantages DSL and DSLAM Types of DSL transmission Services through broadband Cable Modem Internet Access.
1/23/2005 page1 11/11/2004 MPEG4 Codec for Access Grids National Center for High Performance Computing Speaker: Barz Hsu
Insights into Future Video Codec Huawei Technologies
Multimedia Data Video Compression The MPEG-1 Standard
Multimedia Data Video Compression The MPEG-1 Standard Dr Mike Spann Electronic, Electrical and Computer.
Profiles and levelstMyn1 Profiles and levels MPEG-2 is intended to be generic, supporting a diverse range of applications Different algorithmic elements.
Accelerating the process of invention, patent creation and monetization by providing funding, talent and expert processes. Coverage Diagram Example For.
Copyright © 2008 Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 HPA Technology Retreat 2009 ATSC 2.0 The next generation Graham Jones,
New ITU-R Question 128/6: Digital three-dimensional (3D) TV broadcasting 1)What are the user requirements for digital 3D TV broadcasting systems? 2)What.
Computer Architecture Lecture 30 Fasih ur Rehman.
MPEG-4 Design Team Report. 2 Proposals draft-ietf-avt-rtp-mpeg4-02.txt draft-guillemot-genrtp-01.txt draft-jnb-mpeg4av-rtp-00.txt FlexMux packetization.
Q G Dave MacCarn, WGBH. Q G From Analog to Digital to HD  Explosion of new formats with the start of standard-definition digital video and an even broader.
1 Chapter 5 Multiplexing : Sharing a Medium Data Communications and Computer Networks: A Business User’s Approach.
WGBH Public Television Quality Workshop
CIS 321 – Data Communications & Networking Chapter 8 – Multiplexing.
HDTV Video and AC-3 Payload Formats Ladan Gharai Allison Mankin USC/ISI.
Layered Coding Basic Overview. Outline Pyramidal Coding Scalability in the Standard Codecs Layered Coding with Wavelets Conclusion.
Recording Options: Codecs and Containers 1 Dave MacCarn, WGBH.
Q G Over-the-Air (OTA) Bit Management David Felland.
QART Presentation – July Videosurveillance Streams Rate Time Series Videosurveillance Streams, when encoded with traditional H.264 encoders, at.
Glossary of Digital Broadcast. Analog  A type of waveform signal that contains information such as image, voice, and data. Analog signals have unpredictable.
Q G NETA Quality Workshop 1 Dave MacCarn, WGBH. Q G From Analog to Digital to HD  Explosion of new formats with the start of standard-definition digital.
Doc.: IEEE /0717r1 Submission July 2008 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide Packets and MPEG Frames Background to Graceful degradation of audio.
What Exactly is Television?  A process of transmitting images through a signal from one place or another.
Carnegie Mellon. Carnegie Mellon Video I Carnegie Mellon Digital Video Size quality Broadcast quality is very different from www MPEG-2 is satellite.
Scalable Video Coding and Transport Over Broad-band wireless networks Authors: D. Wu, Y. Hou, and Y.-Q. Zhang Source: Proceedings of the IEEE, Volume:
From Analog to Digital An introduction to HDTV. Analog… (review) 6 MHz signal Scan lines Shadow mask Poor resolution Digital to analog conversion (satellites,
HD, Multicasting or Something Else?. The Digital Environment.
Making Connections Efficient: Multiplexing and Compression Data Communications and Computer Networks: A Business User’s Approach Seventh Edition.
Multiplexing Team Members: Cesar Chavez Arne Solas Steven Fong Vi Duong David Nguyen.
MPEG.
Chapter Five Making Connections Efficient: Multiplexing and Compression Data Communications and Computer Networks: A Business User’s Approach Eighth Edition.
1 High Definition Video Is Coming To H.323-Based Videoconferencing Larry Amiot Northwestern University
Digital Video MPEG : Standards, Technology and Applications Lesson 2.
Saving Bitrate vs. Users: Where is the Break-Even Point in Mobile Video Quality? ACM MM’11 Presenter: Piggy Date:
Q G Boston Public Television Quality Workshop 1 Dave MacCarn, WGBH.
Residential Audio & Video Systems Copyright © 2005 Heathkit Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Presentation 18 – Digital Television (DTV) – Part 2.
Submitted To: Submitted By: Seminar On Digital Audio Broadcasting.
Toshiba RF Receiver for HDTV Presentation 2: 10/21/2004 Team: Josue Caballero, Brett DiCio, Daniel Hooper, Efosa Ojomo, George Sewell.
PRESENT BY:- DHVANI BHANKHAR RUCHA PATEL. INTRODUCTION  HD IS DESCRIBED FROM THE LATE 1930s.  HIGH DEFINITION TELEVISION.  DIGITAL TV BROAD CASTING.
Presenting: Shlomo Ben-Shoshan, Nir Straze Supervisors: Dr. Ofer Hadar, Dr. Evgeny Kaminsky.
High Definition Television. 2 Overview Technology advancements History Why HDTV? Current TV standards HDTV specifications Timeline Application Current.
DTV SAMARTH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING &TECHNOLOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONIC & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING Subject Code [ ] 5th semester (E&C)
July 2008 doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2008
Chapter Five Making Connections Efficient: Multiplexing and Compression Data Communications and Computer Networks: A Business User’s Approach Eighth Edition.
Chapter 6: Video.
Coding Approaches for End-to-End 3D TV Systems
Chap 3: Encoding Video Content
Presentation transcript:

Over-the-Air (OTA) Bit Management David Felland Milwaukee Public Television

Acquisition and Distribution  New impacts on broadcast transport stream Better coding efficiency in new HD encoders ○ Claims of 10-15% improvement ○ Potential for two 720p HD services in one transport stream – or other services More SD services from which to choose Mobile DTV Fixed and Mobile DTV Data Services

 Public television has used its spectrum to serve diverse audiences with more variety in content (“multicasting”) Pluses: greater range of services; potential higher value to individual communities Minuses: locked into audience expectations; stations are forced to balance video quality with service quantity Tradeoffs affect Quality:

Bit Management  Some options for broadcasters Reduced horizontal resolution (1440 vs 1920) Noise reduction of both HD and SD Modern statistical multiplexing 720p vs. 1080i ☺ X X ☺

What are stations doing?  Surveyed the ETAC 1-3 OTA services Different services plans among all members Focus on HD + national / local SD services

HDSD1SD2SD3SD4 PSIPData # k128k # k1M+ 128k #3a k128k #3b k100k ETAC Members’ OTA Italics = Stat Mux Pool

HDSD1SD2SD3SD4 PSIPData # k128k+ 100k #5a ~200k128k #5b k128k # k1M ETAC Members’ OTA (x4) (x2) Italics = Stat Mux Pool

HDSD1SD2SD3SD4 PSIPData # k- # k250k+ 128k # k6M # M- ETAC Members’ OTA Italics = Stat Mux Pool

HDSD1SD2SD3SD4 PSIPData #11a k 128k+ 110k #11b k 128k+ 110k #11c k 128k+ 110k # k- ETAC Members’ OTA (x2) Italics = Stat Mux Pool

HDSD1SD2SD3SD4 PSIPData # k128k # k1M+ 300k ETAC Members’ OTA Italics = Stat Mux Pool

Mobile DTV Bandwidth Usage How much OTA spectrum is needed?  Mobile / Handheld service requirements Multiple modes – e.g., “Half-rate”, “Quarter-rate”, or a variety of “Mixed Modes” Many broadcasters will use Quarter or Mixed ○ Quarter  ~17% payload (83% FEC) ○ Mixed (e.g., ½, ¼, ¼, ¼)  ~ 26% (74% FEC) ○ Half  ~34% payload (66% FEC)

Bandwidth Usage (bits) How much OTA spectrum is needed?  Mixed Mode examples (26%): One 500 kbps stream  ~1.92 Mbps ○ Two 500 kbps streams  ~3.85 Mbps  Quarter Rate examples (17%): One 500 kbps stream  ~2.94 Mbps ○ Two 500 kbps streams  ~5.88 Mbps

Some Mobile PTV Services  Simulcast of Local HD or SD Services  Simulcast of National HD or SD Services  Stand alone Local Mobile Services  National or Local Kids Service  “Radio” Services Audio Only – 16 – 48 kbps “Audio with Pictures” – same as Video/Audio

DTV Spectrum Usage: ETAC Member #1 ~15 Mbps ~3 Mbps 150 kbps 128 kbps HD program PSIP SD program Data/Ancillary 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool

DTV Spectrum Usage: ETAC Member #2 ~12 Mbps ~2.5 Mbps 250 kbps 1Mbps+128 kbps HD program PSIP SD program Data/Ancillary ~2.5 Mbps SD program 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool

ETAC Member #1: One Mobile Service (Mixed) ~13.5 Mbps 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream ~2.5 Mbps 150 kbps 128 kbps HD program PSIP SD program Data/Ancillary ~2 Mbps Mobile program Stat Mux Pool

ETAC Member #2: One Mobile Service (Mixed) ~11 Mbps ~2 Mbps 250 kbps 1Mbps+128 kbps HD program PSIP SD program Data/Ancillary ~2 Mbps SD program 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool ~2 Mbps Mobile program

DTV Spectrum Usage: ETAC Member #14 ~10 Mbps ~3 Mbps 150 kbps 1Mbps HD program PSIP SD program Data/Ancillary ~3 Mbps SD program 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool

ETAC Member #14: Multiple Mobile Services (Mixed) ~9.5 Mbps ~1.8 Mbps 250 kbps 1Mbps HD program PSIP SD program Data/Ancillary ~1.8 Mbps SD program 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool ~2 Mbps Mobile program ~2 Mbps Mobile program Radio Services (100k)

Other Stations: Possible Mobile Services (Mixed) ~11 Mbps 250 kbps HD program PSIP 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool ~2 Mbps Mobile program ~2 Mbps Mobile program ~2 Mbps Weather Mobile program

Other Stations: Possible Mobile Services (1/4 rate) ~11 Mbps 250 kbps HD program PSIP 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream Stat Mux Pool ~3 Mbps Mobile program ~3 Mbps Mobile program ~2 Mbps Weather

Other Stations: Possible Mobile Services (Mixed) ~4.5 Mbps 100 kbps SD program PSIP 19.4 Mb/s DTV Transport Stream ~2 Mbps Mobile program ~2 Mbps Mobile program

Sorry but No Free Lunch!  MPEG very cleverly hides picture errors BUT Errors hidden at one stage can appear downstream Don’t use an extra codec cycle simply because you can  Use suitable workflow techniques Don’t over compress master recordings Plot your program performance to the end user Test and understand how to use MPEG tools properly

How does my show look?  Examples of original video compared to: 720 progressive at different station presentation rates 1080 interlace at different station presentation rates  Producer tech choices drive the viewer experience Downstream network workflow and distribution Local station bandwidth constraints and practices Quality pictures at home require Best Practices upstream

Some Best Practices  Use progressive acquisition cameras Use higher frame rates Avoid interlace – Digital TV handles it inefficiently  Streamline post production workflow Successive coders will reduce picture quality Assume your show will look worse downstream Prove that the tools you use “do minimal harm”

Observations and Suggestions:  Many stations are moving to 720p replacing spatial resolution with improved temporal resolution Significantly reducing picture blocking artifacts Reducing horizontal resolution  With an increase in demand for more services public television can improve performance by Dropping interlace and moving to progressive pictures Replacing older HD encoders with the next generation Changing PBS satellite distribution to progressive

Q G Video Examples

Q G Questions?