Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

0 Michael Robinson Midwest ISO 3 June 2008 Midwest ISO Markets: Demand Response & Resource Adequacy.
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Highlights of the 2004 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor May.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
Kick-off Stakeholder Workshop "Post 2020 framework in a liberalised electricity market with large share of Renewable Energy Sources" 28 April 2014, Brussels.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
1 Presentation to the Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (WIEG) T. Graham Edwards President & CEO August 9, 2007.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Wind Power in Ireland: Treatment of wind in the Single Electricity Market APEx Conference, Paris 16 th October 2007.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Demand Resources: Challenges and New Initiatives for ISO New England Henry Yoshimura, ISO New England NEW DEMAND RESPONSE PRODUCTS IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
Power Plant BI POWER GENERATION Evolution of Plant Ownership From Regulated Era Regulated Utility Monopolies To “Partially” Deregulated Era Independent.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
1 Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets 09 February 2007.
Storage Integration – Look Ahead SCED Issues for ETWG CAES Perspectives Brandon Whittle ETWG Storage Workshop.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Ontario Electricity Supply Forum PEO Mississauga Chapter - September 6, 2007 Rhonda Wright-Hilbig, P.Eng Market Analysis - IESO.
Bulk Power Transmission System
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Day Ahead Market Working Group April 14, Agenda Discussion of SMD-style DAM review questions posed by the DAM WG and Coral regarding the SMD-
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Renewable & CHP Generators : A suppliers perspective Presentation by Steve Armitage Tel
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Market Participant Experiences with Demand Side Bidding and Future Direction Linda Roberts, EA Technology Richard Formby, EA Technology.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Highlights of Midwest ISO: 2004 State of the Market Report and Day-2 Energy Markets Prepared by: David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor Midwest.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Planning for Texas’ Energy Future Select Committee on Electric Generation Capacity and Environmental Effects Bob Kahn President & CEO February 6, 2008.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
1 Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
1 A Conversation about MISO Paul Spicer November 8, 2007.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) and Variable Energy Resources (VERs) at MISO 14 November 2017.
The Future of Demand Response in New England
New England Resource Adequacy
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012

About MISO MISO is an independent, non-profit organization and is committed to the safe, cost-effective delivery of electric power MISO’s Three Primary Roles: –Reliability - keeping the lights on throughout the Midwest –Wholesale Market Management - allowing the sale and transfer of wholesale electricity to reduce costs and promote reliability –Regional Transmission Planning - working with all transmission stakeholders to develop the region’s transmission grid in a way that promotes public interest; reliability, and enables lowest-cost delivery of electricity and implementation of public policies 2

Market Based Demand Response MISO operates an open wholesale energy market where Market Participants can buy or sell energy in a fair, efficient and non-discriminatory manner Markets work best when there is vigorous and voluntary participation by both buyers (demand response) and sellers Demand response can: –reduce the need for new generating capacity –address real-time reliability issues –mitigate peak prices and price volatility –limit supplier market power 3

Demand Response Participation MISO’s markets provide opportunities for demand to participate on a comparable basis to supply side resources (generation) –Provides price signals for demand resources to make flexible energy use decisions –Provides for full cost recovery of the flexibility offered by demand resources 4

MISO Services for Demand Resources Energy and Ancillary Services Markets –Day ahead Energy –Real time Energy –Ancillary Services Markets Emergency Procedures Resource Adequacy Ancillary Service Markets Resource Planning 5

Day-Ahead Energy Market Participation in Day Ahead Market provides a hedge against real-time congestion Offer types –Fixed Demand Bid – Loads indicate the amount to be purchased, regardless of price (~85% of market demand on a daily basis) –Price Responsive Demand (PRD) – Loads submit PRD bids, either “physical” or “virtual,” to manage price risk (~15% of market demand on a daily basis) –Demand Response Resources (DRRs) – Treated in all respects like generation; DRRs are evaluated and cleared based on offer components, including start, notification, minimum run times and availability 6

Real-Time Energy Market Participation in Real-Time Market provides price signals for supplying real-time energy Offer types –Price Responsive Demand (PRD) – Load Serving Entities manage load by responding to Real-Time clearing prices –Demand Response Resources (DRRs) – DRRs can be dispatched based on economics, in the same manner as a supply-side resource Including ability to participate in 5-minute balancing market 7

Ancillary Services Markets Enables demand resources to provide Ancillary Services –Spin and Regulation services Offer types –Demand Response Resources Type I Capable of supplying a specific quantity of Energy to the market through physical load interruption Committed in the same manner as a Supply Resource –Demand Responsive Resource Type II Capable of supplying dispatchable Energy to the market through behind-the-meter generation or controllable load Can be Committed and Dispatched in the same manner as Generation Resources 8

Emergency Procedures Demand Resources during emergency conditions are used to avoid load interruptions during Real- Time generation emergencies Needed infrequently in MISO to date Demand Resources provided –3,000 MW of relief on August, 2006 –300 to 500 MW in February

Resource Adequacy Provides a mechanism for Demand Resources to be counted as capacity similar to generation resources by MISO Load Approximately 9,000 MW of Demand Response in MISO is eligible to count towards capacity by MISO Load –Today most of this 9,000 MW is registered as Emergency Demand Response 10

Resource Planning Enables MISO to plan the transmission system for use of demand resources –MISO conducts long-term reliability planning to determine the need for and to coordinate new investment in generation and transmission in each region –MISO, through its MISO Transmission Expansion Planning (MTEP) process, has committed more than $5b for new transmission investment –In MTEP planning studies, demand resources compete against generation or transmission to address internal resource deliverability 11

Questions? 12