AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP29 - 146 th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP.29-146-21 146th WP.29, 11-14 November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GTB Proposals to amend Regulations Nos. 7 and 48 to introduce Interdependent Lamp Systems (ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2009/62 and ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2009/63)
Advertisements

Miller Pipeline Corp. DRIVER SAFETY TRAINING. SECTION 1 Introduction.
Comments on GRE/2012/27 (Lighting & Signalling WG) Headlamp Initial Aiming October 2012 Informal document No. GRE (68th GRE, October 2012,
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision) Proposal for Amendment.
Justification to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2010/16 : Exterior courtesy lamps of the vehicle illuminate the surrounding field of the vehicle. This can assist.
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Simplification of Regulations Light Sources Regulations Nos. 37, 99, 128 Clarification 8 April 2015 GRE IWG SLR Informal Working Group Simplification of.
Analysis of the influence of aiming, on visibility distance and glare Poland 65 GRE, 29 March 2011 Dr EngTomasz Targosinski Informal document No. GRE
Technical Regulating in the Russian Federation and Adoption into Its National Laws of the Global Technical Regulations Established under 1998 Agreement.
THE SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS LIMITEDPAGE 1 Poland: comments on OICA comments on GRE/2012/27 Headlamp Initial Aiming and leveling tolerances.
PROPOSALS THE REVIEW OF THE 1958 AGREEMENT AND THE INTRODUCTION OF INTERNATIONAL WHOLE VEHICLE TYPE APPROVAL (IWVTA) IWVTA Informal Group WP th Session.
Develop a standard for lightweight protective helmets for motorcycle riders Proposal to establish an informal working group to develop a standard for lightweight.
Definition for Levels of Automation
1 Background information on the Japanese proposal to amend R4 for IWVTA (GRE-69-23) Informal document GRE Rev.1 (69th GRE, 8-11 April 2013, agenda.
10 November 2009 Masahiko NAITO MLIT, JAPAN Future direction for harmonization of vehicle regulations ~ Japanese contribution to WP29 ~ Informal Document.
Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.
QRTV for UN Regulation GRB 62 Transmitted by IWG QRTV for UN Regulation Informal document GRB (62nd GRB, 1-3 September 2015, agenda item 11)
Click the left mouse button to continue. If at any time you wish to end the presentation, press the Esc (Escape) key at the top left of the keyboard,
ECE Regulation No.79 Informal Document No. GRRF (61 st GRRF, 5-9 February 2007 agenda item 5.) Proposal for Amendments Presented by the Expert from.
Research on Daytime Running Lamps of 4-wheeled Vehicles Expert from JAPAN Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRE (74th GRE,
Document: SLR Date: Author: Geoff Draper (GTB) Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations A proposed work plan for discussion.
Regulation 13-H Transitional Provisions Presentation in conjunction with ECE/TRANS/WP29/GRRF/2014/16 Prepared by the ad hoc group on Transitional Provisions.
Transmitted by the expert from GTB Informal Document No. GRE (64th GRE, 4-7 October 2010, agenda item 5(f)) Proposal for Amendments to Regulations.
8 November 2010UNECE Transport Division1 Presentation at the WP.29 – 152 nd session 9-12 November 2010, Geneva By Antony Lagrange, UNECE Transport Division,
Dynamic Turn Indicator: Research/Investigation Findings Informal document GRE (70th GRE session (21-23 October 2013, agenda item 5(f))
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Outcome of 2nd session of the IWG VGL April 04, 2016 in Geneva
G T B The International Automotive Lighting and Light Signalling Expert Group Groupe de Travail “Bruxelles 1952” GTB Working Group Light Sources Extension.
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Transmitted by the expert from India
Simplification of ECE Type Approval Marking
National Traffic Safety and Environment Laboratory
Comments on GRE/2012/27(Lighting & Signalling WG)
IIHS headlight ratings
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Informal document No. 9 (50th GRE, 7-11 April 2003, agenda item 3.2.)
Review of the 1958 Agreement
GTB Proposals to amend Regulations Nos. 7 and 48
GRE Informal Working Group „Simplification of Regulation“
GRE Informal Working Group „Simplification of Regulation“
Transmitted by the expert
GRSG-113 Agenda point 5 – Awareness of Vulnerable Road Users proximity
Mandatory Application of the Unique Identifier (UI)
Japan’s proposal for security regulation
Simplification of the UN Lighting and Light-signalling Regulations
SUMMARY OF INITIAL AIMING AND LEVELLING TOLERANCE ISSUE
Reversing audible warning devices for M- and N- Vehicles
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Rear direction indicator lamp and stop lamp separation
Chair: Jin Seop Park, Republic of Korea Secretary: Thomas Kinsky, OICA
Additional light source type headlamp
Additional Explanations to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2016/35
Safety Assessment of Automated Vehicles
SIMPLIFICATION. Status after GTB WG FL meeting November 28th , 2018
ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRE/2013/57 Alternative aiming/leveling (explanations)
Simplification of the UN Lighting and Light-signalling Regulations
Safety concept for automated driving systems
GRE Informal Working Group „Simplification of Regulation“
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
BOX JUSTIFICATION for GRE-81-13
GTB activity report for the 81st GRE session
Simplification of Lighting and Light-Signalling Regulations
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
IMMA proposal for amendments
GRE/2012/27... DRIVERS OPINION POOL
Sustainable Mobility & Automotive industry Unit
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
Putting Some Reality into the Glare and Visibility Debate
Regulation ECE R79-03 ACSF C 2-Step HMI
Presentation transcript:

AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November 2008, agenda item )

Introduction Technological progress now provides the possibility to produce an adaptive driving beam GTB considers that such a system can be introduced into ECE regulations by amendments to Regulations Nos. 48 and 123. GTB wishes to clarify the current provisions to avoid differing interpretations and consequential debate between the contracting parties regarding acceptability.

" Adaptive front lighting system " (or "AFS") means a lighting device type- approved according to Regulation No. 123, providing beams with differing characteristics for automatic adaptation to varying conditions of use of the dipped-beam (passing beam) and, if it applies, the main-beam (driving-beam); ECE R48

TRANS-WP29-GRE-48-inf28e Page 14

AFS is available  related to dipped and main beam  applications currently focused on dipped beam AFS dipped beam solves the problem of :  Bend situation  Adverse weather situation  Town situation  Motorway situation Current AFS Situation

The AFS dipped beam does not completely solve the problem of providing sufficient forward illumination. It does not provide a complete answer to ensuring adequate visibility in the case of the random presence of other vehicles. Current AFS Situation

How to increase viewing distance without causing discomfort to other road users? Problems to Overcome  Main beam as it exists today glares oncoming traffic in many situations and cannot be used.  The separation distance between vehicles means that the dipped beam will not provide sufficient forward illumination.  Drivers have a reluctance to operate the main beam and frequently select the dipped beam too early as recent research by LLAB shows.

No Opposing Traffic Full Main Beam Operated Dipped Beam operated when opposing or preceding vehicles are present. Frequently drivers operate the dipped beam earlier than necessary Problems to Overcome

The Adaptive Driving Beam The following diagrams are intended to show the general principle of the automatic adaptation of the main beam to different traffic conditions.  They do not attempt to represent the actual beam distributions that can be achieved.  They only consider the case of a straight, flat road although the adaptive main beam responds to all road geometries. The Solution

No Opposing Traffic – Full Main Beam Operated Main Beam light distribution adapted to avoid glare to oncoming vehicle Opposing Traffic The Solution

No Preceding Traffic – Full Main Beam Operated Main Beam light distribution adapted to avoid glare to preceding vehicle Preceding Traffic The Solution

VIDEO 1

VIDEO 2

The system evaluates the road scene ahead of the vehicle and automatically adapts the light distribution according to the position of the preceding and oncoming traffic. Normal dipped beam The Solution Increased Observation Distance Adapted Main Beam Preceding Vehicle Situation Opposing Vehicle Situation

This is a driver assistance system. The driver remains responsible for deciding when it is appropriate to operate the main beam The Safety Benefit

Improvement of the observation distance to:  Reduce driver fatigue  Enhance the chances of detecting pedestrians and other hazards  Avoid discomfort to other drivers The Safety Benefit

GTB taskforce established Prototype systems demonstrated to GRE in October 2008 Feedback from GRE experts Proposals for amendments to ECE R48 and R123 expected to be approved by GTB in May 2009 Proposals expected to be introduced to GRE in October 2009 Introduction Programme

Thank you for your attention Your comments will be greatly appreciated