Janet Easterling, Institutional Research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Integrated Approach to Computer and Information Literacy Linda Ehley Alverno College Associate Professor CS EDUCAUSE 2003 Copyright – Linda Ehley 2003.
Advertisements

© Scordias & Morris, 2005 Virtual Classroom Visits: Using Video Conferencing Technology to Enhance Teacher Education Dr. Margaret Scordias Pamela B. Morris,
While You Were Out: How Students are Transforming Information and What it Means for Publishing Kate Wittenberg The Electronic Publishing Initiative at.
Classroom Integration of a Student Computer Initiative David J. Wright Dir. Curriculum Innovation and E-Learning Karen Bull Dir. Operations, Educational.
The Academic Computing Assessment Data Repository: A New (Free) Tool for Program Assessment Heather Stewart, Director, Institute for Technology Development,
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Eliminating the Barriers to Pervasive Computing A Pilot Project Sandy Bennett Coordinator of Instructional Technology Development Copyright Sandra M. Bennett,
Andrea Eastman-Mullins Information & Technology Coordinator University of North Carolina, Office of the President Teaching and Learning with Technology.
Flexible Information Literacy Alternatives for Independent Learners Suzanne Hayes March 17, 2003 Copyright Suzanne Hayes This work is the intellectual.
111 © 2004 Bowdoin College. All rights reserved. Information Technology Division Blended Courses and Boundaries: Residential Students’ Perceptions Christina.
CCSCE 2007 Bert Wachsmuth, Seton Hall Mobile Instructional Laboratory Experiments and Their Use in Computing Sciences St. Joseph's College Bert G. Wachsmuth.
Ubiquitous Computing at Seton Hall University Stephen G. Landry CIO Presented to TLT Group April 18, 2006.
Chatham College Community and Computers Pervasive Computing at a Liberal Arts College Charlotte E. Lott, Ph. D. Lynda Barner West, Ed. D. Copyright Charlotte.
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
Copyright Shanna Smith & Tom Bohman (2003). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared.
Mellon Fellowship for Undergraduate Research: Ideas, Innovations & Impacts Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California,
Embedded Librarian Program: Librarians and Faculty Partnering to Serve Online Students NERCOMP Annual Conference Innovation and Reliability: Finding the.
Employing e-Portfolios in Instructional and Co-Curricular Settings Jennifer Matthews, Senior Consultant Blackboard Inc April 13, 2005.
Why We Need It In a Small Residential College The Plan The Reality What We Hope to Accomplish What We Have Learned So Far Unexpected Benefits Statistics.
1 Abu Dhabi Women’s College Certified Designer Course.
Intellectual Property Protocol and Assessment for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the.
Haute Software: Juggling Open Source and Vendor Software Jeshua Pacifici, Manager, Learning Systems Kim Gausepohl, Assistant Manager, Online Course Systems.
Learning technology center Preparing Faculty and Students for Hybrid Courses Copyright Alan Aycock, Carla Garnham & Robert Kaleta, This work is the.
Copyright © 2003, Scott Higgins and Marianne Hollis Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for.
EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Student technology use and skill: convenience, communication, and control January 24, 2005 NLII New Orleans, LA Robert.
Herding CATS: the Community of Academic Technology Staff Lou Zweier, Director CSU Center for Distributed Learning The California State University NLII,
SALTING THE OATS ENGAGING FACULTY IN “IT” BY ENGAGING STUDENTS KENTON ADLER LYON COLLEGE BATESVILLE, AR Copyright Kenton Adler, This work is the.
Preparing for and Teaching Hybrid Courses Midwest EDUCAUSE March 25, 2003 Mary Sudzina, Ph.D. University of Dayton Robert Kaleta, Ph.D. & Carla Garnham.
Catalyst Portfolio Tool Copyright Tom Lewis, This work is the intellectual property.
Copyright Jack Chambers, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non- commercial,
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
February 22, Southwest Educause Conference 1 Copyright Rebecca Frost Davis, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Connecting Work and Academics: How Students and Employers Benefit.
This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided.
Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Blackboard Strategies: Using Blackboard Pedagogically.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Managerial Role – Setting the Stage Lesson 6 Jeneen T. Chapman John Madden Facilitators.
Lowering the Technology Barrier: Assigning Collaborative Web Projects Scott E. Siddall Denison University Copyright Scott E. Siddall, This work is.
1.Rationale for using and engaging with wikis 2.Preparation for using wikis 3.Purpose and uses of wikis 4.Wiki to aid in assessment 5.Outcomes from using.
Managing Intellectual Property for Distance Learning Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies Board of Regents of the University System.
INSTRUCTOR & FACULTY ORIENTATION Blackboard 9.1. What is Online Learning? The term online learning is used interchangeably with e-learning or electronic.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Teaching International Marketing in a blended learning modus - Didactical and Technological Concept of a Blackboard based Course University of Applied.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Ubiquitous Computing at Rensselaer Sharon Roy Director, Academic & Research Computing March 7, 2005.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Course Management System Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools.
Educause Learning Initiative 2006 Integrating Tablets & Mobile Technology: Breaking Down the Class Through Active Learning, Practice and Faculty Engagement.
Copyright Copyright University of Washington This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
Weighing Costs versus Benefits: Evaluating the Impact From Implementing a Course Management System Richard E. West University of Georgia
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Copyright [Dr. Michael Hoadley, Chat Chatterji, and John Henderson ] [2004]. This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright Information Copyright Karen St.Clair & Stan North.
Student Learning when Teaching with Technology: Aligning Objectives, Methods, and Assessments Copyright.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
1 Faculty Development Opportunities Weekly events – Institute on High Impact Pedagogical Practices – Faculty Development Workshop Series – The Pre-Tenure.
Improving the Social Nature of OnLine Learning Tap into what students are already doing Tap into what students are already doing Educause SWRC07 Copyright.
Intro to Outcomes. What is “Outcomes”? A. a statewide initiative aimed at improving learning and accountability in education B. a standing SFCC committee.
An Evaluation of Professional Development for One-to-One Instruction at Pantego Christian Academy Steven R. Newby Kristi Fairbanks Marilyn Dardenne.
CM220 College Composition II Friday, January 29, Unit 1: Introduction to Effective Academic and Professional Writing Unit 1 Lori Martindale, Instructor.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
1 Designing the HyFlex World Dr. Brian Beatty Instructional Technologies San Francisco State University AECT 2006.
How Technology Enhances Undergraduate Education Kathy Keairns Senior Instructional Designer University of Denver.
Copyright Carol L. Smith, Dave Berque and Terri Bonebright 2008
Educause Learning Initiatives (ELI) January 20-22, 2009
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Teaching and Learning with Technology at Seton Hall University Janet Easterling, Institutional Research Danielle Mirliss, Senior Instructional Designer Shayle Abelkop, Instructional Designer Copyright Abelkop, S., Easterling, E., and Mirliss, D. (2007). This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author.

Why Mobile Computing “Seton Hall University’s Mobile Computing Program is designed to break down the barriers of space and time and allow all our students to fully participate in our scholarly community and achieve high levels of performance.” Mobile Computing Mission Statement This has been our main impetus for assessment – we have been at this for some time – program in place since 1996

Mobile Computing Timeline 1994 – 1996: Development of SHU Strategic Plan 1995 – 1997: Mobile Computing Pilot Project with small cohorts of students in Business School 1997: Mobile Computing Pilot Project expands to 300 incoming Freshman 1998: Mobile Computing Program launched for all incoming Freshman 2001: Mobile Computing Program expanded to select graduate programs; campus wireless network implemented 2002: SHU graduates first mobile class 2004: Tablet PC Pilot Project Poll the audience – who is responsible for doing assessment on their campus? Who is actually engaged in assessment of technology? Have audience describe where they are and their interest in this topic?

Mobile Computing @ SHU Innovative academic program involving three components: Access: The University licenses student use of a laptop computer as part of tuition and fees. Curricular Integration: The University encourages and supports faculty use of technology in teaching and learning. Network and Support Services: The University provides the infrastructure that enables effective use of technology in teaching and learning. This is how we have viewed our mobile computing program – the inspiration for our assessment efforts. From the T&L perspective the curricular integration is very important.

Mobile Computing Assessment Began in 1996 Student Survey Historically focused on: Overall Satisfaction Use of the Technology Impact on Effective Teaching Practice 2005-2006 Renamed Teaching and Learning with Technology Survey Emphasis on Student Use and Effective Integration of Technology Make sure to mention survey fatigue – mixing the technical with the pedagogy . Talk about importance of team - stakeholders

Early Efforts/Challenges In an effort to assess everything the survey grew to monstrous proportions Felt a need to document clearly positive outcomes of efforts to infuse Then compelled to monitor positives Added questions but also kept all the questions… Slide on what to assess – cannot ask everything

Better but not there yet… Survey questions were narrowed to emphasize teaching and learning Exploratory approach to achieve better questions– open-ended/focus groups Smaller number, better questions Application of results to inform practice Slide on what to assess – cannot ask everything

Where we want to be… Ask questions that are meaningful to all stakeholders (even students!!) Craft a survey each year based on needs in a changing context Disseminate information to campus and beyond Include additional stakeholders to drive questions Other people are driving what we want to look at

Results from along the way… Quantitative – student responses on usage, gains, preferences & benefits Qualitative – opinions, details of perceived benefits and barriers Other people are driving what we want to look at

T & Learning with Technology Students Quantitative highlights Hours each week on-line Q3 Usage of IT to .. Q4 IT preferences in courses Q5 IT improves collaboration, feedback, control? Q6 IT improves my learning Q7 IT feature most valuable Q8 Gains d.t. on-line Bb/web Q12 Opps 7prins qual learning Q13 Janet

Learning with Technology Student Survey administered April 2006 to a random sample of freshmen and juniors oversampling for males and for students identifying as non-white 253 responses, overall response rate 30% Higher rates for Women, Residents, FR Lower rates for Men, Non-White, Commuting Students, JR

1 –. Hours each week on-line Q3 How many hours per week would you estimate you spend… Most frequent response 6-10 hours / week on-line (www/e-mail/..) for academic work avg 11 hours ~1 in 2 students (a little under) specify more than 10 hours a week ~1 in 5 students (a little over) 5 or fewer hours a week ~1 in 10 students (a little over) 21 or more hours a week 45% more than 10 hours (11% 21+) 23% 5 hours or less ( 4% zero)

1 –. Hours each week on-line Q3 How many hours per week would you estimate you spend …. Most frequent response 6-10 hours / week on-line (www/e-mail/..) for non-academic work avg 13 hours ~1 in 2 students (a little over) specify more than 10 hours a week ~1 in 4 students 5 or fewer hours a week ~1 in 4 students (a little over) 21 or more hours a week 55% more than 10 hours (27% 21+ hours) 25% 5 hours or less (11% zero)

~3 in 5 students specify 21 or more ! ~1 in 4 students 10 or fewer 1 –. Hours each week on-line Q3 How many hours per week would you estimate you spend.. Summed responses for hours / week on-line (www/e-mail/..) in total avg 23 hours ~3 in 5 students specify 21 or more ! ~1 in 4 students 10 or fewer ~1 in 10 students 41 or more !! 60% more than 20 hours (12% 41+ hours) 25% 10 hours or less ( 2% 5 or less)

2 – Use of IT for Academic work Q4 On average how often do you use Information Technology to.. Daily/Weekly/Monthly/Rarely/Never Frequency of use of IT for academic work to complete course assignments 77% D/W e-resources from Library web 48% D/W e-resources from other sites 72% D/W (other than a library web site)

2 – Use of IT for Academic work Q4 On average how often do you use Information Technology to.. Daily/Weekly/Monthly/Rarely/Never Freq of use of IT for academic work to work in teams during class 62% D/W/M outside of class 70% D/W/M (to complete course assignments)

3 – Student prefs for use of tech in courses Q5 I prefer taking courses that … first choice, courses that use a moderate level of technology 42% (email, several ppt presentations, some on-line activities/content) however, almost tied ! use technology extensively 39% (class lecture notes on-line, ppt, computer simulations, streaming video) third choice use limited technology 13% (professor email, limited ppt use)

4 – Impact of IT Q6 Compared to courses that use little or not technology, the use of technology … (agreement) use of IT allows me to Take greater control of my course activities planning, apportioning time, awareness of success/failure 89% (42% strongly agree, 37% agree) use of IT results in More prompt feedback from my instructor 85% (40% strongly agree, 45% agree) use of IT helps me Better communicate and collaborate with my classmates 80% (38% strongly agree, 42% agree)

has Improved my Learning 80% (strongly agree or agree) 5 –IT Improves Learning? Q7 The use of technology in my courses has improved my learning… (agreement) use of IT in my Courses has Improved my Learning 80% (strongly agree or agree) ------------------------------------------------------------------ 21% strongly agree 59% agree 15% neutral 3% disagree 2% strongly disagree

benefit from using technology 68% convenience / saves time 6 – IT Most valuable benefit Q8 Which of the following benefits from using technology in your classes are most valuable to you… single most valuable benefit from using technology 68% convenience / saves time 19% helps manage class activities 9% improves my learning 3% other 2% none

Course selected by the student 7 – Perceived gains from on-line (Bb/web) use Q12 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, what was the effect of having the following on-line features (available through Blackboard or your professor’s web site)? Course selected by the student as one that makes effective use .. (student reasons for selecting – Danielle Mirliss will present these)

Course selected by the student 7 – Perceived gains from on-line (Bb/web) use Q12 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, what was the effect of having the following on-line features (available through Blackboard or your professor’s web site)? Course selected by the student as one that makes effective use .. 59% Mostly Undergraduate – FR/SO 39% Mostly Undergraduate – JR/SR

In course selected by the student 7 – Perceived gains from on-line (Bb/web) use Q12 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, what was the effect of having the following on-line features (available through Blackboard or your professor’s web site)? In course selected by the student as one that makes effective use .. Improved Learning %responses Online readings & links to materials 67% Online discussion board 47% Sharing materials with students 45% Improved Management of Class Activities Online syllabus 85% Ability to turn in assignments on-line 73%

In course selected by the student 7 – Perceived gains from on-line (Bb/web) use Q12 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, what was the effect of having the following on-line features (available through Blackboard or your professor’s web site)? In course selected by the student as one that makes effective use .. Positive Experience 0/1 Mean Online syllabus .89 Online readings & links .86 Online turn in assignments .79 Online sharing materials .70 Online get grades, comms .66 Online track your grades .64 Online discussion board .63

In course selected by the student 8 – Opportunity for 7-principles learning env’s Q13 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, how often were you able to do or experience the following)? In course selected by the student how often able to do or experience .. Student Faculty Contact %often {very} Have contact with professors 80% on course content Diverse ways of learning % often {very} Explore course materials .. 75% Demonstrate what I have learned .. 63% .. in different ways

In course selected by the student 8 – Opportunity for 7-principles learning env’s Q13 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, how often were you able to do or experience the following)? In course selected by the student how often able to do or experience .. Cooperation among students %often {very} Spend time with other students on .. 55% Feedback Get prompt feedback on performance 73% Observe & record my own progress 57% Time on Task Edit and improve my projects / assign. 60%

8 – Opportunity for 7-principles learning env’s Q13 As you answer the following questions, think about one particular course from among those you are taking this semester that, in your opinion, makes effective use of technology to support teaching and learning… In this course, how often were you able to do or experience the following)? Does positive experience with related on-line activity relate to frequency of opportunity for high quality learning environments? Cooperation among students %often {very} Q13b Spend time with other students on .. 55% Positive experience with on-line Q12 Online readings & links .86 .23 Online sharing materials .70 .32 Online discussion board .63 .14 mean correlation with 13b

9 – Strengths, Challenges Quantitative data More gen’l observations .. come back to.. Strengths .. results s-f contact .. (as in prior years) s-s interaction .. (newly revealed) Challenges .. data ? serious responses .. (given incentive) ? generalizable .. (given response %)

10 –Teaching & Learning with Technology survey assessment continued Next .. Reviews of qualitative - Danielle & Shayle helps .. hinders .. effective use .. +Focus Groups to probe, explore - “effective uses” of technology – examps .. - gains from interactions – which online resources.. Survey Qs next cycle that probe effective use in terms meaningful to student

Qualitative Responses

Technology helps learning by… Providing anytime, anywhere access Organizing information Facilitating communication among students/professors Broadening research/resource materials Efficient methods of submitting assignments Making access equitable Having projectors in class Exercising technical skills

What students said… “Giving us access to certain resources that benefit our learning experience as a whole” “Giving students an outlet to learn valuable skills” “Making it easier to contact professors and fellow students for help, notes, etc.” “Technology is always available and accessible when I need it, whether I want to take notes in class with my laptop or use resources available through the school’s homepage” “With all the information that is now provided via the internet, the technology we have guides us to easy access for attaining this information.”

Technology prevents learning by… Providing distractions Technical issues Too much reliance Facilitating plagiarism Less personal contact w/ students “At Seton Hall, technology can prevent learning because during lectures some students may be too busy using instant messenger instead of paying attention to the professor.”

What students said… “Being a distraction for those who do not know when to separate from it at needed times.” “Having access to cheating methods.” “Technology can prevent students from learning because they are able to surf the net while in class as well as talk on AIM.” “Many students bring their laptops to classes and become distracted by them because it gives them something to do besides paying attention.”

Why did you choose this course as one that makes effective use of technology? Assignments – ability to complete and submit assignments electronically “This course not only provides me with a syllabus online but with other assignments that are to be done online.” Collaboration – use of technology to communicate and co-author assignments “I thought it allowed me to work better with my classmates.”

Why did you choose this course as one that makes effective use of technology? Convenience – enables students to keep track of work and updated materials “Kept me up to date with my course grades and assignments.” Feedback – provides a way for faculty to give feedback on assignments “Many of our assignments are turned in online via our discussion board and we are given feedback on certain assignments from our professor as well.”

Why did you choose this course as one that makes effective use of technology? Frequency – course uses technology more than other courses “Because technology is used for every aspect of the class: assignments, quizzes, lectures, discussion board, etc.” Information Literacy – ability to access resources from library and Internet “We use the library database every day.”

Why did you choose this course as one that makes effective use of technology? Learning – contributed to students’ understanding of course material “Overall the technology use enhanced my level of learning in the course.” Pedagogy – effective faculty use of technology “The professor uses power point presentations to teach us the material, and it makes it easier to follow along and catch up on missed topics.”

Why did you choose this course as one that makes effective use of technology? Technology Interest – fulfilled students’ interest in using technology “This course played into both my love of technology and my major” Blackboard – frequently mentioned as tool employed in technology enhanced courses “All quizzes and notes are provided on BlackBoard”

Questions? Thank you! For more information please contact Danielle Mirliss at mirlisda@shu.edu