1 Demand Response Update April, 2011. 2 Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

Recent Successes in Demand Response
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Smart grid energy business
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
AMI Home Area Network Update SAG Meeting March 18, 2014.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Idaho Power Idaho Society of Professional Engineers June 22, 2012.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
© ABB SG_Presentation_rev9b.ppt | 1 © ABB SG_Presentation_rev9b.ppt | 1 Smart Grid – The evolution of the future grid Karl Elfstadius,
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Conservation & Demand Management July 2004 – September 2007 Joyce McLean Director, Strategic Issues Toronto Hydro
Introduction & Overview April 11, 2011 Barry Haaser Managing Director.
Electric Vehicle Infrastructure and Education Program Overview
1 Billing, Metering CRM/CIS America 2004 Transition Strategy: Manual Field Data Collection to AMR Implementation Chuck Session Manager, Cinergy Meter Reading.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
Load Management Strategies to Support Grid Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Paulina Jaramillo and Lester Lave.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
OUC’s EV Roadmap Near Term Planning Activities Develop a flexible framework and visionary roadmap Collect actionable information Business models Charging.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Load Management SMUD & Demand Response Jim Parks CEC Load Management Standards Scoping Workshop March 3, 2008.
September 24, 2007Paying for Load Growth and New Large Loads APPA September 2007.ppt 1 Paying for Load Growth and New Large Loads David Daer Principal.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Smart Grid Workforce Education Presentation Smart Grid – A Framework for Change Brad Gaskill, CEO - Poudre Valley REA May 29, 2009.
Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.
//plug-in ready michigan //powerpoint// plug-in ready michigan an electric vehicle preparedness plan: Utilities made possible through the generous support.
1 Demand Response: An international perspective March 3, 2008 California Energy Commission Richard Schomberg VP research EDF North America Gridwise Arch.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Dynamic Pricing Case Studies. Digi International.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Demand Response
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Demand Side Management The Natural Purview of Utilities Presented to Marketing Executive Council Presented by Lynda Ziegler Southern.
Demand Response, Planning, and Regional Markets NASUCA Conference June 30, 2009 Joe Rosenthal, CT OCC.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
PG&E’s Distribution Resources Planning READ AND DELETE For best results with this template, use PowerPoint 2003 Planning the “Networked Grid“ Integrated.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Multi-Use Application Use Case #3: Optimized Pricing and Resource Allocation (OPRA) Project. May 3, 2016.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
SCE Plug-In Electric (PEV) Smart Charging Pilot DRMEC Meeting May 10-11, SCE Internal Use Only.
Workshop February 4, Idaho Power Smart Grid Vision At Idaho Power, our smart grid vision remains focused on seven major characteristics : 1.Enhance.
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
NW Demand Response Symposium
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes

DECISION
Presented by: Harvey Michaels Strategic Consultant
UM 1856 PGE’s Energy Storage Proposal – Commission Workshop #1
Presentation transcript:

1 Demand Response Update April, 2011

2 Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional customer service, promote economic growth, and exhibit corporate responsibility.  Provides an alternative to peak capacity generation construction and associated transmission needs and environmental impacts.  Enhances the value of the Smart Grid and Smart Meter interval data provided to customers by empowering a response to market based rates [1][1] PGE, NewsLine, July 2010, 3 Questions featuring Jim Lobdell “I think a lot about the lack of electrical capacity in the region. In other words, about how we can be sure to meet the peak energy needs of our customers.” Jim Lobdell, VP Power Operations and Resource Strategy [1]

3 Strategic Alignment and Benefits

4 Example: No New SCCT Demand Response is needed in PGE’s forecasted 2015 resource stack. Generation Resources based on 2015 capacities, as stated in the Existing Resources section of the 2009 IRP. 100 MW of Short- and Mid-Term Market purchases based on 2009 IRP estimates for 2015 (p. 322). DSG follows with 120 MW, dispatching when the theoretic peak reaches over 3,000 MW. Demand Response is needed during extreme peaks.

5 Example: With Flex SCCT Demand Response is needed even with added generation.

6 Existing Pricing Demand Response  Time of Use – # of Customers 1800 Residential Customers 300 Small Business Direction Smart Meters improved cost effectiveness (no one-off meters or associated meter read) Electric Vehicles are a natural fit –Increased marketing targeting EV purchasers –Program growth based primarily on EV sales projections

7 Existing Direct Load Control  Energy Partner SM– Schedule 77 Pilot 2 Customers 10 MW within 4 hours notice Direction Tighten the participation requirements Grow the program for process driven customers MW cap raised

8 Future Pricing Programs  Critical Peak Pricing Pilot – Flex Rate Program SM # of Customers – 1000 Residential Objectives Test take rate for PGE customers Utilize existing PGE systems to implement a CPP program by Nov., 2011 Measure and evaluate Direction Potential for adding an enabling technology for year 2 of the pilot Possible CPP pricing program after the pilot

9 Future Direct Load Control  Residential Pilot – Water Heater Direct Load Control Salem Smart Grid project area only pilot Customers must be on the test feeders involved with the project Less than 100 Water heaters will respond to radio signal PGE will dispatch the radio signal using a transactive control based on price signals from the Smart Grid project. August of  Automated Demand Response 3 rd party provides PGE a turn-key DR resource 50 MW within 5 years 30+ kW customers Status RFP in 2009 Contracting RFP winner Regulatory approval pending Potential to have 5 MW online in December

10 Limiting Resource Impacts  Web Management – Energy metering web portals, such as the PGE IDES system, will allow customers to access online their interval energy usage data; this data will help them respond to market based pricing in ways that benefit both PGE and the customer.  Corporate Communications – Communications to new customers to grow the participation numbers and to encourage existing customers to try new programs.  TCC – Customer service representatives (CSRs) could require additional call time to promote Demand Response. In addition to call time, CSRs will require training.  Billing – Larger Demand Response programs may request additional billing requirements beyond the basic bill that many customers now receive.  IT – IT resources will be required to automate Demand Response processes.

11 Scheduling  Flowchart 2: Schedule

12 Conclusion  DR meets the needs for the top 80 peaking hours of the year.  DR aids PGE in using resources as cost efficiently as possible.  DR improves customer satisfaction by empowering customers to use their interval data as a tool to control their energy costs.  Technologies (such as the Smart Meter) exist and are emerging that enable the DR component of the Smart Grid.

13  Questions?