1 Building Strong! THE ECONOMIST’S ROLE Ken Claseman Senior Policy Advisor for Economics Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Advertisements

Economic Guidance Summary The Basis for Benefit-Cost Analysis in the Corps.
F4B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Damage Reduction Module F4: Reformulation – Optimization, Incremental Analysis and Selection of the NED Plan.
F1B - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Flood Risk Management Module F1: Authorities and Policies.
Formulation from an Economic Perspective An Exercise:
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Vertical Team Roles & Responsibilities Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Copyright 2009  Develop the project charter: working with stakeholders to create the document that formally authorizes a project—the charter  Develop.
Strategic Management in Action Mary Coulter
Chapter 20 Introduction to Systems Development and Systems Analysis Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education 20-1.
1 Financial Management Institute (FMI) Being an FMA – Areas to Pay Attention To Nathalie Deslauriers, CPA, CGA Financial Management Advisor – Policy Group,
Program Evaluation It’s Not Just for OMB Anymore….
Lecture(2) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.
ACT CANADA 2014: Using Business Cases To Get Great Projects Financed and Delivered December 1, 2014| Michael Sutherland.
Rodney E. Stanley, Ph.D. Associate Professor & Chair Department of Public Administration College of Public Service & Urban Affairs Tennessee State University.
ACTeon Innovation, policy, environment Madrid – WFD Conference April 2006 How to proceed with the Programme of Measures and the River Basin Management.
Managing Risk to Reduce Construction Claims (And Improve Project Success) Presented by Laurie Dennis, PE, CVS-Life, FSAVE.
COUNCILLORS, MAYOR & ADMINISTRATOR ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES.
Chapter 2 A Strategy for the Appraisal of Public Sector Investments.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Presenter Name Presenter Title.
Ecosystem Restoration Module ER4: Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analysis and the NER Plan BU ILDING STRONG SM.
Role and Components of Project Evaluation
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
NED COSTS And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning And Other Bewilderments Of COE Planning.
Project Risk and Cost Management. IS the future certain? The future is uncertain, but it is certain that there are two questions will be asked about our.
Change Management “Getting from where you are, to where you want to be”
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® STEP FOUR: EVALUATE EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE PLANS Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Dr. Anahita Williamson Director, NYS Pollution Prevention Institute Kate Winnebeck LCACP, Senior EHS Specialist.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
BUILDING STRONG SM Plan Formulation: General Module G-1: What is plan formulation?
Module 14 STEP 8 Conduct Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Roles of Economists and New Analytical Requirements
1 Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Ch 2 Mod 5 Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines
Project Scoping Fundamentals Alan Lively Project Delivery Specialist Local Government Section April 6, 2010.
Introduction A GENERAL MODEL OF SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® PLANNING GUIDANCE Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
1 Cost Effectiveness (CE) and Incremental Cost Analyses (ICA) “IWR-Planning Suite” Ch 6 Mod 5 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING.
Guidelines for Impact and Adaptation Assessment Design versus Implementation Issues RICHARD J.T. KLEIN POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH (PIK)
Welcome To: PCC4: Economic Analysis In Planning U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Planners Core Curriculum.
M4 - 1 BU ILDING STRONG SM Multi-Purpose Projects Module M4: Telling the Plan Formulation Story.
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Formulating a Simulation Project Proposal Chapter3.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
© 2009 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
PLANNING 101 CORPS STRATEGIC GOALS People Process Communication.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Preliminaries Federal/Corps Planning Process PA Program Plan Formulation Supplement - FY 08.
Project Management Project Integration Management Minder Chen, Ph.D. CSU Channel Islands
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
1 “IWR-Planning Suite” Ch 6 Mod 5 See ICA Tutorial in Reference Folder ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING.
Essential Standard: 8.H.1 Apply historical thinking to understand the creation and development of North Carolina and the United States. Concept(s): Historical.
Managerial Economics. What is Managerial Economics???  It is the integration of economic principles with business management practices  It is essentially.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
SUSTAINING ENVIRONMENTAL CAPITAL (SEC) INITIATIVE Providing resources for applying ecosystem services in public land & water management.
Overview PRINCE Hogeschool Rotterdam. 2 Project definition  A project is a temporary organization that is created for the purpose of delivering.
RECREATION AUTHORITY  P.L , Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended  P.L , “…require cost-sharing…”  P.L , “…est.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Step 6: Selection Of The Recommended Plan Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers Relationship of the NEPA to Principles & Guidelines 1 Ch 2 Mod 5
Economic Analysis Watershed Rehabilitation Workshop St. Louis, MO August 20-22, 2002 Dale Pekar, Economist National Water Management Center
PRINCIPLES & GUIDELINES
Presentation transcript:

1 Building Strong! THE ECONOMIST’S ROLE Ken Claseman Senior Policy Advisor for Economics Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE

2 Building Strong! OBJECTIVES THE STUDENT WILL KNOW: WHAT ECONOMISTS DO WHAT THEY NEED TO PERFORM THEIR FUNCTIONS HOW THEY SHOULD PERFORM THEIR FUNCTIONS

3 Building Strong! WHAT ECONOMISTS DO INFORM DECISIONMAKING COMMUNICATE VALUE PARTICIPATE ON TEAMS REPRESENT THE AGENCY

4 Building Strong! Demand/Supply Willingness-to-Pay Scarcity Opportunity Costs Decisions at the Margin THE ECONOMIST’S WORLD

5 Building Strong! PRINCIPLES & GUIDELINES (1983) Intended to ensure proper and consistent planning by Federal Agencies The Federal Objective is to contribute to National Economic Development consistent with protecting the environment Alternatives are to be systematically formulated Planning Criteria: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Completeness, and Acceptability Plan that maximizes net NED benefits is selected (unless an exception is granted) Discounting is used to make benefits and costs comparable Separable costs will be assigned to their respective purposes

6 Building Strong! ECONOMICS IN THE USACE Determines project justification Helps identify the best Federal Investment Consistent with economic theory Integrated with the planning process Guidance is highly developed –Principles and Guidelines –ER –Economic Guidance Memorandums Administration Policies affect the scope of Economic Analyses and Formulation

7 Building Strong! SPECIFIC ACTIVITIES Inventories using sampling / surveys Identify and Quantify Economic Variables Forecasts Of Future Conditions Economic Analysis of Alternatives –NED Benefits –Develop Economic Costs –Estimate B/C Ratios & Net Benefits –Cost Effectiveness/Incremental Cost Analyses –Trade-off Analysis –RED and OSE Empirical Evidence is Essential

8 Building Strong! SO THE ECONOMIST MUST BE AN... Appraiser Survey Specialist Data Processor Statistician Financial Analyst Communicator

9 Building Strong! BUT CAN ECONOMISTS DO IT ALONE?

10 Building Strong! ECONOMISTS REQUIRE INPUTS AND INTERACTION LAND USE PLANS PROBABILITIES DISCHARGE STAGES TRAFFIC FORECASTS CHANNEL DIMENSIONS COSTS RESTORATION OUTPUT

11 Building Strong! WHERE DO WE GET THE INFO? Other Team Members Other Governmental Agencies MSCs - HQUSACE – IWR Communities of Practice Centers of Expertise Outside Experts Surveys and Databases

12 Building Strong! THE STUDY TEAM –TODAY’S COMPLEXITIES REQUIRE TEAM SOLUTIONS. –ALL OF US ARE SMARTER THAN ANY ONE OF US.

13 Building Strong! HOW SHOULD WE DO IT? Follow the Guidance Time and Budget Constraints Objectivity / Avoiding Bias Documentation

14 Building Strong! 6 STEP PLANNING PROCESS Step 1 - Specify Problems and Opportunities Step 2 - Inventory and Forecast Conditions Step 3 - Formulate Alternative Plans Step 4 - Evaluate Effects of Alternative Plans Step 5 - Compare Alternative Plans Step 6 - Select Recommended Plan

15 Building Strong! STEP 1: CONCEPTS Problems, Opportunities and Constraints –Economists actively participate in defining problems, opportunities and constraints. Goals and Objectives –Economists use goals and objectives for evaluation.

16 Building Strong! STEP 2: INVENTORY AND FORECAST Data collection –Related to problems, opportunities and objectives Define historic and existing conditions Forecast –Existing Condition –Future Without Project Condition –Future With Project Conditions

17 Building Strong! STEP 3: ALTERNATIVE PLANS Management Measures Alternatives Programs Economists must participate in formulation process, understand performance of measures to estimate economic impacts.

18 Building Strong! STEP 4: EVALUATION Quantify and Describe Effects & Impacts –National Economic –Environmental, including ecological and cultural –Regional Economic –Social Four Evaluation Criteria: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Completeness, Acceptability Other Criteria – RED/OSE Future With Project Conditions

19 Building Strong! STEP 5: COMPARISON Compare all viable plans Describe differences –Contributions to objectives –P&G Evaluation Criteria –Other criteria of importance Describe trade-offs –Systematic trade-off analysis might be required.

20 Building Strong! STEP 6: SELECTION No Action NED Plan NER Plan Locally Preferred Plan Combined NED/NER Plan Economists provide primary input for decision making IS IT WORTH IT ?

21 Building Strong! OTHER THINGS ECONOMISTS DO Input to PMPs Financial Analysis Life Cycle Cost Studies Economic Updates Economic Analysis for: – DMMPs – Dam Safety – Military Projects Budgetary Support

22 Building Strong! KEY TAKE AWAYS Economists communicate value. Economists help identify best Federal investment. Empirical evidence is essential. Economists are important members of Project Delivery Teams. Economists play a significant role throughout the planning process. IS IT WORTH IT???