2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan1 Yasuyuki NISHIO Senior Coordinator for International Affairs, Ports & Harbours Bureau Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Japan Report on APEC Seminar on Port Security in Malaysia 2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/ th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada 5-8 September 2006

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan2 ISPS Code Implementation Assistance Program Project Timeline Copyright APEC Maritime Security Experts Group 2005 Development Phase 1 st visit to the Philippines 7-11 March st visit to the Philippines 7-11 March 2005 Visits Phase Review TPT-24 Thailand Aug 2004 Minister’s Meeting Indonesia July 2004 TPT-23 China April 2004 Leader’s Meeting Chile Nov 2004 High Level Meeting on Maritime Security Cooperation The Philippines Sep TPT-22 S. Korea Sep TPT-25 US 31 May – 2 June 2005 TPT-26 Russia Sep 2005 TPT-26 Russia Sep nd visit to Thailand 28 Nov–2 Dec nd visit to Thailand 28 Nov–2 Dec th visit to Vietnam 19–21 Dec th visit to Vietnam 19–21 Dec rd visit to Indonesia 6-8 Dec rd visit to Indonesia 6-8 Dec th visit to Peru Jan th visit to Peru Jan 2006 TPT-27 Vietnam May 2006 TPT-27 Vietnam May th visit to Malaysia 12–15 Jun th visit to Malaysia 12–15 Jun 2006

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan3 APEC Seminar on Port Security in Malaysia Date: June 2006 (3 days seminar & 1 day port visit) Speakers (8) : Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Singapore (2), USA and Japan (2) Participants (82): Malaysia (72; including Marine Department, other agencies, PASO and PFSO), Papua New Guinea (2), Peru (1), Philippines (2), Thailand (2), Vietnam (1) and Japan (2)

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan4 Agenda  Day 1: 12 June 2006 (Mon) -Status of ISPS Code implementation in the world and U.S. approach -Port security policy and administration in Japan -Maritime security information sharing –Public and private- -Best practice and practical solution of enhancing ISPS Code implementation (Malaysia view) -Enhancing port security in Singapore -Training, drill and exercises  Day 2: 13 June 2006 (Tue) -Exercise brief -Table-top exercise demonstration  Day 3: 14 June 2006 (Wed) -De-briefing of exercise demonstration -Case study –Exercise in the US- -Case study –Security incidents in Australian Ports- -How to raise security awareness in Canada -Towards Enhancing Port & Maritime Security in the ASEAN and APEC region

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan5 Objectives of the Table-top Exercise The exercise objectives were:  a. Practice Command, Control, Coordination & Communications (C4) Procedures.  b. Demonstrate coordination procedures with External Security Agencies.  c. Practice communication linkages and information flow among various agencies such as Emergency Command Centre and relevant Government Security Elements – Customs, Immigration, Police and Navy etc.  d. Coordinate enhancement of measures from Security Levels 1 to 2 and linkage with the Port Security Committee.

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan6 Exercise Participants Participants were divided into 4 syndicates with 18 participants per syndicates. Participants role-played the following key players in this exercise:  a. Designated Authority, Port Security Committee, Police, and other government agencies.  b. Port Facility Security Officers  c. Deputy Port Facility Security Officers  d. Chief Security Officers  e. Deputy Chief Security Officers  f. Company Security Officers  g. Ship Security Officers  h. Port Facility Security Personnel  i. Port Facility Management

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan7 Table-top exercise

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan8 Exercise Injects (1) A total of 9 exercise injects were provided by individual syndicate controllers during the exercise. The planned exercise injects were:  a. Start State. Port Facility was operating at Security Level 1  b. Exercise Inject 1. A suspicious person was seen loitering outside the facility with apparent actions that he was conducting surveillance activities by taking photographs of entry points and behaving suspiciously. He was also dressed in attire that did not blend with the normal human traffic at the location.  c. Exercise Inject 2. An attempted entry of a vehicle at the Main Gate claiming supplying ship stores for MT XXX  d. Exercise Inject 3. Designated Authority informed Port Facility that they received intelligence report about a terrorist bomb attack targeted against MT XXX

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan9 Exercise Injects (2)  e. Exercise Inject 4. Security guard, while on roving patrol, discovered some damage to the perimeter fence. On closer inspection, he found some torn fabric (parts of a shirt material) and a map of the Port Facility.  f. Exercise Inject 5. Designated Authority declared Security Level 2.  g. Exercise Inject 6. Tape recorded message was delivered via a parcel to the Admin Dept “warning” the Management that something was going to happen in the Port Facility.  h. Exercise Inject 7. Designated Authority informed Port Facility, Public authority and emergency response team are proceeding to port facility for assistance  i. Exercise Inject 8.Unauthorized small craft approached MT XXX at high speed  j. Exercise Inject 9.Suspicious item discovered in ship’s galley of MT XXX

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan10 Feedback  a. Facilitates discussion among participants about best practices, legal aspects and procedures for addressing the various injects.  b. The participants felt that it was an outstanding learning opportunity.  c. The exercise helped build relationships, both domestically in Malaysia and internationally between countries.  d. The exercise helped identify, explore and reconcile different security practices and organizations between facilities and regions in the Malaysia.

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan11  a. An artificial port consisting of various types of port facilities should be created for the purpose of subsequent table-top exercises.  b. General information on this artificial port and the respective port facilities should also be provided to enhance the background knowledge of the port facilities prior to the exercise.  c. Artificial Port Facility Security Plans for port facilities should be developed to provide basic reference to the participants.  d. The respective exercise key players within the syndicate should be in different locations to better test the communications among the exercise key players.  e. Role should be pre-assigned and tags or badges with the various roles available. Recommendations

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan12 Speakers & Secretariat

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan13 Proposals for Phase 2 to ISPS Code Implementation Assistance Program 1. Vietnam Date: December 2006 (2 days) Venue: Ho Chi Min City Contents: Table-top exercise etc. Participants: participants 2. Indonesia Date: June 2007 Venue: Under consideration Contents: Under consideration Participants: Under consideration

2006/TPT-WG-28/MEG-SEC/041 MLIT-Japan14 Thank you for your attention. Port Klang West Port Container Terminal