Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August 2009 1 Iran’s Missile: Current and Future.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)
Advertisements

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY International conference “Europe space policy: ambitions 2015” Session 1. “General view on propulsion systems: LV of the future”
The Special Challenges of Cruise Missile Proliferation Dennis M. Gormley Senior Fellow Monterey Institute’s Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
V/FLF 117/ /06/ P. 1 ESA SPACE EXPLORATION AND INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION Workshop – Washington D.C. June 21-22, 2004.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
May 2010 The Principles of Short Range Missile Defense RubinconLtd. Defense Technology Consulting 1  Classification of regional missiles and rockets.
Science 9: Unit E: Space Exploration Topic 6: Above the Atmosphere and Under Control.
1 Air Launch System Project Proposal February 11, 2008 Dan Poniatowski (Team Lead) Matt Campbell Dan Cipera Pierre Dumas Boris Kaganovich Jason LaDoucer.
The Situation in Iraq 19 February Key developments 14 February Inspectors report to the UN Security Council Debate in the UN Security Council 16.
Babakin Space Center, Space Research Insitute, Makeev Rocket Design Bureau COSMOS ONE: THE FIRST SOLAR SAIL a project of The Planetary Society with Cosmos.
Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American.
Iranian Ballistic Missile Capabilities Michael Elleman Senior Fellow for Missile Defence International Institute for Strategic Studies 22 November 2010.
Principles of Propulsion and its Application in Space Launchers Prof. Dr.-Ing. Uwe Apel Hochschule Bremen REVA Seminar1.
The Arms Race. The race begins…. Both countries began developing their weapons so as to be able to ‘outgun’ their opponents. This meant: developing more.
Ballistic Missiles and Getting Into Orbit
Rocket Power – Part 2 Introduction to Rockets and Missiles Scott Schoneman 4 Nov 03.
Paradigm Shift in Future Warfare Northrop Grumman Corporation
The current overall EU policy framework: Europe 2020 strategy, Innovation Union and Energy 2020 Strategy On March 2010, the Commission presented a Communication.
1 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides 1.
The Arms and Space Race. Space Race – Arms Race!
China Space Technology
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Missile proliferation. Delivery options… Nuclear, chemical, biological weapons need some means of delivery – Terrorists may be satisfied with truck or.
Assessment of BMD Global capabilities Missile Defence as a Factor in Establishing a New Security Environment International Conference Moscow, 3-4 May 2012.
Not Beyond Reach – Access an Equity to Aerospace Transportation: India Dr. Sanat Kaul 1.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
Rockets Tuesday: Rocketry Wednesday: Meet in my room 601: hydrogen demo and Quiz over rocketry. Thursday: Satellites and Orbital Mechanics Friday: Satellites,
Nuclear Arsenals. Table 1. Estimated global nuclear weapons inventories, Hans M. Kristensen, and Robert S. Norris Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
Dynamic Design: Launch and Propulsion Genesis Launch Vehicle: The Delta Rocket Student Text Supplement.
Enav.it Channelling Finance and Innovation to Industry Steps towards the Air Traffic Management system modernisation.
Nuclear Arsenals. Status of World Nuclear Forces, 2015.
Space-Based Force Application: A Technical View Dr. Laura Grego Union of Concerned Scientists Outer Space & International Security: Options for the Future.
September 20th TJ Faculty Presentation 2006
Air-launched Earth-observing Ground Information System Carleton University’s 4 th Satellite Design Team Introduction to AEGIS.
Space Exploration Timeline
A presentation on the History of British Rocketry from the 1950s and 60s. Compiled by Andy Hill (May 2005) Early British Rocketry.
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
By: Tyler Callese. Thesis America’s aging nuclear deterrent must be either modernized or have a life extension program enacted because of the imminent.
SPUTNIK 1 By, S.Subhashini M.Tech(COS) 1 st year.
The Cold War and the Space Race  At the conclusion of World War 2 both the United States and Russia set themselves up to be super powers  This rivalry.
Kiyoshi Higuchi Executive Director Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) JAXA Space transportation systems.
THE U2 CRISIS and THE SPACE RACE. Space Race – Arms Race!
Learning Goals  I will be able to identify the names of the space shuttles in NASA’s program.  I will be able to identify two shuttle disasters.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R ENB443: Launcher Systems Image Credit: ESA Caption: The generic Ariane-5 (Ariane Flight 162) lifting.
Lesson 2 – Disarmament.  Review goals of NPT treaty.  Compare different types of weapons.  Identify key treaties regulating nuclear arsenals.  Describe.
Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)
Powered Re-entry Vehicle David Lammers ASTE 527 Concept 13 December 2011.
THE U2 CRISIS and THE SPACE RACE. Space Race – Arms Race!
Nuclear Arms and Space Race NATO vs. Warsaw Pact Conventional issue – The defense of Europe Arm to “prevent war – by deterring the other side The nuclear.
 NASA History A look through the years. Beginnings  NASA was created by congress on October 1, 1958 as a way of competing with the Soviet Union at the.
Space – The Final Frontier. What is out there?  Ever since mankind has looked up at the moon and stars, we have wandered about life in the universe.
2015 in Spaceflight: A year in review Tal Inbar Head, Space Research Center The Fisher Institute for Air & Space Strategic Studies, Israel.
Propulsion Economic Considerations for Next Generation Space Launch by Chris Y. Taylor 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.
U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China
THE U2 CRISIS and THE SPACE RACE
Patriot Missile Failure
THE U2 CRISIS and THE SPACE RACE
IGY and Sputnik 30 August 2017.
Space Express Sub-Orbital Mission
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Two Nations Live on Edge
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Introduction Dr. Alfred Lynam
ThunderStruck Destination Mars 2022 by Robert Brand.
Presentation to the EPREV Lessons Learned Workshop
THE U2 CRISIS and THE SPACE RACE
THE U2 CRISIS and THE SPACE RACE
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Iran’s Missile: Current and Future Implications for Europe Uzi Rubin Based on open source material. Copyright Rubincon Ltd 12 th Space and Missile Defense Conference, Huntsville Alabama Iran ’ s armament policy. Highlights in Iran ’ s missile and space programs. Analysis of the recent EastWest Institute report on Iran ’ s missile capabilities. Conclusions.

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Iran Army Day Parade April 2008

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Iran Army Day Parade IAF Flyby

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August ? “Musudan/BM25 ”

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August From Unguided Rockets to PGM: The Fatah 110 Heavy Guided Rocket Iran ’ s Achievements in Missiles and Space

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Iran ’ s Achievements in Missiles and Space Technology From 1300 Km Shahab 3 to 2000 Km Kadir 1 Shahab Kadir

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Credit: Jane’s Missile Review Iran ’ s Achievements in Missiles and Space Technology From Land Mobility to Silo Basing

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Iran ’ s Achievements in Missiles and Space Technology From Single Stage Ballistic Missiles to Multi Stage Space Launch Vehicles Kavoshgar test vehicle Safir Space Launch Vehicle

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Iran ’ s Achievements in Missiles and Space Technology Iran’s SLV Achieves Earth Orbit, February 3 rd 2009

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Novermber 2007: “Ashura” test announced by Iran’s MoD, no images released. November 18 th 2008: “Sejjil” test announced by Iran’s Mod, Images released and interviews granted. Declared range: “More than 2000 Km” Iran ’ s Achievements in Missiles and Space Technology From Scud Era Technology to Modern Solid Propellant Technology

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August The EastWest Institute Report of May “There is no reliable information at present on the state of Iran’s effort to develop solid propellant rocket motors and therefore no basis on which to make an assessment….” (3.3)

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Key Claims On Iran ’ s Missile Program “ Iran does not have the infrastructure of research institutes, industrial plants or the scientists and engineers that are needed to make substantial improvement in the basic rocket components it used from the start ” (3.15) “ The major problems that have to be solved in building IRBM and ICBMs: a. The development of powerful rocket motors. b. Flight controls, guidance systems and telemetry. c. Reentry vehicle heat protection. d. Construction material. e. Flight testing. Each of these areas would pose major problems for Iran ” (3.20) "Iran does not now have a missile capable of delivering a 1000 Kg payload to a range of 2000 Km “ (3.21) Iran ’ s longer range missiles “ Will probably need a first stage consisting of a cluster of (liquid) rocket motors ” and hence “ large, visible, cumbersome.. fired from above ground, anchored to their launch sites and will take days to prepare for launch ” (3.22 and 3.23)

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Sejil’s 3 rd Flight Test, May 20 th 2009 “ The missile will have a range of approximately 2000 to 2500 Km ” (Robert Gates, SecDef) “ The test involved a solid propellant system which apparently they developed on their own ” (Garry Saymor, NSC)

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August First Stage: ton (12,5 tons of propellant) Second Stage: 5.78 ton ( 4,9 tons of propellant) Warhead: 1.0 ton Take off weight: 21.5 ton (Credit: Dr. T. Postol, Addendum to the EWI report) US 1 st generation solid propellant ballistic missiles: Polaris A1: 14.5 ton Minuteman I: 33.0 ton 1.25 m Estimated Dimensions and Weights of Sejjil

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Months12 Months6 Mnths May 2005: Iran ’ s MoD announces the successful development of two large solid propellant motors November 2007: 1 st flight test of two stage solid propellant missile (Failure) November 2008: 2 st flight test (Failure) May 2009: 3 st flight test (Success) Pace of Development: Solid Propellant Missile

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Months6 Mnths Pace of Development: Space Launch Vehicle 6 Mnths July 2005: Iran MoD announce a forthcoming satellite launch “ Within one year from green light ” February 2008: Unveiling of “ Safir ” SLV, Launch of “ Kavoshgar ” vehicle (Failed in 1 st stage) August 2008: 1 st Launch of “ Safir ” SLV (Failed in 2 nd stage) February 2009: 2 nd Launch of “ Safir ” SLV (Success)

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Assessing Iran ’ s Current Proficiency The development of powerful rocket motors: Demonstrated existence of infrastructure and skilled human resources to develop manufacture and test 10+ ton composite solid propellant rocket motors. Flight controls, guidance systems and telemetry: Demonstrated capability to guide, control and successfully launch an indigenous SLV to earth orbit. Reentry vehicle heat protection: Demonstrated capability of RV heat shielding both for Kadir 1 and Sajeel. Construction material: None seem to be lacking, MTCR notwithstanding. Flight testing: completed 6 major flight tests in 18 months (!) Impressive recovery from flight test malfunctions – evidence of ample telemetry, competent system engineering and energetic program management.

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Large Propellant Mixers Fluid Energy MillsVacuum Casting Pits High Power X Ray Inspection SystemsThrust Stands Essential infrastructure for Developing, Manufacturing and Testing of Large Solid Propellant Motors (MTCR Controlled)

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Growing proficiency in Solid Propulsion

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Technical Addendum to the EWI Report, May

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Key Claims in the Technical Addendum “ The May 19 th report did not provide analysis of Iranian solid propellant missiles … (because) the available data was insufficient for serious analysis. ” “ On May 20 th Iran successfully tested a solid propellant missile … (which) makes it possible to provide detailed assessment.. ” “ The Sejjil should be able to carry a one ton warhead to a range of about 2200 Km. ” To threaten Northern and Western Europe, Iran will need a 5000 Km missile with 1 ton warhead. Such a missile will require a first stage of 45 tons and will have a take off weight of 65 tons or more. “ The weight of US Minuteman III and Russia ’ s SS 27 is about 35 ton ”. The large weight of the postulated Iranian IRBM will prevent it from being mobile. The Sejjil technologies could not rapidly evolve into ballistic missiles with ranges that could threaten Europe of the continental United States. The recent Sejjil test does not alter any of the EWI report ’ s main conclusions.

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Estimated Dimensions and Weights of 5000 Km “ Super Sejjil ” First Stage: ton Second Stage: ton Third Stage: 5,78 ton Warhead: 1,0 ton Take off weight: 66.5 ton (Source: Dr. T. Postol, Addendum to the EWI report)

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Assessing Iran ’ s True Capabilities Computations using the EWI Addendum figures for the Sejjil dimensions, weights and ISP figures yield a maximum range of 2500 Km. This result was independently derived by US and Israeli teams. Accordingly, Iran has already achieved the capability to target to 6 EU/ NATO member states

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Assessing Iran ’ s Potential Capabilities Using the EWI estimated ISP and Mass Fractions of Sejjil, two independent teams in the US and Israel calculated a significantly smaller 5000 Km “ Super Sejjil ” First Stage: ton Third Stage: 5,78 ton Warhead: 1,0 ton Take off weight: 38.61ton (Credit: D. Wilkening, CISAC, Stanford U) This missile will be 9 tons lighter than Russia ’ s fully mobile, 47.2 ton SS27 Topol M

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Relevant Ranges for Europe Threatening Missiles

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Relevant Ranges for Europe Threatening Missiles

Iran’s Missiles: Current and Future Implications for Europe Rubincon Ltd. Defense Technology Consulting August Conclusions 1. Iran is vigorously pursuing several missile and space programs at an almost feverish pace with impressive achievement. 2. In spite of the MTCR and in the face of sanctions, Iran has succeeded to acquire the needed infrastructure and to raise a cadre of proficient scientists and engineers backed by academy and research institutes. 3. The solid propellant Sejjil signifies a breakthrough. This missile is already a threat to a meaningful number of European Union countries. 4. Based on its demonstrated achievements in solid propulsion and staging, Iran will face no significant hurdle in upscaling the Sejjil into a compact, survivable IRBM. A range of 3600 km will be sufficient to put most of the EU under threat. 5. The EWI report estimates that it will take Iran six years to fit a nuclear warhead to a missile. If true, the time to start deploying missile defense in Europe is now.