Wood for trees 1wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 1 Testing Jon Kelly, Director of Wood for Trees March 2015 Outstanding M arketing S ervices.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Annual Awards. Case Marketing Awards Highest Lead Volume Award In recognition of the franchise partner with the highest number of overall leads.
Advertisements

Problems, Skills and Training Needs in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations Dr. Rick Hoefer University of Texas at Arlington School of Social Work.
METRICS THAT MATTER MEASURING THE SUCCESS OF YOUR FUNDRAISING EFFORTS IN A MULTI- CHANNEL ENVIRONMENT.
Precipitation development; Warm and Cold clouds >0 ° C
Research Reporting Tools. In order to access the Research Reporting System (RRS), enter into the browser or click the link.
© 2014 Fair Isaac Corporation. Confidential. This presentation is provided for the recipient only and cannot be reproduced or shared without Fair Isaac.
Becoming their BCF (Best Charity Forever) A guide for long term donor cultivation.
J. Milito & Associates, Inc. We have been successfully conducting telephone fundraising for the past 15 years We work exclusively with Arts, Academic,
New Models of Fundraiser Accountability and Prospect Pools Dave Scott, Development Services Manager Glasgow Caledonian University.
2011 Chief Institutional Advancement Officers Conference Jim Runyan February 24, 2011 Finding Answers to the Four Most Challenging Issues for Development.
Sisters Network 20 th Anniversary Break-out Session.
Learn from PETA’s segmenting success. Segmentation = Knowing your supporters... & showing it.
1 LONDON I OXFORD I HIGH WYCOMBE I PARIS I BOLOGNA Welcome! Buckinghamshire Community Foundation Local Giving Index Survey 2013.
Making the Right Call: Effective Lapsed Donor Reactivation Strategies using Telemarketing Making the Right Call: Effective Lapsed Donor Reactivation Strategies.
Guide Dogs Maximising the impact of Raffle appeals Kate Parker Senior Insight Analyst.
CREATE THE DIFFERENCE Customer Relationship Management Introduction.
Introduction to Business Intelligence: (CIT625) Business Performance Management (BPM)
Copyright 2013, Mobile Commons, Inc. reach everyone, everywhere Top 5 Features to Supercharge Your Mobile Campaign.
1 Member Findings Christmas Donations An Amárach Report // February 2015 //
VALENTINES CAMPAIGN “BEE MY HONEY” Breakfast Briefing 24th February 2010 Presented By.
Raffle & Weekly Lottery Specialists Building a Database with Lotteries.
Wood for trees 1wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 1 Outstanding Marketing Services Provider 2011 (Database Marketing awards); Supplier of the Year 2012.
Converting campaigners to donors Tony Fawcett, Web Manager Campaign to Protect Rural England.
Business Cheque Market Research 2010 August 2010.
Getting Started with Building a 24-Month Relationship Management Experience United Southeast Regional Conference Wednesday, May 30, 2012 Charleston, SC.
Chapter 7: Generating Funds Part 2 Meg Giddings. 3 Types of Individual Fundraising A) Annual Giving: campaigns run each year soliciting past and new donors.
Longitudinal Data: An introduction to some conceptual issues Vernon Gayle.
Employment, unemployment and economic activity Coventry working age population by disability status Source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National.
IoF Insight in Fundraising 2010 Conference Classic Analysis: Supporter Attrition Lifetime Value RFV Victoria Barham – Senior Marketing Analyst, PDSA David.
Scott Wheeler ChoicePoint Precision Marketing Travis Schraffenberger Western & Southern Life September 15, 2008 Bringing Home the Bacon!
Introducing BI4ALL Business Presentation 1/7/2012
Acquiring Donors to BBBS Step Two: Tracking and Segmenting Your Pool.
Holly Stibbon Marketing Overview Segmenting & Targeting Relevant for Individuals Improve Efficiency.
Direct Marketing 201 Acquisition Katie Valvo Associate Director, Acquisition The Nature Conservancy
RP ELECTRONIC TRAINING Donors. Donors & Potential Donors  LYBUNTs  SYBUNTs  New Members & Non-Donors  Non-HVAC Industry Companies.
Fundraising and Marketing
A Prognosis For The Future Presented by: Karen W. Endresen, Ph.D. The Endresen Institute at The Jackson Organization Healthcare Marketing:
Setting Limits on Credit Seguin - Debt “ATM does not mean all the money, Loretta.” Seguin - Debt 2011.
Top tips on the Recency Frequency Value (RFV) technique – ensuring RFV is used correctly to improve response rates (and ROI?) and measure trends Steven.
Creativematch eCRM Creativematch has launched a new eCRM platform providing access to an marketing suite from your own desktop. Our eCRM platform.
Stephen Pidgeon Fundraiser Asking your donors to leave a gift when they die 1 Stephen Pidgeon.
Marketing Campaign A Marketing Campaign You have been asked to produce a marketing campaign for a ‘Trainer/Sport Shoe’ Come up with the design.
5 appeals each year Mail version to existing and potential supporters Webpage – redesigned landing page last year to supporters Reminder .
15 th September How to bring innovation and more success to a mature lottery programme.
Presentation Title. Donor Retention & Monthly Donors: 5 Steps to Financial Stability.
What Makes Them Give? 2012 Stelter Donor Insight Report Latest Stelter Study finds influences and activities that yield planned gifts.
The 5 Pillars of Online Fundraising 18 th June 2009 Sue Fidler, Director, Sue Fidler Ltd.
Online Fundraising How to Make it Work 20 th October 2008 Sue Fidler, Director, Sue Fidler Ltd.
Donations Philippa Woods HOFFRA. Donation Income Recognition The accounting treatment for each type of donation is as follows: Unrestricted Donation Income.
Individual Giving Survey 2010 The Northern Ireland Giving Survey 2010 was carried out between 5 July 2010 and 13 August 2010 Based on telephone interviews.
What’s Next? Taking It To The Next Level: Cultivating Your Georgia Gives Day Donors Sam Macfie Central Georgia Nonprofit Fundraising Summit October 9,
SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM Best ones too use for Acumen animation studios.
Direct Marketing Customer Stories
Social Media for nonprofits
Who? Supporter Audience Analysis
Building Sustainable Giving from Individual donors
Reduce Recycle Reuse Ana Wood Polk County Solid Waste Director
Contest Orientation.
Who is responsible for your marketing? May 2013
Response Uplift Modelling
How simple analysis opened up a new source of income
Personality: part 1 One of the things that psychologists have tried to do for a very long time is to make generalizations about how “certain people” are.
NOMINATION FORM FOR COMPETITIVE TRAVEL MARKETING AWARDS
Successful Campaign Elements
Figures adapted from the TIEDI Analytical Report #1: Labour outcomes of immigrants by savings brought to Canada Report available at:
7 things my grandparents taught me about DIGITAL FUNDRAISING
Customer Relationship Management
Write a story about the picture
Analytic Optimization Thalamus Hill SVP of Advanced Analytics, RKD Group Robert Connelly Director of Strategic Services, Integral #DM201.
#DM201 10:00 -11:00 AM – Modeling – Lists – Match – Coop
Presentation transcript:

wood for trees 1wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 1 Testing Jon Kelly, Director of Wood for Trees March 2015 Outstanding M arketing S ervices P rovider 2011 (Database M arketing awards); Supplier of the Year 2012 (IoF SIG Awards); Innovation in Analytics for Marketing 2013 (Database Marketing Awards)

wood for trees 2wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 2 Some thoughts on testing Determine the reason for the test – what are you expecting to find out Beware of averages Beware of balancing effects Test as wide as possible Explore behaviour changes within sub populations of the test audience Action the test Re-test Understand the longer term effects

wood for trees 3wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 3 Prompt Testing – Top Level Results Top level views and analysis previously done shows that the testing had little effect. However looking at certain segments in more detail tells a different story..

wood for trees 4wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 4 Response Pattern Overall response pattern in line with other campaigns However, different response picture where testing took place

wood for trees 5wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 5 May 2012 By Last Amount This behaviour is the same across all giving levels, so £5 donors give £10 – GOOD £25 donors give £10 – BAD As long as responder volumes remain consistent…… Previous Gift = £5 Previous Gift = £25

wood for trees 6wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 6 May 2012 by Last Amount Low value responders were prompted to give more but less responded High value responders were prompted to respond more but to give less

wood for trees 7wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 7 TEST - £5 and under Test 1: £5, £8, £10, £15, Other Test 2: £8, £10, £15, £20, Other Test 3: £10, £15, £20, £25, Other

wood for trees 8wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 8 Cold Mailing - £5 and under

wood for trees 9wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 9 Max Warm Donation in last 5 years <=£10 Responded to a previous campaign Max Response Amount Ever > £12 Max Response Amount Ever £6 - £12 Max Response Amount Ever < £6 Not responded to a previous campaign Mailed once or less (Warm) in last year First payment in last 15 months First Payment before last 15 months Mailed more than once in last 12 months First relationship within last 2 years Given via self sponsorship Not given via self sponsorship First relationship more than 2 years ago GROUP A: £12 ASK – Max Warm Donation in last 5 years <=£10 Max Warm Donation in last 5 years <=£10 Responded to a previous campaign Max Response Amount Ever > £12 Max Response Amount Ever £6 - £12 Max Response Amount Ever < £6 Not responded to a previous campaign Mailed once or less (Warm) in last year First payment in last 15 months First Payment before last 15 months Mailed more than once in last 12 months First relationship within last 2 years Given via self sponsorship Not given via self sponsorship First relationship more than 2 years ago

wood for trees 10wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 10 Max Warm Donation in last 5 years <=£10 Responded to a previous campaign Max Response Amount Ever > £12 Max Response Amount Ever £6 - £12 Max Response Amount Ever < £6 Not responded to a previous campaign Group A1

wood for trees 11wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 11 Ask:£5£12£15 No. mailed:1,4314,3101,418 Response rate:8.4%7.3%7.8% Average gift:£12.20£15.16£20.05 ROI: Group A1 Group A1: Max donation in last 5 years less than £10 – but previously responded at more than £12 Ask:£5£12£15 No. mailed:1,4314,3101,418 Response rate:8.4%7.3%7.8% Average gift:£12.20£15.16£20.05 ROI:

wood for trees 12wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 12 Max Warm Donation in last 5 years <=£10 Responded to a previous campaign Max Response Amount Ever > £12 Max Response Amount Ever £6 - £12 Max Response Amount Ever < £6 Not responded to a previous campaign Group A3

wood for trees 13wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 13 Ask:£5£12£15 No. mailed:6,01617,8145,966 Response rate:16.3%13.1%12.2% Average gift:£4.43£4.57£4.48 ROI: Group A3 Group A3: Max donation ever is less than £6 Ask:£5£12£15 No. mailed:6,01617,8145,966 Response rate:16.3%13.1%12.2% Average gift:£4.43£4.57£4.48 ROI:

wood for trees 14wood for treeswww.woodfortrees.net 14 Most effective ask levels - summary