ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 SESAME An initiative for the Single European Sky from the European air transport community

ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 SESAME Definition Phase A way to incorporate ASAS into the global ATM picture

Page 3ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Background (1/2)  Sustainable growth in European economies and further EU integration and harmonisation is essential (Lisbon Agenda)  Single European Sky Implementation Programme (SESAME) in support of the operational implementation of the SES Legislation SESAME will define the future ATM network and steer its subsequent implementation phases SES legislation SESAME Definition PhaseSESAME Implementation Phases

Page 4ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Background (2/2) Define European air transport system performance requirements up to 2020 and beyond. Identify globally interoperable and harmonised ATM solutions Establish a detailed and phased implementation and deployment plan, Produce the detailed Research and Technology and validation work programme, Propose the legislative, financial and regulatory framework Source: CALL FOR TENDERS Nº AO/03/HQ/EC/05, Requirement Specification for Core Activity, p. 5&6

Page 5ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 General Objectives From agreed performance requirements to implementation of the future European ATM Network Core foundation (ops concepts, architecture, specifications) for implementation with broad commitment Further to this, R&T and validation activities to support the performance requirements for 2020 (long-term baseline) Define the launch conditions for implementation Decision making processes, legislation, regulation, financing Programme Management structure The views of the Air Transport Industry

6 SESAME Definition Phase Governance European Commission Industry Consultation Body Single European Sky Committee EC/EUROCONTROL Steering Board EUROCONTROL Stakeholder Consultation Group Consortium European Commission EUROCONTROL Agency Consortium Contractual Relationship Information & Consultation Mechanisms

Page 7ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Analyse air transport value and role of ATM M1 Air Transport Framework identified MARKET Identify performance requirements & standards M2 Performance requirements & Standards established SPECIFICATION Identify the most promising ATM concepts Ex: ASAS, 4D trajectory exchange, CDM M3 ATM target Concept defined OPTIONS Optimise concept for deployment M4 ATM Baseline frozen SELECTION Build the ATM Master Plan M5 ATM Master Plan specified ACTION PLAN Define organi- sation & work- programme M6 Work- programme for completed GO The 6 Project Milestones Progressive build-up of the ATM Master Plan through six incremental milestones

Page 8ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005  The SESAME initiative is user and customer driven:  Tangible benefits must be defined and achieved  Buy-in is a prerequisite and is essential to minimise risks  The European ATM Master Plan will define viable transition scenarios for ANSPs, airspace users and airports:  Costs/funding, Workforce, consistency with current investment plans  Global harmonisation / interoperability is one key condition for success,  Efforts must be undertaken on all levels: political, institutional, industrial In brief SESAME – a driver for change

ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 CONSORTIUM

Page 10ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Consortium: a broad basis of expertise Lufthansa Iberia Air France AEA ERA IAOPA IATA LVNL LFV Austrocontrol AENA DFS DSNA ENAV NAV NATS BAA FRAPORT AAS AENA LFV EADS INDRA Airbus BAE Systems Selex SI Thales ATM Thales Avionics Research Centres (10) CAA UK BOEING EURAMID IFATCA ATC EUC JATMWG EBAA ECA Potential Project Associates Airspace Users Basic Consortium Members (9) ANSPs Basic Consortium Members (9) Airports Basic Consortium Members (7) Supply Industry Basic Consortium Members (7) EADS Airbus Thales SA Thales ATM Project Directorate (Secretary) Air Traffic Alliance GIE GLOBAL CONSORTIUM (co-contracting arrangements) Content Responsibility (4 Basic Consortia and Project Associates) Subcontracting arrangements for admin purposes Military (Observer) Users (4) ANSPs (3) Airports (2) Supply Industry (1) PROJECT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (10 voting rights) Project Directorate KLM Munich Airport ADP SWISS Initially: 29 members (co-contractors) Currently: up to 33 members

Page 11ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 SESAME Work Breakdown Structure Airspace Users ANSPSupply Industry EURCRCTAIRPORT 2. Performance Requirements & System Definition1. Institutional Framework Definition3. Implementation Plan Definition4. Work Programme for For info only, not necessary up to date Apparent complexity totally tight to the driving Buy In process

ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 MANAGEMENT 3 Bodies: - Executive Committee - Project Directorate - Content Integration Team (CIT)

Page 13ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Executive Committee The Executive committee is in charge of the overall direction and major decisions with a strategic and high level operational role. It gives appropriate mandate to the project directorate for the daily project operations. It supervises the work of the Content Integration Team and of the Project Directorate. It decides upon use of the Project reserve. It is composed of : 4 Users representatives including the Chairman, 3 ANSPs representatives, 2 Airports, 1 Industry, 1 Military observer. All decisions should be based on consensus, where required voting mechanism applies with at least 75% for decision.

Page 14ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Project Directorate Project Director Project Assistant Quality & Risk Manager Contract & Finance Manager PMO Performance Manager Communication Managers Configuration & Data Manager Milestone Manager WP Coordinators Project Directorate Ensures the Project control, time and cost management, Handles a master project plan, integrating the dashboards associated to the processes under monitoring (progress, risks, quality,…). Reports to the Executive Committee, and to the Purchaser and the European Commission within the mandate attributed to it by the Executive Committee.

Page 15ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Content Integration Team: CIT Manage the content of the Project: Drive the preparation of the Milestone Objective Plans (in cooperation with Project Directorate and R levels) Ensure consistency of the work performed through the different Milestones, incl. the successful building of the ATM Master Plan Prepare the Di by integrating the outputs generated by the Participants on WP and Task level as R/O/W Ensure compliance of the work performed with the Milestone Objective Plans and, more generally, the overall project objectives Organisational framework: Staffed by Basic Consortia (2 from ANSP, 2 from Industry, 1 from User Group and 1 from EUROCONTROL (tbd)) in order to provide corresponding expertise Reporting to ExCom Collocated with Project Directorate

Page 16ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Relationships within the Project Project Directorate Executive Committee PROCESS CONTENT CIT WBS Collocation Participants Responsibility assignment Personnel assignment Sequence of activities WP CoordinatorsR/O/W resp. Milestone Managers Content Integrators D6D6 D5D5 D4D4 D3D3 D2D2 D1D1 Reporting lines

ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 COMMUNICATION PLAN

Page 18ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Communication & Buy-in Plan Relevant levels of communication : Buy-in of results, recommendations and deliverables Feed-back (through appropriate Q&A forms) Political Buy-in and reporting to political / institutional bodies (e.g. SES Committee, ICB, …) PR & Marketing The relevant stakeholders groups (Internal / external parties) Mechanisms and tools: Existing channels (stakeholders associations’ working groups / newsletters, appropriate EUROCONTROL consultation processes) Channels to be developed (newsletters, presentations, conferences etc)

Page 19ASAS TN II Workshop Malmö Sept 26-28, 2005 Communication & Buy-in Plan Airport represen- tatives Users represen- tatives Airspace users group Industry group Airports group ANSP group Associates represen- tatives ANSP represen- tatives SESAME ExCom Associates Non participating airports Non participating industry Non participating airspace users Non participating ANSPs Non participating associates Politicalbuy-in Industry represen- tatives WP/Tasks Buy-In Buy-in within stakeholder groups Non participants buy-in Politicalbuy-in Internal: External: