Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating and Institutionalizing
Advertisements

»This template gives you a starting point to create a presentation to managers on workplace health and wellbeing. »If you have any evaluation data available,
Sleep, Pain, and Fatigue in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation Learning Conference August 9, 2012 Susan Cordes, MS, CGC.
Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.
Growing a Healthy Todd County Todd County Health Department Recommendations We have received over 700 completed surveys. After looking over and analyzing.
1 Response to the Employee Survey Recommendations.
WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN???. Reasonable Accommodation Gina Portillo, Reasonable Accommodation Coordinator (510)
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Welcome to Swinburne Online! You are an integral part of our team and we want to ensure that whilst working from home your safety is our Number 1 priority.
Workstation Ergonomics
SHELLY GUFFEY MAKING THE MOST OF YOUR REVENUE CYCLE MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
The HCAHPS and Competency Connection HealthStream, Inc. The HCAHPS and Competency Connection HealthStream, Inc.
Better Health Care for All Floridians AHCA.MyFlorida.com MDS 3.0 Section F – Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities Kimberly Smoak Bureau of.
Physical Activity in the Workplace Bruce Lockie Cornwall Sports Partnership Health & Physical Activity.
Occupational Health Support For DSE Users Sandi Adams RGN, BSc Hons (OHN) SCPHN.
UGA Libraries Compensation Satisfaction Consulting Project Carrie McCleese Starr Daniell.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Genius online Appraisal Management System 1. Appraiser Configuration Getting Started Appraisal Management let the user to effectively conduct a users.
How to start a worksite wellness program Evelyn Escalera & Brandi Muro.
Workstation Ergonomics Make your work area more comfortable and productive.
Expectation & Experience Surveys 1998 & 2002 AIRPO, June West Point, New York.
Podcasting In Education By: Gerryanne Schwanke, Rachel Larson, Caitlyn Huonder, and Karli Beissel Introduction: Podcasting is basically a radio show online.
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PLATTEVILLE VOLUNTARY SEPARATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM Presented by: Human Resources John Lohmann, J.D., M.B.A. - Interim Director.
Get up and Go…. But STAY at your desk!. Negative effects of sitting: Responsible for poor posture including neck, back and knee pain. Obesity Increased.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
CERCA Practitioner Survey Report FTA FedState E-File Symposium May 3, 2000.
SERVICE HOURS CIMARRON DISTRICT ALAMO AREA COUNCIL July 14,
ALERT™ Education Outcomes and Impact on Clinical Practice Chris Parr Senior Information Analyst 1.
The Healthy Way to Reduce Absenteeism, Cut Insurance Costs and Take Care of Your Most Valuable Assets.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
The Economic and Health Effects of Biomedical Innovation Peter R. Orszag Vice Chairman, Corporate and Investment Banking Chairman, Financial Strategy and.
Fitness Review  How is a person who is physically fit described?  They are able to complete daily tasks without excessive fatigue, are able to handle.
Resistance Training: Maintaining an Independent and Active Lifestyle.
Ergonomics. What is Ergonomics ? It is... fitting the work to the worker Ergon = Greek for “work” Nomos = Greek for “laws of” The Study of Work Applies.
Accommodation & Hospitality Services STAFF BRIEFING – No 20 Workstations & Ergonomics.
2009 Jamestown Park Golf Course Survey Results 25 August 2009 By R. E. Pifer, Ph.D. Meaningful Analytics.
10/10/2015 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG Lecture END Project Report Requirements & Project Presentation Information.
Occupational Safety and Health Course for Healthcare Professionals.
August 7, Market Participant Survey Action Plan Dale Goodman Director, Market Services.
INTRODUCTION METHODS Amanda Mortensen Dr. Karen Mumford Amanda Mortensen Dr. Karen Mumford Campus Wide Healthy Eating Initiative RESULTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
LESSON 6.11: SURVEY DESIGN Module 6: Rural Health Obj. 6.11: Identify potential problems in the design of survey questions.
2009 Retirement Confidence Survey: Summary of Key Findings Employee Benefit Research Institute th Street NW, Suite 878 Washington, DC Phone:
Tracking Healthy People 2010 Objectives: Methodological and Definitional Changes Kathleen M. Turczyn, MPH National Center for Health Statistics.
Applied Anthropometry, Work-Space Design Part II - Design of Work Surfaces (Chapter 13) Prepared by: Ahmed M. El-Sherbeeny, PhD *(Adapted from Slides by:
2009 Assessment of the Learning Edge Academic Program (LEAP) Tony M. Lentz & Talia Carroll.
Looking after yourself Occupational Health and Safety using the computer.
Integration Issues for RTF Guidelines: Savings, Lifetimes and Cost/Benefit October 24, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker, SBW.
Energizing Ergonomics Using ergonomic principles to reduce and eliminate injuries.
Health Checks. Introductions Today’s Layout 14:00 – 14:30 Welcome and Introductions Update from Hospital Discharges Slot for any updates from Go To people.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board Brown Bag Series February 7, 2007 CITI – What is It & Why Do I have to Do It?
Return on Investment in Worksite Wellness Programs.
Vicky Copley, PHE Risk Factor Intelligence
Insert name of presentation on Master Slide Office equipment pilot: Standing Desks and Sitting Balls Josef Prygodzicz Senior Public Health Specialist Public.
Lesson 1 – Workplace Ergonomics Outcome 1.2. Set up and organize workstations safely and efficiently.
DESIGNING GOOD SURVEYS Laura P. Naumann Assistant Professor of Psychology Nevada State College.
Multi-Rater Assessments The Next Step in Your Professional Development from ICMA University.
Ergonomics.
Introduction Data may be presented in a way that seems flawless, but upon further review, we might question conclusions that are drawn and assumptions.
2016 Ergonomic Program Updates and Training UC ANR All Staff Meeting - July 21, 2016 Malendia Maccree, CIH UC ANR Environmental Health and Safety
Occupational Sitting Lindsay Harris Ontario Lett Sterling Smith Zac Wheeler Melissa Worley.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
Readiness Consultations
NSTec Ergonomic Program Sit to Stand Workstation Survey
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND DEPRESSION IN FIBROMYALGIA
Investing in good health at work
Research in hairdressers Tasks, posture and MSDs
Employee Performance Management System
James Gillespie’s High School
Cost of Oral Contrast in ED Patients with Non-traumatic Abdominal Pain
South Staffordshire Council
Presentation transcript:

Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment Ohio University, Athens Team Members: Chris Rasch Xiaodong Song Seth Taylor Erik Blotzer Client: Marty Dagostino Advisor: Diana Schwerha Instructor: Gary Weckman

Introduction Studies show extensive sitting is unhealthy1 Heart disease, obesity, type 2 diabetes, muscular and skeletal issues Height adjustable workstation could help change this and improve worker comfort and productivity Some faculty and staff at OU already utilize this type of table and requests for them have increased No in-depth follow up study has been done to evaluate the impact of adjustable workstations at Ohio University 12010 American Cancer Society study, “Leisure Time Spent Sitting in Relation to Total Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of US Adults” Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Introduction Example: Steelcase Series 7 Programmable and powered by electricity Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Project Definition Business Reason Opportunity Statement Height Adjustable Workstations are in use, no follow up has been done to assess their effectiveness or return on investment Push-button, programmable ~ $1400 Retrofit adjustable kit ~ $800 Opportunity Statement Determine if adjustable workstations have an effect on worker pain and productivity Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Expected Benefits Goals Addressed by this Project Assess if adjustable workstations have an effect on worker comfort and productivity Benefits to Ohio University Gain information regarding the effects of adjustable workstations Benefits to OU Employees Increased willingness of OU to provide employees with adjustable workstations or encouragement for OU to explore other options to make workers more comfortable Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Process Flow Create the Survey Send Out the Survey Researched pain scales and similar surveys Created multiple drafts of the survey, got feedback Submitted project proposal and survey draft to IRB Create the Survey For ease of completion and collection, we did not use hard copies Sent out using the online survey platform Qualtrics Send Out the Survey Data was recorded and viewed through the Qualtrics website Collect Data from the Survey Determined actual KPIVs, time spent for pain related breaks Analyze the Data Determine if the cost of each workstation is justified by the potential benefits Complete a Cost-Benefit Analysis Determine if adjustable workstations are a worthy investment for Ohio University Make Final Recommendation Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Cause and Effect Diagram *Items boxed in red are what we believe to likely be KPIVs Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Survey Layout Survey was conducted through Qualtrics Survey questions were separated into 6 sections General Information Typical Workday Workstation and Posture Pain and Discomfort Productivity Personal Opinion Questions Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Original Workflow Diagram Individual Requests an Adjustable Workstation Marty Installs the Workstation No Feedback is Received Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Updated Workflow Diagram Individual Requests an Adjustable Workstation Marty Installs the Workstation Feedback is Received from Survey Respondents Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Process Analysis After the survey was completed, we analyzed the data and made inferences Looked for correlations between how they use the workstation, their daily habits, etc., and their reported pains Cost-Benefit analysis was performed comparing… Cost of adjustable workstation Savings associated with change in productivity Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

KPIVs Correlation values were calculated for different factors that could contribute to a worker’s pain KPIVs were determined to be: BMI: r=0.488 Hours standing outside of work: r=0.500 Age: r=0.687 Number of position changes: r=0.588 (N=15, α = 0.1) Correlation does not always mean causation Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Average Frequency of Pain Sometimes Rarely Never Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Any Pain Severe?

Average reduction in break time per day to relieve pain: 7.7 minutes Breaks Average reduction in break time per day to relieve pain: 7.7 minutes Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Personal Opinions of Adjustable Workstations Feel more productive? 73% say yes, 27% say no change Improved overall comfort? 93% say between moderate and significant improvement, 7% say no change Improved overall mood? 93% say yes, 7% say no change Would you recommend HAW to others, with or without pain? 100% say yes Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Summary of Results Frequency of pain Severity of Pain Decreased in 6 of 8 areas, but increased in the feet Severity of Pain Decreased in all areas except feet and legs where it increased Length of breaks due to pain or discomfort Fewer and shorter breaks required to relieve pain Overall Opinion More productive, increased comfort, improved mood, would recommend HAWs to everyone Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Findings from Other Studies Effects of An Electric Height-Adjustable Worksurface on Self-assessed Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Productivity in Computer Workers Alan Hedge of Cornell University, 2004 Found significant decrease in severity of pain in shoulders, neck, upper back, lower back, forearms, wrists, and hands Found slight significant increase in frequency of pain in the same areas Lower increase in discomfort ratings throughout the day 57.2% said it “somewhat/definitely helped” with productivity 82.4% of participants preferred the EHAW Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Findings from Other Studies Reducing Occupational Sitting Time and Improving Worker Health: The Take-a-Stand Project Pronk, Katz, Lowry, and Payfer, 2011 Time spent sitting reduced by 66 min each day Reduction of upper-back and neck pain by 54% Increased mood and vigor, decreased depression, confusion, and tension All observed changes went away after FHW was replaced Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Cost-Benefit Analysis Assumptions: Average Salary: $59,000 Calculated from average salaries from professions reported by respondents 251 working days in a year 8 hours working each day Equates to $29.45 per hour or $0.49 per minute $1400 for adjustable workstation Could not find figures relating to adjustable workstations and reduction in MSD claims so analysis is based on productivity increase Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Cost-Benefit Analysis $948 saved per year on reduced break time 1.47 year payback period Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Recommendation We recommend for Ohio University to consider purchasing and installing more height adjustable workstations around campus to promote productivity and the greater wellness of its faculty and staff Height Adjustable Workstation Assessment

Create for Good.