Overview of ARIES ACT-1 Study Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center for Energy Research UC San Diego and the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
Advertisements

ASIPP Zhongwei Wang for CFETR Design Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University.
Fusion Power Plants: Visions and Development Pathway Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 15 th ICENES May 15 – 19, 2011 San Francisco, CA You can download a.
Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Safety Issues Related to Flibe/Ferritic Steel Blanket and Vacuum Vessel Placement Brad Merrill.
September 15-16, 2005/ARR 1 Status of ARIES-CS Power Core and Divertor Design and Structural Analysis A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–
1 LOCA/LOFA Analyses for LiPb/FS System Carl Martin, Jake Blanchard Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES-CS Project Meeting.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop.
January 8-10, 2003/ARR 1 Plan for Engineering Study of ARIES-CS Presented by A. R. Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting UCSD San.
September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Initial Assessment of Maintenance Scheme for 2- Field Period Configuration A. R. Raffray X. Wang University of California, San.
Perspectives on Fusion Electric Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting December 13, 2004 Washington,
June 14-15, 2007/ARR 1 Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code Presented by A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego With contribution.
ARIES Meeting General Atomics, February 25 th, 2005 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.
Contributions of Burning Plasma Physics Experiment to Fusion Energy Goals Farrokh Najmabadi Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng. And Center for Energy Research.
The ARIES Compact Stellarator Study: Introduction & Overview Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego ARIES-CS Review Meeting October 5, 2006.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Status of Advanced Design Studies and Overview of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies & Advanced Technologies.
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Prospect for Attractive Fusion Power (Focus on tokamaks) Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Mini-Conference on Nuclear Renaissance 48th.
Overview of ARIES Compact Stellarator Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego US/Japan Workshop on Power Plant Studies & Related Advanced.
February 24-25, 2005/ARR 1 ARIES-CS Power Core Engineering: Status and Next Steps A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting GA.
Exploration of Compact Stellarators as Power Plants: Initial Results from ARIES-CS Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 16 th ANS Topical.
Overview of the ARIES-CS Compact Stellarator Power Plant Study Farrokh Najmabadi and the ARIES Team UC San Diego Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants.
Physics Issues and Trade-offs in Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA APS April 2002 Meeting.
December 12-13, 2007/ARR 1 Power Core Engineering: Design Updates and Trade-Off Studies A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego ARIES Meeting.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
ARIES Systems Studies: ARIES-I and ARIES-AT type operating points C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, San Diego, December.
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Re-Examination of Visions for Tokamak Power Plants – The ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center.
Overview of the ARIES Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC Mission: Perform.
Progress in ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies 8-9 March 2012 US.
A new approach for exploration of tokamak power plant design space Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 4 th IAEA Technical.
Assessment and comparison of pulsed and steady-state tokamak power plants Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 21 st International Toki Conference, 28 Novemeber-1.
Fusion: Bringing star power to earth Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego NES Grand Challenges.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Ceramic Breeder Blanket and Plan for Future Effort A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions.
Engineering Overview of ARIES-ACT1 M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang and the ARIES Team Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Advanced Technologies
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
San Diego Workshop, 11 September 2003 Results of the European Power Plant Conceptual Study Presented by Ian Cook on behalf of David Maisonnier (Project.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Thoughts on Fusion Competitiveness Initiative Farrokh Najmabadi, George Tynan UC San Diego University Fusion Initiatives Meeting, MIT 14-15, February 2008.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Update of Vacuum Vessel Analysis Hamed Hosseini, Farrokh Najmabadi, Xueren Wang ARIES Meeting Washington, DC, May 30-June 1, 2012.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Heat Loading in ARIES Power Plants: Steady State, Transient and Off-Normal C. E. Kessel 1, M. A. Tillack 2, and J. P. Blanchard 3 1 Princeton Plasma Physics.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
ARIES Town Meeting “Edge Plasma Physics and Plasma Material Interactions in the Fusion Power Plant Regime” Meeting Summary and Recommendations Mark Tillack.
Page 1 of 19 Design Improvements and Analysis to Push the Heat Flux Limits of Divertors M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, J A. Burke and the ARIES Team Japan-US.
ARIES Meeting University of Wisconsin, April 27 th, 2006 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Update of Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.
ARIES ACT1 Power Core Engineering M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, F. Najmabadi, S. Malang and the ARIES Team ANS 20 th Topical Meeting on the Technology of.
Engineering models in the ARIES system code, Part II M. S. Tillack, X. R. Wang, et al. ARIES Project Meeting January 2011.
Improvements to power flow modeling in the ARIES system code
The European Power Plant Conceptual Study Overview
Trade-Off Studies and Engineering Input to System Code
Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Near-term plan for the current ARIES project
Status of the ARIES Program
Systems analysis of ACT2 design space
ACT-1 design point definition
Presentation transcript:

Overview of ARIES ACT-1 Study Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center for Energy Research UC San Diego and the ARIES Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies with participations from China & Korea February 26-28, 2013

ARIES Program Participants Systems code: UC San Diego, PPPL Plasma Physics: PPPL, GA, LLNL Fusion Core Design & Analysis: UC San Diego, FNT Consulting Nuclear Analysis: UW-Madison Plasma Facing Components (Design & Analysis): UC San Diego, UW- Madison Plasma Facing Components (experiments): Georgia Tech Design Integration: UC San Diego, Boeing Safety: INEL Contact to Material Community: ORNL

Goals of ARIES ACT Study  Over a decade since last tokamak study : ARIES-1 (1990) through ARIES-AT(2000).  Substantial progress in understanding in many areas.  New issues have emerged: e.g., edge plasma physics, PMI, PFCs, and off-normal events. o What would be the maximum fluxes that can be handled by in- vessel components in a power plant? o What level of off-normal events are acceptable in a commercial power plant?  Evolving needs in the ITER and FNSF/Demo era:  Risk/benefit analysis among extrapolation and attractiveness.  Detailed component designs is necessary to understand R&D requirements.  Over a decade since last tokamak study : ARIES-1 (1990) through ARIES-AT(2000).  Substantial progress in understanding in many areas.  New issues have emerged: e.g., edge plasma physics, PMI, PFCs, and off-normal events. o What would be the maximum fluxes that can be handled by in- vessel components in a power plant? o What level of off-normal events are acceptable in a commercial power plant?  Evolving needs in the ITER and FNSF/Demo era:  Risk/benefit analysis among extrapolation and attractiveness.  Detailed component designs is necessary to understand R&D requirements.

Frame the “parameter space for attractive power plants” by considering the “four corners” of parameter space Reversed-shear ( β N = ) DCLL blanket Reversed-shear ( β N = ) DCLL blanket Reversed-shear ( β N = ) SiC blanket Reversed-shear ( β N = ) SiC blanket 1 st Stability ( no-wall limit) DCLL blanket 1 st Stability ( no-wall limit) DCLL blanket 1 st Stability ( no-wall limit) SiC blanket 1 st Stability ( no-wall limit) SiC blanket ARIES-RS/AT SSTR-2 EU Model-D ARIES-1 SSTR Lower thermal efficiency Higher Fusion/plasma power Higher P/R Metallic first wall/blanket Higher thermal efficiency Lower fusion/plasma power Lower P/R Composite first wall/blanket Higher power density Higher density Lower current-drive power Lower power density Lower density Higher CD power Decreasing P/R Physics Extrapolation Engineering performance (efficiency)

Status of the ARIES ACT Study  Project Goals:  Detailed design of advanced physics, SiC blanket ACT-1 (ARIES-AT update).  Detailed design of ACT-2 (conservative physics, DCLL blanket).  System-level definitions for ACT-3 & ACT-4.  ACT-1 research is completed.  First design iteration was completed for a 5.5 m Device.  Updated design point at R = 6.25 m (detailed design on-going)  Final report to be published as a special issue of Fusion Science & Technology  ACT-2 Research will be completed by December  Project Goals:  Detailed design of advanced physics, SiC blanket ACT-1 (ARIES-AT update).  Detailed design of ACT-2 (conservative physics, DCLL blanket).  System-level definitions for ACT-3 & ACT-4.  ACT-1 research is completed.  First design iteration was completed for a 5.5 m Device.  Updated design point at R = 6.25 m (detailed design on-going)  Final report to be published as a special issue of Fusion Science & Technology  ACT-2 Research will be completed by December 2013.

ARIES-ACT1 (ARIES-AT update)  Advance tokamak mode  Blanket: SiC structure & LiPb Coolant/breeder (to achieve a high efficiency)

ARIES Systems Code – a new approach to finding operating points  Systems codes find a single operating point through a minimization of a figure of merit with certain constraints  Very difficult to see sensitivity to assumptions.  Our new approach to systems analysis is based on surveying the design space and finding a large number of viable operating points.  A GUI is developed to visualize the data. It can impose additional constraints to explore sensitivities  Systems codes find a single operating point through a minimization of a figure of merit with certain constraints  Very difficult to see sensitivity to assumptions.  Our new approach to systems analysis is based on surveying the design space and finding a large number of viable operating points.  A GUI is developed to visualize the data. It can impose additional constraints to explore sensitivities Example: Data base of operating points with f bs ≤ 0.90, 0.85 ≤ f GW ≤ 1.0, H 98 ≤ 1.75

Impact of the Divertor Heat load  Divertor design can handle > 10 MW/m 2 peak load.  UEDGE simulations (LLNL) showed detached divertor solution to reach high radiated powers in the divertor slot and a low peak heat flux on the divertor (~5MW/m 2 peak).  Leads to ARIES-AT-size device at R=5.5m.  Control & sustaining a detached divertor?  Using Fundamenski SOL estimates and 90% radiation in SOL+divertor leads to a 6.25-m device with only 4 mills cost penalty (current reference point).  Device size is set by the divertor heat flux  Divertor design can handle > 10 MW/m 2 peak load.  UEDGE simulations (LLNL) showed detached divertor solution to reach high radiated powers in the divertor slot and a low peak heat flux on the divertor (~5MW/m 2 peak).  Leads to ARIES-AT-size device at R=5.5m.  Control & sustaining a detached divertor?  Using Fundamenski SOL estimates and 90% radiation in SOL+divertor leads to a 6.25-m device with only 4 mills cost penalty (current reference point).  Device size is set by the divertor heat flux

The new systems approach underlines robustness of the design point to physics achievements Major radius (m)6.25 Aspect ratio44 Toroidal field on axis (T)67 Peak field on the coil (T) Normalized beta*5.75%4.75% Plasma current (MA)10.9 H Fusion power (MW) Auxiliary power Average n wall load (MW/m 2 ) Peak divertor heat flux (MW/m 2 ) Cost of Electricity (mills/kWh) * Includes fast  contribution of ~ 1%

The new systems approach underlines robustness of the design point to physics achievements Major radius (m)6.25 Aspect ratio44 Toroidal field on axis (T)67 Peak field on the coil (T) Normalized beta*5.75%4.75% Plasma current (MA)10.9 H Fusion power (MW) Auxiliary power Average n wall load (MW/m 2 )2.5 Peak divertor heat flux (MW/m 2 )13.5 Cost of Electricity (mills/kWh)6769 * Includes fast  contribution of ~ 1%

Detailed Physics analysis has been performed using the latest tools New physics modeling  Energy transport assessment: what is required and model predictions  Pedestal treatment  Time-dependent free boundary simulations of formation and operating point  Edge plasma simulation (consistent divertor/edge, detachment, etc)  Divertor/FW heat loading from experimental tokamaks for transient and off-normal*  Disruption simulations*  Fast particle MHD New physics modeling  Energy transport assessment: what is required and model predictions  Pedestal treatment  Time-dependent free boundary simulations of formation and operating point  Edge plasma simulation (consistent divertor/edge, detachment, etc)  Divertor/FW heat loading from experimental tokamaks for transient and off-normal*  Disruption simulations*  Fast particle MHD * Discussed in the paper by M. Tillack, C. Kessel

Overview of engineering design: 1. High-hest flux components*  Design of first wall and divertor options  High-performance He-cooled W-alloy divertor, external transition to steel  Robust FW concept (embedded W pins)  Analysis of first wall and divertor options  Birth-to-death modeling  Yield, creep, fracture mechanics  Failure modes  Helium heat transfer experiments  ELM and disruption loading responses  Thermal, mechanical, EM & ferromagnetic  Design of first wall and divertor options  High-performance He-cooled W-alloy divertor, external transition to steel  Robust FW concept (embedded W pins)  Analysis of first wall and divertor options  Birth-to-death modeling  Yield, creep, fracture mechanics  Failure modes  Helium heat transfer experiments  ELM and disruption loading responses  Thermal, mechanical, EM & ferromagnetic * Discussed in paper by M. Tillack and J. Blanchard,

Overview of engineering design*: 2. Fusion Core  Features similar to ARIES-AT  PbLi self-cooled SiC/SiC breeding blanket with simple double-pipe construction  Brayton cycle with  ~58%  Many new features and improvements  He-cooled ferritic steel structural ring/shield  Detailed flow paths and manifolding for PbLi to reduce 3D MHD effects*  Elimination of water from the vacuum vessel, separation of vessel and shield  Identification of new material for the vacuum vessel  Features similar to ARIES-AT  PbLi self-cooled SiC/SiC breeding blanket with simple double-pipe construction  Brayton cycle with  ~58%  Many new features and improvements  He-cooled ferritic steel structural ring/shield  Detailed flow paths and manifolding for PbLi to reduce 3D MHD effects*  Elimination of water from the vacuum vessel, separation of vessel and shield  Identification of new material for the vacuum vessel * Discussed in the paper by M. Tillack, this session

Detailed safety analysis has highlighted impact of tritium absorption and transport  Detailed safety modeling of ARIES-AT (Petti et al) and ARIES-CS (Merrill et al, FS&T, 54, 2008 ) have shown a paradigm shift in safety issues:  Use of low-activation material and care design has limited temperature excursions and mobilization of radioactivity during accidents. Rather off-site dose is dominated by tritium.  For ARIES-CS worst-case accident, tritium release dose is 8.5 mSv (no-evacuation limit is 10 mSV)  Major implications for material and component R&D:  Need to minimize tritium inventory (control of breeding, absorption and inventory in different material)  Design implications: material choices, in-vessel components, vacuum vessel, etc.  Detailed safety modeling of ARIES-AT (Petti et al) and ARIES-CS (Merrill et al, FS&T, 54, 2008 ) have shown a paradigm shift in safety issues:  Use of low-activation material and care design has limited temperature excursions and mobilization of radioactivity during accidents. Rather off-site dose is dominated by tritium.  For ARIES-CS worst-case accident, tritium release dose is 8.5 mSv (no-evacuation limit is 10 mSV)  Major implications for material and component R&D:  Need to minimize tritium inventory (control of breeding, absorption and inventory in different material)  Design implications: material choices, in-vessel components, vacuum vessel, etc.

Revisiting ARIES-AT vacuum vessel  AREIS-AT had a thick vacuum vessel (40 cm thick) with WC and water to help in shielding. (adoption of ITER vacuum vessel).  Expensive and massive vacuum vessel.  ITER Components are “hung” from the vacuum vessel. ARIES sectors are self supporting (different loads).  ARIES-AT vacuum vessel operated at 50 o C  material?  Tritium absorption?  Tritium transfer to water?  Vacuum vessel temperature exceeded 100 o C during an accident after a few hours (steam!)  AREIS-AT had a thick vacuum vessel (40 cm thick) with WC and water to help in shielding. (adoption of ITER vacuum vessel).  Expensive and massive vacuum vessel.  ITER Components are “hung” from the vacuum vessel. ARIES sectors are self supporting (different loads).  ARIES-AT vacuum vessel operated at 50 o C  material?  Tritium absorption?  Tritium transfer to water?  Vacuum vessel temperature exceeded 100 o C during an accident after a few hours (steam!)

New Vacuum Vessel Design  Contains no water  Can run at high temperature: o C. (350 o C operating temperature to minimize tritium inventory)  Cooled by He flowing between ribs.  Tritium diffused through the inner wall is recovered from He coolant (Tritium diffusion to the cryostat and/or building should be much smaller.  Made of low-activation 3Cr-3WV baintic steel (no need for post-weld heat treatment ).  Contains no water  Can run at high temperature: o C. (350 o C operating temperature to minimize tritium inventory)  Cooled by He flowing between ribs.  Tritium diffused through the inner wall is recovered from He coolant (Tritium diffusion to the cryostat and/or building should be much smaller.  Made of low-activation 3Cr-3WV baintic steel (no need for post-weld heat treatment ).

In summary …  ARIES-ACT study is re-examining the tokamak power plant space to understand risk and trade-offs of higher physics and engineering performance with special emphais on PMI/PFC and off-normal events.  ARIES-ACT1 (updated ARIES-AT) is near completion.  Detailed physics analysis with modern computational tools are used. Many new physics issues are included.  The new system approach indicate a robust design window for this class of power plants.  Many engineering imporvements: He-cooled ferritic steel structural ring/shield, Detailed flow paths and manifolding to reduce 3D MHD effects, Identification of new material for the vacuum vessel …  In-elastic analysis of component including Birth-to-death modeling and fracture mechanics indicate a higher performance PFCs are possible. Many issues/properties for material development & optimization are identified.  ARIES-ACT study is re-examining the tokamak power plant space to understand risk and trade-offs of higher physics and engineering performance with special emphais on PMI/PFC and off-normal events.  ARIES-ACT1 (updated ARIES-AT) is near completion.  Detailed physics analysis with modern computational tools are used. Many new physics issues are included.  The new system approach indicate a robust design window for this class of power plants.  Many engineering imporvements: He-cooled ferritic steel structural ring/shield, Detailed flow paths and manifolding to reduce 3D MHD effects, Identification of new material for the vacuum vessel …  In-elastic analysis of component including Birth-to-death modeling and fracture mechanics indicate a higher performance PFCs are possible. Many issues/properties for material development & optimization are identified.

Thank you!