Information Technology NU Communication Systems Funding Models February 5, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unified Communications Bill Palmer ADNET Technologies, Inc.
Advertisements

Darton College Information Systems Use Policies. Introduction Dartons Information Systems are critical resources. The Information Systems Use Policies.
University of Baltimore Telecommunications Technology
BAI613 Module 2 - Voice over IP Technology. Module Objectives 1. Describe the benefits of IP Telephony/Packet Telephony/VoIP over traditional telephone.
1 Leading the way with innovative leadership The Navajo Nation  Walking In Beauty Into the 21st Century  Achieving Government Reform  Securing Financial.
IT INFRASTRUCTURE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Rate Day June 10, Consolidated Technology Services Established by SB First Special Session, RCW “To ensure maximum benefit.
IT Governance Committee on Research Technology January 11, 2011.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
New Opportunities with Telecommunications Technology change in the telecommunications infrastructure is opening new doors to increased service levels,
Promoting the Enterprise IPMA 2005 Executive Seminar September 21, 2005 Gary Robinson, Director Department of Information Services Scott Came, Director.
1. Funding model for telecom services  FTE funding model  Blue Ribbon Committee on IT Excellence Horizontal wiring upgrades 2.
Larry Conrad October 14, Issues with Current Comm Tech Funding Model Based on phone service only…no networking charges Revenues generated from bundled.
1 TIF Discussion Communications Technology Services.
IACC-ITS.PPT June 1, 2001 Communications and Computing Services Johanna Madjedi IACC-ITS Joint Meeting June 1, 2001.
Data Centers and IP PBXs LAN Structures Private Clouds IP PBX Architecture IP PBX Hosting.
The Technology Presentation prepared by Warren Frost.
IS Organization Peter E. Lesser Kraft Kennedy & Lesser (212) LawNet 2001.
Blue Swann Technologies. Blue Swann is the Future The critical success factor for business is “reach” and not size. Blue Swann is specifically designed.
ISVs and Technology 26% Banking and Finance 26% Travel and Consumer 22% Information and Media 14% Emerging Verticals 10% Company 1993 founded, US-based,
Navigating the Maze How to sell to the public sector Adrian Farley Chief Deputy CIO State of California
Effectively Explaining the Cloud to Your Colleagues.
Extending Traditional Desktop Office Communication Systems Chuck Harden, System Analyst Nick Kwiatkowski, System Analyst.
IT Update Faculty Senate September 1, 2004 University of Houston Information Technology.
Voice over IP Spring LNA Meeting April 1, What is Voice over IP? n A technology for transporting integrated digital voice, video and data over IP.
Concept & Practicality in London Borough of Newham VOIP.
Cornell 18,000 students 2,000 faculty Twelve colleges on Ithaca campus Four are state colleges, eight are private (including grad school and school of.
1 Faculty Council IT Committee C-13 February 4, /4/2010.
What now for the telecom industry
Reviewed by Kim Davis EDLD 5362 Final Project May 15, 2011.
Current Job Components Information Technology Department Network Systems Administration Telecommunications Database Design and Administration.
TECHNOLOGY AND THE BOND PROGRAM TECHNOLOGY PLAN
Computing and Telecommunication Services Dennis Fouty, Ph.D. Information Technology September 5, 2003 We are IT Building the IT Community... Together.
Happy Valley School District Technology Budget Team A: Paula Fehlinger Natalie Leibensperger Chris Parsell Monica Parsell.
VoIP Implementation Pitt County Government September 13, 2004.
A Glance Back  We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from:  Declining state appropriations  Pressure.
Converged Service A Dartmouth Perspective Bob Johnson.
Development of a Tribal Utility Why is the Development of a Tribally Owned Utility a Why is the Development of a Tribally Owned Utility a “Good Thing”
U Michigan Voice Service IT Central Services Andy Palms January 5, 2005.
Cloud Services 8 Reasons to Outsource your Software to the Cloud.
Telecommunications & Technology Infrastructure Program (TTIP): Annual Report and Update Patrick Perry, Vice Chancellor Technology, Research & Information.
P R E S E N T A T I O N to Academic Senate Forum 17 – May ALFA TECH.
Information Technology Cost Pool Council of Research Associate Deans March 12, 2009.
The Virtual Call Center: Enhancing the Customer Experience Greg Pisano Director, Market Development BlueNote Networks.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY PARKING SERVICES STUDENT FEE USAGE UPDATE OCTOBER 2014.
Conferencing & Enterprise ROI Randy Knaub Director of Marketing.
September 19, 2002CSG - Seattle1 Toward Sustainable Models for Funding IT in Higher Education Common Solutions Group September 19, 2002 Jack McCredie.
Information Technology Current Work in System Architecture January 2004 Tom Board Director, NUIT Information Systems Architecture.
Making the Case for the Hosted Solution Presented By: Jon Beck Chief Operating Officer Pandora Networks
A Model For Centralized Network Support On The Campus Basil Irwin Senior Network Engineer June 8, 1999 National Center for Atmospheric Research.
ICS Working Groups Snowmass August ICS Intercampus Demonstration Project(s) Intercampus VoIP for ICS members –For our conference calls Intercampus.
Core IT Assessment Approach Common Solutions Group IT Governance and Funding Workshop January, 2006 Philip Long Yale University.
National Information Communication Technologies Strategy Vasif Khalafov “National strategy” working group - Web -
1 Computing Support of Instruction Dr. H.E. (Buster) Dunsmore Purdue University Department of Computer Science PowerPoint slides.
1 ITS STRATEGIC INITIATIVES Ken Orgill Assistant Vice Chancellor, Information Technology Services and Campus Chief Information Officer.
Information Services & Technology Data Network Recharge Forum May 19 and 20, 2010.
UCB Messaging Initiative Brad Judy Information Technology Services.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AT UAB Rates and Services For FY
1 People ready: one click communication from the most popular Office applications Streamlined communication: communication is based on the presence information.
Out of Sight, But Not Out of Touch Remote Office, Branch Office IP Telephony Solutions Charles Henderson Director, Product Management EADS TELECOM North.
Network Funding Model Recommendation May Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style Technology. It’s Happening Here. 
Information Technology Support Services Focusing on our customers 1.
Helen Wright Christine Springett Schools Broadband Connectivity The Way Forward.
Printing (Net-Print) Joanne Button August 23rd 2016.
Network Funding Model Recommendation
The Lone Star College System
Campus Network ~100 academic/administrative buildings
Creating a University IT Service Portfolio
Priorities for the new century
Toward Sustainable Models for Funding IT in Higher Education
Presentation transcript:

Information Technology NU Communication Systems Funding Models February 5, 2006

Information Technology Departments Involved Budget Office Controller’s Office Information Technology

Why New Model? Voice systems at end-of-life and support Technology and standards established Market focused on converged technologies End-user expectations New at-home pricing models

Information Technology Consultant engagement resulted in – Development of overarching principles – Creation of a “Core Services” concept – Identification of new models Library model Head-tax model NUIT and Budget Planning developed NU approach – Plan is to share with the larger NU community Planning Process

Information Technology Provide “core services” to everyone Eliminate technology islands Promote and ensure investment utilization NUIT is sole provider of core services – NUIT manages all infrastructure – NUIT owns all networking components to the jack in the wall Overarching Principles

Information Technology Combination of services that have evolved from a separate telecommunications and networking environment to a converged communications environment – support and enhance communications – facilitate University goals – are provided to all faculty, staff and students Core Services

Information Technology Included in Core Services Current services: Dialtone Voice conferencing System upgrades to the communications infrastructure Operational support Inter-campus fiber link Commodity Internet Internet 2 and Starlight Secure remote access Host-based virus protection On campus network wireless access (expanded) Current services separately billed: Voic Local calling Domestic long distance Emergency and public space telephones Basic NUTV New services: Desktop video conferencing Enterprise instant messaging Softclients for VoIP Headsets for softclients

Information Technology Future Core Services Enhanced and calendaring Network storage Campus-wide firewalls

Information Technology Telephone sets (VoIP) Telephone sets (TDM) Video camera Cellular Calling cards Departmental firewalls Home network connectivity International LD Expanded NUTV Installation charges Telephone answering service Automatic Call Distribution (ACD) telephone sets and features Non-Core (separately charged)

Information Technology Impact of Technology on Funding Models Industry trend is toward per-pipe pricing vs. per- call pricing Users pay for network access, not usage

Information Technology Two fundamental models – Library model – central funding of core services – Head-tax model – charge schools/departments for core services Under either model – Stop usage billing for core services – Continue billing for non-core services Continue charges to decentralized and self- supporting units – (e.g., Kellogg, FSM, Law, Housing, etc.) Funding Models

Information Technology Reallocate existing budgets from schools and departments to fund core services centrally At what level? – Actual spending on telecommunications and networking exceeds budgeted funds by $1.5+ million For decentralized and self-supporting units, costs of core services still allocated to them Library Model

Information Technology Allocation bases considered – Employee Salary – Employee Headcount – Employee Headcount + Student Headcount Under all bases – Projected costs = numerator – Prior year actual salary/counts = denominator – Annual/periodic charge for core services Headcounts – No partial heads – Weight to account for seasonality during the year Head-tax Models

Information Technology Based on salary expense in CUFS Implications vs. current charges – More charges to administrative units – Less charges to majority of schools Head-tax Model: Employee Salary

Information Technology Based on HRIS records Implications vs. current charges – Almost all areas charged less except FSM Head-tax Model: Employee Headcount

Information Technology Based on HRIS + SES records Student count = All registered students Implications vs. current charges – Increased charges to schools vs. other approaches Head-tax Model: Employee + Student Headcount

Information Technology Implement the Employee + Student Headcount funding model for FY2006. – Discontinue NetID charges – Discontinue usage charges for core services Continue charges to schools / departments for non- core services For decentralized and self-supporting units, continue and adjust allocations to them based on FY2006 funding model changes Recommendations