P. Lynn Kennedy Louisiana State University. No Net Cost Directive PRIOR LAW/POLICY Requires USDA to the maximum extent practicable to operate the sugar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies to correct balance of payments disequilibrium
Advertisements

Winter 2013/2014 Reliability Solution Including LNG MWHs N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Greg Lander Skipping Stone NEPOOL Markets & Reliability.
World Trade Organization Impacts on China and Hong Kong.
Global Sugar Policy Reform John Beghin and Amani El-Obeid Economics and CARD Iowa State University Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy Reform University.
Chapter 4 global analysis Section 4.1 International Trade Section 4.2
Chapter 4 Global Analysis
Understand the role of business in the global economy. 1.
Unit 13 International Marketing
Lynn Kennedy Department of Agricultural Economics & Agribusiness Louisiana State University A&M College and LSU AgCenter.
Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (FAIR Act of 1996) Also referred to Freedom to Farm Developed by: Joe L. Outlaw.
International and Regional Agreements Affecting Trade.
Introduction to Business
Chapter 9: International Trade. Argument Against Free Trade Foreign goods crowd out our markets, reducing employment and sales Trade deficit increases.
Free Trade? Despite policy reforms enacted as a result of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, global dairy markets remain among the most protected.
ACRE VS DCP Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 Michael R. Dicks Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University June 6, 2008 Thanks.
Government Intervention in Agriculture
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Gábor Zsugyelik ISO Council Session Istanbul 23 May April 2006.
Sugar Policy in the United States: Pressures For Reform, Lessons From Europe German Marshall Fund November 10, 2005 Thomas Earley Executive Vice President.
New Trade Agreements: Implications for U.S. Sugar P. Lynn Kennedy Louisiana State University.
1 NAFTA and the Saga of the Corn Joe Sun Chee Qiujia Chen Angela Dixon.
Free Trade versus Protectionism Chapter Benefits of International Trade uIncreased variety of goods uLower costs uIncreased competition and better.
Free Trade versus Protectionism
The United States and the Global Economy COI1 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the.
BPA FY 2003 Financial Condition Update: Liquidity Tools to Bridge the Gap Confidential – Sensitive Information BPA has a number of liquidity tools to bridge.
SUGAR PROGRAM 2008 Farm Bill Dan Colacicco United States Department of Agriculture.
International Trade McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 37 – Comparative Advantage recap,
USDA Farm Service Agency Iowa July Iowa Farm Service Agency Local County Offices/Service Centers County Committee Both Farm Programs and Farm Loans.
Trade Programs, Policies, and Outlook 2014 Farm Bill Education Conference Luis A. Ribera Associate Professor and Extension Economist.
Tailoring the U.S. Sugar Program for the Future Jackie Theriot Louisiana Farm Bureau – Executive Committee Sec./ Treasurer.
Near Term Prospects for the U.S. Sugar Industry Edward Evans, Sikavas Na Lampang and John VanSickle International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center.
Global Interdependence and Trade
Agreement on Anti-Dumping Measures Anti - Dumping Importers would like to import goods if available at a price lower than that of the good in the importing.
The Impact of Standards and SPS in selected Food sectors International Agreements Related to Trade and Standards * WTO Agreement on SPS * WTO Agreement.
“Normalizing Trade Relations with Cuba: GATT- compliant Options for the Allocation of the U.S. Sugar Tariff-rate Quota” Presented By: Devry S. Boughner.
Chapter 6: Allocation of Partnership Income Among the Partners: The Substantial Economic Effect Requirement.
The U.S. Sugar Regime: Options for Reform David Blandford Penn State University German Marshall Fund Luncheon Washington, DC. November 16, 2005.
The United States and the Global Economy COI1 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the.
The Doha Declaration and the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement Islamabad, 28 November 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
The 2002 Farm Bill: Implications for North American Trade Relationships North American Trade Relationships:Policy Challenges for 2002 and Beyond Chicago.
Impacts of Trade Agreements on U.S. Dairy Trade C.W. “Bill” Herndon WTO Impacts on U.S. Farm Policy: S-1016 Conference 2 June, 2005.
1 Chapter 21 International Trade and Finance ©2004 Thomson/South-Western Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary Summary Practice Quiz.
# McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. International Trade and Exchange Rates 20.
International Trade Chapter 38 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Unit 15 Why Nations Trade.. Section 1-4 Why Nations Trade In a recent year, about 8 percent of all the goods produced in the United States were exported,
International Sweetener Colloquium Orlando, Florida February 9, 2009 U.S. Sugar Policy in the 2008 Farm Bill: Why Congress Made Some Changes Jack Roney.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 General Overview Crop Programs Dairy Provisions.
American Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EIS) and the global agriculture Yong Liu Department of Agriculture.
A Review of NAFTA Disputes: Sugar and Agricultural-Based Sweeteners P. Lynn Kennedy and Daniel Petrolia.
Ch 4.1 International Trade The Global Marketplace.
Today’s Schedule – 12/7 Trade Barriers and Agreements PPT
Fashion and Economics.
International Trade Created by: Ms. Daniel. We talk about trade in terms of trade between nations, but the actual trade is between individuals and businesses.
Expectations from LDCs WTO 10 th Ministerial Conference in Nairobi
Wool, Mohair and Other Programs 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri May 20-21, 2002 David P. Anderson Texas A&M University.
Trade Programs and Policies 2002 Farm Bill Education Conference Kansas City, Missouri May 20-21, 2002 Joe Outlaw Texas A&M University.
Dairy Policy in the 2007 Farm Bill Ed Jesse UW-Madison/Extension.
MARKETING ALTERNATIVES FOR GEORGIA FARMERS TRI-CO. YOUNG FARMER ORGANIZATION.
Bioenergy Policies Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University June 23, 2008.
The United States in the Global Economy COI1 Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior.
Standard SSEIN1: Explain why we trade internationally.
International Trade 15-1 Why Nations Trade 15-2 Barriers to Free Trade
Business in the Global Economy
Chapter 17 International Trade.
Topic#3 Exchange control.
FTAA, WTO, FARM LEGISLATION MAY23-24,2002
The Global Marketplace
The Global Markets Continued...
International Trade Chapter 4.1 (2006 Edition)
Presentation transcript:

P. Lynn Kennedy Louisiana State University

No Net Cost Directive PRIOR LAW/POLICY Requires USDA to the maximum extent practicable to operate the sugar nonrecourse loan program at no net cost by avoiding sugar forfeitures to the CCC. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Continues no-cost requirement found in prior law. [Secs. 1401, 1403] Requires USDA to operate sugar-for-ethanol program (in Energy title) to ensure this no-cost directive is met.

Price Support Levels, Loans and Payments PRIOR LAW/POLICY Sets raw cane and refined beet sugar loan rates at 18.0¢ and 22.9¢/lb. Expands loan eligibility to in-process sugars and syrups at 80% of the applicable loan rates. Makes nonrecourse loans available to processors under certain conditions. Sets 9-month repayment term for such loans. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Increases raw cane sugar loan rate to 18.75¢/lb. in 2011and 2012, in 1/4¢ increments beginning in FY2009. Sets refined beet sugar loan equal to 128.5% of the raw cane rate, starting in FY2009 (e.g., to rise to 24.1¢/lb. in 2011 and 2012). Continues other provisions found in prior law.

Price Support Levels, Loans and Payments PRIOR LAW/POLICY Authorizes CCC to accept bids from sugar processors to purchase USDA owned sugar in conjunction with reduced production of new sugar crops. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Continues in-kind authority. Stipulates that planted beets or cane diverted from production only be used as bioenergy feedstock.

Price Support Levels, Loans and Payments PRIOR LAW/POLICY USDA now pays storage rates of 8¢/cwt. for raw cane and 10¢ per cwt. for refined beet sugar that has been forfeited under the nonrecourse loan program. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Requires (through crop year 2011) USDA minimum storage payment rates of 10¢/cwt. and 15¢/cwt. on forfeited raw cane and refined beet sugar.

Price Support Levels, Loans and Payments PRIOR LAW/POLICY Authorizes CCC to provide financing to processors of domestic sugar to construct or upgrade storage and handling facilities. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Continues prior law, but stipulates that loans shall not require any prepayment penalty.

Marketing Allotments and Allocations PRIOR LAW/POLICY To avert loan forfeitures, requires USDA to limit the amount of sugar processors can sell each year. This is done through a national “overall allotment quantity” (OAQ) between cane and beet sectors, and allocated to individual processors. The OAQ must accommodate WTO and NAFTA import commitments (1.532 million short tons). If imports are larger, USDA’s authority to implement allotments is suspended. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Continues purpose and structure of marketing allotments and allocations, but changes some key provisions. Changes formula to require USDA to set OAQ at not less than 85% of estimated human food and beverage sugar use. Eliminates allotment suspension provision.

Marketing Allotments and Allocations PRIOR LAW/POLICY Directs USDA to reassign unused raw cane and beet sugar marketing allocations first to other cane states and beet processors, respectively; second to cane processors within each state; third to sales of sugar in CCC’s inventory; and fourth to imports. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Adopts House/Senate change to prior law requiring that any reassignment of unused cane and beet allocations to imports [in the last step] must be met by imports “of raw cane sugar.”

Trade-Related Provisions PRIOR LAW/POLICY In accord with a 1994 trade commitment, USDA sets an annual global sugar import quota of not less than mil. short tons. USTR allocates the quota among eligible countries, and also administers preferential sugar import quotas for free trade agreement partner countries. Effective January 1, 2008, Mexico can ship duty free an unlimited amount of sugar to the U.S. market. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Makes no change to current U.S. trade commitments.

Trade-Related Provisions PRIOR LAW/POLICY Requires USTR in to reallocate unused country quota allocations to other quota-holding countries with sugar to sell. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Repeals requirement for reallocating sugar import quota shortfalls.

Trade-Related Provisions PRIOR LAW/POLICY USDA has discretion to increase the size of global raw cane and refined sugar import quotas when domestic sugar supplies are inadequate to meet U.S. demand at reasonable prices. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Requires USDA to set quotas for raw cane and refined sugar at the minimum level necessary to comply with U.S. trade agreement obligations. In cases of sugar shortages, supplies are to be increased first by reassigning allotment deficits to imports of raw cane sugar, second by increasing the refined sugar quota, and third by increasing raw cane sugar quota.

Trade-Related Provisions PRIOR LAW/POLICY To protect domestic sugar prices, USDA regulated the flow of sugar imports from large quota holders (through 2005). CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Conference agreement contains no comparable provision.

Trade-Related Provisions PRIOR LAW/POLICY The U.S.-Mexican agreement on bilateral market access for sugar and high-fructose corn syrup created an industry and government task force to address problems that might arise after the elimination of tariffs on sweeteners on January 1, CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Conference agreement contains no comparable provision.

Trade-Related Provisions PRIOR LAW/POLICY The U.S. withdrew from the International Sugar Organization (ISO) in 1992 because of opposition to the allocation of country contributions to ISO’s budget. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Requires the Secretary of Agriculture to work with the Secretary of State to restore U.S. membership in the ISO within one year.

Biofuel Feedstocks PRIOR LAW/POLICY No comparable provision. CONFERENCE AGREEMENT Establishes the Feedstock Flexibility Program, authorizing the use of CCC funds to purchase sugar to be resold as a biomass feedstock to produce bioenergy.