Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activities Theory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2  Individuals who are caught and sanctioned by the criminal justice system will be less likely to re-offend  Does prison reduce recidivism?  Do.
Advertisements

Chapter 15 Sentencing Options
Lesson 4 – Classical Approach and Rational Choice Robert Wonser Introduction to Criminology Crime and Delinquency 1.
Weak empirical support If anything, the certainty of punishment may have marginal effects on crime WHY SO WEAK? Based on “weak” theory—weak assumptions.
Chapter Four: Choice Theory: Because They Want To.
Neoclassical Criminology
Crime and Punishment.
Learning Theories. A Life of Crime? Could you go out tomorrow and embark on a life of crime? What would you do? How would you do it?
Chapter Four The Development of Rational Choice Theory
Choice Theory Development of Choice Theory Concepts of Rational Choice
Rational Choice Theory and Deterrence Theory
The Rational Offender The “Classical School” Deterrence Theory
Classical theory n Beccaria: On crime and Punishment (1764) n Justice was chaotic, corrupt; governments were monarchies (divine right of kings) n Essay.
Sentencing and Punishment
 Economics (language, theory)  “Expected Utility” = calculation of all risks and rewards  This is much broader than deterrence ▪ Includes risks not.
Theory 101 Organizing Theory Theoretical Traditions
Comments on Economic Behavioral Theory Sally S. Simpson University of Maryland.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 477 Terrorism Theory Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Theoretical Perspectives.
Spring 2005chris uggen – soc Lecture 7: rational choice and deterrence.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Theories of Delinquency. What to look for in a theory What are the central concepts (causes) Is the theory empirically supported? –Survey research, experimental.
Punishment & Sentencing Chapter 10 in Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
The Rational Offender The “Classical School” Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activities Theory.
Intro to Law Criminal Process: Sentencing. Sentencing Options Suspended Sentence – given, but does not have be served at that time, but may have to serve.
LAW 12 MUNDY 2008 Process and Objectives of Sentencing.
Deterrence and Rational Choice Theories
Rational Choice, Routine Activities, and Deterrence.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 2 Causes of Crime.
“Rational Choice” and Opportunity Theories. “Rational Choice Theory” Economics (language, theory) –“Expected Utility” = calculation of all risks and rewards.
A Primer on Criminological Theories. “Classical” Criminology Utilitarianism: Locke, Bentham, Beccaria Biological Determinism: Lombroso, Sheldon Psychological.
Imprisonment and Crime: Can Both be Reduced? Daniel S. Nagin Carnegie Mellon University National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
1 Conflict & Marxist Theory Prediction: Those who lack power will get treated more harshly by the CJS In U.S., power = race/class Controlling for “legal.
SPECIFIC DETERRENCE Individuals who are caught and sanctioned by the criminal justice system will be less likely to re-offend ◦Does prison reduce recidivism?
Classical Criminology  Based on the assumption that individuals choose to commit crimes after weighing the consequences of their actions.  Grew out of.
“Rational Choice” Theories and Situational Crime Prevention
Sentencing What purpose is served by establishing a system of punishment for those who commit crimes?
Copyright © 2012, 2009, 2006, 2001, 1997 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved 0 Criminology: A Sociological.
Punishment and sentencing By: Jessie Graber The goals of modern sentencing  General Deterrence- a crime control policy that depends on the fear of criminal.
Vocabulary  Retribution- Theory that includes harsh punishment for criminals, such as long prison sentences and uncomfortable prison conditions.  Rehabilitation-
Chapter 1 The Goals of Correctional Policy Corrections Content: Jails, probation, prisons, parole Context: Democracy, bureaucracy Goals: Fairness (law)
©2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ Corrections: An Introduction, 2/e Seiter CJ 240: Legal Issues in Corrections.
Legal Psychology Gerhard Ohrband ULIM University, Moldova 7 th lecture Judicial judgments.
Dealing with Lawbreakers
© 2003 Wadsworth Publishing Co. Chapter 5 The Development of Rational Choice Theory Criminology 8 th edition Larry J. Siegel.
Expert witness A person who is a specialist in a subject, often technical, who may present his/her expert opinion without having been a witness to any.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 2 Causes of Crime Chapter 2 Causes of Crime © 2015 Cengage Learning.
Social Control.  Collective efforts to ensure conformity to the norms.  Formal vs. Informal –“Informal” subject of considerable discussion to this point.
The Criminal Justice System. Approaches to Crime Control Deterrence: the threat of punishment does deter crime if the individual knows: ▫They are likely.
THE EARLY SCHOOLS OF CRIMINOLOGY : CLASSICAL VIEW AND POSITIVISM.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
Chapter Four: Choice Theory: Because They Want To.
Introduction to Corrections Chapter One. Corrections Today 6.7 million adults under supervision (2002)
Important Piece of Research I Forgot to Cover Larry Sherman’s Domestic Violence Experiments  Random assignment of police response to D.V. Counsel Separate.
Copyright © 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Punishment and Sentencing Chapter 12.
FCND2 Part I: Introduction (Chapters 1 and 2) Chapter 1: Introduction Copyright © 2015 Carolina Academic Press. All rights reserved.
Criminal Justice Unit 4.  Read  Should euthanasia (aka assisted suicide) be legal?
Choice Theory Chapter 4 SOC 112.
Chapter 4 Classical and Neoclassical Thought
Chapter 2 Causes of Crime
Chapter Four Rational Choice Theory
Chapter 5 The Classical Thinkers
Criminal Violence Riedel and Welsh, Ch
Probation and Parole.
Theories of Delinquency
Introduction to Theory
Chapter 3 Neoclassical Criminology
“Choice Theories” Historical Context of Choice Theories
Goodbye to the “Hedonistic Calculators” and Hello to “Born Criminals”
Process and Objectives of Sentencing
Presentation transcript:

Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activities Theory The Rational Offender Deterrence Theory Rational Choice Theory Routine Activities Theory

Social Context Classical School Criminology (1750s) Bentham, Beccaria as “utilitarian philosophers” Articulated a “general theory” of human behavior Rebirth of Deterrence Social Context of U.S. in the 1970s Murray, Martinson, Economists

Base Assumptions about Humans 1. Rational (cost/benefit) 2. Hedonistic 3. Human behavior can be controlled through certain, swift, severe punishment

Additional Baggage (assumptions) General theory (explains all crime) Equally feel pain Equally judge opportunity, pleasure

Deterrence Theory Criminal behavior (or crime rates) vary directly with _______ of FORMAL punishment. Certainty Severity Swiftness MICRO or MACRO? Specific or General

Marginal versus Absolute Absolute deterrence: the existence of formal punishment reduces crime Marginal: increases in existing formal punishment reduces crime further

General Deterrence (Macro) What should reduce crime rates? Evidence: Severity of Punishment Death Penalty Research Certainty of Punishment Experiments in Certainty (KC patrol) Swiftness of Punishment?

General Deterrence Micro Level An individuals perceptions of _______ influence their decision to commit crimes. “Perceptual Deterrence” Criticism of “objective” = do people really know the clearance rate? Better: what do you think the clearance rate is?

Perceptual Deterrence Research Initial cross sectional studies: Perceived risk, severity SR crime But, what is the causal order?? Deterrence vs. “Experiential” effect Manipulation of Perceived Risk Scared Straight

Specific Deterrence A person who commits a crime and is punished is less likely to commit additional crimes. Swift, Certain, Severe (Marginal) How test these propositions?

Testing Specific Deterrence Prison vs. Probation? Perhaps, “time in prison” or “type of prison” More realistically Probation vs. Intensive Probation Probation vs. Boot Camp

Deterrence Review: Deals only with formal legal sanctions. Is this fair? Empirical Support? General Deterrence Macro Micro (Perceptual) Specific Deterrence

Why little support for deterrence? We can’t get certain, severe, swift enough The theory is based on bad assumptions How rational are we? Equality of opportunity, pleasure, pain? “Marginal” deterrence!

POLICY IMPLICATIONS General Deterrence: certain, swift, and severe punishment reduces crime rates, or the probability that an individual will offend Specific Deterrence: CS&S punishment reduces recidivism Can’t/Won’t make sentences swift, certain, and severe enough? Incapacitate