In-orbit calibration (TOTAL channel) V space -V IBB Raw Earth V (counts) Raw IBB V (counts) =

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AITA 9, MERTIS Team – MERTIS Calibration, Oct 2007 Folie 1 Development of a calibration concept for the MErcury Thermal Infrared Spectrometer Thomas Saeuberlich,
Advertisements

1 st post launch SCIAMACHY calibration & Verification Meeting L1b Astrium Friedrichshafen – Germany 24 July 2002 First Level 1b Spectral Calibration analysis.
Brown Bag Lunch Lecture ABI Calibration
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
Cluster Angewandte Fernerkundung DLR Oberpfaffenhofen Figure 2 shows all sun mean reference spectra of GOME from July 1995 to June 2006.
Calibration commissioning 16/01/2003: Extended ‘Normal mode’ 282 columns 22/01/2003: TOTAL forward and reverse scans ~11:00-12:15 23/01/2003:Earth stare.
Preliminary Noise Estimates for Infrared Data from the GOES-13 Imager Don Hillger NOAA/NESDIS/StAR/RAMMB Tim.
1 PHYSICS Progress on characterization of a dualband IR imaging spectrometer Brian Beecken, Cory Lindh, and Randall Johnson Physics Department, Bethel.
Digital Cameras CCD (Monochrome) RGB Color Filter Array.
NOAA Research and Operations Marine Optical Buoy Design Review July 18-19, 2006 Plan for calibration and maintenance of AHAB Uncertainty Budget: Laboratory.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
CERES-GERB Joint Science Teams The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) experiment GERB Status Imperial College London J E Harries (GERB.
0. To first order, the instrument is working very well ! 1.Evolution of the IR detector with time 2.Stability of the L channel 3.Saturation 4.Linearity.
Plans for interim data release J E Russell (Imperial)
Thermal Infrared Multispectral Mapper Computer Model of the Experiment It is a model of the EXPERIMENT, it is not a model of the DEVICE Special models.
Addendum to Exercise 6 and 7 Handling and Processing Satellite (Landsat) Images.
OMEGA DATA CUBE ORBNNNN_M.QUB Idat  S jdat sdat1 sdat0.
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION B. Gondet,Saint Louis, 21/05/2008.
Level 1.5 Processing Updates Martin Bates, RAL GIST th December, 2005.
Module 2 : Linearity AGENDA TVI Vision, Kari Siren Linearity in general Theory, what does non-linearity mean when measuring “true” colour How to measure,
18 th GIST Meeting 14 th –16 th May 2003 Ground Segment (GGSPS) Report 1 Commissioning update B.C.Stewart RAL.
Slide 1 Implementation of algorithmic correction of stray light in a pushbroom hyperspectral sensor > Karim Lenhard > Implementation of algorithmic.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
Overview of the “Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB)” Experience. Nicolas Clerbaux Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) In collaboration.
RGP geolocation analysis. The geolocation problem We don’t have all the necessary information: –Optical model needs tuning Can prob. do this now but not.
NASA Langley Research Center / Science Directorate CERES SW channel spectral darkening: Rev1 adjustments and beyond Contributors: Norman Loeb, Jennifer.
EG2234: Earth Observation Interactions - Land Dr Mark Cresswell.
March 2004 Charles A. DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECEG287 Optical Detection Course Notes Part 15: Introduction to Array Detectors Profs.
Lecture 5: Radiative transfer theory where light comes from and how it gets to where it’s going Tuesday, 19 January 2010 Ch 1.2 review, 1.3, 1.4
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Calibration Commissioning Report GIST 19 RAL, 27th August 2003 GERB Instrument Team & Operations Team.
Phase calibration pictures 3/9/10. Dark count image Required for: 1. determining image intensity in the absence of light. 2. also required for phase artifact.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
Kinetic Temperature Retrievals from MGS TES Bolometer Measurements: Current Status and Future Plans A.A. Kutepov, A.G. Feofilov, L.Rezac July 28, 2009,
CALMON data 1 Use of daily CALMON data Brian Stewart RAL.
IBB Calibration Update J. Rufus GIST21 Meeting Boulder, CO. 31 st March – 2 nd April 2004 © Imperial College London.
Coco Rulinda (CGIS-NUR) for PGD 2009
GERB in-flight calibration Monitoring Instrument Gain.
Level 1.5 Processing Updates Martin Bates, RAL GIST th April, 2005.
# x pixels Geometry # Detector elements Detector Element Sizes Array Size Detector Element Sizes # Detector elements Pictorial diagram showing detector.
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
GERB Ground Calibration Overview and Status J. Rufus
GSICS DCC calibration update
Validation status overivew
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
Validation status overivew
TEMPO Instrument Update
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Calibration Status for the GOME Instrument
GOES Lunar Calibration
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION
System Overview CHRISS Combined High-Resolution Imaging and Spectroscopy System Intelligent Systems Group – University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.
DETERMINATION OF PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION
San Diego Conference 2 August 2001
MODIS Characterization and Support Team Presented By Truman Wilson
Data Preparation for ASTER
Meteorological Service of Canada
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
What Is Spectral Imaging? An Introduction
GIFTS System Calibration Requirements Flowdown
EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting
PATMOS-x AVHRR Solar Reflectance Calibration Update
UVIS Calibration Update
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
Na Xu, Xiuqing Hu, Lin Chen, Min Min
Lunar calibration of COMS visible channel using GIRO
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

In-orbit calibration (TOTAL channel) V space -V IBB Raw Earth V (counts) Raw IBB V (counts) =

In-orbit calibration B : ground calibration measurement of G(SW source) / G(LW source) L F IBB : ground calibration measurement of the filtered internal black body radiance

In-orbit calibration monitoring SW response monitored via CALMON solar diffuser sphere Quartz filter transmission: [V sw (light) – V sw (dark)]/ [V TOT (light) – V TOT (dark)] SW response: [V CALMON (light) – V CALMON (dark)] / G TOT

In-orbit calibration monitoring Internal black body behavior monitored as by temperature variation

Calibration table updates 1: spectral response Updated reprocessed visible ( µm) detector spectral response received In the absence of infrared data this was ‘stitched’ to the witness sample infrared data (starting at 2.5µm) Updated calibration parameters have been produced from this (B, A, T)

Reprocessed Average Detector Spectral Response and witness sample data

Effect of reprocessed data on calibration Ratio of Gain calculated from a SW source to that calculated from a LW source Would be 1 for perfect knowledge of spectral response and instrument linearity Green: old SR, Red: reprocessed SR

Calibration table updates 2: internal black body table Pixel to pixel variability in the filtered internal black body radiances determined from ground calibration has been found to be due to pixel offset drift during the calibration measurements This drift can and has been illuminated for the central pixels, a decision needs to be made about how the issue is dealt with for the other pixels in the array An update to the internal black body table will result after such a decision.

Variation of black body and detector temperatures Detector temp. variation 0.4  C Implies G(TOT) variation ~ (0.04%)

Gain variations 28/4/03 – 03/03/04 Pixel 123 (noisy)

Gain variations Scan means 28/4/03 – 03/03/04