Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Science Challenges: Streamline the process to ensure products are operational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3rd GOES User’s Conference Report on the NESDIS Data User’s Conference Ken Knapp GOES User’s Conference May 2004.
Advertisements

NASA Earth Science Data Preservation Content Specification H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan John Moses 10 th ESDSWG Meeting – November 2, 2011 Newport News, VA.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Meeting Expectations Gary Jedlovec Purpose of review SPoRT Mission and Vision Role of Science Advisory Committee Charge to Committee members transitioning.
NOAA Climate Program – An Update NOAA Science Advisory Board March 19, 2003 NOAA Science Advisory Board March 19, 2003 Mary M. Glackin NOAA Assistant Administrator.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 NOAA Operational Geostationary Sea Surface Temperature Products from NOAA.
Introduction to Computer Technology
Storm Tracker – a Web-Based Tool for Working with the Automated Tracking of Thunderstorm Clusters Bob Rabin NOAA / NSSL / CIMSS Tom Whittaker Space Science.
System design technique  System Development Life Cycle  Prototyping  Rapid Application Development.
Systems Investigation and Analysis
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES-GOES Blended SST Analysis.
SRA Enabling Programme SRA Board Meeting – Public Session Carey Street, London 26 th February 2009.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Science Support for NASA-NOAA Research to Operations (R2O) and GPM Ralph.
Chapter 13: Developing and Implementing Effective Accounting Information Systems
Chapter 14 Information System Development
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
Acquiring Information Systems and Applications
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) x is reduced state vector [SST(x), TCWV(w)]
3rd NSTWS, Vienna VA, July Research to Operations in the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation Lars Peter Riishojgaard Director, JCSDA.
1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Declaring a Product Operational Instructions / Guidance This template will be used by NESDIS personnel to recommend to the SPSRB.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Center for Satellite Applications and Research External Review Alfred M.
1 SPSRB Decision Brief on Retiring “Product Name” Date Presenter: V4 July 22, 2015 Guidance can be found on the note pages. Delete this banner when submitting.
Objects in the Mirror are closer than they appear Where We’ve Been What We’ve Accomplished Where We Need to Go Why We Need to Go There THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Climatology of Hurricane.
DRAFT POES-GOES-GPS Blended TPW Products July ??, 2008 Preliminary Design Review.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 POES Microwave Products Presented.
US BENEFITS. It Addresses Priorities The US and Canada have common scientific, economic and strategic interests in arctic observing: marine and air transportation.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Requirements Gathering World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
2008 US CLIVAR Summit Phenomena Observations and Synthesis.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 In Situ SST for Satellite Cal/Val and Quality Control Alexander Ignatov.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 CoastWatch / OceanWatch Presented.
CEOS Priorities for 2013 Agenda 3 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS Executive Officer CEOS SIT-28 Meeting Hampton, Virginia, USA 12 March 2013.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
January 7, 2015 Walter Wolf, Jaime Daniels, and Lihang Zhou NOAA/NESDIS, Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Shanna Sampson, Tom King,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Influences of Changes.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
NPOESS Science Advisory Team Gregory W. Withee Assistant Administrator for Satellite and Information Services July 16,2003 A Proposal to the NOAA Science.
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is envisioned as a coordinated national and international network of observations, data management and analyses.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing Assimilation Techniques for Atmospheric Motion Vectors Derived via a New Nested Tracking Algorithm Derived for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
1 Instructions / Guidance This template is a reporting template for product updates or enhancements being promoted into operations. The OSPO SPSD Division.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Recommended Tabulations and Dissemination Section B.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
1 An Overview of Recent Actions/Events to Assure a Continued OSVW Capability.
V7 July 22, Analysis of Alternatives Decision Brief to the SPSRB Instructions / Guidance This template will be used by NESDIS personnel to present.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Role of Satellite Ocean.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
V1 November 12, Instructions / Guidance This template is a reporting template for product updates or enhancements being promoted into operations.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Requirement: Provide information to air quality decision makers and improve.
CLASS Metadata and Remote Sensing Extensions CLASS Data Provider’s Conference September 2005 Anna Milan, Ted.Habermann,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Combining GOES Observations with Other Data to Improve Severe Weather Forecasts.
NOAA, May 2014 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Activities toward Transitioning Mature R&D Missions to an Operational Status.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
Satellite Information Flow
Requirements Analysis Scenes
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
NSIDC DAAC Accessioning and “De-commissioning” Plans
ESMF Governance Cecelia DeLuca NOAA CIRES / NESII April 7, 2017
Tennessee Longitudinal Data system (TLDS)
Presentation transcript:

Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Science Challenges: Streamline the process to ensure products are operational within 45 days. Next Steps: Review all operational products to determine if they are still used or can be retired. Transition Path: SPSRB Process NESDIS Process to Transition Satellite Products from Research to Operations Eileen Maturi1 (GOVERNMENT PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR), Mike Kalb1, IvanCsiszar1, Marco Vargas1, Tom Schott2, David Benner3, Antonio Irving3, John Paquette3 1.NOAA/NESDIS/STAR, 2. NOAA/NESDIS/OSD, 3. NOAA/NESDIS/OSDPD Requirement: Transition satellite research products to operational satellite products for users (Govt, Mil, Universities, Industry) Science: How can I develop a process to transition satellite products from research to operations? Benefit: 1) user can identify a need for a new or improved observations or products 2) scientific agencies can identify a maturing scientific development or algorithm thought to provide significant user benefit 3) NOAA/NESDIS program or project managers can receive requirements to develop new or improved products. These acquisitions managers formulate plans to acquire the new capabilities for users. These requests will include the requirements, specifications and other information needed to describe the requested product or service. They are submitted on the Satellite Products and Services Review Board (SPSRB) web site: by only (gov and mil) domains. Others can submit a user request but have to submit their requests through a NESDIS sponsor. The SPSRB Manager receives a notification of each request and the assessment process is initiated. These requests will include the requirements, specifications and other information needed to describe the requested product or service. They are submitted on the Satellite Products and Services Review Board (SPSRB) web site: by only (gov and mil) domains. Others can submit a user request but have to submit their requests through a NESDIS sponsor. The SPSRB Manager receives a notification of each request and the assessment process is initiated. There are three key assessments performed on the user requests: (1) request-ensure the request contains sufficient information to process, (2) requirement- consistent with the NOAA Mission Goal Program observational requirements data bases, and (3) technical- determine technical feasibility to satisfy the user request and provide NESDIS management the best way to process the user request. (3) ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES There are four actions required in this part of the process: (1) Determine if the product is really needed and satisfies a NOAA Mission Goal Program; (2) Form an integrated products team (IPT)-assembled to guide product development; (3) identify viable technical solutions; (4) select a technical solution- Yes or No on product development. (3) ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES There are four actions required in this part of the process: (1) Determine if the product is really needed and satisfies a NOAA Mission Goal Program; (2) Form an integrated products team (IPT)-assembled to guide product development; (3) identify viable technical solutions; (4) select a technical solution- Yes or No on product development. The SPSRB technical solution is to form an IPT and generate a plan for product development. As part of this plan, the resources needed for development, maintenance and archive are included. The projects are tracked via the secure SPSRB Web Product database. (4) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRE – OPERATIONAL This stage allows the IPT to begin routine processing for the purpose of complete testing and validation of the product. It allows for limited testing of the product by selected users. The user feedback helps refine the product and ensure formats are documented properly. PRE – OPERATIONAL This stage allows the IPT to begin routine processing for the purpose of complete testing and validation of the product. It allows for limited testing of the product by selected users. The user feedback helps refine the product and ensure formats are documented properly. (5) OPERATIONAL This stage allows the Management to work jointly with the IPT to transition the product into operations. Users are invited to participate. Two elements need to be met (1) project meets users' needs and (2) product can be supported operationally. Then the SPSRB will declare the product operational. The products database is updated and the product is required to become operational within 45 days or less. (5) OPERATIONAL This stage allows the Management to work jointly with the IPT to transition the product into operations. Users are invited to participate. Two elements need to be met (1) project meets users' needs and (2) product can be supported operationally. Then the SPSRB will declare the product operational. The products database is updated and the product is required to become operational within 45 days or less. Products are identified that no longer satisfy user requirements or the responsibility for the production can be transferred to another organization. (6) DIVESTITURE OR RETIREMENT SIX KEY STEPS (1) User Request (2) Assessment (3) Analysis of Alternatives (4) Project Development (5) Operational Decision (6) Product Divestiture or Retirement. SIX KEY STEPS (1) User Request (2) Assessment (3) Analysis of Alternatives (4) Project Development (5) Operational Decision (6) Product Divestiture or Retirement. (2) ASSESSMENT (1) USER REQUEST User Request 1. User 2. Science Improvement 3. Project Manager Resource Identification 1. Annual Product Reviews 2. Project Manager Reviews 3. Out-of-cycle Review Assessment 1. Request and Requirement Assessment 2. Technical Assessment 3. NOAA Partnership Policy Requirement Operational Decision 1. New Product Product Development 1. Development 2. Pre-operational 3. Operational Reporting 1. Project 2. Management Divesture or Retirement Decision NOAA Partnership Policy Requirement Analysis of Alternatives 1. Integrated Project Team Formed 2. Proposal for Product Development (Solution Analysis and Selection) Initial Project Plan Consolidated/Mission Observational Requirements List (CORL/MORL) PPBES NOAA Observational System Architecture (NOSA) User Key SPSRB Processes PROCESS STEPS Resource and Development Planning SPSRB Databases Change or Project Manager Allocate Funding Approved Project Plan Operational Decision 1. Update Product Ocean Surface Wind Vectors: Reduced Rain Flagged Vectors Produced with New QuikSCAT Processing A B A B New QuiKSCAT 25km Old QuikSCAT 25km COMPARISON OF NEW vs. OLD PROCESS: WHITE : RAIN FLAGS A and B are regions of the same area in both images showing the difference in quantity of rain flags. Decrease in rain flags indicate higher accuracy of prediction for wind vectors. No rain flags indicate a good measurement COMPARISON OF NEW vs. OLD PROCESS: WHITE : RAIN FLAGS A and B are regions of the same area in both images showing the difference in quantity of rain flags. Decrease in rain flags indicate higher accuracy of prediction for wind vectors. No rain flags indicate a good measurement Examples of Ocean Color Products MODIS-Chlorophyll Anomaly Product SeaWiFS-Chlorophyll Concentration Product NOAA’s Satellite and Information Service (NESDIS) process to transition satellite products from research to operations is a function of the Satellite Products and Services Review Board (SPSRB). The transition to operations of new satellite products requires approval through the SPSRB process. MECHANISM