SSC Page 1 Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies Presentation to FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003 Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESTeem RF Design Tools SECTION 4 - RF System Design.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE Submission January 2004 Bill Byrnes, Shared Spectrum Co. Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies This Presentation.
UAbove Law fahrul hakim2003 Wireless LAN implications Project managers and design engineer should be aware, the following potential problems from the implementation.
W5HN North Texas Microwave Society NTMS 1 W5HN North Texas Microwave Society NTMS Intro to Microwave Propagation for data Joe Jurecka – N5PYK.
Tri-Band RF Transceivers for Dynamic Spectrum Access By Nishant Kumar and Yu-Dong Yao.
The Radio Environment Map Sami Lunnamo. Presentation outline REM Definitions Requirements Challenges Design Location and mobility Database WS availability.
Wireless LAN Technology
Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong EE3900 Computer Networks Data Transmission Slide 1 Continuous & Discrete Signals.
Advanced Topics in Next- Generation Wireless Networks Qian Zhang Department of Computer Science HKUST Wireless Radio.
Summary of Path Loss in Propagation
Wireless Communication: Overview of basic concepts Narayan Mandayam.
Smart-Radio-Enabled Opportunistic Spectrum Utilization Xin Liu Computer Science Dept. University of California, Davis Netlabs Workshop, Davis, 2005.
Voice capacity in CDMA xRTT systems Term project (COE-543) By S.M.Rehman #
Wi-fi Range. Topics Discussed When we say range or coverage, what do we mean? What factors can affect range? Why are there so many different designs of.
5-1 Data Link Layer r What is Data Link Layer? r Wireless Networks m Wi-Fi (Wireless LAN) r Comparison with Ethernet.
Propagation characteristics of wireless channels
NSMA Conference Interference Temperature Round Table May 18, 2004 Les Wilding Cingular Wireless 5565 Glenridge Connector Atlanta, GA
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
Link Budget Calculation
Doc: CRpNL-10/0012d0 Summary of White Space ruling in the USA Vic Hayes, TUDelft 06-Oct-10Submission by Vic Hayes, TUDelft1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:
Wireless Transmission Fundamentals (Physical Layer) Professor Honggang Wang
Building your Business in the TV White Space
College of Engineering Resource Management in Wireless Networks Anurag Arepally Major Adviser : Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Introduction.
Wireless: Facts and Fiction Benjamin Friedlander Department of Electrical Engineering University of California at Santa Cruz Wireless Communications and.
© 2009, Shared Spectrum Company National Broadband Plan Staff Workshop Technology: Wireless Broadband Panel 2: Rural Broadband Thursday, August 13, 2009.
POWER CONTROL IN COGNITIVE RADIO SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECTRUM SENSING SIDE INFORMATION Karama Hamdi, Wei Zhang, and Khaled Ben Letaief The Hong Kong University.
Signal Propagation Propagation: How the Signal are spreading from the receiver to sender. Transmitted to the Receiver in the spherical shape. sender When.
Frequency Assignment 1 WRAP 0863F. Frequency Assignment WRAP efficiently supports assignment of frequencies and polarisations to stations and networks.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
EPL 476 Fundamental Concepts in Wireless Networks
Airborne RLAN and Weather Radar Interference Studies at C Band Paul Joe 1, Frank Whetten 2, John Scott 1 and Dennis Whetten 2 1 Environment Canada 2 The.
A Survey of Spectrum Sensing Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Applications YaGun Wu netlab.
24/03/2003Jacques MdM / REF France1 HF Receivers desensitisation from wideband noise spurious in HF bands (1.8 to 30 MHZ) Impact of spurious radiations.
ECE 4710: Lecture #36 1 Chapter 8  Chapter 8 : Wired and Wireless Communication Systems  Telephone  Fiber Optic  DSL  Satellite  Digital & Analog.
Applications of Wireless Communication Student Presentations and Research Papers Wireless Communication Technologies Wireless Networking and Mobile IP.
Static Spectrum Allocation
Risk Analysis in Spectrum Policy Julius Knapp Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology U.S. Federal Communications Commission Silicon Flatirons Center.
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ k Link Budget Considerations] Date.
Networked Systems Practicum Lecture 5 – Cellular Intro 1.
Wireless Communications Outline Introduction History System Overview Signals and Propagation Noise and Fading Modulation Multiple Access Design of Cellular.
CDMA Based MAC Protocol for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Alaa Mouquatash & Marwan Krunz Presentation by: Moheeb Abu-Rajab.
Doc.: IEEE /00144r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Dialog with FCC Nada.
1) A binary transmission system uses a 8-bit word encoding system. Find the Bandwidth and the SNR dB of the system if the channel capacity is bps.
1 Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE b and a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol Xiangpeng Jing and Dipankar Raychaudhuri, WINLAB Rutgers.
SE43 10th meeting5th-7th July 2011© IRT – Schuberth Study on a) maximum transmit power for TVWS devices b) available amount of TVWS in Bavaria/Germany.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil.
8.5 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
The University of Iowa. Copyright© 2005 A. Kruger 1 Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks Wireless Terms, FAQ & Glossary 27 January 2005.
INTRODUCTION. Electrical and Computer Engineering  Concerned with solving problems of two types:  Production or transmission of power.  Transmission.
Spectrum Policy Technological Solutions for Policy Problems Allen Petrin ©2003 all rights reserved 1 System Architecture for a Dynamic-Spectrum.
Numericals.
A SEMINAR ON “SATELLITE DIGITAL RADIO”
August, 2012 MBANS FCC Rules Summary Information document for SRD/MG on the FCC adopted MBAN rules under part 95 MedRadio service on 24 May 2012.
Unit I: Introduction.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster,
Transmission Problems
Cognitive Radio Based 5G Wireless Networks
UNIT I – Wireless channels
Concept of Power Control in Cellular Communication Channels
Technician Licensing Class
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
Nuts and Bolts of FCC FM Allocations
Wireless LAN Technology
April 24, Study Group 1 A Regulatory Framework for Use of TV Channels by Part 15 Devices John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Geo-location in USA Date: Authors: January 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar. 2010
Presentation transcript:

SSC Page 1 Frequency Agile Spectrum Access Technologies Presentation to FCC Workshop on Cognitive Radios May 19, 2003 Mark McHenry Shared Spectrum Company

SSC Page 2 Agenda Requirements Spectrum occupancy characteristics –Significant amount of “low hanging fruit” Spectrum access methods –Listen-Before Talk “TDMA” spectrum Broadcast spectrum –Probe –Geo-location/database

SSC Page 3 Frequency Agile Radio Requirements Create insignificant interference –Secondary operation with minimal requirement for coordination with primary system licensees –Unlicensed with equipment certifications on a system basis to assure avoidance of interference Operate in multiple bands –Assured capacity Offer cost/capacity/link range/deployment benefits –Access more (5 X?) spectrum than any current system –Operate in VHF/UHF TV band –Rapid spectrum agreements for itinerate use

SSC Page 4 Spectrum Occupancy Is Low “In many bands, spectrum access is a more significant problem than physical scarcity of spectrum, in large part due to legacy command-and-control regulation that limits the ability of potential spectrum users to obtain such access.” 1 Shared Spectrum’s measurements indicate –Many bands have no detectable occupancy –Some bands have low occupancy –Some bands have high occupancy Note 1: FCC Spectrum Policy Task Force Report, page 3

SSC Page 5 Typical Spectrum Occupancy Measurement No signals Medium and short duration signals FCC should conduct and publish spectrum occupancy measurements to identify low occupancy bands

SSC Page 6 Initially Harvest the Low Hanging Fruit Measurements show a large quantity of long duration, large area spectrum holes “Simple” spectrum access methods are sufficient –Minimal coordination between transceivers –Moderate computational costs Later evolve algorithms to handle more complex situations –Short duration, small spectrum holes –Optimize frequency assignments for increased capacity

SSC Page 7 Agenda Requirements Spectrum occupancy characteristics –Significant amount of “low hanging fruit” Spectrum access methods –Listen-Before Talk “TDMA” spectrum Broadcast spectrum –Probe –Geo-location/database

SSC Page 8 Adaptive, Receive-Only Spectrum Access Method P max TX = 10*log10(k * T * B) + P Primary – P measured - Margin –Margin = 10 to 20 dB, required for cummulative effects, rapid propagation changes, false alarm minimization –T – Interference Noise Temperature, in K –B = signal bandwidth, in Hz

SSC Page 9 Primary Transceivers Frequency Agile Transceivers Interference/Connectivity Limit Exclusion Zone Frequency Agile Coverage “Morphs” To Fit Primary Users Hidden-node problem overcome by each Frequency Agile transceiver listening to all Primary users within range

SSC Page 10 High Sensitivity Receiver Performance

SSC Page ground vehicles spread over 25 km moving at 25 km/hr 10 stationary ground vehicles spread over 25 km West Virginia location 3 m antenna height Simulation Example Primary users are stationary XG users are mobile Omni-directional antennas 420 MHz signal frequency

SSC Page 12 Link closure Interference Longley-Rice Model 420 MHz Free space loss Actual loss Propagation Losses

SSC Page 13 Frequency Agile network reduces TX power automatically Network needs switch to another frequency at low TX power levels XG TX Power (dBm) Target interference level of –100 dBm Primary Interference Level (dBm) TX Power and Interference

SSC Page 14 TV Receiver Frequency Agile Transceiver TV Transmitter Region of Potential Interference P T (kW) HAAT (m) Listen-Only Method in the Broadcast Bands TV Receiver L1 L2 Differential propagation loss = L1-L2

SSC Page 15 Transmit Power Rule P max TX = Po if Primary signal is not detected = Transmission prohibited if Primary signal is detected where, P max TX = Frequency Agile transmitter power level, in dBm Po = specified power value, in dBm

SSC Page 16 TV Receiver with Grade B reception Frequency Agile Transceiver TV Transmitter Terrain Blockage Building Blockage LOS Location LOS to Frequency Agile Transceiver Multi-Path Effects Minimal Interference Joint probability of three conditions –Agile Receiver doesn’t detect TV signal –Primary user receives TV signal –D/U < 15 dB

SSC Page 17 Minimum Detectable Signal (-121 dBm) Minimum Signal Strength – “Grade B” (-81 dBm) Min D/U =15 dB Acceptable Interference = Thermal Noise (-96 dBm) Received Power (dBm) 40 dB 25 dB Maximum Differential Propagation Value Maximum differential propagation value = 40 dB Maximum practical sensitivity improvement due to special detection processing Signal level at TV receiver Signal level at Frequency Agile receiver

SSC Page 18 Simulation of Differential Propagation Test reception points along a ~ 8 km path Scenario – Mid-Atlantic Region Elevation contours TV transmitters

SSC Page 19 Large Change in Propagation Loss over a Short Distance is Rare Signal from TV station A Signal from TV station B ~30 dB change in propagation loss over a small distance

SSC Page 20 Low Power Transmitters Have a Small Interference Range Noise Obstructed propagation Free-space propagation Maximum interference range of 4 km in free- space Maximum interference range of 600 m in obstructed conditions 1 mW transmit power

SSC Page 21 Spectrum Probing Method 75 km to 200 km spacing Frequency Agile transceiver Broadcast Receiver 1) Transmit (Pt) at a very low power 3) Measure Pr of the very weak signal using high processing gain 2) Very weak signal doesn’t interfere with primary user 4) Pt minus Pr is the propagation loss 5) Repeat with N nodes to estimate minimum propagation loss into area Frequency Agile monitors

SSC Page 22 Geo-Location Method TV Receiver Frequency Agile Transceiver TV Transmitter Region of Potential Interference P T (kW) HAAT (m) TV Receiver Protected Area Position information GPS, telephone Beacon TX Protected area boundary database information Telephone, over-the-air, special beacons, Internet, manually entered Guard Distance

SSC Page 23 Significant “White Space” Between TV Coverage Areas Grade B 50% and 90% contours Channel 5 and channel 54

SSC Page 24 How Large A Guard Distance? Noise Maximum interference range of > 100 km in free-space Maximum interference range of 2 km in obstructed conditions 1 W transmit power Large guard distances reduce spectrum harvest TV bands: 100 km is too large >> Limit TX power to mW’s Other bands: Max TX power ?

SSC Page 25 Summary Multiple, robust spectrum access methods –Listen-Before Talk “TDMA” spectrum Broadcast spectrum –Geo-location/database FCC should conduct and publish spectrum occupancy measurements –Many spectrum holes are large and have long duration FCC should allow experimental interactive operations –All access methods including Probe –TV and other bands