UNDERSTANDING RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Review. 2 TEST A 1.What is the single most important property of vibrating structure? 2. What happens when structure is vibrating in resonance? 3.What.
Advertisements

An-Najah National University
PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
MEEG 5113 Modal Analysis Set 3.
Sensitivity Analysis In deterministic analysis, single fixed values (typically, mean values) of representative samples or strength parameters or slope.
Application of Fluid-Structure Interaction Algorithms to Seismic Analysis of Liquid Storage Tanks Zuhal OZDEMIR, Mhamed SOULI Université des Sciences et.
Earthquake Engineering
Record Processing Considerations for Analysis of Buildings Moh Huang California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program California Geological Survey Department.
SRS Synthesis Special Topics
Lecture 2 January 19, 2006.
Keck Telescope Seismic Upgrade Design Support - Progress Report Frank Kan Andrew Sarawit 4 May 2011 (Revised 5 May 2011)
IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.
C ODE COMPLIANT SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS By Raed M. Hawladar ( ) Muhammad F. Alwaqdan ( ) Khalid M. Alghamdi ( )
Acceleration – Magnitude The Analysis of Accelerograms for the Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Nazgol Haghighat Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Ir. Daniel J. Rixen
ECIV 724 A Dynamics of Structures Instructor: Dr. Dimitris C. Rizos 300 Main St. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering (803)
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Dynamics Free vibration: Eigen frequencies
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering
Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of
1 HOMEWORK 1 1.Derive equation of motion of SDOF using energy method 2.Find amplitude A and tanΦ for given x 0, v 0 3.Find natural frequency of cantilever,
RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD
Time-history seismic analysis with SAP2000 A step-by-step guide for BEng/MEng/MSc students familiarizing with this piece of software.
December 3-4, 2007Earthquake Readiness Workshop Seismic Design Considerations Mike Sheehan.
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Elastic and inelastic relations..... mx+cx+Q(x)= -ma x Q x Q Q=kx elasticinelastic.
CABLE-STAYED BRIDGE SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ARTIFICIAL ACCELEROGRAMS
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab 1 December Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering K orea A dvanced I nstitute of S cience.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
1 Automated Processing of Earthquake Swarm Records at Very Short Epicentral Distances José M. Cepeda Universidad Centroamericana, (UCA) San Salvador, El.
Bentley RM Bridge Seismic Design and Analysis
COMPILATION OF STRONG MOTION DATA FROM EASTERN CANADA FOR NGA-EAST PROJECT Lan Lin Postdoctoral Fellow, Geological Survey of Canada.
Invited Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing Convened by The Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS) Pacific.
1. 2 CE-312 Engineering Geology and Seismology Instructor: Dr Amjad Naseer Lecture#15 Department of Civil Engineering N-W.F.P University of Engineering.
University of Palestine
Progress in identification of damping: Energy-based method with incomplete and noisy data Marco Prandina University of Liverpool.
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.
Zuhal OZDEMIR, Mhamed SOULI
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
Structural Dynamics & Vibration Control Lab., KAIST, Korea 1 A Comparative Study on Aseismic Performances of Base Isolation Systems for Multi-span Continuous.
Response of MDOF structures to ground motion 1. If damping is well-behaving, or can be approximated using equivalent viscous damping, we can decouple.
Department of Civil Engineering National Taiwan University National Taiwan University Generation of Uniform Hazard Accelerogram Representing from “Dominant.
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
February 12, John Anderson GE/CEE 479/679 Earthquake Engineering GE / CE - 479/679 Topic 7. Response and Fourier Spectra John G. Anderson Professor.
Dynamics Primer Lectures Dermot O’Dwyer. Objectives Need some theory to inderstand general dynamics Need more theory understand the implementation of.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
RELIABLE DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS Mehdi Modares, Robert L. Mullen and Dario A. Gasparini Department of Civil Engineering Case Western.
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 18 Force Vibration Response Spectrum.
Indian National Strong Motion Instrumentation Project Principal Investigator Prof. Ashok Kumar Department of Earthquake Engineering Indian Institute of.
Basics of Earthquakes Frequency
Force Vibration Response Spectrum
1 March 22, 2002Singapore, Elgamal Response Spectrum Ahmed Elgamal.
A SAMPLING OF BRIDGE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA BY MARK YASHINSKY, CALTRANS OFFICE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Most bridge owners have adopted design criteria.
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Eduardo Ismael Hernández UPAEP University, MEXICO
How the ground shakes? Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D., by
Design Spectra.
Seismic Moment Dr. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim M.Tech., Ph.D.,
Earthquake Load Formulation using ASCE7-05
3 General forced response
Aristotelis Charalampakis and Vlasis Koumousis
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
Shock Analysis of Launch Vehicle Equipment using Historical Accelerometer Records to Satisfy Shock Response Spectra Specifications By Tom Irvine.
Design Spectra.
Presentation transcript:

UNDERSTANDING RESPONSE SPECTRUM & PROVISIONS OF BNBC-2014

OUTCOME WHAT IS AN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRUM AT THE END OF THIS TRAINING/WORKSHOP/DISCUSSION YOU WILL UNDERSTAND: WHAT IS AN EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRUM RESPONSE SPECTRUM AS PER BNBC/14, AND HAVE A DISCUSSION GROUP TO SHARE YOUR IDEAS AND CONFUSIONS

CONTENT PART – I UNDERSTANDING EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE SPECTRUM PART – II RESPONSE SPECTRUM PROVISION OF BNBC/2014 PART – III : GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

RECAP - STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS

EQUATION OF MOTION       Summing forces along the x-axis is p(t) - fS – fD –fI = 0  

EQUATION OF MOTION (Earthquake Excitation) Single-Degree-of-Freedom System    

NATURAL PERIOD OF VIBRATION k n  rads/sec m  2 T sec n  n  n f cps (Hz) n 2

EFFECT OF DAMPING ON FREE VIBRATION DAMPED FREE VIBRATION     EFFECT OF DAMPING ON FREE VIBRATION

EFFECT OF DAMPING ON THE NATURAL VIBRATION FREQUENCY DAMPED FREE VIBRATION EFFECT OF DAMPING ON THE NATURAL VIBRATION FREQUENCY

PART - I UNDERSTANDING RESPONSE SPECTRUM

ORIGIN OF THE RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD Response Spectrum Method began in 1932, in the doctoral dissertation of M.A. Biot (1905–1985) The RSM remained in the academic sphere of research for many years and did not gain widespread engineering acceptance until the early 1970s. First, the computation of the response of structures to earthquake ground motion led to “certain rather formidable difficulties” (Housner 1947), and, second, there were only a few well-recorded accelerograms that could be used for that purpose. Then, in 1971, with the occurrence of the San Fernando, California, earthquake, the modern era of RSM was launched. This earthquake was recorded by 241 accelerographs, and by combining these data with all previous strong-motion records it became possible to perform the first comprehensive empirical scaling analyses of response spectral amplitudes (Lee 2002).

TIME HISTORY DATA THE MOST DIRECT DESCRIPTION OF AN EARTHQUAKE MOTION IN TIME DOMAIN IS PROVIDED BY ACCELEROGRAMS THAT ARE RECORDED BY INSTRUMENTS CALLED STRONG MOTION ACCELEROGRAPHS. THE ACCELEROGRAPH RECORDS THREE ORTHOGONAL COMPONENTS OF GROUND ACCELERATION AT A CERTAIN LOCATION. THE PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION, DURATION, AND FREQUENCY CONTENT OF EARTHQUAKE CAN BE OBTAINED FROM AN ACCELEROGRAMS. AN ACCELEROGRAM CAN BE INTEGRATED TO OBTAIN THE TIME VARIATIONS OF THE GROUND VELOCITY AND GROUND DISPLACEMENT.

El Centro ground motion (N-S Component) TIME HISTORY DATA El Centro ground motion (N-S Component) May 18, 1940 Time, sec Acceleration, g 0.00 0.00630 0.02 0.00364 0.04 0.00099 0.06 0.00428 0.08 0.00758 0.10 0.01087 0.12 0.00682 0.14 0.00277 0.16 -0.00128 0.18 0.00368 0.20 0.00864 0.22 0.01360 0.24 0.00727 0.26 0.00094 0.28 0.00420 0.30 0.00221 http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/ http://db.cosmos-eq.org/scripts/default.plx

TIME HISTORY DATA CENTRAL DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR EARTHQUAKE EXCITATION – i. ANALYTICAL SOLUTION IS NOT POSSIBLE; ii. NUMERICAL METHODS ARE EMPLOYED TO FIND OTHER QUANTITIES LIKE a. VELOCITY; b. DISPLACEMENT ETC. DIFFERENT NUMERICAL METHODS ARE: CENTRAL DIFFERENCE METHOD AVERAGE ACCELERATION METHOD NEWMARK’S METHOD ETC.

TIME HISTORY DATA ANALYSIS

RESPONSE SPECTRUM

DEFORMATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM

VELOCITY RESPONSE SPECTRUM Plot of V vs. TN  

ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM Plot of A vs. TN  

COMBINED D-V-A SPECTRUM A  V   D n n Tn A  V  2 D 2 Tn

RESPONSE SPECTRUM CHARACTERISTICS Response spectrum ( = 0,2,5, and 10%) and peak values of ground acceleration, ground velocity, and ground displacement for El Centro ground motion.

RESPONSE SPECTRUM CHARACTERISTICS Response spectrum for El Centro ground motion plotted with normalized scale A/ϋgo , V/ůgo , and D/ugo ;  = 0, 2 , 5 and 10%.

RESPONSE SPECTRUM CHARACTERISTICS Response spectrum for El Centro ground motion shown by a solid line together with an idealized version shown by a dashed line;  = 5%

ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM EL CENTRO EARTHQUAKE 5% DAMPING IT IS NOT PRACTICALLY POSSIBLE TO CALCULATE EXACT STRUCTURAL PERIOD . SPECTRAL ACCELERATION FOR SHORT PERIOD IS VERY IRREGULAR. FOR PRACTICAL USE IT HAS TO MADE ‘SMOOTH’

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM

PART - II RESPONSE SPECTRUM PROVISIONS OF BNBC/14 [Part 6, chapter 2 – article 2.5.6]

DEVELOPMENT HISTORY EARTHQUAKE ZONING MAP OF BANGLADESH

EARTHQUAKE ZONING MAP 1972 Adopted from East Pakistan Map DEVELOPED BY METROLOGICAL DEPARTMENT OF BANGLADESH IN 1972 THE COUNTRY WAS DIVIDED IN FOUR ZONES ZONE 1 : Seismic factor 0.2g ~ 0.1g ZONE 2 : Seismic factor 0.1g ~ 0.067g ZONE 3 : Seismic factor 0.067g ~ 0.05g ZONE 4 : Seismic factor < 0.05g

ZONING MAP 1978 PREPARED BY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF BANGLADESH THE COUNTRY WAS DIVIDED IN THREE ZONES ZONE 1 : Seismic coefficient 0.08g ZONE 2 : Seismic coefficient 0.05g ZONE 3 : Seismic coefficient 0.04g

BNBC – 1993 Housing and Building Research Institute (HBRI) FIRST SCIENTIFIC APPROACH ADOPTED IN PREPARING SEISMIC ZONING MAP THE COUNTRY WAS DIVIDED IN THREE ZONES ZONE 1 : Seismic coefficient 0.2g ZONE 2 : Seismic coefficient 0.15g ZONE 3 : Seismic coefficient 0.075g PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE 20% IN 50 YEARS.

BNBC – 2014 being updated Housing and Building Research Institute (HBRI) SEISMIC ZONING MAP PREPARED FOR 2475 YEARS HAZARD LEVEL (PROBABILITY OF EXCEDENCE 2% IN 50 YEARS) THE COUNTRY IS DIVIDED IN FOUR ZONES ZONE 1 : Seismic coefficient 0.36g ZONE 2 : Seismic coefficient 0.28g ZONE 3 : Seismic coefficient 0.20g ZONE 4 : Seismic coefficient 0.12g

EARTHQUAKES 1973-2013 http://earthquake.usgs.gov/

EARTHQUAKES 1973-2013 Historical earthquakes of 1973~2013 (source http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/) superimposed on proposed on BNBC seismic zoning map

BNBC/14 EARTHQUAKE DEFINITION 2% Probability of Exceedence in 50 Years (2,475 Year Return Period) – MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE (MCE) Design Ground Motion 2/3rd of MCE Design Ground Motions are Set at 2/3rd of MCE Ground Motion Levels, With The Reasoning That Any Structure Designed With The Provision Shall Have A Minimum Margin Against Collapse of 1.5

PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION (PGA) AN INFINITELY RIGID STRUCTURE HAS ZERO NATURAL PERIOD (T=0) DOES NOT DEFORM: NO RELATIVE MOTION BETWEEN ITS MASS AND ITS BASE MASS HAS SAME ACCELERATION AS OF THE GROUND HENCE, PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION REPRESENTS STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF A STRUCTURE OF ZERO PERIOD

PARAMETERS DEFINING ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM

ACCELERATION RESPONSE SPECTRUM   TB = Lower limit of the period of the constant spectral acceleration branch as a function of site class (Table 2.5.4 ) TC = Upper limit of the period of the constant spectral acceleration branch as a function of site class (Table 2.5.4 ) TD = Lower limit of the period of the constant spectral displacement branch as a function of site class (Table 2.5.4 ).

PARAMETERS DEFINING ELASTIC RESPONSE SPECTRUM Table 2.5.4: Site dependent soil factor and other parameters defining elastic response spectrum Soil type S TB(s) TC(s) TD(s) SA 1.00 0.15 0.4 2.0 SB 1.20 0.5 SC 1.15 0.20 0.6 SD 1.35 0.8 SE 1.40 MAY BE THIS VALUE IS WRONG !!!!!!!!!!!!

ELASTIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT, CS SOIL TYPE = SA (ROCK) DAMPING = 5% ZONE = DHAKA (0.2g)

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM  

STRUCTURE IMPORTANCE FACTOR, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 2.5.7.1 Table 2.5.5 Importance Factors for Buildings and Structures for Earthquake design OCCUPANCY CATEGORY IMPORTANCE FACTOR, I I OR II 1.0 III 1.25 IV 1.5

RESPONSE REDUCTION FACTOR

AN EXAMPLE   Table 2.5.4: Site dependent soil factor and other parameters defining elastic response spectrum Soil type S TB(s) TC(s) TD(s) SA 1.00 0.15 0.4 2.0 SB 1.20 0.5 SC 1.15 0.20 0.6 SD 1.35 0.8 SE 1.40

AN EXAMPLE - Continued ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT FOR “0” PERIOD (PGA FOR THE SITE) ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE FOR SHORT PERIOD ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT FOR CONSTANT ACCELERATION ZONE ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT FOR VELOCITY SENSITIVE ZONE ELASTIC SEISMIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT FOR DISPLACEMENT SENSITIVE ZONE          

AN EXAMPLE - Continued ELASTIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT, CS T CS 0.000 1.150 0.100 2.013 0.150 2.444 0.200 2.875 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.700 2.464 0.800 2.156 0.900 1.917 1.000 1.725 1.100 1.568 1.200 1.438 1.300 1.327 1.400 1.232 1.500 1.600 1.078 1.700 1.015 1.800 0.958 1.900 0.908 2.000 0.863 ELASTIC RESPONSE COEFFICIENT, CS TB = 0.2 sec TC = 0.6 sec TD = 2 sec

AN EXAMPLE - Continued    

DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM, Sa Original (Rock site) Soil Amplication Design, Sa (Reduced by R) 0.000 0.133 0.153 0.031 0.100 0.267 0.268 0.054 0.150 0.333 0.326 0.065 0.200 0.383 0.077 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600 0.222 0.700 0.190 0.329 0.066 0.800 0.167 0.288 0.058 0.900 0.148 0.256 0.051 1.000 0.230 0.046 1.100 0.121 0.209 0.042 1.200 0.111 0.192 0.038 1.300 0.103 0.177 0.035 1.400 0.095 0.164 0.033 1.500 0.089 Amplified for Soil Type Original on Rock Reduced by Response Reduction Factor, R

PART - III GROUND MOTION SIMULATION

SEISMIC INSTRUMENTATION ERA, BANGLADESH ONE ANALOGUE SEISMOGRAPH WAS INSTALLED IN 1954 IN BALU-BAGAN CHITTAGONG. INSTRUMENTATION ERA STARTED BY INSTRUMENTATION OF JAMUNA BRIDGE. JAMUNA MULTIPURPOSE BRIDGE AUTHORITY COMPLETED THE INSTRUMENTATION WORK IN 2003. SIXTY MORE ACCELEROGRAPHS WERE OBTAINED FROM SAFER CITIES PROJECT OF COSMOS—WSSI TO DEPLOY IN THE FREE-FIELD AT DIFFERENT LOCATION OF BANGLADESH. THIRTY FOUR (34) STRONG MOTION ACCELEROGRAPHS (SMA) ARE INSTALLED IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS OF PWD OFFICE AND BUET CAMPUS IN 2006. NO TIME HISTORY DATA AVAILABLE

BANGLADESH STRONG MOTION DATA at Station ID: ALTUS S/N 2928 Channel 1: EW 07/05/2008 16:55:52 (GMT) – AT NATORE

GROUND MOTION SIMULATION SPECTRUM COMPATIBLE TIME HISTORY DATA GENERATION STANDARD PROCEDURES AVAILABLE Linear scaling Frequency content modification Frequency domain techniques Time domain techniques COMPUTER ROUTINE NEEDED TO CALCULATE THE MATCHING. COMMONLY AVAILABLE SOFTWARE ARE RspMatch SeismoMatch SIMQKE SYNTH EZ-FRISK

GROUND MOTION SIMULATION 1. LINEAR SCALING OF A KNOWN STRONG MOTION DATA EL-CENTRO EARTHQUAKE STRONG MOTION DATA HAS BEEN SCALED DOWN BY A FACTOR OF 0.41716 TO MAKE MAXIMUM ACCELERATION OF 0.133g

RESPONSE SPECTRUM OF THE SCALED STRONG MOTION DATA

COMPARISON OF SCALED DATA – BNBC/14 SPECTRUM

STRONG MOTION SIMULATION 2. SPECTRA MATCHING IN FREQUENCY DOMAIN TECHNIQUES EL-CENTRO SPECTRUM PLANNED TO MATCH WITH THE BNBC SPECTRUM

SPECTRUM MATCHED

COMPARES OF THE SPECTRUMS

MATCHED TIME HISTORY GRAPH

WELCOME TO OPEN DISCUSSION THANKS & WELCOME TO OPEN DISCUSSION