Putting CAEP Standards 2 & 4 into Practice Kathryn Button TechTeach Professional Development Facilitator March 5, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.
Advertisements

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Developed by ESC Region 12 in partnership with TEA. 9/16/04 Texas Teacher STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness
1 Educator Preparation Advisory Council (EPAC) September, 2013.
Lead. inspire. teach. Welcome! Mentor Collaboration working together to increase student achievement.
Every Moment Counts: Preparing New Teachers for Success
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
Read to Succeed Reading Coaches. “Reading coaches shall serve as job-embedded, stable resources for professional development throughout schools in order.
Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:167,269 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.1%
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
BUILDING STRONG TEACHERS FOR TEXAS STUDENTS Welcome to TAP Connect.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
Defiance College – Increased clinical experiences, Expanded P-16 partnerships, Greater P-16 input and workshops OCTEO SPRING 2015 PRESENTED BY: IAN MACGREGOR.
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Connect with CAEP Transformation Initiatives Respond to the Needs of the Profession James G. Cibulka, President,
TEACHER PREPARATION AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY The College of Education for the 21 st Century MARY LOU FULTON TEACHERS COLLEGE Sarah Beal Association.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | The Next Horizon Incorporating Student Perception Surveys into the Continuous.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching TASA MidwinterConference January 29, 2007 Austin, TX Dynamic Partnerships.
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
An Update on: AVATAR Advisory Committee Education Service Center Region 10 October 9, 2012 M. Jean Keller University.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
Texas Tech University Site Supervisor Training Charles R. Crews, PhD, LPC-S Associate Professor – Counselor Education.
“Another Path is Possible” by Greg Michie National Teaching Academy (NTA) in Chicago opened in 2002 serving students from 2 housing projects. $47 facility.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
The Power of Partnerships One College’s journey to growth and understanding…
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 UST Support for Institutional Effectiveness: Information for Academic OA Plan Writers.
Assessing Impact on P12 Learning: A Multiple Measures Approach Leslee PetersonLeslee Peterson, Assessment Coordinator Micki M CaskeyMicki M Caskey, Associate.
An Introduction to Co-Teaching for Professional Development Schools:
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
It’s a Great Day to be a Mustang!
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Improving Teaching Practices through the Use of Video-Case Analysis
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Standard 3 Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
North Carolina Read to Achieve
Themes Collaboration – vertical and horizontal Autonomy at all levels
Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant
Implementing Race to the Top
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
The Teacher Work Sample: An Authentic Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Putting CAEP Standards 2 & 4 into Practice Kathryn Button TechTeach Professional Development Facilitator March 5, 2015

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Who Are We?  32,440  1 of 10  507  550 Lubbock Independent School District Dallas ISD Lubbock Cooper ISDFort Worth ISD Slaton ISDNortheast ISD Roosevelt ISDGrand Prairie ISD Frendship ISDNew Caney ISD Marble Falls ISD Fredericksburg ISD Partners:

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Fall 2011 ~ a new beginning...  NCATE/CAEP accredited since 1965  Arrival of new dean from ASU with a reform agenda  College was trying something new with a new dean… our reform effort, fit with Transformational Initiative (TI)

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY  School leaders said that they preferred to hire new teachers from other institutions because they were more “classroom ready.” Fall 2011 ~ A new beginning... Input indicators suggested quality graduates BUT

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Talk with the school districts that we serve: Graduates who can:  1. Teach effectively  2. Engage/inspire the students that they teach  Increase K-12 student achievement/success

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY OUTCOMESMEASURES 1.Teach Effectively 2.Engage/inspire K- 12 students 3.Increase student achievement TAP Rubric Student Attitudinal Measure District Achievement Data

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY What is TechTeach? Clinically intensive - Early placement - Full-year student teaching - Co-teaching Competency-based with TAP Focused on student achievement Dean’s two promises to partner districts

CAEP Standard Two CAEPTechTeach Program Features Clinical Partnerships and Practice Site Coordinator, a TTU faculty member, embedded in a pod of 3-5 schools within a partner district: The major professor for 20 – 27 TCs throughout blocks 1-4 for clinical on the TAP Site Coordinators select and train Mentor Teachers – co-teaching Mentor Teacher Meetings - 1 per 6 weeks Year-long student teaching in the same classroom

CAEP Standard Two CAEPTechTeach Program Features Clinical Partnerships and Practice 2X POP cycles/semester (Mentor Teacher involved) using TAP & K-12 Student Attitude Survey and Achievement Data Use of iPads & Teachscape to foster TC self-reflection in A&Es & POP cycles Video capture on Teachscape permits faculty double-scoring to ensure scoring rigor & inter-rater reliability Governance Meetings – SC, School Administrators, PDF – 1 per 6 weeks

CAEP Standard Four CAEPTechTeach Program Application of Professional Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions Site Coordinators, research study following their TCs after graduation State of Texas New Educator Evaluation – T-TESS Teacher Evaluation & Support Rubric (1 of 4 domains – “Content Knowledge and Expertise”)

CAEP Standard Four CAEPTechTeach Program Employer Satisfaction with Completers Administrators are now fighting over our graduates “We’ll hire all that you have!” Early Contracts given in Dallas and Fort Worth ISD All 5 th grade students in classroom with TC passed STAAR Math Test TEA Principal’s Survey – 2014

CAEP Standard Four CAEPTechTeach Program P-12 Student Learning and Growth District MOU -Benchmark P-12 Test Scores -P-12 Student Attendance Goal: classrooms with TC classrooms without TC

Early Findings – TC impact on learning Presence of TC vs. School/grade average * Content

“Buckets” of Data Coursework data – Apply & Evaluate Assignments Instructional competency – Performance Assessment (PA) Data P-12 student achievement data Benchmark

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY Our three-year reform effort… What do TC need to be prepared for 21 st century schools? A real change in our relationships with our partner schools.