Lecture 2.  “We try to take a different look at stories and events around us. I think that South Africans enjoy this – they like to laugh at themselves.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Workplace Disputes Topic 4: Human Resources Strategies in human resource management.
Advertisements

Business Studies Grade 12
 Lecture 16  Discipline and Dismissal  Operational requirements (retrenchments)
Labour Law – ARR224 Lecture 12 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
CONDUCTING SECTION 188A ENQUIRIES. Introduction The proposed amendments to section 188A of the Labour Relations Act may result in increased usage of the.
Hampton Inn Case Study Bryan Andrews. Meeting Legal Requirements Bryan Andrews.
LABOUR LAW – ARR224 Lecture 11 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
Lecturer: F.Q. Cilliers Contact number: Lecture 14.
Submission on Clause 6 of the Employment Equity Amendment Bill of 2012 and its compliance with ILO Convention 111 of 1958 By Prof D du Toit on behalf of.
Labour Law – ARR224 Lecture 9 The Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997.
Lecture 10 The Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 75 of 1997.
1 Current Labour Law 2011 Collective Bargaining Clive Thompson.
Equal Employment Opportunity 1964–1991
TheEmployment Equity Bus The Employment Equity Amendment Act Winston Owen Owen, Adendorff & Associates (Pty) Ltd MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS AND TRAINING PROVIDERS.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR EMPLOYMENT EQUITY AMENDMENT BILL, 2012.
© 2005 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited. 1 Employment Discrimination and Employment Equity.
When elephant retire- EE These notes are insufficient for study purposes.
Lecture 1 and 2. When elephant retire- EE These notes are insufficient for study purposes.
. South African Airways South African Airways Applications for vacant position required: POSITION:Flight attendant DUTIES:Serve passengers; Ensure flight.
Discipline and Dismissals Lecture 15
LECTURE 4.  See the study guide for paragraphs to be studied and those for reading purposes only  Follow p21 of the study guide in this respect.
LABOUR LAW Theme 8. THEME 8 DISPUTE RESOLUTION PGL (2006: ) ;WL (2009: ) PLL (2005: ; );
1 Employment Equity as an imperative to Skills supply and demand. Presentation to Bankseta 25/10/07 Jimmy Manyi.
From Racism to Equality 7 October 2007 Karon Monaghan.
Labour law – ARR224 Caselaw – Employment Equity Act.
South Africa UN Convention of the Rights of People with Disabilities: Signed and ratified: December 2007.
Lecture  Those rules regulating the legal relationship between: ◦ employees, ◦ employers, and also between employers and employees and the Sate,
Labour Law – ARR224 Lecture 10 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
*Dr Emma Fergus Institute for Development and Labour Law, University of Cape Town.
“The process of regulating the relationship between the parties to the employment contract” Employment law.
Registration and Certification of Unions in Canada Presentation at the Government-to-Government Session and Seminar for an Exchange of Information on Topics.
Employment Equity Act No 55 of 1998 (81). Purpose of EE Act (81) Redress past discrimination –Eliminate unfair discrimination [applies to all employers]
1 Employment Equity Amendment Bill, 2012 PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR 12 March 2013.
ABR224 Lecture 3 EEA. DUTIES OF DESIGNATED EMPLOYER [Sect. 13]  1) Consultation with Employees:  In order to ensure consensus regarding the implementation.
1 introduction. 2 Introduction cont.  The Four main labour laws 1.LRA -Act 66 of BCEA – Act 75 of EEA– Act 55 of Skills Development.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
LABOUR LAW – ARR224 Lecture 10 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
EMPLOYMENT LAW B COM HRM. UNIT OUTCOMES See page 149.
LRA Lecture 9. Labour Relations Act Introduction to Labour Law  Those rules regulating the legal relationship between:  employees,  employers, and.
Labour Law Amendments by Leon Grobler Collective Bargaining Conference 2011.
PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE MEETING; 14 NOVEMBER 2013 PRESENTATION ON WOMEN EMPOWERMENT AND GENDER EQUALITY BILL, 2013.
Labour Law – ARR224 Lecture 11 The Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998.
LABOUR LEGISLATION PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE 02 September 2009.
What Is Employment? Compare employee with agent and independent contractor Differences: Control test - Degree of control exercised over an employee is.
Lecture 2.  NDF  NIA  SA Secret Service  SA National Academy of Intelligence  Staff and directors of COMSEC. (COMSEC (formally Electronic Communications.
Department of Labour: 1 LABOUR LAW AMENDMENTS PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR 01 MARCH 2011 LABOUR LAW AMENDMENTS PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO.
Unfair Labour Practice.  This definition is NB- see par 15.2 and study by heart.  186(2) defines an ULP as act or omission that arises between an employer.
Lecture 9.  Collective agreements: ◦ Bargaining council agreements: May vary, replace or exclude conditions of employment.  The following core rights.
Unfair Labour Practice.  186(2) defines an ULP as act or omission that arises between an employer and an employee involving:  (a) Unfair conduct, by.
STUDY UNIT 4: Employment Equity 1Saterdag - SU 4 Employment Equity.
Labour law amendments Parliamentary briefing 9 October 2001.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Foundations of Recruitment and Selection II: Legal Issues.
The rights of Migrant and Domestic Workers How ILO standards can make a difference.
Lecture 7. A. Collective agreements: 1. Bargaining council agreements: May vary, replace or exclude conditions of employment. ▪ The following core rights.
FUNCTIONS OF THE INSPECTIONS & ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BRANCH
PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON ENERGY
Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997
Study unit 10 Employment law impacting on employment relationships
Comparative Labour Law Matrix
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY: TUT 22 JULY 2009.
Employment Equity Act No 55 of 1998 (81)
EMPLOYMENT EQUITY ACT, No 55, 1998 (EEA)
PORTFOLIO COMMITTTE ON WOMEN, CHILDREN AND PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY MEETING 22 AUGUST
Labour & employment law
PROGRESS MADE REGARDING LEGISLATION PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON LABOUR
The Economic Regulation of Transport Bill, 2018
Public Service Employment Relations in South Africa
Amendments to Legislation
THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON
Compliance with the Employment Equity Act, 55 of 1998 as amended by the Employment Equity Amendment Act, 47 of 2013.
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 2

 “We try to take a different look at stories and events around us. I think that South Africans enjoy this – they like to laugh at themselves and their imperfections.” - Quinton Cronje, NANDO’s MARKETING DIRECTOR. Sunday Times 29 August 2010.

 National Defense Force  National Intelligence Agency  SA Secret Service  SA National Academy of Intelligence  Staff and directors of COMSEC. (COMSEC - formally Electronic Communications Security (Pty) Ltd) is a company owned by the Government of South Africa through its National Intelligence Agency. COMSEC’s main task is to secure South African government communications against any unauthorized access and also from technical, electronic or any other related threats. The company also provides verification services for electronic communications security systems, products and services used by the South African government.)Government of South AfricaNational Intelligence Agencycommunications (Discrimination matters are dealt with by the Constitutional Court or a complaint lodges with the Human Rights Commission) These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 Prohibits discrimination.  Employers must take steps to promote equality AND eliminate unfair discrimination.  Direct and indirect discrimination are prohibited.  Examples of each? See PGL par These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 Requires every employer to take steps to promote equal opportunities by eliminating unfair discrimination in employment policies and practices.  Employer must address unfair discrimination in relation to wage differentials by way of collective bargaining / BCEA measures.  Medical testing of employees are prohibited unless permitted by legislation.  HIV testing is prohibited unless permitted by the Labour Court.  Psychometric testing is prohibited unless the test being used has been scientifically validated as one that provides reliable results and is appropriate for the intended purpose.  The test must be applied fairly to all employees irrespective of their culture to exclude bias to people from designated groups. These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

Dispute resolution: (Sect. 10)  Refer to CCMA (Not a bargaining council)  Within 6 months of the act or omission  CCMA – conciliation [30 days from referral]  No conciliation Certificate of non-resolution LC for adjudication  UNLESS parties agree to jurisdiction of the CCMA to have the matter arbitrated, rather than adjudicated These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 ONUS:  Where unfair discrimination on one of the listed grounds is alleged, the onus is on the Employer (ER) to prove the discrimination was fair. [Presumption towards Unfairness]  If discrimination is alleged on one of the unlisted grounds, the Employee (EE) needs to prove both elements i.e. the discrimination and the unfairness thereof. [No presumption]. Chapter 2 These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 Rationale: Purpose  To ensure that suitably qualified persons form designated groups have equal opportunities and are equitably represented in all occupational levels in the workplace.  Who is a suitably qualified person? Where any of the following is present: Formal qualifications Prior learning Relevant experience Capacity to acquire, within reasonable time, the ability to do the job These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 In order to comply with AA-provisions, the ER must register an Equity Plan [developed for a max. period of 5 years].  This plan must contain, inter alia, AA-measures – study PGL par &  ER is not required to adapt its policies in such a way to exclude employment (continued & advancement also) of non-designated groups. –  PRESUMPTION: EXCLUSION = DISCRIMINATION. Chapter III

 Applies to “Designated Employer” & “Designated Employee”.  Designated employer:  >50 employees;  <50 employees but exceed the prescribed annual turnover of a small business as stipulated in the Act;  Municipality;  Organs of State in national and provincial spheres of Government;  Employer becomes a designated employer in terms of a collective agreement.  Employer excluded may become subject to the provisions:  By notification to the Director General.  Order of the Labour Court. Chapter III: APPLICATION These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 Designated employees – with no preferential ranking specified;  Black people (Africans, Coloureds and Indians).  Women.  People with disabilities. Chapter III These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 Assessment of compliance:  Director-General takes into account, inter alia, the extent to which suitably qualified people (SQP’s) are represented, economic & financial circumstances, planned vacancies & pool of SQP’s and progress made in implementing the E-plan.  Protection of EE Rights:  Contraventions made known to Trade Union, fellow employee, ER, CCMA, D/G or Labour Inspector.  No person may discriminate against an EE who is exercising any right conferred by the Act [including lawful / permitted disclosures].  No person may favour an EE in exchange for not exercising a right.  State Contracts:  Failure to comply with the Act’s provisions is sufficient grounds for rejection of any offer to furnish supplies / services to an organ of state.  Contravention:  Contravention of certain provisions = R500,000 – R900,000 / 3yrs imprisonment. These notes are insufficient for study purposes.

 Discrimination:  Kadiaka v Amalgamated Beverage Industr.;  Griggs v Duke Power Co.  Affirmative Action:  PSA v Minister of Justice ILJ 241;  McInnes v Technicon Natal ILJ 1138 (LC);  Hoffman v SAA ILJ 2357 (CC);  Swart v Mr. Video (1998) 19 ILJ 1315 CCMA. (see also Sect. 187 (2)(b) of EEA) Additional reading [not requirement]