Chapter 9 Marisa Nguyen Elaine Sherriffe Mark Balraj
Seen as: inconvenient, faceless numbers, queue-jumpers and problem people for Canada border control management View View
Over 200 million people residing outside their homeland The “push” effect The “pull” effect Domestic and abroad immigrants have historically played a role to contributing to national identity, and boosting the Canada economy
Aging population and decline birth rates Diminishing tax base Create more jobs Work skills Business Starters Drudge work and labour shortage New labour market should be controlled by immigrants in 2011 Strong mentality to succeed
UN Nansen medal in 1986 Immigration policies: - how many? - what kind? - what for? Too many immigrants who are not suitable for Canada Not enough of the “right kind”
Unjust Political considerations rather than national interest Exploitation of new immigrants by immigration consultants Bureaucratic Ineptness Sexist, racist, and values social class History History
Blacklog of immigrant applications; could take up to 6 years to process (minimum) 6.2 million immigrants (Foreign) live in Canada Foreign born: 19.8 of population increased by 13.6 Canadian birth rates were only 3.3% By 2025, immigrants will make up all population increase in Canada
Asian and the Middle East as the largest newcomer at 58.3% More than 200 languages in Canada Toronto housed 2.3 million foreign born residents (47.7% of total population)
Many support Others are openly critical Others are openly critical Some immigrants are those who buy their way in Also seen as poor, and criminal individuals Canadians are comfortable with poor immigrants and fear highly qualified immigrants Some fear they are a threat to the economy Linked to terrorism, drug trafficking, prostitution among other things
What occurs when the economy is booming versus when the economy cools down? The Globe and Mail and CTV reports these sorts of attitudes exist Discussion Question: What are you thoughts/personal experiences to these claims?
Refugees: Forced to flee their home country Face persecution or death Permanent status Asylum Seekers Internally displaced person Stateless Person Evacuee Temporary Worker Professional Transient
4 criterion: - policies and programs to regulation entry - integration - citizenship rights - Society builders
Informal and discretionary Racist orientation Criminals, mentally unfit, the diseased, nationalities unlikely to assimilate and city dwellers Japanese, Chinese, and East Asians “White-man Country” Immigration were known for: cheap labour and rapid removal 3 insights to this overview
1947 immigration policy Radical shift in immigration law by 1962 Class rather than race emerged as a criteria 1967 classes: Family assisted relatives independents refugees Point system Question: Although Canadian immigration policy has come along way from the early 1900’s, does it still eliminate race entirely from its provisions?
Economy Class Family Class Humanitarian Class Plus: Temporary Residents
What kind of immigration program does Canada want? Why does Canada need immigrants? How many? From Where? Which class is preferred? Immigration policies that reflect European experience may no longer apply Mutual accommodation Fair and Equal social contract