1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Advertisements

I-95 HOT/HOV Lanes Project Fairfax County TAC August 16, 2011.
Click to edit Master title style »Click to edit Master text styles –Second level Third level –Fourth level Fifth level 495 EXPRESS LANES ITS TIME TO CHANGE.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Adding Priced Capacity for Congestion Relief Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
Presentation to the AMP Leadership Team Moving forward. April 17, 2013.
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION KATY (I-10) HOT LANE 13 mile (20.9 km), one-lane reversible facility in the median of Katy (I-10) Freeway. HOT operations (QuickRide)
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Ginger Goodin, Texas Transportation Institute Greg Jones, Federal Highway Administration.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Central London Congestion Charging David Hutchinson GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection.
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
BRT in Pittsburgh: Martin Luther King, Jr. East Busway
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
Brian Kary Minnesota Department of Transportation.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
(Expressway Traffic Management System)
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study
I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
D Line Project Overview
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES

2 2  Intro to Houston METRO  Discuss History – since 1979 –Priority buses = Park & Ride program –Priority Highways = HOV  Discuss Future – since Jan –Priority buses = Satellite Buses –Priority Highways = HOT Lanes / Managed lanes

3 3 The City – Houston, Texas  2 million residents –2 million more expected by 2020  1,700 Square miles

4 4 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (Houston METRO)  Service area = 1,700 Sq. Miles  100 million boardings in 2008  250,000 daily boardings The Transit Provider

5 5 HOUSTON METRO  1,200 buses in service; –126 Routes - 95 Local, 31 Park & Ride  8 mile METRO Rail LRV line  6.7 million Boardings per month –4.8 million bus, 1.2 million rail per month –4.2 million Local Bus; 600,000 Park & Ride per month  87 Miles of HOV Lanes – 6 Corridors –36,000 vehicles per day ~ 7% total highway traffic

6 6 METRO PRIORITY BUSES  HISTORIC = Park & Ride Program – since 1979 –31 Routes = 12 to 40 mile trip lengths –Move patrons from 29 Parking Lots, 27 Other Sites in 5 counties into Downtown Houston and Texas Medical Center Using HOV Lanes –25,000 parking spaces –Approx. 30,000 Daily Boardings (15-20% of daily boardings) –Early form of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) service Special Stations No Stops en-route  FUTURE = Satellite Buses – since June 1, 2009 –3 Routes to be established –1 st route = Bellaire route = parallel to largest local route –From Suburbs to Texas Medical Center Using city streets rather than HOV Lanes

7 7  29 Park & Ride parking facilities METRO Park & Ride Sites

8 8  27 other Park & Ride sites in 4 neighboring counties

9 9 METRO Park & Ride Facility

10 METRO Park & Ride Service  Commenced Operations – 1979  Early form of Bus Rapid Transit  No stops between Park & Ride lots and destination zone –Downtown or Texas Medical Center  Variety of Buses Employed in Service –MCI hybrids & diesel –New Flyer Viking –Neoplan Articulated  Weekday service only  Zoned Fares based on distance from destination –3 zones – one fare per route  All trips use HOV Lanes

11 METRO Future = “QuickLine” Satellite Bus Service  Commenced Operations – June 2009 = Bellaire Route 402 –Eases demand on the 2 Bellaire route (10,000 riders daily)  Limited stops to popular business centers all along the line  Eight state-of-the-art bus stations complete with digital “next bus” signage  A bright blue road stripe has been painted along the entire route for easy identification.  Reliable weekday rush-hour service, every 15 minutes  Same Fare as Local Service Routes $1.25 each way  Overall trip times reduced from 52 to 38 minutes over the 9-mile route  Custom-wrapped bus exterior for easy identification  Additional routes planned

12 PRIORITY HIGHWAYS  HISTORIC = High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes –87 Miles of HOV Lanes –Designed and Built for Bus Usage Only From 1979 to 1985 – Bus and Vanpool only 1985 – Carpools permitted 2+ / 3+ usage allowed –6 Corridors North, West, Northwest, Northeast, Southeast + Southwest I-10 West, I-45 North + South, US 59 North & South, US 290  FUTURE = High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes –Permit use by Single Occupant Vehicles for toll

13 HOV Corridors  IH 45 North  IH 45 South  US 59 North  US 59 South  US 290  IH 10 West

14 History of METRO HOV Lanes  Lane Openings –1979 First Corridor – pylons, bus and vanpool only –1984 Second Corridor – barrier separated, bus and vanpool only –1985 Carpool added to two corridors –1988 Two Corridors Added - Bus, Vanpool and Carpool –1993 One Corridor Added - Bus, Vanpool and Carpool –1999 One Corridor Added - Bus, Vanpool and Carpool  Operation Condition –One lane per Corridor – barrier separated –Initially Pylons only on first corridor from 1979 to 1984 –Bus + VanPool Operation only from 1979 to 1984 –Carpools permitted in 1985, 4+ then 3+ then 2+ (3+ on 290 AM remains)

15 Current METRO HOV Lane Operations  No changes to core design –primary access / egress through Park & Ride lots –Manual direction reversals at all access points twice a day = gate movements  Operate in Peak Hours only –Mon. – Fri. 5 am – 11 am; 2 pm – 8 pm  One lane per Corridor – Barrier Separated  Most mid-route entries through Park & Ride lots, rather than from general purpose lanes  Daily Vehicle Volumes ~ 36,000 per day 7 – 8% total Traffic Volumes in Corridors 1,000 Buses per day 500 Vanpools 35,000 Carpools  2+ Carpools allowed; 3+ only for US 290 AM Peak

16 METRO HOV Lane Operations

17 PLANNED HOV LANE IMPROVEMENTS  Strategy –Improve use of existing HOV resources Currently used by 36,000 vehicles per day – expect % increase –Mitigate Congestion on General Purpose Lanes –Improve monitoring of traffic flows through cameras, meters –Reduce Operating Cost through gate automation –Provide some improvement to air quality

18 Houston Area Managed Lane Projects  I-10 = Katy Managed Lanes (Opened March 2009) –Managed by Harris County Toll Road Authority (HCTRA) –Constructed with TxDOT I-10 Expansion project –2 Managed Lanes in each direction HOV Hours (Mon. – Fri. 5 am – 11 am; 2 pm – 8 pm) –1 lane = free HOV 2+; 1 lane = tolled SOV === $2 - $4 Non-HOV Hours and Weekends - both lanes tolled HOV & SOV == $ 1 –Carries approximately 12,000 per day (8% total traffic) 7,000 HOV, 5,000 Tolled  5 Corridors = METRO HOT Lanes (Likely Start = mid 2010)

19 METRO HOT Lanes  5 Corridors –Eastex, North, Northwest, Southwest, Gulf Expressways  One lane per Corridor – barrier separated  SOVs tolled at all times, HOVs free at all times  Dynamic Pricing – price rises with congestion in lane –Toll Rates to Be Determined by METRO Board  SOVs prohibited when lane speed below 50 mph  Automated Gates will permit night and weekend operation  Probable Start Date = mid 2010

20 HOT Lane Conversion BENEFITS  Expands use of HOV Lanes by 50%+  Expeditious implementation – 1.5 years for implementation  Enhances maximum HOV lanes utilization rates in nation –(currently 7% total traffic v. 3% nationally)  No new real estate required  Enhance and expand operations through automated gate control systems  Provide ease of use through better signage, movement monitoring systems  Cost is affordable COSTS  Approx. $50 million for installation –80% Capital cost recovery from FTA  $ 8-10 million per annum for Operations, Maintenance and Enforcement –Recoup Operating, Maintenance and Enforcement costs through tolls

21 Available HOV Lane Capacity Sell Blue and Yellow Areas

22 HOT Lane Impact on Transit Schedules  Minimal Impact on bus schedule due to increased volumes expected –Reduce adverse impact on speed with controlled access to lane No Single Occupant access when speed less than 50 mph –Dynamic Pricing increases tolls as speed diminishes to reduce demand –Greater occupancy enforcement available due to funding through tolls  Arrangements on I-10 lanes with HCTRA –Bus access guaranteed –Operations Committee reviews schedule impact and adjusts tolls / access accordingly –No issues with traffic flow to date despite greater use than expected

23 COMPONENTS OF HOT LANE TOLLING OPERATION TRANSPONDER READERS LICENSE CAMERAS VERIFICATION AGENTS

24 Two Path Access

25 Toll Collection  Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) will use a special lane at observation booths. –Transponder will be read –License Plate will be photographed  If transponder valid – account will be charged toll.  If transponder invalid or missing – license plate photo will be used to send violation notice to registered owner of plate.

26  DYNAMIC TOLLING EMPLOYED –Toll varies based on HOT lane congestion / speed  Automatic toll collection — no barriers; no cash needed.  All vehicles will need a transponder. –EZ-Tag or Texas toll tags will be accepted for payment– fully interoperable –Free Trips counted with transponder readers in HOV lane –Missing transponder generates citation to plate holder automatically  Toll price posted well in advance of entry points.  Toll to patron does not change after entry to lane.  Occupancy enforcement with attendants and patrol officers HOT Lane Operations

27 Other HOT Lanes

28 Phase 1 = HOT Lane Conversion – current year Phase 2 = Access Improvements – 2 / 4 years Phase 2 a = Lane Access / Egress Improvements (Slip Ramps) Phase 2 b = Lane Access / Egress Improvements (Wishbone Ramps) Phase 3 = Lane Dualization – 10 / 20 years Phase 4 = High Speed Rail in ROW - ??? Future HOV Lane Enhancements

29 Phase 2 – Access Improvements BENEFITS  Provides additional direct outbound and inbound access from general purpose to HOV Lanes  Further congestion mitigation  Expeditious implementation – Approx. 4 years to install  Minimal impact on real estate limitations – primarily achieved through use of existing shoulders  Employs movement monitoring, tolling systems and automated gate systems from Phase 1  Cost to implement is affordable COSTS  Approximately $ 50 – 70 million to implement

30 Phase 2 – Access Improvements

31 Phase 3 – Lane Expansion BENEFITS  Maximize congestion mitigation on existing system  Increase HOV Usage –Estimates range between additional 60,000 to 85,000 vehicles –Change in vehicle volumes = additional 63% to 135% from current DISADVANTAGES  Extensive impact on real estate – need to expand freeways Will require thousands of condemnations / taking actions  Extensive cost  Extensive time required for implementation  Expansion of some corridors will NOT meet traffic demand in 2035

32 Phase 4 – High Speed Rail  Strategy –Install elevated guide way rail in center of all HOV corridors –Install station operations at existing Park & Ride facilities –Extend rail beyond current termini of HOV lanes  Benefits –Avoid extensive need for real estate takings – most real estate in TxDOT highway right-of-way and METRO Park & Ride sites –Provides service to meet traffic forecasts beyond 2035  Cost –Approximately $30 million per mile –Total costs for 6 corridors approximately $3 Billion

33 THANK YOU !!!! RICH LOBRON LCL Advisors, Inc. Houston METRO