Remote Rural Mobility Solutions and the Creation of a Rural Transit District Linda K. Cherrington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SECTIONS 5310, 5316 AND 5317 PROGRAM GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS The Governor of South Carolina has designated the South Carolina Department of Transportations.
Advertisements

Public Transit Division Discretionary Programs Overview January 2011.
Regional Service Planning for East Texas Texas Department of Transportation Tyler District Thursday, October 6, :30 PM.
Proposition 1 Formula Distribution Proposal for FY 2015 PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PROPOSITION 1 FORMULA DISTRIBUTION PROPOSAL FOR FY 2015 TxDOT/Stakeholder Working.
Act 44 Transportation Funding John Dockendorf Pennsylvania Department of Transportation November 2007.
The Sustainable Communities Partnership and U.S. DOT’s Livability Initiative 6 th Annual East and Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit Don.
What is an Area Development District? The Area Development Districts comprise a statewide network of multi-county planning and development organizations.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU) enacted August 10, 2005 Required that projects be derived from a locally.
MAP-21 Overview and Programmatic Impacts February 4, 2013 Serge Phillips MnDOT Federal Relations Koryn Zewers.
Public Transit Division Discretionary Grant Programs.
Resources: Upcoming Opportunities. Resources What are the available resources? When will they be available? How do I access them?
1 The Development of Federal Surface Transportation Authorization Legislation Jim Kolb Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure U.S. House of Representatives.
THE PRESIDENT’S FISCAL YEAR 2012 BUDGET REQUEST Federal Transit Administration.
GETTING THERE The Vehicle To Participation!!!!
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region IV Introduction to FTA Grant Programs.
Burnet County Comprehensive Plan. What Is the Comprehensive Plan? This is a county strategic plan that will focus on the areas where the county government.
Progressive 15 Membership Meeting 2007 Fort Morgan, Colorado Presented by: Troy Gladwell & Kim Cooke.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Regulation & Finance Unit 7: Forecasting and Encouraging Ridership.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Communuity and Public Transit and the MAP 21 Challenge Charles Dickson Associate Director Community Transportation Association Washington DC
Minnesota Council on Transportation Access Moving Transit Forward with Coordination, Action and Advocacy 9/19/11.
Transportation Coordination & Federal Transportation Administration Programs Marianne Freed, MSW/LSW Office of Transit Ohio Department of Transportation.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
Workshop of the Medical Education Subcommittee of the Strategic Planning/Educational Policy Committee Board of Governors July 20, 2005.
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
Full Access & Coordinated Transportation FACT For all of San Diego County Stakeholder Outreach Meeting North County Pilot Project July 10, 2006.
Staying Positive: Responding to Transit Critics Eron H. Linn Federal Relations Manager Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) 1.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Effective Transportation Planning City of Seattle, WA.
Enhancing the Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Access and Use of Targeted Transportation Funds August 17, 2015.
RURAL ACCESS AND MOBILITY: A CASE OF MANAGING INDIVIDUALIZED MOBILITY NEEDS THROUGH INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT IN NW USA Sen, Lalita Ph.D. Texas Southern University,
WELCOME! GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas.
May 30, 2008 Community Integration Commission 1 DRPT Initiatives on Transportation Services For Older Adults, People With Disabilities.
Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Transit Service Plan.
Agency Education Program Session 1 North Country New Hampshire.
IMPLEMENTING THE “NEW” SECTION 5310 PROGRAM STATE PROGRAMS MEETING AUGUST
SAFETEA-LU The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005 Added New Federal Transit Administration Programs Revised some existing programs Final.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO TCC & CAC Presentation – August 21, 2012.
Early findings in the Helena’s Planning Process Lisa Ballard, P.E. November 28, 2012.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Regional Transit Coordination Action Plan Update Regional Transit Coordination Subcommittee January 24, 2013 Kari J. Hackett Mgr. Special Studies.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
4.0 Understanding the Local Economy Exploring the Human Resources/Economic Development Connection Community Choices: Public Policy Education Program 8.
1 SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Office of Program Management Tribal Transit Outreach.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
Ben Herr Executive Director, Texas Transit Association Transit-Related Legislation.
Who Does What Susan Handy TTP282 October Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers.
Funding for Pedestrian Planning and Implementation Workshop on Collaboration for Walkable Kentucky Communities Thursday, August 27 th in Frankfort, KY.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Keeping Harris County Moving A Coordinated Approach.
Public Transportation Coordination – Barriers, Constraints & Opportunities Texas Transportation Commission November 16, 2006.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON A MERICAN GOVERNMENT HOLT 1 Local Government Section 1: U.S. Communities Section 2: Local Government Organization Section 3:
Population Growth & Distribution
Greater Toronto Transportation System
Rick Scott Governor Barbara Palmer APD Director.
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT
GATEWAY CITIES Gateway Cities agenda CONFERENCE Draft recommendations
SAFETEA-LU The Transportation Reauthorization Bill passed in 2005
Presentation transcript:

Remote Rural Mobility Solutions and the Creation of a Rural Transit District Linda K. Cherrington

Sponsored by

Topics for Discussion  Transit in Texas  Rural Transit Services  How is Rural Transit Funded?  How is Rural Transit Organized?

Transit in Texas  Regional Transit Authorities Dallas DART Houston METRO San Antonio VIA Austin Capital Metro Fort Worth The T Corpus Christi RTD  County Transit Authority Denton County  Municipal Transit Depts. El Paso Sun Metro Laredo El Metro

Transit in Texas  Small Urban Transit 30 transit systems  Rural Transit 39 transit providers

Rural Transit in Texas Characteristics  Largest Rural Transit by Land Area Panhandle Community Services  25,749 sq mi West Texas Opportunities  23,360 sq mi  Smallest Rural Transit by Population South Padre Island  1,425 population Webb County  17,535 population  Rural Transit in Areas of Lowest Population Density Concho Valley  3.69 persons/sq mi

Why Transit in Rural Communities?  Access to Basic Necessities Medical Social Services Essential Shopping  Improve Quality of Life Personal Business Family Recreation  Advance Economic Opportunity Jobs Education

Population Served by Rural Transit  Seniors  Persons with disabilities  Persons without limited economic resources  Families  Persons in remote areas

Rural Transit in West Texas  El Paso County Services in El Paso County outside El Paso Sun Metro Fixed Route General Population Commute services to connect with Sun Metro Area 809 square miles Population 31,157 in 2000

Rural Transit in West Texas  Permian Basin Rural Transit District Provider is West Texas Opportunities, Inc. Services in 17 counties Demand-response General population Sub-regional dispatch centers Area 23,360 square miles Population 166,056 in 2000

Funding Rural Transit in Texas  Federal Section 5311 Funds for Rural Areas  State of Texas Public Transportation Funds  Local Funds

Federal Funding for Transit

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA-LU)  Six-year funding policy  Revisions to Urbanized Area Formula Funds  Revision to Section 5311 Rural Area (Non-urbanized) Formula Apportion 20% of funds to land area Increased funding  New Formula Funding Programs for Transit Growing States and High Density States Program New Freedoms Program Alternative Transportation in Parks

Section 5311 Rural Areas  Rural Areas Under 50,000 Population  Formula Funds Population (80%) Land Area (20%)  Set aside 15% for intercity bus, 2% for Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP)  Eligible Uses Capital projects including preventive maintenance  Eligible 80/20 federal/local match* Operating expenses  Eligible 50/50 federal/local match* Administrative and planning expenses  80/20 federal/local match* Local match is any non-federal source of match

Section 5311 Funding Allocation to Rural Areas  Federal Funds to the Governor of each State  Governor of Texas designates TxDOT as responsible state agency  Funding formula established by Texas Transportation Commission

Indirect Sources of Federal Funds  Rural Community Advancement Program  Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants  Independent Living Programs  Medicaid  Temporary Assistance for Needy Families  Community Services Block Grants  Developmental Disabilities Grants  Welfare to Work Grants  Workforce Investment Act Programs

State of Texas Funding  Public Transportation Fund  Health and Human Service Programs

Public Transportation Fund  State Funds for Public Transportation Small Urban Areas Rural Areas  Subject to Biennium Funding from Texas State Legislature  Allocation Historical Trend Continued Revised by Legislation 2003

Public Transportation in Texas  Significant Legislation House Bill 3588 revamped Texas Department of Transportation responsibilities House Bill 2292 revamped organization of health and human services programs  TxDOT has responsibility for all public transportation funding  Administration of programs not consolidated

State Funds for Transit in Texas  Responsibility delegated by the Legislature to Texas Transportation Commission in 2003  Texas Transportation Commission named Public Transportation Committee (PTAC) to advise on funding formula  PTAC recommended goals and objectives for funding transit  Includes Rural Federal and State Funding Allocation

PTAC Goal #1 To improve access to public transportation in Texas in a fiscally responsible manner. Support transit to provide basic mobility for dependent populations in all counties using obtainable resources Provide incentives for local investment to support public transportation Encourage service enhancements to support economic opportunity, job access, cleaner air and congestion mitigation by encouraging transit as a mode of choice Improve awareness of the availability of services to increase the utilization of transit.

PTAC Goal #2 To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of public transportation services. Recommend state funding formulae that reward efficiency and effectiveness Recommend changes to current policies that will result in improved efficiency, effectiveness and utilization Recommend enhancements to processes used to obtain and verify performance data Recommend programming of capital investments to support managing assets (vehicles, facilities) for enhanced utilization, safety and reliability

PTAC Goal #3 To improve cooperation and coordination of services. Recommend state funding formulae that reward coordination of services Support changes to legislative and administrative codes to resolve barriers or remove constraints to the coordination of services Ensure implementation of the recommendations from the Regional Services Planning (RSP) initiative to coordinate public transportation services

State Transit Funding Allocation State Transit Funds 35% Urban Systems Needs 100% population Performance 65% Rural Systems Needs 75% population 25% land area Performance Federal 5311 Funds, too

Funding Formula Performance Indicators 33% local $ / expense 33% rev. mi. / expense 33% riders / rev. mi. Rural Performance

Sources of Local Funding  Transit generated revenues  Private sector  General revenue  Bonds for capital  Non-traditional Impact fees, parking fines Special districts  Economic development sales tax  Federal programs that take on a local veil Community Development Block Grants

Sources of Local Funding (continued)  Dedicated sales tax Regional Transit Authorities Municipal Transit Departments County Transportation Authorities  Eligible: Funding through Regional Mobility Authorities

Organizing for Rural Transit in Texas  Rural Transit Districts Texas Transportation Code Chapter 458 Political subdivision of the state that provides and coordinates public transportation Eligible to receive funds from State via TxDOT Single County or Multicounty New rural transit district Join an existing

Things to Consider  Goals for Public Transportation in Your Area  Service Plan  Provider  Local Funding  Challenges  Opportunities

Questions?  Contact Linda Cherrington TTI