Network Management and Internet Pricing S. Raghavan J. Bailey The Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimizing Cost and Performance for Multihoming Nick Feamster CS 6250 Fall 2011.
Advertisements

CSIT560 Internet Infrastructure: Switches and Routers Active Queue Management Presented By: Gary Po, Henry Hui and Kenny Chong.
Barath Raghavan, Kashi Vishwanath, Sriram Ramabhadran, Kenneth Yocum, Alex C. Snoeren Defense: Rejaie Johnson, Xian Yi Teng.
CNDS 2001, Phoenix, AZ Simulating the Smart Market Pricing Scheme on Differentiated- Services Architecture Murat Yuksel and Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer.
A Flexible Model for Resource Management in Virtual Private Networks Presenter: Huang, Rigao Kang, Yuefang.
Network Border Patrol Celio Albuquerque, Brett J. Vickers and Tatsuya Suda Jaideep Vaidya CS590F Fall 2000.
XCP: Congestion Control for High Bandwidth-Delay Product Network Dina Katabi, Mark Handley and Charlie Rohrs Presented by Ao-Jan Su.
Network Congestion Gabriel Nell UC Berkeley. Outline Background: what is congestion? Congestion control – End-to-end – Router-based Economic insights.
CPSC Topics in Multimedia Networking A Mechanism for Equitable Bandwidth Allocation under QoS and Budget Constraints D. Sivakumar IBM Almaden Research.
A Case for Relative Differentiated Services and the Proportional Differentiation Model Constantinos Dovrolis Parameswaran Ramanathan University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Traffic Engineering Jennifer Rexford Advanced Computer Networks Tuesdays/Thursdays 1:30pm-2:50pm.
Internet Research Needs a Critical Perspective Towards Models –Sally Floyd –IMA Workshop, January 2004.
1 Cross-Layer Design for Wireless Communication Networks Ness B. Shroff Center for Wireless Systems and Applications (CWSA) School of Electrical and Computer.
Prefix Caching assisted Periodic Broadcast for Streaming Popular Videos Yang Guo, Subhabrata Sen, and Don Towsley.
A message oriented phone system for low cost connectivity R.J. Honicky, Omar Bakr, Micheal Demmer, Eric Brewer. By Aalaya Gopala Kolli.
Building a Controlled Delay Assured Forwarding Class in DiffServ Networks Parag Kulkarni Nazeeruddin Mohammad Sally McClean Gerard Parr Michaela Black.
UCB Implementing QoS Jean Walrand EECS. UCB Outline What? Bandwidth, Delay Where? End-to-End, Edge-to-Edge, Edge-to-End, Overlay Mechanisms Access Control.
A Real-Time Video Multicast Architecture for Assured Forwarding Services Ashraf Matrawy, Ioannis Lambadaris IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA, AUGUST 2005.
1 Auction or Tâtonnement – Finding Congestion Prices for Adaptive Applications Xin Wang Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University.
User Experiments of Using Congestion Pricing to Allocate Access Link Bandwidth Jimmy Shih, Randy Katz, Anthony Joseph.
University Of Maryland1 A Study Of Cyclone Technology.
Distributed-Dynamic Capacity Contracting: A congestion pricing framework for Diff-Serv Murat Yuksel and Shivkumar Kalyanaraman Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,
Design of a Scalable Clearing House Architecture Lakshminarayanan Subramanian Chen-Nee Chuah Ramakrishna Gummadi ICEBERG Design Review Jan 12, 2000.
Using Prices to Allocate Resources at Access Points Jimmy Shih, Randy Katz, Anthony Joseph One Administrative Domain Access Point A Access Point B Network.
Performance and Robustness Testing of Explicit-Rate ABR Flow Control Schemes Milan Zoranovic Carey Williamson October 26, 1999.
Efficient agent-based selection of DiffServ SLAs over MPLS networks Thanasis G. Papaioannou a,b, Stelios Sartzetakis a, and George D. Stamoulis a,b presented.
Connection Admission Control Schemes for Self-Similar Traffic Yanping Wang Carey Williamson University of Saskatchewan.
S. Suri, M, Waldvogel, P. Warkhede CS University of Washington Profile-Based Routing: A New Framework for MPLS Traffic Engineering.
10th Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems 1 A Comparative Evaluation of Internet Pricing Schemes: Smart Market and Dynamic Capacity Contracting.
1 Scheduling calls with known holding times Reinette Grobler * Prof. M. Veeraraghavan University of Pretoria Polytechnic University
Not All Microseconds are Equal: Fine-Grained Per-Flow Measurements with Reference Latency Interpolation Myungjin Lee †, Nick Duffield‡, Ramana Rao Kompella†
1 Proposed Additional Use Cases for Congestion Exposure draft-mcdysan-conex-other-usecases-00.txt Dave McDysan.
DaVinci: Dynamically Adaptive Virtual Networks for a Customized Internet Jennifer Rexford Princeton University With Jiayue He, Rui Zhang-Shen, Ying Li,
Adaptive Packet Marking for Providing Differentiated Services in the Internet Wu-chang Feng, Debanjan Saha, Dilip Kandlur, Kang Shin October 13, 1998.
CS540/TE630 Computer Network Architecture Spring 2009 Tu/Th 10:30am-Noon Sue Moon.
Aadil Zia Khan and Shahab Baqai LUMS School of Science and Engineering QoS Aware Path Selection in Content Centric Networks Fahad R. Dogar Carnegie Mellon.
Multiscale Traffic Processing Techniques for Network Inference and Control Richard Baraniuk Edward Knightly Robert Nowak Rolf Riedi Rice University INCITE.
1 Optical Burst Switching (OBS). 2 Optical Internet IP runs over an all-optical WDM layer –OXCs interconnected by fiber links –IP routers attached to.
Network Instruments VoIP Analysis. VoIP Basics  What is VoIP?  Packetized voice traffic sent over an IP network  Competes with other traffic on the.
ACN: RED paper1 Random Early Detection Gateways for Congestion Avoidance Sally Floyd and Van Jacobson, IEEE Transactions on Networking, Vol.1, No. 4, (Aug.
1 Lecture 14 High-speed TCP connections Wraparound Keeping the pipeline full Estimating RTT Fairness of TCP congestion control Internet resource allocation.
FAIR CHARGES FOR INTERNET CONGESTION Damon Wischik Statistical Laboratory, Cambridge Electrical Engineering, Stanford
Huirong Fu and Edward W. Knightly Rice Networks Group Aggregation and Scalable QoS: A Performance Study.
Differentiated Services for the Internet Selma Yilmaz.
1 IEEE Meeting July 19, 2006 Raj Jain Modeling of BCN V2.0 Jinjing Jiang and Raj Jain Washington University in Saint Louis Saint Louis, MO
Brussels Workshop Use case 3 11/09/2015 Mario Sisinni.
Peter Key Cambridge UK joint work with Richard Gibbens, Statistical Laboratory, Cambridge Uni. UK The.
Packet Scheduling and Buffer Management Switches S.Keshav: “ An Engineering Approach to Networking”
Multiplicative Wavelet Traffic Model and pathChirp: Efficient Available Bandwidth Estimation Vinay Ribeiro.
Florida State UniversityZhenhai Duan1 BCSQ: Bin-based Core Stateless Queueing for Scalable Support of Guaranteed Services Zhenhai Duan Karthik Parsha Department.
DaVinci: Dynamically Adaptive Virtual Networks for a Customized Internet Jiayue He, Rui Zhang-Shen, Ying Li, Cheng-Yen Lee, Jennifer Rexford, and Mung.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 - Queuing and Basics of QoS.
1 SIGCOMM ’ 03 Low-Rate TCP-Targeted Denial of Service Attacks A. Kuzmanovic and E. W. Knightly Rice University Reviewed by Haoyu Song 9/25/2003.
Anticipating the Metering and Settlement Implications of the Drive for Internet Quality of Service Joseph P. Bailey, Ph.D. Robert.
Zurich Research Laboratory IBM Zurich Research Laboratory Adaptive End-to-End QoS Guarantees in IP Networks using an Active Network Approach Roman Pletka.
Explicit Allocation of Best-Effort Service Goal: Allocate different rates to different users during congestion Can charge different prices to different.
Chapter 11.4 END-TO-END ISSUES. Optical Internet Optical technology Protocol translates availability of gigabit bandwidth in user-perceived QoS.
Internet Measurement and Analysis Vinay Ribeiro Shriram Sarvotham Rolf Riedi Richard Baraniuk Rice University.
Querying the Internet with PIER CS294-4 Paul Burstein 11/10/2003.
Optimization-based Cross-Layer Design in Networked Control Systems Jia Bai, Emeka P. Eyisi Yuan Xue and Xenofon D. Koutsoukos.
Tango1 Considering End-to-End QoS Constraints in IP Network Design and Planning M.Ajmone Marsan, M. Garetto, E. Leonardi. M. Mellia, E. Wille Dipartimento.
Buffer Management in a Switch
PROTEAN: A Scalable Architecture for Active Networks
ISO New England System R&D Needs
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Measuring Service in Multi-Class Networks
Open Issues in Router Buffer Sizing
TCP, XCP and Fair Queueing
Prestented by Zhi-Sheng, Lin
Presentation transcript:

Network Management and Internet Pricing S. Raghavan J. Bailey The Robert H. Smith School of Business University of Maryland

Outline Goals Ex-Post Charging Framework Traffic Collection & Measurement Models & Experiments –Effective bandwidth model –Moment-based model Ex-Post Charging Diffusion Conclusions

Goals Develop a better mechanism for giving users and network administrators feedback regarding congestion costs (imposed on other users) Co-locate the economic incentives with the managers of the network Sacrifice economic optimality to achieve a pragmatic implementation Subscribe to the design philosophy of the Internet of heterogeneity and interoperability

Internet Pricing Goals Ex-Post Charging Network Management i Network externality Network Management j Implementation j Quality of Service i Extensibility i Scalability i Security i Implementation i Accountability i Accountability j

Ex-Post Charging Concept Charging algorithm is known ex-ante, only utilization and burstiness metrics are unknown A portion of the charge may be determined ex- ante. ISP meters the link to collect aggregate traffic statistics. ISP charges the user at the end of the billing period using the charging algorithm and the utilization and burstiness statistics.

Features of Ex-Post Charging Simple to explain/understand –To ensure feasible implementation –For use in Service Level Agreements More accurate charging of congestion costs –Utilization prices have been assessed before –Addition of burstiness parameter Low Burden on System –Bayesian Updating No need for storage of gigabytes of trace data Prevents potential security risk –Non-intrusive mechanism (to collect data and bill).

Traffic Measurement To fully develop a pricing mechanism, it is essential to understand traffic measurement and collection. Achievable granularity with off the shelf technologies (low cost) – around 1ms. Finer granularity measurement can be achieved by using GPS synchronized clock and more expensive computing power. Traces used and analyzed –NLANR, New Zealand, University of Maryland (Van Munching Hall)

Schema of Billing/Ex-Post Charging System

Effective Bandwidth Model R p peak rate,  utilization, b mean burst period, B buffer size, buffer overflow probability. Key variable:  This is the tradeoff between bandwidth and buffer. (users can purchase buffer capacity from ISP). a scalar. Provides incentive for appropriate buffer size selection

Price vs. Buffer Size (Same Trace / Different Deltas)

Price vs. Buffer Size

Price vs. Buffer Size (Same Delta / Different Traces)

Price vs. Time

Moment-Based Model x is original trace. y is smoothed trace, obtained by taking a simple moving average (with moving average window size w).  utilization. B bandwidth of link. a, b, c, scalars. Uses basic statistical measures. Easy to understand for non-engineers.

Moment-Based Model: Window Size Sensitivity

Moment-Based Model: Price Convergence

Ex-Post Charging Diffusion user i, a light user of Internet resources, who currently subsidizes some of the heavier users, switches from an ex- ante charging model to an ex-post charging model to lower their costs. user j, a medium user of Internet resources, is now faced with larger costs because they are no longer subsidized by user i, chooses to manage their network better and adopt an ex-post charging model. user k, a heavy user of Internet resources, is now faced with larger costs because they are no longer subsidized by users i and j, so they switch to an ex-post charging model.

Quality of Service P expost = a 1 *(C 1 +  1 B 1 ) + a 2 *(C 2 +  2 B 2 ) Users get more specific about QoS needs, then ex- post algorithms could be more specific (SLAs) But, to have an environment where guaranteed end-to-end QOS applications can be provided over the internet there must be overall adoption of better network management among all users. Ingress and Egress is where the bottlenecks are and this is where the charging algorithms will be working

Security (Benefits) Accounting gives network managers metrics to identify potential security problems Charging based on these metrics gives network managers an incentive to monitor their networks.

Research Dissemination Ex-Post Internet Charging, J. Bailey, J. Nagel, and S. Raghavan to appear in Internet Services, L. McKnight and J. Wroclawski, eds., MIT Press Ex-Post Internet Charging Models Using Effective Bandwidth, I. Gamvros, C. Hernandez, J. Bailey, S. Raghavan, working paper to be completed summer A Prototype Ex-Post Internet Charging System, J. Noda, S. Raghavan, and J. Bailey, working paper to be completed shortly. Second Moment Model for Ex-Post Internet Charging, C. Lapuerta, J. Bailey, and S. Raghavan, working paper to be completed summer 2001.

Conclusions Simple pricing scheme, implementable in practice, provides incentives to users to manage and monitor their networks. Result is a more stable/secure network where it is easy to provide QOS guarantees. Pushes responsibility to edges of networks.. Determination of scalars. Develop (ISP) cost models to provide guidelines on how to set scalars.