Robin van IJperen European Commission IREG Conference, Astana16 June 2009 Towards a Multi-dimensional Ranking: the View of the European Commission on Transparency.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

European Responses to Globalisation in Higher Education C onvergence and Diversity European Responses to Globalisation in Higher Education C onvergence.

Advertisements

Chemawawin Cree Nation. Community Planning Change, Expectations and Performance Some Observations Chief Clarence Easter Chemawawin Cree Nation Aboriginal.

Current initiatives in rankings: how do you see them from the perspective of your agency? Tia Loukkola 28 September 2009.

Robin van IJperen European Commission ENQA General Assembly, September 2009, Progress Report on Quality Assurance in Higher Education.

TIS International Conference - Internationalisation of Pedagogy and Curriculum in Higher Education: Exploring New Frontiers - 16/17 June 2011 Assessing.

HERODOT International Conference: Torun, Poland 2-5 September Tuning and European Higher Education Geography Kevin Crawford & Karl Donert Liverpool.

The Political Framework of Erasmus Centralised Actions

Building a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions Workshop ‘New challenges in higher education research and policy in Europe and in CR’,

Workshop Mapping Estonian Universities Frans Kaiser & Marike Faber, Tartu (Estonia) 21 March 2011.

Website: Bologna Secretariat Transparency Tools in The European Higher Education Area Viorel Proteasa 2010.

1 Student Diversity = Student Success Jenny Shaw.

An Overview of Quality Assurance in the EHEA by Prof. Andreas G. Orphanides President of EURASHE, Rector of European University Cyprus, and Ex-President.

Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.

Mapping Diversity – The U-Multirank Approach to Rankings Gero Federkeil Workshop Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 29th June 2012.

Ranking - New Developments in Europe Gero Federkeil CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development The 3rd International Symposium on University Rankings.

Towards a Multi-dimensional Ranking: Transparency in Missions and Performances of Higher Education Institutions The EU context Sophia Eriksson Waterschoot.

Virtual Game Method in Higher Education Project presentation.

Ecdc.europa.eu Christian Tauch DG Education and Culture Fostering student mobility: Next steps?

Ecdc.europa.eu Peter van der Hijden European Commission CLASSIFICATION & RANKING Paris 13/14 November 2008.

Impact of ongoing reforms in education and training on the adult learning sector (2nd phase) Description and analysis of adult learning policies and practices.

The world’s first global, multi-dimensional, user-driven university* ranking (* includes all higher education institutions) Jordi Curell Director Higher.

The CHE ranking The multi-dimensional way of Ranking Isabel Roessler CHE – Centre for Higher Education Development International Conference “Academic Cooperation.

U-Multirank – The implementation of a multidimensional international ranking Higher Education Conference Rankings and the Visibility of Quality Outcomes.

International Aspects of the European Research Agenda Lesley Wilson EUA Secretary General Monash University 15 November 2007.

Inclusive Education in Montenegro Belgrade, December 2011.

Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.

Why does ERA Need to Flourish Objectives ERA Vision of the Ljubljana Process (2008) :“fifth freedom” across the ERA by 2020 Since 2011, repeated.

An agenda for modernising higher education in Europe Lene Oftedal Policy Officer, Higher Education and Erasmus, DG EAC Bologna and Higher Education Reform.

Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.

Ingenious-science.eu ECB National Needs Analysis Workshop – Israel Charmaine Kerr ECB Project Coordination.

Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.

Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.

What Can National Rankings Learn from the U-Multirank-Project ? Gero Federkeil, CHE, Germany IREG-Forum: National University Rankings on the.

Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.

Erasmus centralised actions and higher education policy Brussels, 23 rd January 2012 Vanessa Debiais-Sainton Endika Bengoetxea Higher Education; Erasmus.

(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)

Gero Federkeil Expert Seminar „Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Lifelong Learning“, Berlin, February 2011 Rankings and Quality Assurance.

Role of University Rankings in Kazakhstan Prof. Sholpan Kalanova BRATISLAVA 2011.

Quality Enhancement and Quality Assurance in EU Higher Education – Key Characteristics Jill Morgan Assistant Dean, Learning and Teaching, Quality Enhancement,

Lisbone, March ALBANIAN METADATA AlbMeta Prepared by INSTAT Working Group.

1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.

Dublin, 22 February 2011 I.EU Higher Education Policy and The Bologna Process II.ECTS and DS Labels 2011 Ruard Wallis de Vries European Commission Directorate.

The Governance and Management of European Universities – Future Trends Thomas Estermann Senior Programme Manager European University Association Targu.

Classifying European Institutions of Higher Education Phase II Frans van Vught.

European Higher Education in Flux – challenges for the next decade - Lesley Wilson Secretary General, EUA EAIR, Vilnius, 24 August 2009.

Person centred care planning workshop -23 rd June 2010 York.

A Europe 2020 flagship initiative YOUTH ON THE MOVE An overview.

Bernd Wächter Director, ACA EUPRIO Conference Stavanger, 13 June 2008 Promotion and marketing – key components of an internationalisation strategy.

The industrial relations in the Commerce sector EU Social dialogue: education, training and skill needs Ilaria Savoini Riga, 9 May 2012.

Date: in 12 pts The Second Africa-EU initiative: Harmonisation, Quality and Accreditation supporting PAQAF Deirdre Lennan, European Commission.

Setting the context: Full costing and the financial sustainability of universities Country Workshop: POLAND EUIMA – Full Costing Project University of.

Diversity and continuum of services at community level T.Colin, Chisinau, November 24-26, 2009.

What is CSO Development Effectiveness? Presentation at the European Seminar on CSO Development Effectiveness, Vienna, 10 and 11 March 2010.

Co-creating the future; tapping in to our social capital ECNAIS Conference May, 2011 Madrid.

February 2009 Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen Drs. Ron Bormans President HAN Board Studiekeuze123.

Jolanta Urbanikowa University of Warsaw System of Language Provision – aspects of quality assurance.

EU education and training policies (ET 2020) Date: 29 June 2011 Name: Pedro Chaves DG EAC, Unit A.1, European Commission.

1 Researcher Mobility and Careers: Update on Recent EU Policy Initiatives Dr. Dagmar Meyer European Commission DG Research and Innovation Unit B2 - “Skills”

Radboud International 2025

Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines

Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat

International Relations Sector

Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.

Transparency Initiatives European Higher Education

Doctoral programmes in Europe

EU Presidency The Netherlands co-chairing with Moldova January - July

Eurydice Network publications and activities

WG Transparency PLA Noël Vercruysse February 16th 2011

TOWARDS THE CREATION OF A EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY DATA COLLECTION Education and Training Statistics Working Group Luxembourg, 17 November 2010 Peter WHITTEN.

Presentation transcript:

Robin van IJperen European Commission IREG Conference, Astana16 June 2009 Towards a Multi-dimensional Ranking: the View of the European Commission on Transparency in Missions and Performances of Higher Education Institutions

2 A. EU Context: the Modernisation Agenda for Universities B. Overview of EU-supported transparency initiatives C. Towards a Multi-dimensional Global Ranking Outline

3 EU-context Modernisation agenda for Universities

4 Main messages of the Modernisation agenda: (1) Modern universities should dare to diversify on the basis of their strenghts. Not all institutions need the same mix between education and research. The diverse missions and performances of our universities should be made transparent to all stakeholders.

5 Main messages of the Modernisation agenda: (2) More transparency will make it easier for students, teachers and researchers to make an informed choice where and what to study and where to work. More transparency would also serve university management to better position themselves and improve their developments strategies, quality and performances!

6 EU supported transparency initiatives in higher education CHEPS study « Mapping diversity of university profiles » European Data Collection project Expertgroup on Asessment of University based Research Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) Pilot project on design and testing of a multi-dimensional global ranking

7 Towards a Multi-dimensional Global University Ranking Various rankings have their own purpose and target groups (Berlin principles) Shortcomings existing rankings: - tendency to focus on research in hard sciences and ignore performances of universities in other areas like humanities, social sciences teaching quality, innovation, internationalisation and community outreach. - focus on entire institutions, not on programmes/disciplines Therefore desirable that, based on existing initiatives, instruments will be developed which enable a multi-dimensional ranking.

8 Chracteristics of multi-dimensional ranking to be developed and tested Multi-dimensional and user-driven (different users and target groups can choose an own « smart ranking ») Independent (not run by governments or universities) Global (covering institutions in Europe and other continents)

9 Planning of the project End of May 2009: Start of project End of December 2009: Final Report design phase January 2010: Start testing phase End of May 2011: Final Report testing phase