Human Resource Services Planning Council September 20, 2011 Overview of Service Area Outcome 1: Mission, Evaluation and Outcomes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Develop an Information Strategy Plan
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Further Education Support Service (FESS) FESS Equality Action Planning Framework: Supporting FETAC Registered Providers in Implementing Quality Assurance.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
Performance management guidance
President’s Cabinet April 12,  Process review  The “why” for the plan  The draft plan  Q & A  Implementation.
Program Management n KSPE 4250 n Ch 2. Vision Statement n A concise statement that describes the ideal state to which the organization aspires. u Include.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Overview of Transaction Processing and Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Chapter 2.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
Quality Representative Training Version
Coaching for School Improvement: A Guide for Coaches and Their Supervisors An Overview and Brief Tour Karen Laba Indistar® Summit September 2, 2010.
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Arnhem Business SchoolJ.Vinke 2005 Human Resource Management (HRM) Plan guide on developing a practical HRM plan.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
How get your project management or professional services organization ISO 9001 certified.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Competency-based Instructional System Design: A Model for Program Assessment 3 rd Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference Barbara Lyon, Ed.D., SPHR Tarleton.
Example of Maryland Performance Management Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator MARYLAND STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Fall 2008.
OHT 25.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 The quality assurance organizational framework Top management’s quality.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
VPA Quarterly “ Howgozit ” First Quarter 2008 July 1, 2007 – September 30, 2007 Metric Assessments of Key Operating Areas.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Strategic Planning System Sacramento City College Strategic Planning System ….a comprehensive system designed to form a reliable, understood system for.
Chapter 6: THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS FOCUS: This chapter provides a description of the application of customer-driven project management.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Texas A&M University at Galveston Strategic Planning Process Proposal.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Lincoln Trail District Health Department Strategic Plan Our Foundation Strategic Goals & Objectives Measures of Success Mission: The Lincoln Trail District.
There are 6 main components to Care Provider’s Committed to Quality Program: Visionary Leadership Mission Statement Customer Satisfaction Employee Satisfaction.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
Staff development for technology- enhanced learning and assessment an institutional overview Carol Russell.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
National Quality Standards Framework
Committee Orientation
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
National Quality Standards Framework
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Performance Management Workday Module
Conceptual Model of Integrated Planning
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
2009 Listening Sessions 2001 Visioning Focus Visioning
Process and Procedure Documentation
Presentation transcript:

Human Resource Services Planning Council September 20, 2011 Overview of Service Area Outcome 1: Mission, Evaluation and Outcomes

Overview of HRS Planning Summary of SAO-1: SAO-1 is the foundation for the other six SAOs. It contains four outputs at present (with a fifth proposed). Through its outputs we establish the mission, vision and values of the Division, the SAOs and their basis in Accreditation Standards and Institutional objectives, the evaluation model (methods or process), and the overall Plan (PRP) for the Division. It is the shortest of the HRS SAOs, but probably the most critical to our success. What are the Main Outputs? HRS Mission, Vision and Values Statement SAOs with Ties to Accreditation and Institutional Objectives (Pretty Chart) The Evaluation Model The Program Review Plan (PRP) **Palomar Outcomes Database (POD)—proposed new Where Can I Find SAO-1? The HRS Planning webpage, Program Review Plan pp at: Overview SAO-1: The Goals and Structure of HRS Planning Overview SAO-1: The Goals and Structure of HRS Planning 2

SAO-1 Ties from Accreditation to Institution and Division Planning and Specific Outputs 3 HRS SAO-1: Design and Update HRS Outcomes and Systematic Evaluation Model to Reflect Institutional Planning Updates and Increased Program Complexity. Accreditation Standard III.A. Human Resource Planning is integrated with institutional planning. Standard IIIA.6. Systematic assessment of human resources. Goal 2, Objective 2.4 Implement Service Area Outcome Assessment Cycles (SAOACs) Outputs: (1)HRS Mission, Vision and Values; (2)SAO Development; (3)Evaluation Model; (4)Program Review Plan (5)*Proposed New-Populate and Maintain Palomar Outcomes Database (POD) -Resource requirements consist primarily of human resources (employee time) for trainings in metrics/POD and for updating/revisions to key planning outputs. -Priorities for this year ( ) include updates to all outputs and the addition of output 5 for the POD.

SAO-1, Output 1: HRS Mission, Vision and Values 4 Process: -HRS as a team participated in a SWOT workshop to identify a larger group of values. -From this, smaller groups were assembled to review and propose a vision, mission and values statement that reflected Institutional and HRS goals and values. -These group versions were then consolidated into the final version.

SAO-1, Output 2: Evaluation Model Development Formative Plan: Design and methods (1 st year). Summative Plan: Implementation, revision, and updates (2 nd year-on). **This process is slightly expanded for major plan outputs and slightly abbreviated for less complex ones. 5 -The purpose of the evaluation model is to allow data to drive HRS decision-making. Priorities and processes are reevaluated based on the data, which include stakeholder feedback.

SAO-1, Output 3: HRS SAOs with Ties from Accreditation to Division Planning 6

SAO-1, Output 4: The HRS Program Review Plan PRP Revision : The previous PRP had several issues—lack of measurable outcomes, unclear metrics, and omission of major areas for assessment were three notable limitations that drove the latest version’s revisions. PRP Sections: -Section 1: Overview and Plan Design -Section 2: SAO-1 SAO and Evaluation Model Development -Section 3: SAO-2 Recruitment, Hiring and Retention -Section 4: SAO-3 Equity and Diversity -Section 5: SAO-4 Satisfaction, Service and Productivity of HRS Staff -Section 6: SAO-5 Policies, Procedures and Employee Handbooks/Agreements -Section 7: SAO-6 Employee Performance Feedback and Training -Section 8: SAO-7 Information Requests and Records -Appendices Organization within each Section: -Overview -Outputs -Resource Requirements -Timeframes -Next Cycle Planning Priorities Major Outputs by SAO: SAO-1: HRS Mission, Vision and Values; SAOs; and Evaluation Model. SAO-2: Staffing Master Plan and PeopleAdmin implementation. SAO-3: EEO Plan and Discrimination/ Harassment Investigations. SAO-4: Internal climate survey and external customer satisfaction survey. SAO-5: HRS policies and procedures and handbook/agreement updates. SAO-6: HRS Website development, employee evaluations and trainings. SAO-7: Singularity (file scanning). 7

Proposed SAO-1, Output 5: The POD Input and Update Process 8 New Output: Proposed Output 5 would include inputs and updates to the Palomar Outcomes Database (POD) via TracDat. What is the POD? The database allows for a central repository of planning tasks, outputs (assessments) and outcomes, along with associated evidence of progress (i.e., reports, documents, statistics associated with each SAO). Why Include this Output? The rationale for adding this output is that this is a vital database for tracking progress on SAOs, and also one that requires significant human resources for inputs/updates. Inclusion of an output in the PRP also demonstrates Divisional commitment to the project. The Outcomes Database includes several useful tabs and reports: Assessment Plan allows for tracking of each SAO with its associated outputs (assessments) and criteria—see handout. The documents tab contains all of the key HRS Planning documents and evidence of satisfaction of/progress on SAOs. As of 08/11, all HRS SAOs and outputs have been entered.