L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

Ron Bass, J.D., AICP, Senior Regulatory Specialist Jones & Stokes Common NEPA Mistakes and How to Avoid Them January 17, 2008 Oregon Department of Transportation.
1 Environmental Considerations by Aimee L. Kratovil, Esq. Environmental Protection Specialist San Francisco Airports District Office Western Pacific Region.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
The Role of State, Local and Tribal Governments in the Federal NEPA Process Presented by Susan E. Bromm Director, Office of Federal Activities United States.
 Department of Interior – Bureau of Land Management  USDA – Forest Service  CEQ – Council on Environmental Quality.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. David B. Kessler, AICP Regional Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Aviation Administration – Western-Pacific Region
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Rob Adams Vice President, Landrum & Brown NEPA Essentials — Tools: E, B, Desk Reference,
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Making Good Decisions in the Environmental Review Process 2012 Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
What does an Environmental Professional Do?
I Larry Heil, FHWA October 15, 2003 Environmental Streamlining.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
CEQ’s Proposed NEPA Guidance Listening Session _________________________ Welcome Please Sign In Horst Greczmiel Council on Environmental Quality April.
The Role of NEPA Leasing and Mineral Rights Sales Subject to Environmental Use and Planning Provisions –The National Environmetal Policy Act of 1969 requires.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Environmental Review for Grant Projects Montana Coal Board December 2014.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
ACA Conference - September 2017
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
22 CFR 216 A Brief Walk Through
Consultation (C) After approval of the EIS, FONSI, or CE designation, the applicant shall consult with the Administration prior to requesting any major.
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Presentation transcript:

L O N G B E A C H, C A

Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E A C H, C A

Major Parties in NEPA Process FAA Sponsor Consultant State Block Grant Program States

Three NEPA Processes EIS – Environmental Impact Statement EA – Environmental Assessment CatEx – Categorical Exclusions

Initiation of Airport NEPA Process Sponsor Initiates the Process Sponsor Owns and Operates the Airport Sponsor Decides When and Where Development Will Occur Sponsor Seeks Approvals or Funds which Starts the NEPA Process

FAA Role in EIS Lead Federal Agency Selects and Directs Consultant Develops Scope and Content of EIS Lead in All Agency and Tribal Coordination Communicates with Sponsor— Consultant Does not Communicate Directly with Sponsor Issues Record of Decision

Sponsor’s Role in EIS Reviews Consultant Proposals and Provides “Short-List” of Consultants to FAA Contracts With and Compensates the Consultant Enters into a MOU with FAA Concerning Ground Rules Primary Role Mainly During Scoping Proposes Projects and Defines Needs Helps Define Alternatives

Sponsor’s Role in EIS (continued) Provides Comments and Other Information Assists in Public Involvement Process Maintains Relationships with Local Agencies Reviews and Comments on DEIS Responsible for Obtaining Permitting and Approvals Whatever Information is Provided to Sponsor is Shared with Public—No longer deliberative!

FAA Does Not Represent Sponsor Sponsor Represents Itself FAA/Sponsor Work Together for Good of the Airport/System Sponsor Input is Essential—They Operate the Airport

Consultant Role in NEPA Documentation EIS –Contracts with Sponsor, Direction from FAA –Works with FAA to Draft Scope of Work, NOI, MOA, DEIS, and FEIS –Works with FAA to Identify Key Issues, Concerns, and Cooperating Agencies –Works as an Extension of FAA Staff –Communicates with Sponsor per the MOU

FAA Role in EA Assists Sponsor in Determining What Level of NEPA Documentation is Required Works with Sponsor to Develop EA Scope Before Sponsor Begins EA Preparation Helps Sponsor Develop Purpose and Need Helps Sponsor Develop Reasonable Alternatives Independently Evaluates the EA for Accuracy, Compliance with Orders, etc. Responsible for Tribal Coordination Leads Special Purpose Laws Coordination Makes Final Determination of Significance FAA must independently evaluate and take responsibility for its scope and content. It becomes an FAA document when signed by the responsible FAA official.

Sponsor’s Role in EA Responsible for Process Until Submitted for FAA Acceptance Selects and Compensates Consultant Defines Purpose and Need Defines Alternatives Lead in Public Involvement and Coordination if FAA is Not Special Purpose Law Does not Require FAA to do so Cooperates with FAA on Special Purpose Consultation, Including Tribal Consultation Responsible for Early and Continuous Coordination with FAA

FAA Role in CatEx Is it on the Approved List? Evaluates Information Provided by Sponsor Make a Determination of Extraordinary Circumstances Sufficient Coordination Approves CatEx

Sponsor’s Role in CatEx Early Communication with FAA Requests CatEx and Describes Action Prepares Documentation if Special Purpose Laws Allow Assists FAA to Prepare needed Documentation Submits to FAA—Early and Easy Determination

Consultant Role in NEPA Documentation (continued) EA and CatEx –Contracts and Works Directly for Sponsor –Communicates with FAA –Supports FAA with Any Tribal or Special Purpose Laws Coordination –Coordinates with Other Agencies and Public –Prepares Documentation

Special Purpose Law Agencies USFWS, NMFS – Section 7 Consultation under the Endangered Species Act USACOE-Section 404 of Clean Water Act SHPO/THPO-Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act and Section 4(f) of Department of Transportation Act, when Appropriate NPS/USFWS—Section 4(f) of Department of Transportation Act FEMA-Executive Order (floodplains) State CZM Section 401 of Clean Water Act

State Block Grant Program (SBGP) Limited to Non-Primary Airports < 10,000 Enplanements Responsibilities Outlined in FAA Order B, Chapter 2 After FAA Distributes Funds, No Longer has any Control, Therefore, No Federal Action Takes Place for Airport Development Specific Items However, FAA has Contracted with SBGP States to Consider the Environmental Effects of their Actions by Meeting State-like NEPA Requirements or NEPA Substitute “SBGP Agency Personnel” for “Responsible Federal Official” in Documentation Specific Guidance for Dealing with Special Purpose Laws

& Thank You Happy Halloween L O N G B E A C H, C A