Best Practices in Active Learning “Team Based Learning (TBL)” Ilene Harris, PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PORTFOLIO.
Advertisements

Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms From Figure 1-2 in Huba and Freed, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Shifting.
Use as part of a presentation to other faculty.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Session Outcomes Explain how assessment contributes to the learning process Use a model of feedback to enhance student learning Identify a range of feedback.
Integrating Team-based Learning & PBL Mark A. Serva, Ph.D. University of Delaware.
Workplace-based Assessment. Overview Types of assessment Assessment for learning Assessment of learning Purpose of WBA Benefits of WBA Miller’s Pyramid.
Poll #1 Is what you will see: A good thing? A good thing? A bad thing? A bad thing? Not sure? Not sure?
 How many?  5-7 members  What about big classes?  Survey, instructor forms teams.
Cooperative/Collaborative Learning An Instructional technique in which learning activities are specifically designed for small interactive groups Collaborative.
1. 3 Convey Course Concepts Apply Course Concepts TraditionalTeam-Based Readiness Assessment Readings Lecture In Class Out of Class In ClassOut of Class.
Consistency of Assessment
Team Based Learning Dan Mayer, MD Professor of Emergency Medicine Theme Leader, Evidence Based Health Care Albany Medical College Albany, New York, USA.
Team Based Learning Faculty Development Program Office of Medical Education Boston University School of Medicine 2005.
Team-based Learning: The Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching Melissa R. Michelson Sept. 17, 2009.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Best Practices IIEngineering Engineering Education1 use active learning.
Experience in Applying Online Learning Techniques in Computer Science & Engineering Dr. Aiman H. El-Maleh Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University.
Introduction to teaching and assessing so students will learn more using learner-centered teaching Phyllis Blumberg Warm-up activity How can instructor’s.
 Project-based learning is considered an alternative to teacher-led classrooms.  Project-based learning emphasises learning activities that are student-
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
Team-based Learning Simon
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Improvement Coach The purpose of this session is to introduce participants to the role of the improvement coach and prepare for.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Team Based Learning in Animal Physiology Mary Kate Worden, PhD Dept of Neuroscience, UVA SOM BIOL 3230 Fall students in 13 teams, including Megan.
While you wait… 0 Please review Arbesman’s “Let’s Bring the Polymath and the Dabblers Back,” if you have not already.
Thoughts on Teaching Public Health and the Health Work Force University of Medical Sciences Thimphu February 26, 2015.
Setting Trends in Information Literacy Instruction SUNYLA FIT Trudi Jacobson Allison Hosier Greg Bobish University at Albany.
What should teachers do in order to maximize learning outcomes for their students?
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Henry Shu-hung CHUNG Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong.
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge EEET July 11, 2009.
A Flipped Classroom: Team-Based Learning in P430 Self-Care Therapeutics Tami Remington, PharmD Clinical Associate Professor College of Pharmacy.
PBL in Team Applied to Software Engineering Education Liubo Ouyang Software School, Hunan University CEIS-SIOE, January 2006, Harbin.
Materials needed Handouts Reading for RAT RAT Case of the Imploding Group 4-S handout Peer evaluation example A-E cards IF ATs (E015)
2014 CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION PEDAGOGY INCREASING STUDENT OUT-OF-CLASS PREPARATION AND IN-CLASS COLLABORATION USING TEAM-BASED LEARNING Kerry Fay.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
Problem based learning (PBL) Amal Al Otaibi CP, MME.
Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) Don Martin EPSY 6304 Cognition and Development UT-Brownsville Professor Garcia By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com.
Team-based Learning: The Transformative Use of Small Groups in University Teaching 1.
Inquiry Based Learning What is it and how is it achieved? Israel_Johnson_Schlosser Module 2 Assignment 6 Board of Ed Proposal.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Planning for Instruction Chapter 6 NC Teaching Standard IV.
Bryan Touchet, M.D. Ashley Walker, M.D.. Describe how Team-Based Learning and online collaboration are integrated into a journal club seminar for residents.
Team-Based Learning (TBL) Richard Yuretich Department of Geosciences University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Team Based Learning Win May Bev Wood. What? Instructional strategy based on procedures for developing high performance learning teams Michaelsen, Knight.
Agenda What is “learner-centered”? ~Think of Time Activity ~ Learner-Centered: In Our Own Words Effective Instructional Strategies for the Learner- Centered.
The Transformation of Undergraduate Education through Faculty Development and Course Design – Part 1 George Watson (with acknowledgement to.
Course design by M.E. Ellen Graber Curriculum design and EFL/ESL.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
A Comparison of TEAM Approaches: TEAM-Based Learning (TBL) & Process Oriented, Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Presenters: J OHN S HABB, P H D P EGGY M.
 What is Cooperative Learning and how is it different from other instructional methods?
Session: Instructional methods; How to prepare practical exercise/case study 24 th January 2013 Dr. Eliona Kulluri Bimbashi (University of Tirana)
Problem-Based Learning Jodi Bumgarner EDU692: Creativity, Culture, and Global Context in Education Instructor: Angela Stephens October 26,2015.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Simon Tweddell University of Bradford.  Why TBL?  The TBL Process  Our Experiences of TBL  RAP and Application Exercises  Summary  Q&A.
1 Using team based learning (TBL) to maximise the effectiveness of flipped learning School of Law Zoe Swan Sally Gill Kristian P Humble.
TBL: HOW AND WHY IT WORKS Robynn L. Allveri Koc University - Law Faculty Ext
Tackling Freshman Biology Content and Teaching Critical Thinking with Team-Based Learning Rebecca Orr, Collin College.
TEAM BASED LEARNING TBL Traditional Teaching to TBL  3 important distinctions 1.course objectives change -> Shift from familiarisation.
Team Based Learning.
Energize your teaching with team-based learning
Coaching.
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge
Robert W. Lingard California State University, Northridge
Laura Madson & Dominic Simon Department of Psychology
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices in Active Learning “Team Based Learning (TBL)” Ilene Harris, PhD

Agenda Overview : Context Demonstration: TBL Activity to Develop Knowledge and Skills in TBL “Prior reading”: Basis for selection? In groups: IRAT and GRAT Construct groups: Based on balancing resources: Knowledge about TBL Individuals complete IRAT (Individual Readiness Assurance Test) Groups complete GRAT (Group Readiness Assurance Test) Report IRAT and GRAT scores Appeals process Feedback: Discuss IRAT/GRAT item options In group: Application Exercises Debriefing: TBL - What have we learned?

Curriculum Design: Plan and Implementation Needs Assessment: General and Targeted Competencies Goals and Objectives Knowledge Skills Attitudes Teaching/Learning Experiences Lectures, with Active Learning Methods, e.g., Audience Response Systems Team-based Learning (TBL) Problem-based Learning Case-based Learning Small group discussions Reading/journal club Patient care with supervision Role modeling and mentoring Etc Performance: Students/Program Assessment: Of students Evaluation: Of the education program Assessment: Of teaching

TBL Overview Method of instruction for achieving student applied knowledge/competence, through – Primary learning objectives: Application of concepts Cohesive Learning Groups: Constituted to maximize diversity within groups and “equal "distribution of resources Teacher role: Design/manage instruction Student role: Read independently & work collaboratively in groups Assignments: Promote learning & team development, by requiring group interaction Feedback: Frequent/timely Accountability: Assessment/grading supports learning in groups – through accountability for quality of individual and group work; preparation; attendance; contribution to group effort

PBL Demonstration Form groups/teams Read reading? Experience with TBL? Assigned Reading: Michaelson & Sweet, 2008 Readiness Assurance Process (RAP) Take Individual Readiness Assurance Test (IRAT ) Put aside/score – 5 points/correct answer Groups take same RAT; reach consensus on answers Score; discuss incorrect answers; try again; get partial credit Correct 1st try – 5 points; Correct 2 nd try - 4; Correct 3 rd try – 3 Appeal process Feedback Application Exercises

Design of PBL Units Before Course Formulate application-based instructional objectives, e.g., Students will be able to design a PBL unit Design instruction Select reading materials Design Readiness Assurance Tests (RATs) of knowledge Design application exercises

First Day Introduce students to PBL Form groups Alleviate student concern about grades Set mechanisms to encourage development of positive group norms,e.g., records of attendance, individual and group scores

First Day: Introduce PBL Communicate Rationale How course will be conducted Provide overview Basic features Role of instructors Role of students Benefits Activities Explain: In syllabus, using PP Demonstrate RAT, using short reading

First Day: Form Groups Create groups with diverse membership &and balance of resources Relevant characteristics of students, e.g., previous course work, practical experience, access to perspectives Diminish potential for emergence of subgroups Form groups during class

First Day Alleviate concern about grades Grading system creates individual accountability for Pre-class preparation Class attendance Devoting time/energy for group assignments Because – grading system includes Individual grades on RATs Group grades on RATs and application exercises Basing part of grade on peer evaluation Team application assignments Done in class Based on thinking, discussing, deciding Unlikely that less motivated team-mates put group at risk Involve students in setting grade weights

Each Unit Readiness Assurance Process (RAP) Assigned Readings: Read independently ahead of time Readiness Assurance Process : MCQs to assess understanding of key concepts; difficult enough to stimulate team discussion IRAT: Turn in answers/score during team test TRAT/GRAT: Retake test as team; reach agreement on answers Valuable for learning concepts and team development Immediately score, with Intermediate Feedback Assessment Technique (IF-AT), a self-scoring scratch-off answer sheet to provide timely feedback on GRATs Scoring: 1 st try, full credit; 2 nd try, reduced credit, etc. Appeals Process: Refer to assigned readings to build case; address confusion caused by inadequacy of readings or quality of questions Instructor Focused Feedback

Each Unit: Application Exercises 4 S’s Significant: Work on problem, case, question demonstrating usefulness of concept Same Problem: Feedback and common frame of reference Specific Choice: Force decision about complex matter, e.g., diagnosis Simultaneous Report: Stimulates discussion

Near End of Course Reinforce content learning: Review key concepts Learn about value of teams Show evidence: Teams typically outperform best member Recognize effective team interaction Reflection about member changes over time, actions that make a difference, barriers and means to overcome Learning about themselves: How they interact with others

Benefits Students Mastery of course content, with depth of understanding Develop appreciation of value of teams for solving complex problems Gain insights into strengths/weaknesses as learners/team members Benefits at-risk students by social support/ peer tutoring Administrators Cost effective Faculty Student energy/enthusiasm Student preparation and attendance Like working with colleagues More rewarding relationships with students

PBL Demonstration Form groups/teams Read reading? Experience with TBL? Assigned Reading: Michaelson & Sweet, 2008 Readiness Assurance Process (RAP) Take Individual Readiness Assurance Test (IRAT ) Put aside/score – 5 points/correct answer Groups take same RAT; reach consensus on answers Score; discuss incorrect answers; try again; get partial credit Correct 1st try – 5 points; Correct 2 nd try - 4; Correct 3 rd try – 3 Appeal process Feedback Application Exercises

Agenda Overview : Context Demonstration: TBL Activity to Develop Knowledge and Skills in TBL “Prior reading”: Basis for selection? In groups: IRAT and GRAT Construct groups: Based on balancing resources: Knowledge about TBL Individuals complete IRAT (Individual Readiness Assurance Test) Groups complete GRAT (Group Readiness Assurance Test) Report IRAT and GRAT scores Appeals process Feedback: Discuss IRAT/GRAT item options In group: Application Exercises Debriefing: TBL - What have we learned?