MTBA and PSMP in 802.11n Abhay Annaswamy 39977539.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0xxx March 2014 Giwon Park, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on power save mode for real time traffic Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.:IEEE /0859r0 July 2012 Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Inc Short Block Ack Date: Authors:
PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Doc.: IEEE /1190r2 September 2014 Submission Kaiying Lv (ZTE) Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission Slide 1 Date:
/0853r1 Submission July 2008 Jakub Majkowski (Nokia)Slide 1 Peer Traffic Indication enhancements Date: Authors:
WLAN QoS Ronald Lucas. Introduction With the emergence of Voice Over IP, requirements to support Voice Over IP over Wireless LAN’s without degradation.
Doc.: IEEE /1323r0 November 2012 Submission Relays for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0306r3 March 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 Power Save Mode Calibration Results Date: Authors:
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
1 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3. PS in Ad.
Power Management in Presented by Sweta Sarkar June 17 th, 2002.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r1 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Chapter 18 High Throughput and n n history MIMO HT Channels HT PHY HT MAC HT Operation.
Doc.: IEEE /0285r0 March 2013 Submission Resource Allocation Frame Format for RAW- based Medium Access Date: Authors: Chittabrata Ghosh,
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
1 Chapter 8 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee 1. Possible Access Sequences for a STA in PS Mode 2. PS in Infrastructure Network 3.
Doc.: IEEE /342r0 Submission March 2014 Naveen Kakani, CSRSlide 1 Short Packet Optimizations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0103r0 Submission January 2008 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Peer Service Period Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0880r2 Submission Scheduled Trigger frames July 2015 Slide 1 Date: Authors: A. Asterjadhi, H. Choi, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /0102r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 TGah Power Saving Date: Authors: Date: Jan, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
Doc.:IEEE /0114r0 January 2012 Low Power Medium Access Date: Slide 1 Authors:
1/23 Power Management in IEEE Yu-Chee Tseng.
Doc.: IEEE /1324r0 November 2012 Very Low Energy Paging Date: Authors: Slide 1 S. Merlin et al.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1204r1 ZTE CorporationSlide 1 Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework Date: Authors: Sept 2011.
Doc.: IEEE /0409r6 Submission July 2012 Shoukang Zheng et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Channel Access Supporting Low Power Operation Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1101r1 Submission Sept Active Polling Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.: IEEE /229r1 Submission March 2004 Alexandre Ribeiro Dias - Motorola LabsSlide 1 Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY Presented.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission HE A-Control field Slide 1 Date: Authors: Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al. September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1098r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 ACK/BA frame for UL MU under cascading structure Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1309r0 November 2012 Non-TIM Mode Negotiation Date: Slide 1 Authors: Kaiying Lv, ZTE.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
Mathilde Benveniste Avaya Labs
Discussion on MAC Calibration Power Saving Test
Joint Proposal MAC Report
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
DLS Power Save Delivery Mechanism
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
Greg Kamer – Consulting Systems Engineer
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
Frame Exchange Control for Uplink Multi-user transmission
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
July 2015 Calibration Results for PSP and U-APSD for 20MHz, 40MHz and 80 MHz band Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Dmitry.
Power Management in IEEE
Power Efficient PS Poll
Multicast/Broadcast Communication With Acknowledge
TWT SP initiation and termination and legacy PS
July 2015 Calibration Results for PSP and U-APSD for 20MHz, 40MHz and 80 MHz band Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Dmitry.
Power Efficient PS Poll
MAC Partial Proposal for TGn
Power efficient and unified s solution
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
Clarifications on WUR/PCR interactions
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
July 2015 Calibration Results for PSP and U-APSD for 20MHz, 40MHz and 80 MHz band Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Dmitry.
ACK Protection Schemes for the IEEE ac MU-MIMO Downlink
Additional Measurements & Analysis Confirming the RLAN Duty Cycle
PS-Poll TXOP Date: Authors: Month Year
Multiple Antenna OFDM solutions for enhanced PHY
July 2015 Calibration Results for PSP and U-APSD for 20MHz, 40MHz and 80 MHz band Date: Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone Dmitry.
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Peer Service Period Date: Authors: January 2008 Month Year
Chapter 11 Comment Resolution for Letter Ballot 63
Peer Traffic Indication enhancements
WUR with conventional power save
Presentation transcript:

MTBA and PSMP in 802.11n Abhay Annaswamy 39977539

Introduction to 802.11n 802.11n is the evolution of 802.11 a, b and g IEEE 802.11 a, b and g provided speeds up to 54 Mbps where as IEEE 802.11n theoretically could provide speeds up to 600Mbps (nearly 10 times) This meant that it could be used as a suitable alternative to wired internet as it accounted for bandwidth-hungry applications and also supported larger number of simultaneous users.

802.11n (contd….) The reason for increased data rate was the usage of 4 independent spatial streams of data multiplexed using SDM. MIMO(Multiple Input Multiple Output) antenna configuration is used. 40 MHz wide channels and frame aggregation are couple of other enhancements. Advantages It provided for increased range, increased capacity and higher data rates compared to previous 802.11 technologies like a, b and g. Backward compatible with earlier technologies.

Drawbacks/Technical challenges of earlier 802.11 versions User data throughput could not be increased beyond a point due to 802.11 protocol overheads, inter-frame spacing, Physical Layer headers, contention process and acknowledgement frames. Power save methods had to be improved upon to efficiently save and conserve power expended. Solution Frame aggregation – packing multiple Data units/Frames together to reduce overall overheads. Realised by Block Acknowledgement – Instead of transmitting ACK for every frame, multiple frames can be acknowledged together using a single BlockACK frame. Polling and PSMP can also be used to save power consumed.

Powersave in 802.11 In traditional systems , power save polling was done by Waking up, Station sends a PS Poll to AP For every successful PS Poll, AP sends one packet of data(MPDU) Before that Station has to DTIM beacon to find out if AP has data queued for it The AP sends data with the More Data bit set to 1, if more data is buffered for this STA. Upon receiving the data frame with the More Data bit set to 1, the STA sends another PS-Poll. After downloading all the buffered frames, the STA switches to sleep mode. Resulted in high overhead and also inefficient power save method as stations just doze moderately. Solution Legacy Power Save Poll -> U-APSD/S-APSD -> PSMP

U-APSD : Unscheduled – Automatic Power Save Delivery Service Period begins with Trigger and ends with a packet with EOSP bit set Triggers frame is a QoS+Data or QoS+Null frame No pre-set schedules of when to wake up

Regular Powersave & U-APSD Legacy power save U-APSD

PSMP - Power Save Multi Poll Was developed as an enhancement of an existing 802.11e standard (APSD). Was developed due to concerns of power consumption of MIMO based products thereby affecting battery life. Working AP will send a schedule during its own TXOP as to when to be awake to receive data and also schedule as to when to transmit. Since this schedule is known Stations can sleep more and also at the same time not miss any frames

The PSMP sequence starts with the transmission of a non-aggregated PSMP, and terminates when the last scheduled UL (uplink) transmission ends. The PSMP frame comprises of PSMP control header and one or more STA info fields, as shown in Figure 4. The STA info field carries timing details of scheduled UL and DL periods. The STA info includes two additional sub-fields for UL and DL offsets, which help in determining the exact time instant when the UL and DL durations would start. The More PSMP field, in the PSMP control header, when set to 1 indicates whether this PSMP sequence will be followed immediately by another PSMP sequence. When set to 0 it indicates that the current PSMP sequence is the last in the current service period. Figure 5 shows a typical PSMP sequence. It is possible to aggregate multiple streams such as MP3 audio, email chat, VoIP, etc. for a single STA in a PSMP sequence. Some benefits of PSMP over other power saving mechanisms in the IEEE 802.11 standard are: - Erroneous packets can be retransmitted in the same service period. - For a single STA, multiple data packets belonging to different applications can be aggregated together and transmitted in one DL period. - Burst traffic such as real-time video can be supported using multiple PSMP frames in the current service period.

MTBA – Multi TID Block ACK Evolution Single Data-Ack -> Block Ack -> Compressed Block-Ack for A-MSDU -> MTBA ACK – Each data packet is acknowledged with an ACK packet -> results in more traffic and more time. Enhancement :- Block ACK - Enables multiple frames to be transmitted and then acknowledged with a single ACK frame 2nd enhancement :- Compressed BlockACK To aggregate multiple data units with a single Timing ID(TID) so that overhead can be reduced. It is an enhanced version of BA. In compressed BA, Fragmented MSDUs cannot be transmitted and hence the bitmap size is reduced from 1024 (64*16) bits to 64 (64*1) bits. All the above BA methods can handle only single TIDs and in next slide we will look at MTBA which handles multiple TIDs

PSMP in conjunction with MTBA Allows for single frame to respond to (implicit) BAR for multiple TIDs. Are used in conjunction with Power Save operation like PSMP sequences instead of BlockACK. PSMP in conjunction with MTBA Frames of different TIDs are transmitted within a PSMP-DTT(Downlink Transmission Time) or PSMP-UTT(Uplink) allocation of a (Scheduled or Unscheduled) PSMP sequence without regard to Access Category. PSMP schedules when a STA receives and when it may transmit. DL Acknowledgement is scheduled in the uplink & vice versa UL data acknowledged by following PSMP sequence

Summary Both PSMP and MTBA were introduced in 802.11e and have been optimized in 802.11n. Both methods have been very effective in reducing power consumption and also increasing the data rate compared to earlier version.

References http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n-2009 http://www.vocal.com/networking/ieee-802-11n/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_acknowledgement http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.proxy.libraries.smu.edu/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4109751 http://www.cwnp.com/power-save-multi-poll-psmp/ http://wiki.mwnl.snu.ac.kr/twiki/pub/Main/WirelessNetworking20112/07-IEEE-802.11e-for-QoS-part1-and-part2-v2008.pdf

Questions?

Thank You!