Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SRF Cryomodule Assembly Facility Plans Tug Arkan AAC, May 10-12, 2005.
Advertisements

Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Cooling Channel Summary Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration.
Update on Be Wall Cavity Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MTA RF Workshop November 15, 2010.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
D.Proch, Thin film Workshop, Legnaro, Oct SC RF cavity technology: the possibility of mass scale production, a global review Remarkable production.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Industrial Studies of ILC Cavities & Component Production in the Americas IPAC 11 – Kyoto, Japan May 23, 2010 Science Projects Homeland Security Medical.
Question 25: Delineate the R&D program remaining before a technical design review (TDR) and full cost estimate can be prepared. What are the major projects.
Cavity package T.Saeki BCD meeting 20 Dec Cavity shape BCD: TESLA shape Pros: small wakefield, HOM thoroughly investigated single-cell: 43 MV/m.
High Level RF Technical System Review GDE Cost Review July Vancouver Canada Shigeki Fukuda & Ray Larsen For the HLRF Cost Team C. Adolphsen,
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
STF Plan & Schedule H. Hayano, KEK. Superconducting RF Test Facility Comprehensive Test Facility dedicated to ILC SC-RF R&D (expandable to FEL, ERL) for.
Status of cavity fabrication facility at KEK H. Hayano, KEK Cavity Industrialization Study at KEK Superconducting RF Cavity Technology and Industrialization.
Injector/Re-injection Chicane Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design.
S. Prat SCRF meeting Fermilab April 21-25, 2008 Status report on “Industrialization studies” at LAL on power couplers for XFEL _____ SCRF Meeting Fermi.
TTF-II Status & Prospectives Nick Walker DESY 5 th ITRP Meeting – CALTECH.
ILC ACCELERATOR AND DETECTOR TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY SUPERCONDUCTING PARTICLE ACCELERATOR FORUM OF AMERICA KENNETH O. OLSEN June 12, 2013.
1.Energy reach  High power klystrons and modulators for X-band still need development and industrialization, and thus brings risk. But klystrons of similar.
STF plan overview H. Hayano, KEK LCPAC 02/25/2005.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
STF status Mar.22,2005 H. Hayano, KEK. STF Phase 1 Test Accelerator DC gun : 200kV CsTe photocathode for quick start UV(262nm) Laser (337ns spacing, 2820bunches)
Linac R&D Update May 15, L-Band Source Consists of a LLRF system (VME/Epics based), a SNS High Voltage Converter Modulator (on loan), a Thales 2104C.
ILC WG2 (Main Linac System) status & report H. Hayano, KEK.
Status of X-Band PPM Klystron R&D for JLC KEK Yong Ho Chin ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
A general comment first: The questions ITRP has posed to the proponents focus largely upon technical issues for the linear collider. These are important.
D.Proch, DESY; GDE meeting Vancouver 06 Technical systems: Cavity Report Overview on costing activities for ILC –European costing method Overview industrial.
NLC Status and Milestones D. L. Burke ISG9 KEK December 10-13, 2002.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
Summary of TDR Cost Reviews at KILC-12 G. Dugan KILC-12 4/26/12.
Americas Region: T4CM Status and Plans H. Carter TD SRF Dev. Dept. July 14, 2006.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
CLIC TDR Task Force CLIC Zero, cost & schedule considerations R. Corsini.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Medium Beta Cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, and Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
Medium beta cavities Paolo Michelato, Paolo Pierini, Carlo Pagani INFN Milano - LASA.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
HiGrade-Kickoff DESY Global Design Effort 1 ILC-HiGrade WP6 High-Gradient cavities Lutz Lilje DESY.
Proton Driver Resources & Schedule (R&D Plan) Rich Stanek May 10, 2005.
TBTS Test Program & Schedule G. Riddone
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Oxford, UK July 7, 2011 July 7, 2011.
ALCPG/GDE Meeting FNAL Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Specification Table 23 Oct 2007 FNAL Lutz Lilje DESY.
Status of TTF3 Coupler Assembly Program November 26, 2007 Jeff Tice.
26 April, 2016 LCLS II Cryomodules and Cryoplant, Joe Preble LCLS-II Overview JLAB Organization for LCLS-II JLAB responsibilities & Schedule and Status.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
DTL prototype summary and production sequence F.Grespan LNL _06_22 CDR.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
SRF Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Fermilab. Overview Charge: Does the laboratory make effective use of collaboration and existing SRF capabilities at other.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
ACD Down-Select Criteria and Time Scales for HLRF ML-KOM FNAL September 27 、 2007 S. Fukuda, KEK & Ray Larsen, SLAC For the ILC HLRF Collaboration.
The Evolving ILC Project
ILC R&D Board Meeting: SRF Cavities Status and Plans
Complementary ISTC Projects #3888, 3889p
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
Industrialization of previous projects
Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X
IHEP Cryomodule Status
Nick Walker (DESY) EU GDE Meeting Oxford
Linac LLP Outline LINAC Long Lead Procurements
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, 2007
Presentation transcript:

Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization of the large quantity components of the LC will be a major theme over the next several years, leading to the Technical Design Report and costing. Steps include: 1.Breaking the subsystems into appropriate components for industrialization. 2.Identifying interested potential vendors who either have, or wish to develop appropriate facilities for production. Development of multiple vendors. 3.With industry, identify cost drivers and critical procedures; perform value engineering, design for serviceability, reliability, cost optimization. 4.Identify need for further R&D by HEP laboratories and/or industry. 5.Define fabrication process and factory layouts where needed. 6.Define schedule of delivery, testing procedures. Paul Grannis June 2004

Considerable attention has already been given to industrialization of some key components for both cold and warm machines. Both groups clearly understand that the industrialization will become a dominant activity over the next several years. Information from TESLA and X-band on current status of industrialization: 1.Niobium sheet production: 1 vendor has capacity for 100%, 2 more together can do 30%. Have not achieved hoped-for cost reduction for large orders; working on streamlining the facility. Seek factor 2.5 cost reduction. Dominant cost is melting. Eddy current scanning being readied for industry. Squid scanning R&D under contract. 2.Cavity fabrication: 2 vendors at present; needs further infrastructure improvements; welding machine refinement. Seek factor 6 cost reduction. 3.Cavity prep, measurement and module assembly: Up to now, all done at DESY. Have now developed 2 vendors for prep and assembly. Only the cavity measurements would remain at DESY in full production. Need simplification of assembly procedures.

4.X-band structures: Fermilab and KEK have procured satisfactory structures in small quantity from industry. Use standard industry procedures. Seek reduction in cost by factor ~3 5.TESLA modulators: FNAL-built units were used in TTF; now industrializing in 4 companies; 7 have been delivered from industry. 6.TESLA multibeam klystrons: Thales has delivered but still working out gun arcing problems; CPI, Toshiba tubes to be tested soon. Need to develop the horizontal klystron for replacement ease. 7.TESLA rf input couplers: so far use DESY built couplers; have one vendor involved, but need improved production, quality control. Further R&D and subsequent transfer to industry on TiN coatings needed. Large cost improvement is needed. 8.X-band modulators: 2 vendors identified. Work to lower cost of magnetic cells, cooling, assembly; lower cost components. Need higher efficiency.

9. X-band PPM klystrons: At present, 2 tubes – SLAC and Toshiba – have met specs. Contacts with 5 vendors, with preliminary estimates of learning curve and production costs. Are dividing project into subcomponents (e.g. gun). 10. SLED-II system: largest linac subsystem cost; claim elements are all standard for manufacture; need factor of 6 cost reduction. Evaluate Cu plated vs. Al; work on flange sealing method. 11. Cryovessel fabrication: now being made by 1 vendor, but need improved infrastructure or more vendors. 12. Girders for structure/quads: search for supplier; need measurement simplifications, attachment simplifications. 13. Cryomodule support: no information 14. Main X-band Linac quads: made in industry 15. Main Linac SC quads and steering correctors: no information

and so on … Common to cold and warm: 16. Beam delivery system magnets: made in industry 17. Low level rf systems: obtained from industry, standard components For most of the large quantity and state of the art components, industry has been involved, and often has provided working items. The R&D process continues on most items, and work is underway on value engineering and cost optimization. Getting the necessary control of fabrication quality, process control, cost reduction will be a large challenge. There is still much work to be done to get to a successful industrialization for most items, but the process is started. There does not seem to be much worry that the components of either cold or warm LC can be industrialized. The engineers seem to believe that the advertised cost reductions are achievable. Need final stable design to do real industrialization!

My chief worries for industrialization and cost reduction (others may have different choices!):  SC cavity fabrication and preparation  X-band klystrons Summary: Industrialization is understood by both cold and warm projects to be the key need for the next several years. Both have made reasonable starts in working with industry. The primary challenges are different for the two technologies, but I see little to differentiate the probability of success at this time. Getting to a final design from which a cost effective set of quotes can be developed will be a large challenge for either.