Probation II Organization of Probation Probation Supervision Probation Effectiveness & “Felony Probation”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Advertisements

Marijuana Decriminalization The First Step to Prison Reform.
Measuring 109 In Fresno County
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
Juvenile Justice.
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Re-Entry and Recidivism
Community Corrections.  Community Corrections are the subfield of corrections in which offenders are supervised and provided services outside jail or.
Community Corrections
Cost Effectiveness of Treatment for People on Probation Farrokh Alemi, Ph.D. Faye Taxman, Ph.D. Jee Vang Meridith Thanner Victoria Doyon.
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Reported Property Crime and Arrests Reported Property Crime 152, ,677159,814156,833147,684142,384138,899139,438.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Chapter 13 Parole Conditions and Revocation. Introduction Parole conditions determine the amount of freedom versus restriction a parolee has Accomplishment.
Probation Operations Department of Corrections GEORGIA House Bill 1176 Implementation Presented by: Jay Sanders Special Assistant to the Director of Probation.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
History Probation 101.  Middle Ages (1200s-1800s)  Benefit of the Clergy  Sanctuary  Judicial Reprieve  Common Theme/Purpose?
The end of the line…. Who decides?  After the jury returns a verdict of guilty either…guilty The judge determines the sentence Or the jury gives a recommendation.
The Effects of Time in Prison on Male Felons’ Employment and Earnings Haeil Jung University of Chicago 2007 Crime and Population Dynamics Summer Workshop.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME and PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR’S REPORT.
Broken Windows or Broken Logic? Supervising Offenders in the Community.
The Correction of Offenders generally divided into 2 broad categories:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
Overview of Split Sentencing Research October 25, 2006 Mark Rubin.
Criminal Sentencing in N.C.. Structured Sentencing In 2011, N.C. passed the Structured Sentencing law to organize the punishment of criminals. – Sentencing.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Probation Effectiveness
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT 1. 6-Month Preliminary Evaluation Report Post Release Community Supervision Offenders ▫From October 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION ASSEMBLY BILL 109 AND HOW IT IMPACTS COUNTIES.
1 Methods of Measuring Crime Uniform Crime Reports Self- Report Surveys Victim Surveys.
Comparative Perspectives on Sentencing Severity and Sentencing Alternatives Richard S. Frase University of Minnesota Symposium on Alternatives to Incarceration.
Intensive Supervision Probation (or Parole) Initial Rise to Prominence Research on First Gen ISP Programs Finding Something Useful in ISP.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Copyright © 2012 Carolina Academic Press Chapter 1: Crime in California Georgia Spiropoulos.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure – Data Analysis.
1 Arrest to Arraignment Chapter Ten 2 UCR Reports The FBI publishes the Uniform Crime Reports. Uniform Crime Reports divide criminal offenses into two.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Nora Wikoff August 19, Former prisoners face hurdles to gainful employment Recidivism rates are high among former prisoners Prison- and community-based.
Realignment: A One-year Examination of Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Six Months of Public Safety Realignment Association for Criminal.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE WITH SENTENCING GUIDELINES July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2007 (Preliminary)
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
Number of Offenses NationalMaricopa County Violent Crimes Property Crimes -0.2% -4.3% -3.8% -5.5% Violent crimes: murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault.
Probation History Probation 101. Early Precursors Middle Ages (1200s-1800s) Middle Ages (1200s-1800s) Benefit of the Clergy Benefit of the Clergy Sanctuary.
Thinking About A Risk-Based Registry. Sex offender risk assessments are most often employed in applied forensic settings for purposes of decision-making.
© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions Chapter 12 Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions © 2015 Cengage.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Prisons Prisons vs. Jails Prisons – serving more than a year Jail Serving less than a year Awaiting trial (denied bail / couldn’t afford)
Okaloosa County Department of Corrections. Population Reports.
Crime Data.
TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1
Sources of Crime Data The Uniform Crime Report
California State Association of Counties
Crime and Punishment Chapter 7 Section 5.
Existing sources at international level Doc. ESDTAT/D6/CR/04
Warm Up (use 5.1) 1. What is deviance?
Methods of Measuring Crime
Chapter 7 Section 5: Crime and Punishment
Presentation transcript:

Probation II Organization of Probation Probation Supervision Probation Effectiveness & “Felony Probation”

Organization of Probation  Three Central Categories Centralized vs. Decentralized Judiciary vs. Executive Branch Combined With Parole?  No clear consensus for model nationally Minnesota?  Depends on what county you are in

Dual Functions of Probation  Investigation (PSI) Review  Supervision Police vs. Social Work Aspects Role Conflict?

Defining “Success” and Failure in Probation  Success typically low “Recidivism” But, recent authors argue for other definitions  Danger here?  What counts as “Recidivism?” New Arrest New Conviction Re-Incarceration (May include technical violations)

Other Research Issues  Follow-up Period Typically 3 years  Sample Composition What type of probationers? (representative?)  Probation department Funding (“Program Integrity”)  Social Context of Study Anything going on in state/county?

The RAND Study (Funded by NIJ)  Sample 1,672 Male “Felony” Probationers  Drug sales/possession, receiving stolen property, auto theft, robbery, assault  From Alameda and Los Angeles Counties Tracked an average of 31 months

Results—Disseminated in NIJ “Research in Brief”  Rearrested 65%  Convicted 51%  Incarcerated 34%  Startling: 18% convicted of homicide, rape, aggravated assault, robbery or weapons offenses

Conclusions of Authors  Probation, designed for less serious offenders, is “inappropriate for most felons”  Probation needs to be “redefined” Quasi-policing strategies Development of “Intermediate Sanctions”  Especially the “Promising” ISPs  NIJ: Prison is expensive, but you see what happens when we use probation…

Follow-Up Studies Attempts to Replicate  Vito (1986) Representative sample in KY  22% arrest, 18% convicted, 14% incarcerated  McGaha (1986) All MO felony probationers in 1980  22% arrest, 12% conviction  Whitehead (1991) All NJ convicted of drug, robbery, burglary in  36% arrest, 31% conviction, 15% incarceration

Follow-ups Cont  Langan and Cunniff (1992) 32 Counties across 17 states  43% arrested, 36% incarcerated  Fabelo (1996) Seven most populous counties in TX  31% incarcerated

So Ya See Timmy….  “Representative Samples” Much lower recidivism rates  Closer to the Rand Study? Most populous counties in TX “Urban” Counties in U.S.

Revisiting the Original Study  Petersilia et al. (1986) Matched (priors, seriousness, other risk factors) a group of felons to the original RAND probation sample Difference? The Matched Sample went to prison Findings?  Matched sample that went to prison = 78% arrest NIJ refuses to publish brief on this study  Similar to “Martinson Recant”

CA and TX in the mid 1980s?  Funding for Probation in CA counties cut 10%, personnel down 30%, while population doubled Severe prison and jail crowding  Follow up studies contained “less serious” offenders TX had similar conditions  Original “full” RAND report “Our sample is probably not representative of California, much less probation in general”

Lessons from “Felony Probation” Studies  “Felony status” not an important predictor of recidivism Offender characteristics (prior record, age, employment, drug use) more important  There is wide variation in the success of probation Like rehabilitation, much depends on “program integrity”

In other words…  It is probably unwise to take the most serious offenders from counties with severe jail/prison crowding, where probation services have been cut, and use them to represent “PROBATION”