Don Names, Deputy Assistant General Counsel Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department of the Navy EEO Case Law Update.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sexual Harassment 2012 Laws & Case History Laws & Case History Sexual Harassment is Sexual Harassment is Types of Harassment Types of Harassment Importance.
Advertisements

Preventing Discrimination & Harassment. Equal Employment Opportunity Cuesta College is an Equal Opportunity employer. All employees who participate on.
FEDERALLY EMPLOYED WOMEN (FEW) AND COMPLIANCE UNDERSTANDING YOUR RIGHTS Presented By: Melvie Hall-Bellinger FEW National Vice President - Compliance.
The EEOC and Trends for Working Women: Current and Emerging Issues 2007 National Equal Opportunity Professional Development Forum Edana E. Lewis, Esq.
Supervisory Sexual Harassment Training
EEOC Update Baltimore FEB 2014
Chapter 13- Rights of Criminal Justice Employees
Revenge is SWEET... for Plaintiffs: Recent Trends in Retaliation Law Raymond Peeler Senior Attorney Advisor Office of Legal Counsel U.S. Equal Employment.
The Revised Federal EEO Complaint Process Prepared by the IHS Equal Employment Opportunity and Civil Rights Office May 16, 2000.
The Legal Series: Employment Law I. Objectives Upon the completion of training, you will be able to: Understand the implications of Title VI Know what.
Don Names. Transgender Status States Claim under Title VII Day v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No (2/19/13) EEOC reiterates its holding in Macy v. DOJ.
2  Exempt/Non-Exempt  Non-exempt  Exempt Managerial/Policy Making  New Appointment  Probationary—24 months  Trainee--Once training progression is.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT High Profile Issue: EEOC Report on Cases:
Equal Employment Opportunity 1964–1991
3-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Understanding Equal Opportunity and The Legal Environment Chapter 3.
Equal Employment Opportunity Principles of Discrimination Law.
Major EEO Laws (1960s- 1970s) Major EEO Laws (1990s- Current) TERMS The Legal Environment TERMS The Legal Environment and Sexual Harassment TERMS The.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment.
Employment Discrimination Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman.
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT of HRM. MAJOR EEO LAWS u Equal Pay Act (1963) u Title VII, Civil Rights Act (1964/1991) u Pregnancy discrimination Act (1978) u ADE.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY 101 Jessica K. Larkin, Equal Opportunity Specialist U.S. Department of Labor Civil Rights Center Office of Compliance and Policy.
The University of Texas at Austin General Compliance Training Program Equal Employment Opportunity.
Sexual Harassment Training
Chapters 2, 3, 4 Legal Compliance/EEO
CHAPTER THIRTEEN Disability Discrimination McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Myths About Disability.
Employment Law for BUSINESS sixth edition Dawn D. BENNETT-ALEXANDER and Laura P. HARTMAN Chapter 2 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Copyright.
Providing Equal Employment Opportunity and a Safe Workplace
Employee Rights and Discrimination Chapter 12. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Identify major employment discrimination laws impacting.
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Equal Employment Opportunity. Dimensions of Diversity Religious beliefs Parental Status Marital Status Work Background Geographic Location Military experience.
CHAPTER THREE Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Sexual Harassment Increasing Awareness. Section I Introduction 2.
Employment Discrimination.  Fifth Amendment – Prohibits the federal government from: ◦ Depriving individuals of “life, liberty, or property” without.
Pregnancy Discrimination Vanessa A. Gonzalez Board Certified Labor & Employment Law
© 2010 Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. RETALIATION CLAIMS: DOES THIS PROTECTED CLASS ECLIPSE ALL OTHERS ? Presented by: Patti W. Ramseur.
Comprehensive Volume, 18 th Edition Chapter 42: Equal Employment Opportunity Law.
Iowa Civil Rights Commission Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation is a brief overview and should not be construed as legal advice.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY (EEO) POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TRAINING USUHS EEO Office Administrative Support Division
PREVENTIVE LAW WORKSHOP Managing Difficult Personnel Situations Mary Elizabeth Kurz, Vice Chancellor and General Counsel Dianne Sortini, Director, Employee.
EEO and the Legal Environment of HR. Chapter 3 What is Equal Employment Oppy? EEO is legal protection against discrimination. Race Religion Age Sex National.
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Civil Rights Act of 1964  Statutes that outlawed employment discrimination against certain classes  Providing.
Chapter 19 Equal Opportunity in Employment. Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.19-2 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
1 Equal Employment Opportunity and Discrimination in Employment.
The Army Reserve MR. TIMOTHY D. JOHNSON Chief, Labor and Employment Law U.S. Army Reserve Command Labor Law Update.
Title VII and IX Awareness for 4-H Volunteers Awareness, Reporting, and Prevention of Discrimination, Harassment and Sexual Violence 1is2many.okstate.edu.
Discrimination in Employment Chapter 23. Employment Discrimination Treating individuals differently based on differences Treating individuals differently.
2 Equal Opportunity and the Law 2 Copyright © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 2-1.
Chapter 19.  Equal opportunity in employment: The rights of all employees and job applicants  To be treated without discrimination  To be able to sue.
United States Department of Transportation Notification And Federal Employee Anti- Discrimination And Retaliation Act of 2002.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Division of Immigration Health Services FY 2010.
Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Training for Managers/Supervisors
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Why EEO Training? Navy directives require all civilian and military supervisors to receive annual Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) training. To fulfill.
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter 2 Managing Equal Opportunity and Diversity 2-2 Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc.
D. Scott Landry Chaffe McCall, L.L.P United Plaza Blvd., Suite 103 Baton Rouge, LA Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Association of Levee.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Legal Literacy for Supervisors Risk Research Bulletin, January 2008.
Chapter 13 Employment Discrimination Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
ITRC Leadership Responsibility and Team Development Workshop
Sexual Harassment Prevention Training
Sexual Harassment in the University Environment
Harassment and/or Discrimination
NO FEAR ACT Compliance training
No FEAR Act The notification and federal employee anti-discrimination and retaliation act of 2002.
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Class Twelve-Sex Discrimination
Chapter 18: Employment Discrimination
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN EMPLOYMENT
Chapter 33 Equal Opportunity in Employment
Presentation transcript:

Don Names, Deputy Assistant General Counsel Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department of the Navy EEO Case Law Update

The Lay of the Land EEOC’s Annual Report on the Federal Workforce (FY 2012) 15,837 EEO complaints Most common bases: retaliation, age and race (African- American) Most common issues: harassment, non-selection, terms and conditions Government-wide, the number of EEO complaints decreased 5.5% over 5 years

Supreme Court Interprets Pregnancy Discrimination Act Young v. UPS, Inc., No (3/25/15) Pregnant employee with 20-pound lifting restriction informed by employer that she could not work while under the lifting restriction. Supreme Court clarifies that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a pregnant employee alleging that an employer is in violation of the Act can establish a prima facie case of disparate treatment, following the analysis set out in McDonald Douglas Corp. v. Green by showing : – she is a member of a protected class; – she requested accommodation; – the employer did not provide accommodation; and – the employer accommodated others "similar in their ability to work."

The Problem with Procedurals EEOC Reports that nearly half of all procedural dismissals are reversed on appeal (44.9%). Of these reversals, most are dismissals for failure to state a claim (57%) and timeliness (24%). Let’s take a look at a few of these decisions for some lessons learned.

Employee “Aggrieved” by Changed Assignment Complainant v. USPS, EEOC No (4/7/2014) Agency argued that complainant was not aggrieved by change in his mail delivery route, and dismissed his complaint. EEOC disagreed, finding that the change in his route made it physically difficult to perform, and therefore he suffered a “harm or loss with respect to a term, condition or privilege of employment” which stated a justiciable claim.

Stating a Claim of Harassment Complainant v. Army, EEOC No (1/8/2015) Complainant’s allegation of discrimination when she had to wear a sign which read “Ride ‘em Hard” at an office holiday party was dismissed for failure to state a claim (single incident). EEOC reversed, finding that the sign incident and co-worker comments following the party stated an actionable claim of harassment.

Agency Joint Employer of Contractor Complainant v. Navy, EEOC No (5/20/2014) Nurse employed by private staffing firm at agency hospital alleged race discrimination when she was disciplined and ultimately fired. Agency dismissed for failure to state a claim, asserting complainant was not a federal employee or applicant. EEOC reversed, finding agency exercised sufficient control over complainant to qualify as joint employer.

Supervisory Harassment Petitioner v. Interior, EEOC No (7/16/2014), aff’d 121 MSPR 438 (8/15/2014) EEOC differs with MSPB, finding that supervisor engaged in harassment based on race, sex and retaliation when she harassed and ultimately removed complainant. EEOC states that S.Ct. decision in Nassar requiring “but for” proof of retaliation does not apply in federal sector.

Co-Worker Harassment Complainant v. DoD (DIA), EEOC No (6/6/2014) EEOC finds hostile work environment created by co-worker based on sex and retaliation, and agency failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action. EEOC sanctions agency for failure to issue FAD within regulatory time period and agency counsel for interference with investigation (4 hours of EEO training ordered).

Disparate Treatment and Harassment of Transgender Employee Complainant v. Army, EEOC No (4/1/2015) EEOC finds unlawful disparate treatment of transgender employee when she was denied access to common women’s restroom. Transgender employee was subjected to hostile work environment based on sex when team leader intentionally and repeatedly referred to her by male names and pronouns.

Disability – Essential Function of Position Alvara v. DHS, Spec. Panel (9/29/2014), see EEOC No Essential functions of job are outcomes to be achieved. Attendance and timing of duties are not essential functions. Special Panel affirmed EEOC’s decision.

Disability – Reasonable Accommodation Complainant v. DOT, EEOC Appeal No (5/9/2014) Agency rescinded flexible schedule accommodation when complainant’s cancer was in remission. Commission finds that complainant is disabled due to ongoing effects of cancer medication. Agency violated Rehabilitation Act when it rescinded flexible work schedule.

Improper Disability-Related Inquiry Complainant v. Dept. of Education, EEOC No (8/27/2014) Pre-employment inquiry in USAJobs application process regarding candidates’ disabilities violates Rehabilitation Act.

Rehabilitation Act’s Confidentiality Provisions Complainant v. DOJ (Bureau of Prisons), EEOC No (4/25/2014) Agency placed documentation identifying complainant’s diagnosis and symptoms in a non-medical adverse action file in its Human Resources Department. Violation found based on failure to maintain medical information in separate files, even in the absence of an unauthorized disclosure.

Fitness for Duty Exam Complainant v. TVA, EEOC No (5/1/2014) Agency violated restrictions on pre-employment inquiries and medical exams when it ordered complainant to undergo FFDE following “extreme behavior” during investigative interview. Commission found agency failed to provide persuasive evidence that complainant posed “direct threat” or could not perform essential functions.

Retaliation Complainant v. DOJ (FBI), EEOC No (3/27/2014) “Per se” violation of anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII found when agency official threatens to disband the unit if “problems” (EEO complaints) continued. Intentional retaliation also found when complainant was denied use of government vehicle, while co-workers who had not engaged in protected EEO activity were allowed to use government vehicles.

Religious Accommodation Complainant v. USPS, EEOC No (8/15/2014) EEOC finds agency failed to reasonably accommodate complainant’s religious beliefs when it denied his request to not work on Saturdays (his Sabbath).

Sanctions Complainant v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, EEOC No (11/6/2014) EEOC imposes sanction of default judgment when agency fails to provide EEO complaint file to Commission on appeal. Finding that complainant had established a prima facie case of reprisal, the Commission ordered a supplemental investigation on the complainant’s entitlement to compensatory damages.

Sanctions Complainant v. Health and Human Services, EEOC No (6/16/2014) EEOC sanctions agency for failure to preserve interview notes in challenged non-selection. Sanction of adverse inference led to finding of race and age discrimination. Remedies included retroactive placement in position, back pay and $84,000 in attorney’s fees.

Remedies: $200,000 Damages Award Complainant v. DHS, EEOC No (8/7/2014) Following a hearing, an EEOC AJ found that complainant had been discriminated based on her sex when terminated. Complainant was awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages, based upon extensive testimony and evidence of emotional distress, physical symptoms of distress, the demise of her marriage, economic harm and harm to her reputation.