LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Energy Vehicle
Advertisements

PROCESS FRAMEWORK Lecture - 3. Topics covered PROCESS FRAMEWORK PROCESS MODELS DIFFERENCE.
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
Project Management Module 3. Keep focused on the timeline Week Prepare for Kick-off Meeting Assign teams Team forming Review and execute.
Term Project Teams of ~3 students Pick a system (discuss choice with me)  Want simple functionality, security issues, whole system (e. g., client and.
Chapter 5: Project Scope Management
Term Project Pick a system (discuss choice with me)  Want simple functionality, security issues, whole system (e. g., client and server side) Submit a.
Chapter 5: Project Scope Management
LSU v9/08/05LA ACES Overview1 Overview of the LA ACES Program A summary of the motivation, components and expectations of this Louisiana-wide student ballooning.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
LSU 10/09/2007Risk Management1 Risk & Risk Management Project Management Unit #5.
Development and Quality Plans
Defining the Activities. Documents  Goal Statement defines why helps manage expectations  Statement of Work what gets delivered defines scope  Software.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
LSU 07/24/2004Defining Project Tasks1 Defining the Project Tasks Project Management Unit, Lecture 4.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
Unit 5 – eProject – Starting to look at projects Unit 5 Looking in more detail at the structure of the course. 1)Get into groups – 2 X 3 2)All meetings.
LSU 05/02/2006Launch Trip1 The LaACES Launch Trip Ballooning Unit, Lecture 6.
S/W Project Management
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
CHAPTER 5 Infrastructure Components PART I. 2 ESGD5125 SEM II 2009/2010 Dr. Samy Abu Naser 2 Learning Objectives: To discuss: The need for SQA procedures.
Andrea Santangelo, Kepler Center-Tü Toulouse, February 2, 2012 “The Organization of the EUSO- Balloon mission” Andrea Santangelo * Kepler Center for Astro.
Steps to the Preliminary Design Review (PDR) ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 28, 2003.
Technological Design STS-118 Lunar Plant Growth Chamber Challenge © 2013 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association STEM  Center for.
Learning Unit Documents and Examples. Learning Units - basic building block of a course For iGETT a Learning Unit consists of –Three parts Instructor.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Best Systems Engineering Products Drive CMMI NDIA 6th Annual Systems Engineering Supportability & Interoperability Conference October 21, 2003 Dr. Tom.
Statistics Monitor of SPMSII Warrior Team Pu Su Heng Tan Kening Zhang.
LSU 01/17/2006Spring LaACES Schedule For the semester and the next few weeks.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
INFO 424 Team Project Practicum Week 2 - Launch report, Project tracking, Review report Glenn Booker Notes largely from Prof. Hislop.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Project Management, Lifecycle and Documentation
Component 8 Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 4 Structured Systems Analysis and Design This material was developed by Duke University,
ACES Spring 2003 Overview Where are we going? How are we going to get there?
GEEN 2850 / REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: _01 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE CU Balloon Experimental Satellite (CUBESAT)
Critical Design Review (CDR)
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Module 5 Session 5.2 Visual 1 Module 5 Refining Objectives, Scope, and Other Project Parameters Session 5.2 Reviewing the PAR and refining key project.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
BU610 Applied Business Research 2016 Section A (Waterloo Part-time MBA) Faculty Advisors: Mitali De Shelly Jha Kalyani Menon
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
NEM201 Week 4 Project Plan Create and complete outstanding items. 01. Front Cover 02. Document details 03. Scope Document 04. Technical Design 05. Creative.
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
Connecticut Department of Public Health - Keeping Connecticut Healthy Connecticut Department of Public Health PHABuloCiTy! Public Health Accreditation.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering RDCR ARB CS 577b Software Engineering II Supannika Koolmanojwong.
LSU v09/08/05SBC Overview1 Introduction to the LA ACES Student Ballooning Course A summary of the motivation, contents and status of the materials available.
Information Technology Project Management, Seventh Edition.
Prof. Shrikant M. Harle.  The Project Life Cycle refers to a logical sequence of activities to accomplish the project’s goals or objectives.  Regardless.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Software Configuration Management
CMMI Q & A.
Pre-Execution Process Review Presentation
CS 577b Software Engineering II -- Introduction
PSS verification and validation
Project Management Unit #2
Presentation transcript:

LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8

LSU 07/07/2004Communication2 The need for communication Communication and documentation is key for a successful project –“If it is not written down, it did not happen!” (ancient wise saying) –“If you wrote it down, you agreed to do it!” (not as ancient wise saying) Communication assures coordination of effort across stakeholders –Agreement on how to proceed –Tracking of progress –Assure functioning interface between units Written documentation provides the “glue” that stabilizes components and unifies the project –Helps assure “end-to-end” thinking –Show agreement on roles, tasks, schedule –Provides proof of performance Reports & presentations set precedent for acknowledgement of effort and / or discoveries

LSU 07/07/2004Communication3 Major Documents There are a multitude of written documents during a project –Proposal of concept to funding agency –Requirements Document to specify “ground rules” –System Design Document to specify high level design –Interface Control Documents to define subunit interfaces –Risk Management Plan shows how project risks are controlled –Preliminary Design Review (PDR) gives initial definition of project –Critical Design Review (CDR) provides complete definition of project –Flight Readiness Review (FRR) certifies payload for flight –Mission Operations and Data Analysis for post-launch procedures –Technical reports to track progress of project –Science reports to present results publicly For ACES you will need to prepare PDR, CDR, FRR documents and a post-flight science report

LSU 07/07/2004Communication4 The Project Reviews There are at least three major reviews during a project –Preliminary Design, Critical Design, Flight Readiness These reviews provide a check on project progress for all stakeholders PDR, CDR and FRR are major project milestones –PDR during February –CDR during March –FRR just prior to launch in May –Imposed duration on schedule is a risk to be managed The team must prepare written documents and oral presentations for each review Each review has a somewhat different objective and emphasis

LSU 07/07/2004Communication5 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) The primary objective for the PDR is to review results from your design phase At the end of the PDR you should have been able to show that you have “thought the problem through” A member of the LA ACES Project will attend and participate in the PDR Copy of completed PDR document should be received by LA ACES at least 3 days prior to PDR Team needs to provide oral presentation of PDR material –Be able to address questions –Record list of action items resulting from the PDR

LSU 07/07/2004Communication6 PDR Topics The PDR should focus on the following topics: –Goals & objectives –Preliminary System design –Concept hardware & software design –Tasks, schedule, resource needs, long-lead items –Preliminary risk assessment & management plan Use document template to guide your PDR write-up –Similar document for CDR and FRR PDR presentation should be about 1 hour –30 to 40 minutes of PowerPoint presentation –20 to 30 minutes of questions from the review panel –Cover content of PDR document

LSU 07/07/2004Communication7 PDR Document Template Cover Page Shows Core Information

LSU 07/07/2004Communication8 When you change a document you need to track that information

LSU 07/07/2004Communication9 This page provides a basic list of what still needs to be done TDB – To be determined

LSU 07/07/2004Communication10 Addressing this list of topics will provide all the basic information needed to define your payload

LSU 07/07/2004Communication11 Provide a list of all the figures in your document This is a suggestion of some of the types of figures you might want to include

LSU 07/07/2004Communication12 Provide a list of all the tables in your document This is a suggestion of some of the types of tables you might want to include

LSU 07/07/2004Communication13 Section 1.n is more or less done Section 2.0 lists your references Section 3.n describes what science you want to do

LSU 07/07/2004Communication14 Section 4.n describes all the details of your payload design

LSU 07/07/2004Communication15 Section 5.0 discusses your plans for the Development phase immediately after PDR In section 6.n you show how you will get your payload flight ready What you intend to do during flight operations is in section 7.n

LSU 07/07/2004Communication16 Project management is detailed in section 8.n Schedule, WBS, resource allocation is specified in section 9.n

LSU 07/07/2004Communication17 Your costs and acquisition plan are in section 10.n Section 11.0 describes any risks you have identified that could impact your project as well as your plan for managing these risks

LSU 07/07/2004Communication18 Critical Design Review (CDR) The primary objective of the CDR is to review the results from your development phase Determines whether you are ready to begin building your payload Same procedure as for PDR, but LA ACES Project will not be directly involved –LA ACES does not need to signoff on your CDR –Provide LA ACES with CDR document & presentation following review –LA ACES may provide action items that will need to be addressed during by FRR Precise date for CDR should be identified during PDR

LSU 07/07/2004Communication19 CDR Topics CDR should follow the same format as the PDR –Modify document template for CDR –Same oral presentation format CDR should emphasize the following topics: –Resolving issues identified during the PDR –Prototyping results and “proven” designs –Completed system design and defined interfaces –Finalize tasks, schedule, procedures and costs –Updated risk assessment & management plan –Preliminary MO & DA plan

LSU 07/07/2004Communication20 Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Determine that all issues from CDR have been resolved Document Experiment Readiness –As-built configuration –Environmental testing results –Calibrations performed Provide quantitative evidence that the payload: –Meets requirements –Is safe –Will perform properly Determine any impact on other payloads or the vehicle Describe procedures for checkout, integration with the vehicle and mission operations Identify outstanding issues that must be addressed prior to flight

LSU 07/07/2004Communication21 FRR Topics FRR document follows same format at CDR –Documentation of as-built configuration –Prove that payload is safe, will perform properly and satisfies flight constraints –Written FRR document sent to LA ACES Project 2 weeks before flight Oral FRR presentation during the launch trip The FRR will determine whether you are allowed to attach your payload to the flight vehicle! Details about what is expected during the FRR are provided in Ballooning Unit, Lecture 5

LSU 07/07/2004Communication22 Post-Flight Science Report During the launch trip you will be required to present a report on your preliminary science results –PowerPoint presentation including science background, brief description of instrument, calibrations, analyzed data, science results and error analysis You will have a full day following the flight to analyze your data and prepare your report You will be provided with a time to altitude converter program for your flight Recommend the following prior to the launch trip –Have your presentation done except for the science results –Have your calibrations complete and ready to apply –Have your ground data handling and analysis software complete, tested and ready to go