Dayton’s Bluff Achievement Plus Elementary School Saint Paul, MN Presenter: Andrew Collins, Principal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Purpose of Instruction
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Parents as Partners in Education
Marshall Middle School Be brave.. Content Data Overview Academic Awareness – Response to data Behavior – A proactive and positive approach Culture Shifts.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
SEM Planning Model.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Moving from Compliance to Quality Control Focus on nuances of teacher delivery and student response during instruction Integration of important and effective.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
What should be the basis of
Overdale Primary School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: November 1999 Revised: May 2003 Revised: September 2004.
Kenny School School Year. Agenda Welcome Introductions Theory of Action and Strategy Work Core Values Kenny School Vision/Mission School Goals.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
The Puzzle of an Elementary Master Schedule Putting the Pieces Together!
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP September 4, 2012.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PUTTING OUR FOOT DOWN TO ACCELERATE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT FROM WITHIN.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Macomb County Support for Priority & Focus Schools Judith P. Pritchett, PhD Chief Academic Officer Macomb Intermediate School District
Timberlane Regional School District
Chimacum Creek Primary School November 12, School Improvement Plan.
Title I Parent Meeting Boston Sept 1, Agenda 8:15-8:20 Welcome Sign in 8:20-8:25 Ice Breaker 8:25-8:40 Pilot School Innovation Zone 8:40-8:50Title.
Creating, Monitoring and Evaluating a Master Schedule That supports student learning.
Instructional Leadership and Reading First Component 3-Part B Sara Ticer, Principal, Prairie Mountain School District Support for Instructional Leadership.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Effective Grade Level Teams Minnesota RtI Center Conference March 26, 2009 Kerry Bollman St Croix River Education District.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
Dunbar Primary School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: May 2003 Revised: April 22, 2004 Revised: September 30,
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
Elementary Professional Development Day August 31, 2010 Gar-Field High School Dr. Steven L. Walts Superintendent of Schools.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Literacy Partner 2007 – 2008 The literacy partner supports student learning by collaborating with teachers and administrators to model best practices and.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… … a process for providing high quality instruction, assessment, and intervention that allows schools to.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
Presentation transcript:

Dayton’s Bluff Achievement Plus Elementary School Saint Paul, MN Presenter: Andrew Collins, Principal

2 Demographics School Population:District Population: 375 Students (PK-6 th ) 37,875 Students 40% African-American30% African-American 25% Hispanic 14% Hispanic 20% Southeast Asian29% Southeast Asian 13% Caucasian25% Caucasian 2% American Indian 91% Free and Reduced Lunch Status*70% Free and Reduced Lunch Status*(Income eligibility based upon Federal Poverty guidelines) 35% ELL Students41% ELL Students 12% Special Education Students16% Special Education Students 40% Mobility Index* (Students who enrolled or left after October 1 st ) 12% Special Education Students * Note = Statistics taken from School Year

Critical Themes Climate and culture Forgetting about the past and defining our future together Clear and high expectations for all Creating a belief structure Capacity building and strategic empowerment Collaboration is key Establishing data points Effective analysis of formative and summative results Creating academic coherence Implementing research-based practices Having the right mix of strategies to make it work Targeted staff development Supporting the instructional framework 3

Climate and Culture Vision – All students achieving at high standards Clear and specific building-wide mission and vision  Why are we here? Continuous dialogue (Acknowledgment of input vs. benevolent dictatorship)  Consensus among staff  Interpreting and operationalizing monthly expectations  Identify non-negotiables We have an academic urgency…  Let students know where they are and where they are headed  Examining the school calendar Accelerating the decision making process  Focus – Making decisions that are in the best interest of our children Clear and high expectations for student behavior Smile – We have the best job in the world!

How much time do we actually have?

Building Capacity Collaboration… Truly a team approach (Staff and Students) Ownership through empowerment Teacher resource room Strategic mentorship Accountability – High expectations for all stakeholders Environmental factors – Instructional and Structural  Rituals and routines  Adequate classroom resources  School-wide behavior model  Common prep times  Low class size - priority  Inclusion model with support staff  Meaningful committee structure

Turn and Talk How has your analysis of data positively affected your instruction?

Analyzing the Data Where do we find our data? BELIEF: Data drives instruction (Differentiated and Action Oriented)  Individualized instructional plans Deepening and strengthening of instructional practices Examination of data from high stakes assessments  MCA-II, TEAE and NNAT Authentic classroom assessments  Formative reading assessments (Running Record, PALS, QRI, MONDO) Formally - 4x/year (September, November, March, and June) Informally – as needed, but with grades K-3, at least once every two weeks  Writing benchmarks  Math progress reports (Everyday Math Secure Skills chart) Teacher – Student Conferences Observations and analysis of student work  Grade level and cross-grade level

Academic Coherence Standards and frameworks – Implement with fidelity Clear understanding of academic needs Curriculum mapping and alignment  Academic continuity (MN Standards); Identification of Power Standards Workshop model  Uninterrupted blocks (at least 60 minutes) in all core content areas  Focused mini-lesson (strategy/concept), work time (practice of strategy), and sharing (linked to concept being taught) Research based best practices (supplemented and aligned)  Flexible grouping by strategy, concepts, etc. Support staff inclusion in the classroom (planning and team teaching) Continuous monitoring of progress  PLCs, Formative Assessments and Student Portfolios Common language across building (staff development)

Targeted Staff Development How do we support our instructional framework? BELIEF: We are a nested learning community - We build our own capacity…  Model delivered in small incremental steps  Introduction, dialogue, implementation, reflection  Based on building level and individual teacher needs from accountability measures Opportunities for collaboration  Analysis of Data; Learning Walks; PLC’s  Open-door policy regarding observations (learning from each other) Implementation schedule: Integrated School/Meeting Calendar  Common prep. times  Integrated meeting schedule  Participation in PLCs by all staff (Full day) – reflective dialogue  Intervention schedule - Systematic and timely (response time) On-site support and coaching District staff development

Achievement Results