E-GVAP: EUMETNET GPS Water Vapour Programme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Meteorological OrganizationIntergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO Ship Observations Team ~ integrating and coordinating international.
Advertisements

E. Brockmann EGS Nice, April 2002 Applications of the real-time Swiss permanent GPS network 'AGNES' E. Brockmann, S. Grünig, R. Hug, D. Schneider, A.Wiget.
An optimal estimation based retrieval method adapted to SEVIRI infra-red measurements M. Stengel (1), R. Bennartz (2), J. Schulz (3), A. Walther (2,4),
EUCOS The EUMETNET Composite Observing System Stuart Goldstraw – EUCOS Operations Manager Thanks to Jacqui Rogers, EUCOS Technical Co-ordinator.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright COST-717: “Use of radar observations in hydrological and NWP models” –Austria –Belgium –Cyprus –Czech Republic.
DIAS home page Second European Space Weather Week, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, November 2005 European Digital.
Session 5: Methods used in Meteorology Applied to Space Weather Session Introduction Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Third European.
EPN LAC Workshop 2008 Frankfurt Main, Germany, October, 2008 ASI Local Analysis Center Report C. Ferraro, Telespazio/CGS Matera R. Pacione, e-GEOS/CGS.
GPS Network for COPS German – French – Swiss Collaboration.
E-GVAP Space Weather Week, Brussels E-GVAP The EUMETNET GPS Water Vapour Programme Presentor: Henrik Vedel Danish Meteorological Institute Coordinator.
Mesoscale ionospheric tomography over Finland Juha-Pekka Luntama Finnish Meteorological Institute Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer University of Bath 4th.
GPS Atmosphere Sounding, COPS/GOP, April 10, 2006 GPS Atmosphere Sounding J. Wickert, G. Dick, G. Gendt, M.Ramatschi, and M. Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo swisstopo Report for EGVAP 2008/2009 E. Brockmann.
Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
© Crown copyright Met Office GPS Water Vapour in the UK and the E-GVAP Project Jonathan Jones, Upper Air Team, Observations R&D, UK Met Office
00/XXXX1 EUMETNET Tim Oakley Met Office, Exeter, UK CIMO ET on Upgrading the Global Radiosonde Network – Geneva 3-7 November 2003.
GPS data during SOP1 & SOP2 (D4B2) Olivier Bock, LAREG IGN Pierre Bosser, ENSG IGN Contributions from: -C. Champollion, E. Doerflinger (LDL) France -R.
A Radar Data Assimilation Experiment for COPS IOP 10 with the WRF 3DVAR System in a Rapid Update Cycle Configuration. Thomas Schwitalla Institute of Physics.
Linking GPS to Tide Gauges and Tide Gauge Benchmarks Tilo Schöne GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam Understanding Sea-level Rise and Variability, WCRP Workshop,
The E-SURFMAR Programme Pierre Blouch E-SURFMAR Programme Manager.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.
GRUAN GNSS Precipitable Water (GNSS-PW) Task Team: 10 members from 7 countries 1 Seth Gutman John Braun June Wang Galina Dick & Jens Wickert Gunnar Elgered,
Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),
COST 717 USE OF RADAR OBSERVATIONS IN HYDROLOGICAL AND NWP MODELS The main objective of the Action is the assessment, demonstration and documentation of.
TECO-2006 Geneva, Dec. 3-5, Improvements in the Upper-Air Observation Systems in Japan M. Ishihara, M. Chiba, Y. Izumikawa, N. Kinoshita, and N.
Slide 1EGU 2005, Vienna, Austria, April 2005Tuesday, 26 April 2005 M. Troller (1), E. Brockmann (2), D. Ineichen (2), S. Lutz (1), A. Geiger (1),
EPN Central Bureau IGS Analysis Workshop 2008, Miami Royal Observatory of Belgium C. Bruyninx, J. Legrand, F. Roosbeek EPN Central Bureau Royal Observatory.
COSMO Annual Meeting September 2005 Zurich (Switzerland) Short-Range Numerical Weather Prediction Programme.
GIE/EIG EUMETNET, Registered Number RPM Bruxelles International Collaboration in the field of GNSS-Meteorology and Climate Monitoring Jonathan.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Quality Management of a European Wind Profiler Network (CWINDE) Tim Oakley TECO-05 Bucharest, 4 th -7 th May.
Use of sea level observations in DMIs storm surge model Jacob L. Høyer, Weiwei Fu, Kristine S. Madsen & Lars Jonasson Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
1 Mexico Regional AMDAR Workshop November 2011 Data Quality Monitoring and Control (QM / QC) Axel Hoff Convenor of WMO AMDAR Panel‘s Science and Technical.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
European Cooperation on Nowcasting Yong Wang, ZAMG.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 4 June 2008 Recommendations from “RT/NRT user requirements” 1.E-GVAP recommends IGS to support PPP strategy with high quality.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Development of a Ground Based GPS Network for the Near Real Time Measurement of Integrated Water Vapour (IWV) Jonathan Jones.
C. Champollion (1,2), C. Flamant (2), F. Masson (3), P. Gégout (3), P. Brousseau (4), G. Dick (5), J-Van Baelen (6) and E. Richard (7 ) (1) Géosciences.
GRAS SAF AND RADIO OCCULTATION DATA K. B. Lauritsen 1, H. Gleisner 1, M. E. Gorbunov 2, F. Rubek 1, S. Syndergaard 1, H. Wilhelmsen 1 (1) Danish Meteorological.
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
WMO AMDAR Programme Overview Bryce Ford - presenting on behalf of WMO and NOAA FPAW Nov 1, 2012.
5 th COPS Workshop, Hohenheim, March 2007 Real-time assimilation efforts during COPS Hans-Stefan Bauer, Matthias Grzeschik, Florian Zus, Volker Wulfmeyer,
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
1 EUCOS Fourth WMO Workshop on the Impact of Various Observing Systems on Numerical Weather Prediction May 2008, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland Stefan.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo swisstopo Report for EGVAP 2007/2008 E. Brockmann.
IGS Workshop 2008, Miami Beach IGN activities as IGS data center The IGN Global Data Centre (GDC) has been designed and implemented in answer to both the.
Joint MAP D-PHASE Scientific Meeting - COST 731 mid-term seminar, May 2008, Bologna. ErgebnissErgebniss : Long-Term Evaluation of COSMO-DE and COSMO-EU.
COST ES1206 (GNSS4SWEC) M.C. Meeting Reykjavik, Iceland NATIONAL REPORT OF BELGIUM, 2016 Eric Pottiaux, Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) Roeland van.
Recent GNSS activities in Germany for COST
J. Douša (1), G. Dick (2), M. Kačmařík (3), P. Václavovic (1), E
Jan Douša and Galina Dick COST GNSS4SWEC Workshop and MC Meeting
Recent GNSS activities in Germany for COST and E-GVAP
Benchmark Campaign of the COST Action GNSS4SWEC:
Ilke Deniz, Cetin Mekik, Gokhan Gurbuz
Responsible member: Hungarian Meteorological Service Period:
Overview of GNSS & GNSS-Met situation in France
ASYM subWG1 – Feedback from the splinter meeting
Optimizing high-resolution troposphere estimates using PPP method and Benchmark data set Václavovic P., Douša J. Geodetic Observatory Pecný, RIGTC, Czech.
Real-Time Working Group
GNSS-meteorology situation
Communication of weather information – National Weather Service role – single voice principle – European cooperation Eric Petermann, Executive Director.
GPS Network: Status GFZ
SRNWP-PEPS COSMO General Meeting September 2005
The GRAS SAF Project and Aim of the User Workshop
Presentation transcript:

E-GVAP: EUMETNET GPS Water Vapour Programme Galina Dick (1) and Jan Dousa (2) (1) GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany (2) Geodetic Observatory Pecny, Czech Republic In collaboration with E-GVAP Team IGS Analysis Center Workshop Miami Beach, Florida, USA 2-6 June 2008

European Projects: COST, TOUGH, E-GVAP COST-716 Action (1998-2003): "Exploitation of Ground-Based GPS for Operational Numerical Weather Prediction and Climate Applications“ 15 Institutions 7 ACs TOUGH (2003-2006): „Targeting Optimal Use of GPS Humidity Measurements in Meteorology“ 15 Institutions (Coordinator DMI) 12 ACs > 400 GPS sites E-GVAP (2006 - 2009): „The EUMETNET GPS Water Vapor Programme“ 13 Institutions 10 ACs > 800 GPS sites Operational E-GVAP Network

What is E-GVAP? EUMETNET GPS Water Vapour Programme EUMETNET = organisation of European national meteorological offices (West European + number of East European, enlarging) E-GVAP is a separate observing programme under EUMETNET, not all EUMETNET members are members of E-GVAP.

E-GVAP Goal: prepare GPS derived ZTD/IWV for operational meteorological use Main product: ZTD/IWV of ~ 800 European sites in NRT IWV Maps Product delay: < 1h 45 min Hourly transfer to UK Met ftp-server Using for assimilation into NWP models UK MetOffice and Meteo France uses NRT ZTDs in their operational forecasts

Email address: egvap@dmi.dk E-GVAP Members Danish Meteorological Institute (coordinator) Finnish Meteorological Institute Icelandic Meteorological Office Irish Meteorological Service Meteo Swiss Norwegian Meteorological Institute Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Royal Meteorological Institute of the Netherlands Spanish Meteorological Institute Meteo France Croatian Met Service Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute UK Met Office Contact and information points Email address: egvap@dmi.dk Web address: http://egvap.dmi.dk

NRT Data Flow in E-GVAP BUFR MetO FTP server MetDB GOPE Czeck Rep. IEEC Spain LPT(R) Switzerland METO UK NRT Users & mirror sites ROB Belgium SGN France NGAA Sweden GFZ Germany Linux Workstation GTS Users BKG ASI Italy KNMI(1) Netherlands Green = nation member of E-GVAP. Blue = nation not member of E-GVAP. (IGN, Spain is currently starting as a new producer of GNSS ZTD data)

Monitoring: Web Page E-GVAP Timeliness is very important for meteorological forecasting. Arrival statistics of NRT GPS ZTD data at dataserver (by Dave Offiler, UK MetOffice).

Inter comparison of ZTDs from different analysis centres processing the same site, comparison with respect to NWP and radiosonde data - helps to identify optimal processing methods and helps to reject poor data. A set of 12 „supersites“ that all centres must processed has been introduced.

E-GVAP Processing Strategies PPP approach: GFZ (EPOS) NGAA (GIPSY) Network approach: ASI (GIPSY) BKG, GOP, KNMI, LTP, ROB, METO, SGN (Bernese)

Motivation for "Precise Point Positioning“ (PPP) Comparison of different adjustment approaches PPP Network Advantages Small NEQ Keeping CPU with increasing number of sites / parameters (e.g. ZTD every 15 min, estimation of gradients) Investigations of site dependent effect Correlations between parameters of all stations are taken into account Independence of external products (except for small networks) Disadvantages Correlations btw stations are ignored Use of external products (orbits, clocks) Large NEQ Increasing CPU with incr. number of sites/parameters ==> Main reason for switching to PPP : efficient operation of large networks (>100 sites) within short computation time REQUIREMENT: GPS orbits & clocks should be given with sufficient accuracy

Networks used by PPP Analysis Centres E-GVAP (~800 sites) NGAA (~360 sites): Sweden, Denmark, Finnland, Norway GFZ (~220 sites): Germany + EUREF USA: routine impact studies for several years now Japan: no NRT, in preparation, interesting case studies with this very dense network IGS global frame

GFZ NRT Processing Scheme GFZ EPOS Software Part 1 - Network orbit improvement: Adjustment of precise orbits & clocks Global network : ~20 IGS +German sites Input orbits: GFZ 3h Ultra Rapid (pred.) CPU (Linux PC): ~6 to 8 minutes Part 2 - PPP Analysis: Estimation of trop. parameters Large set of parameters possible (high sampling rate, trop. gradients) NEW: ‚slant delays‘ estimation CPU (Linux PC): <5 min for 220 sites .

IWV Monitoring (Web Page of GFZ) Time series (last 2 or 7 days) Animation (selected time interval) Comparison to COSMO-DE of German Weather Service (DWD)

Validation: Web Page E-GVAP (1) A feedback for ACs - Validation with HIRLAM model for each AC: Bias Example GOP Example GFZ

Validation: Web Page E-GVAP (2) A feedback for ACs - Validation with HIRLAM model for each AC: StdDev Example GOP Example GFZ

PPP performance (GFZ, NGAA)

PPP performance (Example NGAA) Data drop-outs is decreasing due to new routines at network operational centers e.g. SWEPOS Occasional (2-3 hours per week) bad ZTD values delivered to EGVAP (see figure). The reason for these “hick-ups” are related to the orbit and clock analysis which sometimes fails due to data (global data) collection problems.

Comparison of different processing strategies ZIMM – one of the 12 ‘supersites’

Validation with Radiosondes (example GFZ) GPS derived ZTD compared to ZTD from RS for Lindenberg, March 2008

Validation with RS and WVR (example GOP)

Impact of ground-based GPS measurements on forecasts Impact over Europe (Results of Meteo France, P.Poli et al.) 23 forecasts June-July 2005 Verification : radiosonde measurements Temperature RMS Diff. Wind Speed RMS Diff. Pressure (hPa) Pressure (hPa) BLUE=better RED=worse Forecast lead time (hours) Forecast lead time (hours) Without GPS ZTD data With GPS ZTD data

E-GVAP and IGS E-GVAP is very thankful for the services that IGS provides the geodetic community. They are vital to the NRT GPS ZTD product that we use in meteorology. For weather forecasting the GPS ZTD data must be available fast, and of a quality which is both good and does not fluctuate strongly in time. The timeliness issue is important and clearly influences ZTD data quality.

Conclusions/Recommendations GPS derived ZTDs are used operationally in Europe Due to steadily increasing number of operational GPS sites PPP strategy presents a promising outlook for future efficient GPS-meteorology. E-GVAP recommends IGS to support PPP strategy with high quality adequate products. The 'real-time' clocks will be interesting future product for using in GPS meteorology. For current needs E-GVAP encourages IGS to deliver clock products in ‘near-real’ time (hourly) till the ‘real-time’ IGS clocks will be available as products with sufficient quality