Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Water Demand Forecasts Presented by: Mike Hermanson Water Resources Specialist Spokane County Utilities Spokane.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Demand Forecasting
Advertisements

Regional Water Planning Senate Bill 1 Introduction and Status as of August 01, 1999.
WEAP Water Evaluation & Planning System
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
Statewide, average water use is roughly: 50% environmental 40% agricultural 10% urban The percentage of water use by sector varies dramatically across.
Water for Texas 2012 State Water Plan. Water Planning: Legislative Response to Drought  Late 1950s Drought of Record – 1957: Creation of TWDB – $200.
Housing New Hampshire’s Workforce Prepared for the New Hampshire Workforce Housing Council Presentation to Business & Industry.
Water Demand Modeling Emanuele Massetti FEEM and CMCC Prepared for the Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation 2 nd Regional Training.
WATER RESOURCES Spokane County Residential Water Use Survey Results Mike Hermanson Water Resources Specialist Spokane County Utilities.
California Water Demand Scenarios David Groves Pardee RAND Graduate School Scott Matyac and Tom Hawkins Department of Water Resources * * * California.
Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Electricity Consumption and Residential Water Use in Cyprus Theodoros Zachariadis Dept. of Environmental Science.
Idaho Water Resources Research Institute
Review of the 2009 Snowmelt and Rain Streamflow Forecasts & Snow Survey Advisory Team Ron Abramovich, Hydrologist Water Supply Specialist USDA Natural.
California Energy Commission End-User Natural Gas Forecast for California May 21, 2015 Chris Kavalec Energy Assessments Division
The Planner’s Role in Urban Water Conservation Philip Stoker Robin Rothfeder PhD students, City and Metropolitan Planning University of Utah Stephanie.
Ensure the quality of the data National Bureau of Statistics of China September 2012.
Pathways to Lasting Solutions “The Longest Yard” Water Budget Rate Structures & The City of Boulder, Colorado January 25, 2007 © 2006 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
Municipal and Industrial Conservation and Water Reuse Workgroup Elizabeth Lovsted Sr. Civil Engineer Urban Water Institute Annual Water Policy Conference.
2013 UPDATE Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Water Demand Forecast Update Rob Lindsay Water Resources Manager Spokane County Utilities Spokane River.
1 Load Forecast and Scenarios David Bailey Customer Energy & Forecasting Manager Soyean Kim Rate Design Manager.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
1 Presented by Bryce Contor University of Idaho Idaho Water Resources Research Institute Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Study Human Water Use.
Demands, Supplies & Priorities. Demand Sectors Irrigation Livestock Mining Industrial Commercial Ecosystems Domestic Total Water Demand Major Cities.
CALIFORNIA’S WATER WAR: PART II Balancing Agricultural and Domestic Water Demands Sharon Liu Urban Planning M206A – Intro to GIS February 13, 2012.
CALIFORNIA’S WATER WAR: PART II Balancing Agricultural and Domestic Water Demands Sharon Liu Urban Planning M206A – Intro to GIS March 19, 2012.
Agricultural and Urban Water Use Scenario Evaluation Tool
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Overview of Economic Methods to Simulate Land Competition Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum National Conservation Training Center.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fixing the Plumbing An Assessment of PNW Irrigated Agriculture Conservation Resource Potential July 1, 2003.
Water Use In Colorado By Travis Hoesli. Water Use In Colorado Unit Learning Objectives 1. Know the different classification of water use In Colorado.
Arkansas Natural Resources Commission. The Major Technical and Planning Elements of the Water Plan Update 2 Regional and Institutional Setting Demand.
GROUND WATER MONITORING TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY Mike Trojan Erin Eid Jennifer Maloney Jim Stockinger Minnesota Pollution Control.
Water use in Irrigated Agriculture Ana Ramirez. Irrigated agriculture produces 40% of the food crops uses 70% of all water withdrawals (Huffaker 2003)
Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Augmentation Study Results Mr. Colt Shelton 1, Mr. Matt McDonald 1, Dr. Michael Barber 2, Dr. Akram Hossain 3,
THINK: WHAT ARE THE FACTORS AFFECTING WATER SUPPLY AND DEMAND?
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Boise River Feasibility Study Ellen Berggren, PMP Outreach Coordinator/ Project Manager Idaho Governor’s Roadless.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Eugene Water & Electric Board Jill Hoyenga, Water Management Services Supervisor.
J an Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-- Applications of Medium Range.
Meeting Utah’s Future Water Needs January 21, 2016 By Todd Adams and Candice Hasenyager.
Access Investment Model (AIM)
Scenario Planning for Water and Wastewater in the Truckee Meadows
/ California Energy Demand (CED) 2011 Revised Electricity and Natural Gas Forecast February 3, 2012 Chris.
SDG&E’s Statistically Adjusted End-Use (SAE) Sales Forecasting
California Energy Demand (CED) IEPR Forecast:
California Energy Demand Electricity Forecast (CED 2014) Update: Method and Summary of Results November 5, 2014 Chris Kavalec Demand Analysis.
Lecture (3): Estimation of water consumption
Utah, will we have enough water?
Water resources In Iron and Washington Counties
Biofuel Demand Projections In the Annual Energy Outlook
UW Civil and Environmental Engineering
Consensus Forecast and Water Resource Comparison
Water Demand Forecasting
Fire Protection Impact Fee
Water Usage & Drought in Austin
Ten Tribes Partnership Tribal Water Study
TEST RUN THROUGH THE METHODOLOGY
State Highway 130 Corridor Water Demand Estimation
Matthew S. Dickens Resource Conservation Manager
Water Demand Forecasting
Drought Planning Through Integrated Rate Design
Comprehensive Update of the Arkansas Water Plan
Connecting community, Water Conservation, & Climate Change
Water Rate Modification – Public Hearing
Consensus Forecast and Water Resource Comparison
WRIA 49 Planning Unit Buildout Analysis
Indiana Finance Authority (IFA)
Presentation transcript:

Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Water Demand Forecasts Presented by: Mike Hermanson Water Resources Specialist Spokane County Utilities Spokane River Forum Conference May 23, 2011

Background 2010 Spokane River Forum Water Demand Presentations –Idaho Future Demand Study Draft Results presentation –Spokane County Water Demand Model presentation of project goals, objectives, concepts.

Presentation Overview Spokane County Water Demand Model Idaho Future Demand Study Study Compatibility

Spokane County Water Demand Model Segregated by Water Use Sector –each subsector has a unique submodel, or way of calculating water demand

Spokane County Water Demand Model Segregated Spatially –487 separate forecast units –A unique water demand calculation is done for each forecast unit

Segregated in monthly increments Spokane County Water Demand Model

Each forecast unit can have different inputs into each sub model Disaggregated Model –In each forecast unit(487) there is a calculation for each submodel (13) for each month 12 –75,972 water demand calculations per year Water demand calculation for each month Spokane County Water Demand Model

Developed and runs in Excel 2007 –Series of interconnected spreadsheets and formulas Spokane County Water Demand Model

Single Family Residential Model –Collected 20 years of data from 15 Water Systems: monthly per connection water use from water systems, weather data demographic data –Time Series-Cross Sectional Regression How does water use vary due to variables that are fixed such as home size. How does water use vary due to variables that change with time such as weather. Spokane County Water Demand Model

Single Family Residential Model –Split into two models: Indoor water use model Outdoor water use model that adds water to indoor use May through October –Indoor model: Water use is a function of household income –Outdoor model Water use is a function of home value, temperature, precipitation, and lot size. Spokane County Water Demand Model

Indoor model r 2 = 0.55 Outdoor model r 2 = 0.74 Spokane County Water Demand Model Single Family Residential Model - Example

SectorModeledReportedRelative % Difference Total Production41,89541, % Single Family Residential15,92015, % Multi Family Residential3,9964, % Total Residential19,91619, % Commercial/Industrial9,5289, % Total Non Residential10,75810, % Non Revenue3,4333, % Annual Public Water System Use: Modeled vs. Reported Reported in millions of gallons per year Spokane County Water Demand Model

Impact of weather on water use Spokane County Water Demand Model

Demand from SVRP Aquifer from Spokane County Spokane County Water Demand Model

Demand from SVRP Aquifer Reported in billions of gallons per year YearWater Demand Change18.01 % Growth33% Spokane County Water Demand Model

Monthly Demand from SVRP Aquifer from Spokane County 156 CFS difference Spokane County Water Demand Model

Conservation and Weather –Conservation efforts can be masked by changes in weather Spokane County Water Demand Model no conservation

Idaho Future Demand Study Includes an estimate of current and future use by water use sector on an annual basis: –Public Water Systems –Self Supplied Domestic –Self Supplied Commercial & Industrial –Agriculture Separates Irrigation and Non-Irrigation Use

Evaluates consumptive vs. non consumptive use Range of population & employment growth scenarios Detailed analysis of conservation scenarios Evaluation of potential climate change impacts Idaho Future Demand Study

WA & ID Study Compatibility Water Use by Sector Water Use SectorWAID Public Water Systems135,13234,430 Self Supplied Domestic4118,800 Self Supplied Commercial/Industrial20,9884,220 Agriculture5,55524,700 Total162,08672,150 Values in annual acre feet Values are total use

Aquifer Total Demand WA & ID Demand Idaho scenario – medium growth & no conservation

Additional Work that would enhance compatibility –Idaho: evaluate demand on a monthly basis –Washington: Utilize model to: –Develop alternate conservation scenarios –Develop alternate growth scenarios –Estimate consumptive/non consumptive use WA & ID Demand