The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
New England Association for Schools and Colleges Re-Accreditation for Brandeis University Marty Wyngaarden Krauss Provost and Senior Vice President for.
Special Meeting on ICT Education in Tertiary Institutions Towards a Regional Perspective on Quality and Academic Standards in ICT Education and Training.
Substantive Change, SACS and Electronically-delivered Programs FDLC Panel Presentation May 15, 2009.
State of PLAR at Alberta Post-Secondary Institutions by: Lucille Walter, Chair September 22,,2005 A lberta C ouncil on A dmissions and T ransfer.
ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE ACADEMIC SENATE FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES MARCH 18, 2011 PRESENTED BY DR. JUDY C. MINER PRESIDENT, FOOTHILL COLLEGE EMBRACE.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
Emanuel GruengardParadigms of Distant Learning1 Paradigms of Distributed Education Prof. Emanuel Gruengard Shenkar College of Engineering & Design.
NWCCU Standard 2 - Educational Program and Its Effectiveness Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez October 29, 2008 SU 219 Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez.
Master Online Teacher Competencies eLearning Conference 2007 Virgil E. Varvel Jr.
Flexible Delivery Faculty of Nursing University of Alberta.
 You Decide You Decide  Authentication and Accreditation Issues  Curriculum Challenges and Opportunities  The Dilemma of On-Campus Requirements 
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges Western Association of Schools and Colleges December 10, 2012 Quality Distance Education.
TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences.
Sub-theme Three The Self-Assessment Process and Embedding QA into the Life of an Institution by Terry Miosi, Ph.D. UAE Qualification Framework Project.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Co-op at PCC Sylvania Co-op Task Force Findings and Recommendations.
Training/Workshop on Planning of Open and Distance Learning (SEAMOLEC, 24 – 27 March 2008) Planning of Open and Distance Learning.
Hot Topics and Accreditation Issues in Distance Education Authentication, Substantive Change, Effective Contact … And Lions and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
JAZAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING & ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES
University of Hawai‘i Distance Learning: Change Agent Ramona Kincaid for Paula Mochida PRDLA/PNC Conference 3 November 2005 Honolulu, Hawai‘i.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
April 8, Agenda Charge of the Group SACS/QEP Update/Overview 5 th Year Interim Report Assigned Areas Next Steps.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Assessment Conversations Focus on Fall 2009 … and Beyond May 7, 2009.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Continual Commitment to Accreditation February 1, 2011.
Student Support Services Standard II B & C. II.B. The institution recruits and admits diverse students who are able to benefit from its programs, consistent.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
SUNY TAACCCT Grant PLA Advisory Board Agenda Review of Charge WordPress Site Policy – Philosophical differences on PLA – What makes a good: Policy?
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Accreditation through the lens of Distance Education Marina Aminy, Ph.D. Interim Dean of Online Education and Learning Resources.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
School for Academic Administrators: Learning Objectives Rodney A. Webb, Associate Vice-President, Academic January 24, 2005.
Two categories: Academic, Professional Issues: Level and nature of programs consistent with mission Well defined, differ from undergraduate programs Doctoral.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
Regardless of Location or Means of Delivery: Meeting the Standards for Every Student Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College.
1 NYS Operational Criteria for Distance Education Dr. Susan Merritt Dean School of Computer Science & Information Systems.
Competency Based Education August 4, Definition In general, competency-based education (CBE) is an outcomes-based approach to earning a college.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
MnSCU E-Student Services Meeting
Distance Education Issues
Launching a Successful Distance Learning Program.
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Curriculum and Accreditation
Curriculum and Accreditation
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Online Curricula Where are we? Where might we go?
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Presentation transcript:

The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning

Some Current Accreditation Concerns Motivation Mission, Educational Programs, and the Curriculum Faculty Students Library and Learning Resources Institutional Effectiveness and Student Outcomes Organization, Planning, Human Resources Facilities and Equipment Catalogs and Publications Intellectual Property Rights

Policy on Distance Learning, Including Electronically-Mediated Learning Background Recognizing that most institutions must make use of the growing range of systems for delivery of instruction, including various electronic means, the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC) has adopted a policy based on principles of good practice to help assure that distance learning is characterized by the same concerns for quality, integrity, and effectiveness that apply to more traditional modes of instruction. This policy statement has drawn from several previous policies and is intended to replace those policies with a single, unified, and up-to-date statement

Definition of Distance Learning Distance learning is defined, for the purpose of accreditation review, as a formal interaction designed for learning in which the interaction principally occurs when the student is separated by location from the instructor, resources used to support learning, or other students. Distance learning may employ correspondence study, audio, video, or computer technologies. Educational interactions delivered through these means may occur on campus as well as off campus. These interactions may be synchronous or asynchronous.

Policy ACCJC policy specifies that all learning opportunities provided by our accredited institutions have the same quality, accountability, and focus on the student outcomes, whether they are delivered electronically or by more traditional means. The intent of the policy is to provide a framework that allows institutions the flexibility to adapt their delivery modes to the emerging needs of students and society while maintaining quality. Any institution offering courses and programs electronically is expected to meet the requirements of accreditation in each of its courses and programs and at each of its sites.

Policy Elements Development, implementation, and evaluation of all courses and programs, including those offered electronically, must take place within tre institution’s total educational mission. Institutions are expected to control development, implementation, and evaluation of all courses and programs offered in their names, including those offered electronically. Institutions are expected to have clearly defined and appropriate student learning outcomes for all courses and programs, including those delivered through electronic means. Institutions are expected to provide the resources and structure needed to accomplish these outcomes.

Policy Elements (cont.) Institutions are expected to demonstrate that their students achieve these outcomes through applications of rigorous assessment. Institutions are expected to provide the ACCJC reasons to believe that these outcomes will continue to be accomplished. Institutions are expected to give the ACCJC advance notice of intent to initiate a new delivery mode, such as electronically-delivered courses, through the Substantive Change process. Institutions are expected to give the ACCJC advance notice of intent to offer a program in which 50% or more of the courses are electronically- delivered, through the Substantive Change process.

Guidelines for Implementation Curriculum and Instruction Each electronically-delivered course or program of study results in learning outcomes appropriate to the rigor and breadth of the course credit, degree, or certificate awarded. What does your institution have to ensure that the courses intended for electronic or other modes of distance delivery are developed through a process similar to traditionally-delivered courses

Guidelines for Implementation Curriculum and Instruction Student experiences result in achievement of intended learning outcomes whether electronically-delivered courses provide for synchronous or asynchronous interaction between faculty and students and among students. How does your institution ensure that courses and programs provide for timely and effective interaction between students and faculty? How does your institution ensure that courses and programs provide for effective interaction among students?

Guidelines for Implementation Curriculum and Instruction Portions of courses delivered through electronic means adhere to the same principles of academic quality and integrity as courses delivered entirely through these means. How does your institution ensure that faculty has responsibility for and exercise oversight of electronically delivered courses and programs, ensuring both rigor of those courses and programs and the quality of instruction?

Guidelines for Implementation Curriculum and Instruction The institution has an effective means of ensuring the integrity of the educational process in electronically-delivered courses including assuring that the work submitted for credit by students is submitted by students actually enrolled in the course. How does your institution ensure the integrity of student work and the credibility of the degrees and credit it awards.

Guidelines for Implementation Institutional Commitment. Review and approval processes ensure the appropriateness of electronic delivery to meeting the course and program objectives. How does your institution ensure that the technology used is appropriate to the nature and objectives of the courses and programs?

Guidelines for Implementation Learning Resources Appropriate learning resources are available to students who take electronically delivered courses. How does your institution provide laboratories, facilities, and equipment appropriate to the course or programs?

Guidelines for Implementation Students and Student Services Students receive clear, complete, and timely information on the curriculum, course and degree requirements, nature of faculty/student interaction, assumptions about technological competence and skills, technical equipment requirements, availability of academic support services anmd financial iad resources, and cost and payment policies. What advertising, recruiting, and admissions information does your institution provide to students that adiquately and accurately represents the programs, requirements, and services available?

Guidelines for Implementation Students and Student Services Enrolled students have reasonable and adequate access to the range of student services appropriate to support their learning and assess their progress. How does your institution provide adequate access to the range of student services appropriate to support the programs, including admissions, financial aid, academic advising, delivery of course materials, and placement, and counseling?

Guidelines for Implementation Students and Student Services Students have the background, knowledge, and technical skills needed to successfully use the technology involved in their course work. How does your institution assess student capability to succeed in electronically delivered courses and programs? How is this information applied to admissions and recruiting? How effective is this assessment?

Guidelines for Implementation Commitment to Support The institution gives appropriate consideration to the technical skills and needs of faculty assigned to teach through electronic means How does your institution ensure that appropriate faculty support services specifically related to distance learning are provided?

Guidelines for Implementation Evaluation and Assessment The institution evaluates the educational effectiveness of electronically-delivered course work, including assessment of student learning outcomes student retention, and student and faculty satisfaction. Students have access to such evaluation data. How does your institution evaluate the educational effectiveness of its electronically-delivered courses and programs (including assessments of student learning outcomes, student retention, and student satisfaction) to ensure comparability to traditionally-delivered courses and programs?

Guidelines for Implementation A Very Important Question How clear and effective are your institution’s distant learning policies concerning ownership of materials, faculty compensation, copyright issues, and the utilization of revenue derived from the creation and production of software, telecourses, or other media products?