Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide 2 Abstract This presentation discusses two ah outdoor deployment issues, limited coverage range and hidden node issue, due to restricted transmission power and low mobile antenna efficiency. The authors propose to define power classes and adopt multiple AP network topology in 11ah specification.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide 3 Achieving outdoor coverage Outdoor coverage requirement in 11ah Support up to 1km with 100kbps data rate The requirement comes from the characteristic of applications Geographic distribution of sensors or mobile stations Limiting factors for coverage (for a given data rate) Signal bandwidth (narrow band transmission can reach far, only consider minimal signal bandwidth 1MHz in this discussion) Propagation environment Transmission power Antenna gain and radiation pattern

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide 4 Tx Power constraints Wide range of maximal Tx power constrains in regions 3 mW or 10 mW depending on channels in South Korea 5 mW or 10 mW depending on channels in China 1 mW, 20 mW or 250 mW depending on channels in Japan 25 mW in Europe 1 W in US

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide 5 Mobile station antenna design constraints Low frequency mobile antenna efficiency is low Small low-frequency antennas are often much lower than 0dB It is a non-trivial exercise to design relatively small antennas with fractional bandwidths of > 7% Space within mobile station is usually very limited and internal components affect the shape of the radiation pattern Losses due to coexistence with cellular transceiver Provide protection from relative high power cellular uplink transmission Either from Rx front-end protection circuitry Or adding a switch in the 11ah antenna path

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Realistic antenna gain Best case antenna gain Vertically polarized, gain +2dB, omni-directional for AP Vertically polarized, gain –3dB, omni-directional for hand-held mobile station Antenna gain variation due to antenna orientation For antennas in mobile hand-held applications, the radiation pattern is essentially omni-directional in one plane only As the user moves it around, the relative antenna orientation would result a gain variations of 20dB or more Slide 6Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Study the received SNR at the cell edge Downlink link budget Assumptions Carrier frequency 900MHz Tx power level 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 25, 250, 1000 mW Best case antenna gain +2dB at AP, -3dB at mobile station Noise figure at mobile station 7 dB Noise floor -114 dBmW/MHz Propagation path loss Outdoor macro path loss model No shadowing loss Slide 7Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Downlink SNR at different distance Slide 8Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Discussion on achieving the coverage If PHY is simply down-clocked by 10 from 11ac PHY Minimal data rate will be 325kbps requiring at least 1.5dB SNR Adding 8 dB shadowing margin and 3dB implementation loss, required cell edge SNR to achieve minimal data rate will be 12.5dB Uplink and downlink link budget are not symmetric Uplink is 5 dB better than downlink assuming maximal ERP at the mobile station Uplink received power: Max ERP – PL + Gap Downlink received power: Max ERP – PL + Gsta Can not achieve 1km coverage with a single central AP in all regions due to Tx power constrains Slide 9Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Hidden node issues Wide range outdoor deployment may result in high percentage hidden nodes Low antenna height and antenna gain on mobile stations Random mobile antenna orientations Averagely longer propagation distance between stations than from AP to mobile stations, especially when coverage is wide Hearing other stations’ transmission is critical for carrier sense Collision avoidance relies on hearing transmission (at least the preamble) from other stations RTS/CTS may not be effective when the percentage of hidden nodes is high (collisions on RTS) Slide 10Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Study the percentage of hidden nodes Carrier frequency 900MHz Tx power level 25 mW Antenna gain -3dB at mobile station, Uniform distributed (0-20dB) antenna orientation loss Noise figure at mobile station 7 dB Noise floor -114 dBmW/MHz Sensitivity for STF detection (-1.5 dB SNR) Outdoor macro path loss model 8 dB log-normal shadowing loss Coverage radius, 250m, 500m and 1000m Slide 11Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 CDF of percentage of hidden nodes Slide 12Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Discussion on hidden nodes issue Mainly due to widely scattering of stations For 1km radius, on average stations cannot hear 70% of other stations; For 250m radius, stations can hear 90% of other stations May result in more collision of transmissions and power consumption due to the prolonged transmission attempt Slide 13Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Possible solutions Define device power classes/capability Easy to identify devices conforming to regional requirements Enable AP to manage devices with different max Tx power Allow multiple APs network topology Enable lower power class device supporting wider coverage Study suitability of existing ESS model Mitigation techniques required for overlapping BSS’s High percentage of hidden nodes within the network May require coordination between APs using in-band or out-band link Slide 14Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSR Nov 2011

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide 15 References 1.Minho Cheong, IEEE /0905r4, TGah Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology 2.Rolf de Vegt, IEEE /1296r3, Potential Channelization for ah 3.Ron Porat and SK Yong, IEEE /0968r1, TGah Channel Model