Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Advertisements

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
© 2010 Learning Sciences International Bering Strait School District Demographic Information  Covers 88,000 square miles.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Alignment of Teacher Evaluation to the School Improvement Process Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Almost Former Director of the Office Of School Improvement Retiring.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Teacher Evaluation Update
 Reading School Committee January 23,
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Implementing High-Effect Size Practices Linking High-Effect Size Practices to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The Art and Science of Teaching: What can schools and districts do to develop highly effective teachers? Robert J. Marzano Margaret McInteer.
Improving Our Profession Through Deliberate Practice.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Data/MTSS Team Training September, Learning Goals Data/MTSS Team members will be able to assist teachers in using data to write a SMARTer PDP goal.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
New Teacher Induction.
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Design Question 1 – Element 3
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day LSI Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day Copyright Learning Sciences International. Reproduction rights provided to Florida DOE. 1.877.411.7114 Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International. Reproduction Rights Granted to FLDOE.

Goals Participants will: Have a better understanding of Deliberate Practice Understand what the context is for DP Understand how DP fits into the framework Understand how to plan for DP Understand how to operationalize DP using the deliberate practice plan Understand how the DP score contributes to the instructional practice score

Teacher Evaluation Metrics LSI Teacher Evaluation Metrics Focus: Instructional Practice Instructional Practice is where classroom observations and feedback are provided to teachers throughout the year.

LSI Review: Last Summer’s Scoring and Weighting Workshop - FLDOE Recommendation Year 1 Year 2 Instructional Practice 50% Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Why do we need Deliberate Practice? LSI Why do we need Deliberate Practice? Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI What if? What if every teacher engaged in a self assessment of their classroom practice? What if the Individual Professional Development Plan was aligned to the teacher evaluation system to help teachers measurably improve the Instructional Practice score? Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

IPDP statute 1012.98(4)(b)5 3(b) Each school district shall develop a professional development system as specified in subsection (3)…. The professional development system must: […] 5. Require each school principal to establish and maintain an individual professional development plan for each instructional employee assigned to the school as a seamless component to the school improvement plans developed pursuant to s. 1001.42(18). The individual professional development plan must: a. Be related to specific performance data for the students to whom the teacher is assigned. b. Define the inservice objectives and specific measurable improvements expected in student performance as a result of the inservice activity. c. Include an evaluation component that determines the effectiveness of the professional development plan.

Generates measurable improvements in teacher practice? LSI Table Exercise Instead of creating a new thing, how do we take advantage of the IPDP to improve it into a high leverage process that: Empowers teachers? Generates measurable improvements in teacher practice? Helps teachers raise their Instructional Practice Score? Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Districts follow the FLDOE-approved model as presented LSI The Deliberate Practice Plan may be used as an option for districts in place of their current IPDP if: Districts follow the FLDOE-approved model as presented At least one of the Deliberate Practice growth targets is developed with consideration of appropriate student growth data Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

What is Deliberate Practice? LSI What is Deliberate Practice? Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Deliberate Practice Deliberate practice is a way for teachers to grow their expertise through a series of planned activities, reflection, and collaboration. Involved in the series is a protocol: setting personal goals, focused practice, focused feedback, observing and discussing teaching, and monitoring your progress Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Making the Connections LSI Making the Connections Deliberate Practice Teacher Behavior Student Achievement Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

When these strategies are used, here is the typical effect on raising student achievement (percentile gain corrected) : Building Vocabulary 20% Effort and Recognition 14% Graphic Organizers 13% Homework 15% Identifying Similarities and Differences 20% Interactive Games 20% Nonlinguistic Representations 17% Note Taking 17% Practice 14% Setting Goals/Objectives 25% Student Discussion/Chunking 17% Summarizing 19% Tracking Student Progress and Using Scoring Scales 34%

Deliberate Practice Involves: 21st Century Approach to Supporting and Supervising Teaching and Learning Deliberate Practice Involves: Focused Practice Focused Feedback Copyright 2008-2010 Learning Sciences International

LSI Remember the Goal An expectation that all teachers can increase their expertise from year to year which produces gains in student achievement from year to year with a powerful cumulative effect Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Fundamentals of Deliberate Practice LSI Fundamentals of Deliberate Practice Deliberate Practice begins with empowering teachers! Teachers should take the lead in identifying their personal growth goals, and collaborate with their principals on their goals. Principal must approve the IPDP Deliberate Practice should be structured, resourced and monitored by the principal. Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Steps for Developing a Deliberate Practice Plan 1. Self Assessment 2. Identify Focus Strategies 3. Create Measurable Goals 4. Actions in the Classroom 5. Reflection 6. Tracking Progress and Celebrating Success Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Linking Performance Scales to Teacher Reflection and Deliberate Practice Autonomous Phase Shaping Phase Cognitive Phase Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Rating Scale for Domain Elements (State Model Teacher Evaluation Scale) 4 3 2 1 Formative Ratings Used for Each Domain Element Innovating Applying Developing Beginning Not Using Autonomous Phase Shaping Phase Cognitive Phase Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Rating Scale for Domain Elements (Danielson Framework Teacher Evaluation Scale) Distinguished Proficient Basic Unsatisfactory Formative Ratings Used for Each Domain Component/ Element Autonomous Phase Shaping Phase Cognitive Phase Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Needs Improvement/Developing LSI Linking Performance Scales to Teacher Reflection and Deliberate Practice Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement/Developing Unsatisfactory Formative Ratings Used for Each Domain Element Autonomous Phase Shaping Phase Cognitive Phase Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Self-Assessment Example Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Identify Focus Strategies Example

LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Write Measurable Goals Example LSI Write Measurable Goals Example Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Action Steps Example LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Reflection Example Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Tracking Progress Example

Appendix Tools Recommendations for Developing Goals and Resources LSI Appendix Tools Recommendations for Developing Goals and Resources Goal #1 – Progress Check-In and Reflection Log Goal #2 – Progress Check-In and Reflection Log Goal #3 – Progress Check-In and Reflection Log Video Self-Observation Guide (Optional) Peer Observation Guide (Optional) Instructional Rounds Guide (Optional) Glossary of Terms Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Recapping the Benefits of Deliberate Practice LSI Recapping the Benefits of Deliberate Practice Empowers teachers to take responsibility for their own professional growth and development Generates sources of evidences for other domains (planning/preparing, reflection/professionalism, etc.) As teachers increase their effectiveness with target strategies, it tends to lift their overall teaching Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

5 Minute Pause What makes sense to me? What questions do I have?

Question: How is focused practice different from the common conception of practice? Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Planning Timeline 2012-13 Example August- September September October- December January New Teachers Teachers complete the self assessment Craft and approve deliberate practice plan Implement plan, monitor, make adjustments Review growth as part of the summative evaluation conference Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Planning Timeline 2012-13 August September October March/April May-June Category I Teachers and Category II Teachers complete the self assessment as part of the summative evaluation process Craft and approve professional deliberate practice plan Implement plan, monitor, make adjustments Ensure observations to establish end growth data point for focus strategies Review growth as part of the summative evaluation conference Consider Teacher Review Teams that would work with teacher teams to review and provide feedback regarding the plan before approval by the principal Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Planning Forward: Brainstorm What needs to take place this year for this process to be put in place for the next school year? Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

District Table Activity Develop a deliberate practice implementation plan: Communication and buy-in from what stakeholders? Impact on current teacher evaluation policies and procedures? What training and resource needs are there to implement? What expectations need to be set with central office, principals, and teachers? What timeline milestones need to be determined?

LSI Scoring and Calculation Deliberate Practice Scoring and Calculation Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

LSI Review: Last Summer’s Scoring and Weighting Workshop - FLDOE Recommendation Year 1 Year 2 Instructional Practice 50% Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

5 Steps to Calculate the Deliberate Practice Score LSI District or teacher identifies target strategies following district policies Step 1 Obtain at least 2 data points for each target strategy Step 2 For each element, determine the number of growth levels from the first data point to the last data point Step 3 Use the average growth level and the final data points against the scale to obtain the Deliberate Practice Score for each target element Step 4 Average the Deliberate Practice Scores for each target element for the final element score. Step 5 Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Example Step 1 Teacher identifies the following targets: Domain1 LSI Example Step 1 District or teacher identifies target element(s) following district policies Teacher identifies the following targets: Domain1 #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics) #2 Tracking student progress #3 Celebrating success Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Example Step 2 Obtain at least 2 data points for each element October LSI Example Step 2 Obtain at least 2 data points for each element October Data Point 1 March Data Point 2 Domain 1: #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics) 3 #2 Tracking student progress 2 #3 Celebrating success 1 Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0) Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Example Step 3 October Data Point 1 March Data Point 2 Growth Levels LSI Example Step 3 For each element, determine the number of growth levels from the first data point to the last data point using the Marzano Scale October Data Point 1 March Data Point 2 Growth Levels Domain 1: #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics) 3 #2 Tracking student progress 2 1 #3 Celebrating success Note: Scores are based on the Marzano scale: Innovating (4), Applying (3), Developing (2), Beginning (1) and Not Using (0) Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Needs Improvement or Developing LSI Example Step 4 Use the scale to obtain the Deliberate Practice Score for each target element Highly Effective (4) Effective (3) Needs Improvement or Developing (2) Unsatisfactory (1) Grows 3 levels Grows 2 levels Grows 1 level Achieves no growth Or grows to Level 4 Or grows to Level 3 Or grows to Level 2 Or scores at Level 1 Note: The district may decide which rule takes precedence Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Deliberate Practice Score Example Step 5 Average the growth levels across target elements LSI Levels Grown Final Level Deliberate Practice Score Domain 1: #1 Providing clear learning goals and scales (rubrics) 3 4* #2 Tracking student progress 1 #3 Celebrating success 2 Final Deliberate Practice Score: 3.33 * This score may be vary depending on the precedence of the scoring rules. This scenario uses the highest scoring rule. Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Deliberate Practice Score LSI Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement Or Developing Unsatisfactory 3.5 - 4 2.5 - 3.4 1.5 - 2.4 1 - 1.4 Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Issue: How to Handle No Growth LSI Issue: How to Handle No Growth Two Options: Score as “Unsatisfactory” – 1 Point Score as “Unsatisfactory,” but allow for one target element with no growth to be “forgiven” if multiple elements were targeted Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

No Growth Sample Scenarios LSI No Growth Sample Scenarios Deliberate Practice Score Start Finish No Growth = Unsatisfactory Forgive One Element 3, 3, 3 1 (Unsatisfactory) 3, 3, 4 2 (Needs Improvement) 2.5 (Effective) 3, 4, 4 3 (Effective) 4 (Highly Effective) 2, 2, 2 2, 2, 3 1.6 (Needs Improvement) 2, 3, 3 2.3 (Needs Improvement) 2, 3, 4 2.7 (Effective) 3.5 (Highly Effective) 3, 3 3, 4 2, 2 2, 3 2, 4 3 2 Highly Effective Effective Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Final Instructional Practice Score LSI Two Methods for Calculating Instructional Practice When Including Deliberate Practice Additive: Status Score + Addition of Deliberate Practice = Final Instructional Practice Score Inclusive: Status Score + Deliberate Practice = Final Instructional Practice Score Deliberate Practice Status Score Final Instructional Practice Score Final Instructional Practice Score Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Additive Method Considerations: LSI Additive Method Considerations: Deliberate Practice is added to the Instructional Practice Score Performance in Deliberate Practice only adds to the Instructional Practice score; it is not punitive Top scores are possible without growth in Deliberate Practice High reward for high growth More teachers will rank higher on the performance scale Deliberate Practice Status Score Final Instructional Practice Score Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Inclusive Method Considerations: LSI Inclusive Method Considerations: Deliberate Practice is a percentage of the Instructional Practice Score Performance in Deliberate Practice can be punitive if the teacher shows no growth. Top scores are not possible without growth in Deliberate Practice Reward for high growth and high status score More teachers will rank lower on the performance scale Final Instructional Practice Score Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Sample Scenarios Typical Teacher LSI Sample Scenarios Typical Teacher Deliberate Practice 2.5 Status Score 3.1 Additive Score: 3.60 (Highly Effective) Inclusive Score (40%, 60%): 2.86 (Effective) Difference: .74 points The Additive method puts the teacher in the Highly Effective range rather than the middle of the Effective range. Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

District Table Group Activity LSI District Table Group Activity What are the benefits and drawbacks of the additive and inclusive model for teachers and for students? Additive Inclusive Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

FLDOE Recommendation 2012/13 2013/14 Additive Inclusive OR 2012/13 LSI FLDOE Recommendation 2012/13 2013/14 Additive Inclusive OR 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Pilot Additive Inclusive Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Next Steps Implementing the Monitoring Plan LSI Next Steps Implementing the Monitoring Plan Monitoring for results and making adjustments Identifying and sharing best practices Celebrating successes Copyright 2011 Learning Sciences International

Remember to Complete the Survey! THANK YOU!