Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel Kaseforth Brian Miller Alex Ordway Casey Shockman Lucas Veverka Megan Williams (Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heat Exchanger Network Retrofit
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
LightSail.
Mechanical Systems Analysis Branch/Code 542 Goddard Space Flight Center Analysis of Damping Treatments Applied to the MAP Spacecraft Scott Gordon Code.
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
07/07/2005 Coupling with PF2012: No existing PF “as is” able to accommodate Karin On going study in France to develop a new generation of PF product line.
Attitude Determination and Control
1 Spacecraft Thermal Design Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
Physics of fusion power
MAXIM Power Subsystem Diane Yun Vickie Moran NASA/GSFC Code (IMDC) 8/19/99.
Space Engineering Institute (SEI) Space Based Solar Power Space Engineering Research Center Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University.
Carbon Fiber and Why We Should Use It By Raymond Haremza.
1 Electrical Power System By Aziatun Burhan. 2 Overview Design goal requirements throughout mission operation: Energy source generates enough electrical.
Design of Heat Sinks P M V Subbarao Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi Success Based on Cooling Challenges …….
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
MECHANISMS OF HEAT TRANSFER
Final Version Bob G. Beaman May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Electrical Power System (EPS)
I T i womiller VG1 Meeting UCSC November 10, 2005 ATLAS Upgrade Workshop Silicon Tracker Stave Mechanical Issues.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Student Satellite Project University of Arizona Team Goals Design, Fabricate, and Analyze a Structure that will Support the Payload –Space Allocation of.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Thermal Systems Design
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
18 November 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) SVD Mechanics IDM.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Carbon Fiber Mesh Carbon Fiber Mesh developed by ESLI Mesh is composed of a network of carbon fibers crisscross linked into a matrix that is mostly empty.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
IFE Plant Structural Concepts Including Shielding and Optical Stability Requirements Thomas Kozub, Charles Gentile, Irving Zatz - PPPL.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 Presenter1 Thermal Control R.Eby Impact Boom Stowed and Deployed SWEA STE Magnetometer Bob.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
Apex Advanced Technologies, Inc. Presented by: Dennis Hammond Contributor Richard Phillips Using a highly effective lubricant in combination with a polymeric.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
Problem Statement Overview of tasks Requirements for selection test.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Platform Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley December 5, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
Static Equilibrium and Elasticity
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Chapter 26 Lecture 22: Current: II
USAFA Department of Astronautics I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Astro 331 Thermal Control Subsystem (TCS)—Intro Lesson 37 Spring.
1 Weekly Summary Weekly Summary Formation Flight AEM4332 Spring Semester March 7,2007 Masao SHIMADA.
Thermal Control Subsystem
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
Solar Sail Project AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
CubeSat Design for Solar Sail Testing Applications Phillip HempelPaul Mears Daniel ParcherTaffy Tingley October 11, 2001The University of Texas at Austin.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Colorado State University Paul Scholz, Tyler Faucett, Abby Wilbourn, Michael Somers June
Solar Orbiter EUS: Thermal Design Progress Bryan Shaughnessy, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Solar Orbiter EUV Spectrometer Thermal Design Progress Bryan.
Electrodynamic Tether Payload RIT SPEX Acknowledgements This work was supported by Provost’s Learning Innovation Grant, Kate Gleason College.
 From SmallSat to CubeSat: Reducing Mass Size and Cost Jeremy Straub 1, Ronald Fevig 2, Todd Borzych 2, Chris Church 2, Curt Holmer 2, Martin Hynes 2,
1 Weekly Summary Solar Sail Spring Semester March 19 th, 2007 Mike Hiti.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Solar Sail Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Spring 2007.
Chapter 7 Rotational Motion and The Law of Gravity.
3-D Printed Pressure Vessel Design to Maximize Volume to Weight
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
Skeleton contributions to targets section
FP420 Detector Cooling Thermal Considerations
Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
TORSION CO 2 : ABILITY TO ANALYZE TORQUE-LOADED MEMBER EVALUATE THE VALUES AND DISTRIBUTION OF BENDING AND SHEAR STRESSES IN BEAM SECTION By: ROSHAZITA.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel Kaseforth Brian Miller Alex Ordway Casey Shockman Lucas Veverka Megan Williams (Team Lead) Solar Sail Project AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design Preliminary Design Review March 28, 2007

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail2 Team Organization Systems Integration & Management: Megan Williams Orbit Control: Eric Blake, Daniel Kaseforth, Lucas Veverka Structures: Jon Braam, Kory Jenkins Attitude Control: Brian Miller, Alex Ordway Communications: Casey Shockman Thermal: Raymond Haremza Power: Michael Hiti

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail3 Presentation Outline Project Overview Design Strategy Subgroup work –Orbit –Structure –Attitude and Control –Communication –Thermal Analysis –Power Demonstration Acknowledgements

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail4 Project Overview Top Level Requirements The payload mass is 34 kg The payload average power draw is 24.5 Watts The final orbit should have a semi-major axis of 0.48 AU and an inclination of 60 deg The launch vehicle will provide a hyperbolic escape velocity of 0.5 km/s. A Delta II 7425 will be used for launch. The structure will fit inside the selected launch vehicle.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail5 Project Overview MAJOR TASKS 1) Develop control law for semi-major axis change and inclination change to determine solar sail orientation. 2) Analyze transfer time for different sail sizes to determined optimum sail size. 3) Conduct a trade study between sliding mass and tip thruster attitude control systems. 4) Determine the data transfer rate and power requirements for data downlinks to Earth. Assume 2 downlinks per week to the DSN. 5) Conduct a trade study between conformal solar array and normal- pointing solar array. 6) Size the solar array to meet total power requirements. 7) Analyze the thermal properties of the solar sail spacecraft. 8) Choose a configuration and compute the total mass and moment of inertia. 9) Design a payload module. 10) Design for the satellite actuation. 11) Calculation and testing of attitude control law.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail6 Project Overview Orbit Non-Keplarian orbit –Inclination 60° –Semi-major axis 0.48AU Structure Target mass: 500 kg Sail size: 100m x 100m Inflatable boom structure, heated curing Attitude Control Sliding mass configuration with secondary tip thruster control Interstellar compass – primary ADS Communications Ka-Band (32 GHz) Horn antennae Thermal Carbon mesh sail material Multifunctional Structure (MFS) configuration Power Power Requirements approximately 878 W Normal Pointing Solar Array area: 2.39 meters Silver-Cadmium (Ad-Cd) battery mass: kg

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail7 Design Strategy Orbit Trade Studies –Sail area versus transfer time Varied sail size and ran simulation Larger sail results in a faster transfer –Transfer maneuver variations Comparison between “hot”, “cold” and simultaneous transfer trajectories “Hot” transfer is quickest but may not be feasible due to thermal restrictions Structure Zero level sizing based on existing designs Trade Studies –Deployable space structure types –Method of rigidizing inflatable structure Stress analysis Determine power/time for boom deployment –Coordinate with Attitude Control and Power subgroups Solid Modeling

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail8 Design Strategy Attitude Control Trade Study –Sliding mass vs Tip thruster ACS Simulink modeling Communication Researched communication devices Thermal Trade Study –Solar Sail material: Mylar vs Carbon fiber mesh Research into thermal management of spacecraft Power Zero level sizing for power requirements Trade Study –Normal vs. Conformal Solar Array Solar Array sizing Battery sizing

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail9 Orbit Control Eric Blake (Simulation) Daniel Kaseforth (Control Law –Simulation ) Lucas Veverka (Control Law – Orbits)

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail10 Orbit Control Problem –How to get from Earth’s orbit to an orbit about the sun with inclination of 60° and semi-major axis of 0.48 AU using solar pressure? Assumptions –Gravity and solar pressure are only forces –Sail is rigid flat plate and does not degrade –Sail material is perfectly reflecting –Instantaneous change in sail orientation

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail11 Orbit Control Technical flow of work –Simulation Two-body force interaction (Sun, spacecraft) –Force of gravity –Force of Solar pressure

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail12 Orbit Control –Control Law Cone and clock angle equations

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail13 Orbit Control “Cold” orbit transfer

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail14 Orbit Control Orbital elements

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail15 Orbit Control Conclusions –Simulation works –Control law functions as desired Recommendations for further work –Sail shape analysis –Optimize transfer trajectory –Simulate sail degradation effects

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail16 Orbit Control FDR Presentation –Discuss control law and simulation assumptions. –Discuss possible transfer orbits. –Show simulation results. –Justify selected transfer orbit. –Discuss further work.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail17 Structural Design Jon Braam Kory Jenkins

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail18 Solar Sail Structure and Deployment Challenge: Design a deployable structure to support the sail and deliver a scientific payload. Solution: The sail support structure consists of four inflatable, rigidizable booms attached to a payload module. Based on L’Garde solar sail demonstrator design.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail19 Aluminum Module Aluminum Unistrut –Ti Weld Unistrut Washer Titanium Hardware Rubber Washer –Vibration Damping

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail20 Hexagonal Shape Maximize area inside capsule Maximize packing area inside module Allowable surface area for features –Antenna –Camera –Solar Panel Attachment

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail21 Sail Mount Hexagonal Shape –Mounting –Strength FEA –Add Gussets –Starburst Mount »Add connections Center Hole –Routing Wiring Propellant

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail22 Boom Geometry Packing constraints require tapered geometry. Laminate thickness t = 0.25 mm. r = 10 cm. R = 16 cm. l = 30 cm. n = number of folds. L = 72 m. Mass ≈ 20 Kg/boom R = r + t ( l/L)

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail23 Estimate Worst Case Loading Assumptions: Solar Pressure at 0.48 AU = 19.8 µN/m^2. Tip thruster forces of 150 µN. Worst case force = 0.05 N. Deployment load of 20 N in compression. Thin wall tubes. Sail quadrant loading is evenly distributed between 3 attachment points. Quadrant area 2500 m^2. Homogeneous material properties. Safety factor of 3.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail24 Boom Material [0/90] carbon fiber laminate. Polymer film inflation gas barrier. IM7 carbon fiber, E = 276 GPa. –Low CTE. TP407 polyurethane matrix, E = 1.3 GPa. –Tg = 55 degrees C.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail25 Expected deployment loads of 20 N in compression dictate boom sizing. Conclusion: Booms sized to meet this requirement easily meet other criteria.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail26 Deployment Booms heated to 75 degrees C. Inflation gas pressurizes booms for deployment. Booms rigidize as they cool to Sub- Tg (glass transition) temperatures. Deployment speed is controlled by a single motor which pays out the tensioning cables at 1 cm/sec. Motor retracts tension cables after booms are rigidized to pull out the sail.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail27 Deployed Boom with Micro PPT Tip Thrusters

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail28 Future Work and FDR Deliverables Future Work: –Sliding mass Size Placement –Effects of structural deformation on attitude control. –Investigate low frequency vibration modes. –Volume of inflation gas needed. –Proper laminate analysis. FDR Deliverables: Configuration: Solid Model stowed and deployed Total Mass/Moment of inertia Deployment Methodology Structural Analysis

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail29 Attitude Control Alex Ordway Brian Miller

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail30 Attitude Control Detailed description of trade study –Sliding Mass characteristics Power consumption –10 W Approximate control torques –Being calculated; will be sufficient Mass required –10 kg, open for refinement –Tip thruster characteristics Power Consumption –100 W Mass required –10 kg

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail31 Attitude Control Detailed description of ACS Primary use of sliding mass Tip thrusters utilized as secondary ACS Configuration chosen for a number of reasons –Thrusters require more power to operate (~1kw) –Ion ejection from ions could interfere with solar arrays –Operational life of thrusters limited to 3000 hours Sliding mass offers comparable transfer times without aforementioned drawbacks Tip thrusters chosen offer smaller force at lower power usage, no significant life restrictions, lower probability of system interference

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail32 Attitude Control Detailed description ACS cont… –Tip Thruster Selection Micro Plasma Pulsed Thruster (Micro PPT) –Solid polymer fuel bar »Eliminates need for auxiliary fuel transport infrastructure –Can be utilized in off-nominal attitude situations in addition to being an available ACS when the solar sail is not deployed

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail33 Attitude Control ADS Primary –Interstellar Compass (ISC) Low power –3.5 W Exceptional Accuracy –0.1 deg (1σ) Low mass –2.5 kg –Technology has not flown Developed by Draper Laboratory

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail34 Attitude Control ADS Secondary –Sun Sensors Located on all solar oriented exterior planes Reorient space craft in off-nominal attitude situations Provide data to orient solar arrays for optimal solar collection

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail35 Future Work Finish attitude control simulation Calculate final required mass for ACS Refine simulation using information from structures group Consider sail ejection once orbit is achieved –Independent module ACS »Reaction wheels most likely candidate

Communications Casey Shockman

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail37 Frequency X-Band: 8.4 GHz –This is the typical frequency used, so DSN is becoming overloaded at this frequency. Ka-Band: 32 GHz –Due to overloaded X-Band frequency, the DSN is migrating to Ka-Band frequency. –Can transfer data much more quickly than X- Band.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail38 Antenna Horn –High data transfer rate with low power required. –Works directly with recently developed Small Deep Space Transponder. –New design works with X-Band and Ka-Band transmit as well as X-Band receive. –Lighter and smaller than parabolic reflector or array. –High gain.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail39

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail40

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail41 Current/Future Work Currently, I am working on a design space to optimize values for power required, antenna sizing, pointing accuracy, and signal to noise ratio. Problems include finding accurate equations for horn antenna systems.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail42 Thermal Analysis Raymond Haremza

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail43 Carbon Fiber Mesh Carbon Fiber Mesh developed by ESLI Mesh is composed of a network of carbon fibers crisscross linked into a matrix that is mostly empty space. 200 times thicker than the thinnest solar sail material, but so porous that it weighs the same

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail44 Common Problems Traditional materials –tear easily –require heavy support structure to maintain tension –can build up static electricity –UV degrades and melt at high temperatures

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail45 Carbon Fiber Mesh Can tolerate temps as high as 4,500 deg F Small areal mass density: 30μm thickness compared to 2μm with same area density (~5g/m^2) Immune to UV degradation Ability to self-deploy, the carbon scrub-pad material could be packed so it pops out flat once released. This can eliminate the need for any complicated mechanical deployment mechanism, which decrease mass of the craft. Easier to deploy because it doesn’t cling or wrinkle Higher Melting Point

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail46 Carbon Fiber vs. Traditional Material Using sample microtruss which is formed from perfectly electrical conducting (PEC) wires. The time-average force on the sail can be found using physical optics assuming microtruss is illuminated by a uniform plane wave (UPW) and Carbon FiberAluminum Coated Mylar Force at 0.48AU = 0.348N

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail47 CP1 Solar Sail Material Developed by SRS Technologies created a 5 micro meter thick film constructed of CP1 with an aluminized front surface and a black emissive black surface. CP1 is a unique polymer which has favorable structural characteristics. Source: Scalable Solar Sail Subsystem Design Considerations

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail48 Thermal Analysis of Payload Module Found an innovative way to configure spacecraft parts which eliminate chassis, cables and connectors. MFS (Multifunctional Structures) achieves this by using MCM (multichip modules) and dissipating its heat through a thermal core fill, and utilizing aluminum honeycomb sandwiched between 2 fiber reinforced cyanate ester composite faceplates. This high density configuration increases payload-mass fraction and provides major weight volume and cost savings.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail49 MFS Configuration Thermal copper strap used to transfer heat to radiator surface. Multichip Module - Specialized electronic package where multiple integrated circuits are packaged to do many jobs with one module. Hi-K facesheets (K13C2U) Aluminum Honeycomb Edge corefill High Conductivity Filler Kz = 700 W/mK High K Isotropic Carbon- Carbon Doubler Kz

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail50 Thermal Control of MFS In order to dissipate waste heat from the MCM along with solar energy loads on the outer skin. Radiation Equation Lateral Conductance Setting equal and solving for temp of baseplate yields Rate of heat flow Effective rad environment Emissivity of radiator Temp of base plate Heat flow path length Average radiator temp Cross sectional area Material thermal conductivity

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail51 Thermal Control Configuration Options For MFS Integration High Conductivity Composite Facesheet With Kx,Ky> 150 W/mK Incorporate Thermal Doubler Hi-K Corefill Kx, Ky > W/mK; Kz> W/mK Incorporate Heat Pipes Incorporate Deployable Radiator Where, Source: Thermal Management For Multifunctional Structures

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail52 Confirmation of MFS The Multifunctional Structure was successful based on the data returned from the Deep Space 1 mission. This mission the MFS was tested by powering it up once every two weeks which provided a data set containing health and status information, electrical- conductivity test data, and thermal-gradient measurements. The thermal-gradient data proved to stay within operating conditions.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail53 Thermal Analysis of Boom Supports Carbon fiber booms need to maintain temperatures below 40 deg C. To achieve this a coating will be applied to the outside of the carbon fiber. By using the radiation equation and basic thermodynamics the required coefficient of absorbtivity, emmisivity can be found that satisfy these constraints. From these coefficients a coating can be chosen.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail54 Thermal Properties of Carbon Fiber Boom Carbon fiber properties: R=13 cm Thickness =.25mm Length = 72 m K = 400 W/m Density = 1490 kg/m^3 Setting equal to each other and solving for temperature of the surface of the boom yields: R

Material Selection for Boom By graphing different values of absortivity and emmisivity the proper Coating can be found that will keep the boom under 313K. White Paint S13G-LO with, gives T =252K

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail56 Material Selection for Boom By graphing different values of absortivity and emmisivity the proper coating can be found that will keep the boom under 313K. White Paint (S13G-LO) with, gives T =252K

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail57 Future Work I plan on further investigating and analyzing the spacecraft components such as the fuel tank, additional thermal control methods, and complete analysis of MFS integration into the spacecraft configuration. Also working together with orbit group to run simulations with Aluminized Mylar, Kapton Carbon Fiber, and CP1 solar sails and find best material for our mission.

Power Michael Hiti

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail59 Objectives Determine the amount of power required to support the payload, and all other components of the spacecraft. Perform a trade study to determine whether to use a normal- pointing solar array or a fixed solar array. Determine the size and type of the solar array Determine the size and type of the batteries that will be used

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail60 Power Requirements BOL Power Requirement : ~878W EOL Power Requirement: ~ 203W Power (W) Remote Sensing Instruments Coronagraph4 All Sky Camera5 EUV Imager6 Magnetograph- Helioseismograph4 IN-SITU Instruments Magnetometer2 Solar Wind Ion Composition and Electron Spectrometer3.5 Energetic Particle3 Communications Satellite/Data Transmission50 Attitude Control 125 StructureHeat Curing Booms675 Misc Sliding Mass, Adjusting Array/Satellite/Antenna50 TOTAL877.5

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail61 Normal Pointing Solar Array Benefits: –A fold out array can be used to utilize its reflectance and thermal characteristics for thermal management –A sun tracker will already be being used –Able to collect maximum possible solar energy –Panels could be positioned to minimize thermal and radiation damage

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail62 Solar Array Sizing General Formulas: P chg = V chg * I chg = (V chg * C chg )/15h P EOL = P L + P chg P EOL = η rad * η angle * η temp * P BOL A array = P BOL / (η GaAs * I S * η pack )

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail63 Solar Array Sizing Normal Pointing Array Assuming: –a temperature efficiency reduction of ~40% –a radiation degradation of ~50% –a packing efficiency of ~90% –Gallium Arsenide cells Approximate Solar Array Area: 2.39m^2

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail64 Solar Array Sizing Conformal Solar Array Assuming: –a temperature efficiency reduction of ~55% –a radiation degradation of ~55% –cosine loss of ~81% –a packing efficiency of ~90% –Gallium Arsenide cells Approximate Solar Array Area: 4.37m^2

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail65 Battery Sizing General Equations: C chg = (P L * t d ) / (V avg * DOD) E bat = C chg * V avg m bat = E bat / e bat

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail66 Battery Sizing Ag-Cd batteries will be used for their reasonable energy density and cycle life Assuming: –a bus voltage of 28V – a DOD of ~25% –a maximum load duration of 2.0h Battery Mass = kg

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail67 Components Spectrolab Cells and Panels –28.3% efficiency –84 mg/cm^2 (cells) –2.06 kg/m^2 (panel)

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail68 Components Moog Solar Array Drives –Two-axis solar array drive –Power = 4W per axis –Mass = 4.2 kg

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail69 Future Work Refining sizing of battery and solar panel with more specific power requirements

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail70 Demonstration For FDR, we plan to have a demonstrated orbit which includes pointing requirements and attitude control.

AEM 4332W - Solar Sail71 Acknowledgements Stephanie Thomas, Princeton Satellite Systems Professor Joseph Mueller, University of Minnesota Professor Jeff Hammer, University of Minnesota Dr. William Garrard, University of Minnesota Kit Ruzicka, University of Minnesota