Presented by Dr. Kristan Rodriguez, Assistant Superintendent of Schools Follow the Path of DDM Development in Chelmsford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Advertisements

Closing the Achievement Gap in Park City School District Nicole Todd, Ph.D. Special Education Coordinator.
11/2/2009 SWAMPSCOTT PUBLIC SCHOOLS MCAS Results ~ Spring 2009.
District Determined Measures
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Lessons Learned on CCSS
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
ECE–12 Mathematics Promising Practices in Denver Public Schools
Watertown Public Schools Assessment Report 2009 Ann Koufman-Frederick & WPS Administrative Council School Committee Meeting December 7, 2009 Part I MCAS,
District Determined Measures aka: DDMs What is a DDM? Think of a DDM as an assessment tool similar to MCAS. It is a measure of student learning, growth,
Grading Practices North Providence School Department.
A Collaborative Approach to Planning for DDM’s Kristan Rodriguez, Ph.D Chelmsford Public Schools.
James M. LaBillois September, General Timeline Summer, 2012 Review Model System Planned for Pilot Roll-Out Determined department(s)/level(s) Determined.
Spring Assessment Update Grades 3 to 8.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Shereen Henry Math Instructional.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District April 30, 2012 Principal Meeting.
Buzz Aldrin Elementary School. Ethnic Background at Aldrin.
WELCOME! Elementary Math Building Leads / Coaches Please complete the ORANGE information sheet. Wednesday, September 26, 2012 Kathleen Wilson - Math Program.
Creating a Movement Creating a Movement. Secondary Mathematics News and Next Steps Staff Development Day March 18, 2011.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Prepared by: Scott Morrison Director of Curriculum and Instructional Technology 10/20/09.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Common Core State Standards Unleashing a Wave of NEW INNOVATION.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
English Language Arts Program Update Dr. Lisa M. White School Committee Meeting January 24, 2011.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Strategic Planning Process & Update. PLC NORMS Responsible Actively Participate Respectful No side bar conversations Reliable Start and end meetings on.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING AUGUST 15, 2011 PBL UNIT #10.
About Us Headquartered in Charleston, SC; CASE Office in Durham, NC High-quality tools for assessments and instruction with expert training CASE Assessments.
“Working hand in hand to improve
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
Historical Student Data Exceptional Children 8.2%8.3%11.9% AIG4.8%5.3%2.4% Limited English Proficient 5.7%6.7% Total F/R Lunch 65.7%72.2%78.7%
RTTT Scope of Work. Key Dates John King video conference with CSA, October 15, 2010, 9:00am, Distance Learning Center Intent to Submit due October.
Math Summit II Held on August 11 th, 12 th, and 13 th, 2010 at Baker College.
Kent ISD Collaborative Five Year Transition Plan to the Common Core State Standards Collaboration + Communication = Success!
Horizonte Instruction and Training Center Salt Lake City School District School Community Council Meeting November 14, 2012.
Spring 2009 MCAS Results. Dedham Elementary Schools.
2013 MASS Executive Institute. More Than a Decade of Progress: Grade 10 MCAS % proficient or higher 2.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Principals’ Retreat “Learning To Walk, Walking To Learn” Renée E.Jackson, Superintendent Local District G August 9, 2001.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools Intro to Online Data Systems For AP’s Oct 27 th and 28th, 2010 Mike Ballard Cathy Gillette.
Administrators’ Meeting Local District G Carol Fujita January 17, 2001.
August 19, English Language Development (ELD) is a Core Subject 1.45 minutes in grades 1-6 and full day kindergarten; 30 minutes in half-day kindergarten.
Academic Program Survey Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office RSDSS Region 8.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Test Administration and Security Training Assessment purpose must be clear. 3. Assessment mechanics should not impact value. 2. Assessment value.
 Located in Jonesboro, AR  Grades 1-6  58 Staff Members (24 Core-Curriculum classroom teachers)  597 Students.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
PUSD Reading Intervention Plan Read 180 and System 44 Implementation Plan August 5,2014.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS and PARCC Results Spring 2015 Joyce Edwards Assistant Superintendent for Teaching and Learning December 8, 2015.
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE
SAHS Advanced Placement Program Evaluation
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards District Name Date, 2016.
Traditional Project Management
December 15, 2016.
Pacing Guides, Assessments and Report Cards
Bethel School District CCSS Plan
ABC Unified School District
Curriculum Selection Process
CSIP/Landtrust
Presentation transcript:

Presented by Dr. Kristan Rodriguez, Assistant Superintendent of Schools Follow the Path of DDM Development in Chelmsford

Development of a DDM Steering Committee Development of DDM Work into PD Committee, Data Team, ECAC, and Curriculum Councils Incorporation of DDM Study Group Into Monthly Coordinator Meetings Resources Provided in Budget for Assessment Training, Assessment Writing, Assessment Purchase, Assessment Equipment, Personnel to Enter Data, Data Management Application to State Exemplar Working Groups Development of DDM Newsletter and Matinee Viewing Series for Webinars Development of DDM SMART Goal for Every Department Sample SMART Goal Templates Provided District Foundation

CPS Made Assessment By the spring of 2014, the _________ department will develop and pilot (Quantity) (Content Subject) common assessments in grade(s) ________, that meet the criteria established by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for District Determined Measures (DDMs), as measured by an updated department data inventory. Purchased or Use of State Exemplar Assessments By the spring of 2014, the _________ department will purchase/adopt and pilot (Quantity) (Content Subject) (Name Assessment) in grade(s) ________, that meet the criteria established by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for District Determined Measures (DDMs), as measured by an updated department data inventory. Make sure action plan defines: Training on developing DDMs The dates of development/purchase The dates of implementation Where the data will be housed and how it will be analyzed How the data will be used (placement, MTSS, instructional data meetings) District DDM Template SMART Goal

Math K-3 (Pre and Post Benchmark Assessment) Supports in the Process Dr. Matthew Beyranevand, K-12 Math Coordinator (Leader for this Project) Anna Swierzbin, Elementary Math Coach Grade Level Teams of Teachers Building Principals Elementary Curriculum Council (Admin.) Elementary Curriculum Advisory Council (Admin. And Teachers) Chosen Area…The Journey of One DDM

Reviewed CCSS Standards Reviewed Recently District Pacing Guides In response to finalized MCAS Sequence for Standards and adopted CCSS version of math program To Determine Covered Standards in Administration Window Reviewed State/WestEd Resources Core Course Objecties and Sample Assessments Reviewed PARCC Protoype Questions Adaptation of Previous Benchmark Assessment-Modified to Be a Pre and Post Assessment-completed ¾ through year for Remediation Before End of year. Content Alignment/Utility

To Be Used as A Pre-Post Assessment to Measure Growth and Inform Instruction Identifying potential floor and ceiling effects. How effectively does the assessment measure growth? Is the measurement instructionally informative? How will this differ in results reporting from previous benchmark proficiency level report outs? From these results, how will we define potential low, moderate, and high growth cut scores? To Be Used in Instructional Data Meetings for Planning, Pacing Purposes Is the measurement aligned to content? Adapted Protocol To Be a Universal Screening Measure for Piloted Math Tier 2 Intervention To Begin to Expose Upper Elementary Students to Electronic Assessments and Question Formats of PARCC To measure the effectiveness of our new curriculum Purpose

Kindergarten: Individual Student Assessment 1:1-Administered by coaches Grades 1-2: Paper and Pencil Assessment-Administered by Classroom Teachers-Whole Group Questions Grades 3 (and 4): Online Assessment Using Study Island program --- Questions are district developed-Administered in Computer Labs During Technology Class Accommodations Provided Per IEP’s Common Administration Window and Proctoring Protocols Across SchoolsAdministration

Kindergarten: Coaches Score Grades 1-2: Teachers Score Grades 3 (and 4): Online Scoring Scoring

Scores Entered By Hourly Data Clerk (K-2) Data Collected from K-2 Spreadsheets and Study Island Reports (3) & Summarized By District Data Specialist Summarized Data Analyzed by Curriculum Coordinator and Coach All Staff Receive a Data Summary for Their Class-Against District Averages Utilize Data Summaries in Data Meetings Data Housed in Student Management System (X2) Data Management

Proctor/Administration Training Met Data Team Training Introduction to Testing Packet Analysis of Paper/Pencil vs Online Year One Best Practices

Sample Artifacts

Sample Artifacts Sample Artifacts